search
Back to results

Methotrexate Withdrawal Study of Tofacitinib Modified Release Formulation in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CP-690,550
Methotrexate
Placebo
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, Tofacitinib, CP-690,550, Xeljanz, methotrexate withdrawal, withdrawal study

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria

- Must be 18 years of age or older.

Have a score of 6 or greater on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis at and/or prior to Screening Visit.

  • Have ≥4 tender/painful joints on motion and ≥4 swollen joints (28 joint counts) at both Screening Visit and Baseline Visit (Visit 1).
  • Have moderate to severe disease activity as defined by CDAI>10 and DAS28-4(ESR) ≥3.2 at Baseline Visit.
  • Have taken an oral MTX treatment regimen (15-25mg/week) continuously for at least 4 months prior to the screening visit and has taken a stable weekly dose of oral MTX with supplemental folic acid or folinic acid for at least 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit (conversion from parenteral MTX to oral MTX will require stabilization of the treatment regimen for at least 1 month).
  • Subjects must screen negative for active tuberculosis or inadequately treated tuberculosis infection (active or latent).

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant female subjects; breastfeeding female subjects; male subjects with partners currently pregnant; male subjects able to father children and female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use 2 highly effective methods of contraception as outlined in this protocol for the duration of the study and for at least 3 months after the last dose of investigational product.
  • Subjects with infection or infection history; subjects with any current malignancy or a history of malignancy (except adequately treated or excised non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ); subjects with history of, or current evidence for, severe gastrointestinal narrowing (pathologic or iatrogenic); and subjects with history of documented diverticulitis.
  • Subjects with a history of insufficient response to ≥2 biologics, regardless of the class.

Sites / Locations

  • Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
  • Arthrocare, Arthritiscare & Research, PC
  • SunValley Arthritis Center, Ltd.
  • CHI St. Vincent Medical Group Hot Springs
  • Med Investigations, Inc
  • HCP Clinical Research, LLC
  • Sierra Rheumatology
  • Pacific Arthritis Center Medical Group
  • Robin K. Dore, MD, Inc.
  • Inland Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Medical Group
  • Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
  • Desert Valley Medical Group
  • AARDS Research Inc
  • RASF-Clinical Research Inc
  • Omega Research Consultants
  • University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville - Rheumatology Research
  • University of Florida, Rheumatology at ACC
  • Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
  • Jeffrey Alper, MD
  • Medallion Clinical Research Institute, LLC
  • Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Florida Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center
  • Gulf Coast Medical Center
  • West Broward Rheumatology Associates, Inc.
  • USF Health Morsani Center for Advanced Healthcare
  • BayCare Medical Group, Inc
  • Institute of Arthritis Research
  • Quincy Medical Group
  • Beacon Medical Group Rheumatology Main Street
  • Diagnostic Rheumatology and Research, PC
  • Ochsner Clinic Baton Rouge
  • Phase III Clinical Research
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
  • Bronson Internal Medicine and Rheumatology
  • Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD
  • North Mississippi Medical Clinics, Inc. - Clinical Research
  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Associates
  • Radnet
  • Arthritis, Rheumatic & Back Disease Associates, P.A.
  • Open MRI & Diagnostic Imaging of Wall
  • AAIR Research Center
  • Physicians East, PA
  • PMG Research of Salisbury
  • Trinity Health Center-Medical Arts
  • Group Health Associates
  • Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
  • STAT Research, Inc.
  • Health Research of Oklahoma
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF)
  • Lynn Health Science Institute
  • East Penn Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
  • Piedmont Arthritis Clinic
  • Articularis Healthcare Group dba ACME Research
  • Articularis Healthcare Group d/b/a Low Country Rheumatology
  • Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
  • Metroplex Clinical Research Center
  • Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
  • Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
  • Genesis Research Services Pty Ltd
  • Optimus Clinical Research Pty Ltd
  • Rheumatology Research Unit
  • Emeritus Research
  • ReumaClinic
  • AZ Delta
  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Dr. G. Stranski EAD
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Plovdiv AD, Rheumatology Department
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Trimontium OOD
  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Kaspela EOOD
  • National Multiprofile Transport Hospital Tsar Boris III
  • Medical Centre Synexus Sofia EOOD
  • CCBR Czech Brno, s.r.o.
  • LEKARNA LANCIER s.r.o.
  • Lekarna Na Lidicke
  • Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o., Revmatologie a interna
  • CCBR Ostrava, s.r.o.
  • Lekarna Rezidence Nova Karolina
  • Revmatologicky ustav, Lekrna
  • Revmatologicky ustav
  • Lekarna Hradebni s.r.o.
  • MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o. Revmatologicka a osteologicka ambulance
  • PV - MEDICAL s.r.o., Revmatologicka ambulance
  • Revmavita s.r.o, Lekarna
  • Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum I
  • DRC Gyogyszervizsgalo Kozpont Kft.
  • Revita Rendelo
  • Qualiclinic Kft.
  • CRU Hungary Kft.
  • Clinical Trial Pharmacy, KyungHee University Hospital
  • KyungHee University Hospital
  • CTC Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital
  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
  • Clinical Trial Pharmacy, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul, St. Mary's Hospital
  • Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico SC Consultorio Medico de Reumatologia (CINTRE)
  • Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion SC (Consultorio Anexo)
  • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
  • Far Eastern University - Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, Marian Medical Arts Bldg
  • Zdrowie OSTEO-MEDIC s.c. L i A. Racewicz, A i J. Supronik
  • ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak. Sp. j.
  • Nzoz Bif - Med
  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Krakow
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne S.C.
  • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C.
  • MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.
  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Rheumatology
  • FSBEI HE "Orenburg State Medical University" of MoH RF
  • FSBEI HE "Orenburg State Medical University" of MoH RF
  • SPb SBIH "Consultative-Diagnostic Centre #85"
  • FSBIH "Clinical Hospital #122 n.a. L.G. Sokolov" of FMBA of Russia
  • SBIH "Samara Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. V.D. Seredavin"
  • NSHI "Departmental Hospital at Smolensk station OJSC "Russian Railways"
  • SAHI YR Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.V. Soloviev
  • State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region "Regional Clinical Hospital"
  • AAGS s.r.o.
  • MEDMAN s.r.o.
  • REUMACENTRUM s.r.o.
  • MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.
  • Reumex s.r.o
  • St. Augustine's Hospital
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
  • Hospital Universitario de Cruces
  • Hospital Infanta Luisa
  • Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pharmacy (dispensary)
  • Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pharmacy, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Department of Rheumatology, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pharmacy Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pharmacy Department
  • The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pharmacy
  • University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

CP-690,550 and methotrexate

CP-690,550 and placebo

Arm Description

Open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded methotrexate capsule

open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded matching placebo for methotrexate capsule

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) at Week 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]) and participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA) on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 ESR at Week 36
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 (C-reactive Protein [CRP]) at Weeks 36 and 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) < 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and physician global assessment of arthritis (PhyGA). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by CDAI <=10 at Weeks 36 and 48
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. Percentage of participants with CDAI <=10 were reported. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by SDAI <=11 at Weeks 36 and 48
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicated low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicated remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) Boolean at Weeks 36 and 48
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission was when a participant satisfied all of the following: tender joint count, swollen joint count (both based on a 28-joint assessment), CRP (in mg/dL), and PtGA (VAS: 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition) and all scores were <=1.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than [<] 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-ESR<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-CRP<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by CDAI <=2.8 at Weeks 36 and 48
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by SDAI <=3.3 at Weeks 36 and 48
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR20) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Participants with 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 36 and 48
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey 8 Domain Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized to derive the 2 component scores (physical component scores [PCS], mental component scores [MCS]) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the SF-36 Health Survey Component Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized aggregated to derive the two 2 component scores PCS and MCS ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Scores at Week 36 and 48
WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of rheumatoid arthritis and yields 4 types of outcomes: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment while working), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and daily activity impairment (activity impairment) for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. These 4 outcomes are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
EQ-5D was a participant completed instrument designed to assess impact on quality of life in terms of a single utility score in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. 3 possible answers for mobility: 1=no problem in walking, 2=moderate problems in walