Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
Primary Purpose
Schizophrenia, Schizo Affective Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Memantine
Placebos
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Schizophrenia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of schizophrenia OR schizoaffective-depressed OR healthy subjects
- ages 18-50 for all subjects
- double barrier contraception for all subjects
- not pregnant for all subjects
Exclusion Criteria:
- DSM-IV Axis I or II Diagnosis for for healthy subjects
- MEM or amantadine for patients
- current substance abuse for all subjects
- current recreational drug use for all subjects
- history of other significant medical illness (e.g. cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, seizures) for all subjects
- open head injury or closed head injury with loss of consciousness > 1 min for all subjects
- hearing or visual impairment for all subjects
- pregnancy for all subjects
- dementia for all subjects
- mental retardation for all subjects
Sites / Locations
- Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Memantine
Placebo
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
PPI of the startle reflex is the automatic reduction in startle magnitude (assessed by EMG of orbicularis oculi) when a startling stimulus (40 ms 118 dB(A) noise burst; "PULSE") is preceded (10-120 msec) by a weak stimulus (here a 20 msec burst 16 dB over background "PREPULSE"). A %PPI metric is calculated based on the relative startle magnitude on (PREPULSE + PULSE) trials vs. PULSE alone trials. Possible maximal inhibition is 100%; there is no maximal "negative" value of inhibition. There is no clear "advantage" or "disadvantage" for lower or higher %PPI values, though on average, schizophrenia patients demonstrate lower % values compared to matched healthy subjects. Day 1 was baseline testing: testing occurred, data was collected, but no "intervention" was given. There were two possible "interventions": active (MEM 20 mg po) and placebo. One intervention was given on day 7 post baseline, the other intervention was given on day 14 post baseline, with order of intervention balanced.
Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Unit of Measure of MMN is Microvolts.
85 dB SPL stimuli were presented via Etymotic ER3-A insert earphones. A 4-tone auditory oddball paradigm with 82% standards & 18% deviant stimuli, differed from standard in pitch, duration, or both. A pseudorandomized sequence produced a minimum of 3 standard tones between each deviant stimulus. All tones had 5-ms rise/fall times presented with a fixed 500-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Subjects viewed a silent movie & instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. EEG were continuously recorded at a sampling rate of 2048-Hz from 64 channels, using BioSemi ActiveTwo system & downsampled to 512-Hz. Deviant-minus-standard difference waves were generated for each deviant type & low-pass filtered (20-Hz zerophase shift, 24 dB/octave rolloff). MMN was computed as mean amplitude across 135-205 ms range for each deviant type in difference waveforms at electrode Fz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between-subject factor, & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor.
Gamma Auditory Steady-state Response (ASSR). The Primary Unit of Measure of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is Gamma Evoked Power (γEP), Expressed as "Microvolts-squared".
1 ms, 85 dB clicks were presented in 500 ms trains at a frequency of 40 Hz; 250 click trains were played (inter-train interval=0.5 s). EEG was continuously recorded with 64-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo system (sampling rate=2048 Hz). Data processed offline via Matlab, EEGlab, & BrainVision Analyzer. Continuous data were segmented relative to stimulus onset (-100 ms to 500 ms) & each epoch was baseline-corrected relative to 100 ms pre-stimulus interval. γEP was assessed based on first 100 artifact-free epochs at Fz. Averaged epochs across click trains were transformed into power spectrum via fast Fourier transform using a bin width of 2 Hz. 40 Hz power spectrum was averaged across 4 Hz band from 38-42 Hz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between- & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor. Analyses revealed robust & time bin-independent effects of diagnosis & drug across 200-500 ms window & thus this interval was the focus of all subsequent analyses.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03860597
First Posted
February 28, 2019
Last Updated
December 1, 2022
Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03860597
Brief Title
Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
Official Title
Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This application seeks to determine if neurophysiological metrics of memantine (MEM)-enhanced early auditory information processing (EAIP) in schizophrenia (SZ) mediate gains in auditory processing fidelity (APF) and auditory learning.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Schizophrenia, Schizo Affective Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Healthy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Memantine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Memantine
Intervention Description
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebos
Intervention Description
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
Description
PPI of the startle reflex is the automatic reduction in startle magnitude (assessed by EMG of orbicularis oculi) when a startling stimulus (40 ms 118 dB(A) noise burst; "PULSE") is preceded (10-120 msec) by a weak stimulus (here a 20 msec burst 16 dB over background "PREPULSE"). A %PPI metric is calculated based on the relative startle magnitude on (PREPULSE + PULSE) trials vs. PULSE alone trials. Possible maximal inhibition is 100%; there is no maximal "negative" value of inhibition. There is no clear "advantage" or "disadvantage" for lower or higher %PPI values, though on average, schizophrenia patients demonstrate lower % values compared to matched healthy subjects. Day 1 was baseline testing: testing occurred, data was collected, but no "intervention" was given. There were two possible "interventions": active (MEM 20 mg po) and placebo. One intervention was given on day 7 post baseline, the other intervention was given on day 14 post baseline, with order of intervention balanced.
Time Frame
7 and 14 days post baseline
Title
Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Unit of Measure of MMN is Microvolts.
Description
85 dB SPL stimuli were presented via Etymotic ER3-A insert earphones. A 4-tone auditory oddball paradigm with 82% standards & 18% deviant stimuli, differed from standard in pitch, duration, or both. A pseudorandomized sequence produced a minimum of 3 standard tones between each deviant stimulus. All tones had 5-ms rise/fall times presented with a fixed 500-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Subjects viewed a silent movie & instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. EEG were continuously recorded at a sampling rate of 2048-Hz from 64 channels, using BioSemi ActiveTwo system & downsampled to 512-Hz. Deviant-minus-standard difference waves were generated for each deviant type & low-pass filtered (20-Hz zerophase shift, 24 dB/octave rolloff). MMN was computed as mean amplitude across 135-205 ms range for each deviant type in difference waveforms at electrode Fz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between-subject factor, & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor.
Time Frame
7 and 14 days post baseline
Title
Gamma Auditory Steady-state Response (ASSR). The Primary Unit of Measure of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is Gamma Evoked Power (γEP), Expressed as "Microvolts-squared".
Description
1 ms, 85 dB clicks were presented in 500 ms trains at a frequency of 40 Hz; 250 click trains were played (inter-train interval=0.5 s). EEG was continuously recorded with 64-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo system (sampling rate=2048 Hz). Data processed offline via Matlab, EEGlab, & BrainVision Analyzer. Continuous data were segmented relative to stimulus onset (-100 ms to 500 ms) & each epoch was baseline-corrected relative to 100 ms pre-stimulus interval. γEP was assessed based on first 100 artifact-free epochs at Fz. Averaged epochs across click trains were transformed into power spectrum via fast Fourier transform using a bin width of 2 Hz. 40 Hz power spectrum was averaged across 4 Hz band from 38-42 Hz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between- & drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor. Analyses revealed robust & time bin-independent effects of diagnosis & drug across 200-500 ms window & thus this interval was the focus of all subsequent analyses.
Time Frame
7 and 14 days post baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
diagnosis of schizophrenia OR schizoaffective-depressed OR healthy subjects
ages 18-50 for all subjects
double barrier contraception for all subjects
not pregnant for all subjects
Exclusion Criteria:
DSM-IV Axis I or II Diagnosis for for healthy subjects
MEM or amantadine for patients
current substance abuse for all subjects
current recreational drug use for all subjects
history of other significant medical illness (e.g. cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, seizures) for all subjects
open head injury or closed head injury with loss of consciousness > 1 min for all subjects
hearing or visual impairment for all subjects
pregnancy for all subjects
dementia for all subjects
mental retardation for all subjects
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32340927
Citation
Molina JL, Voytek B, Thomas ML, Joshi YB, Bhakta SG, Talledo JA, Swerdlow NR, Light GA. Memantine Effects on Electroencephalographic Measures of Putative Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun;5(6):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs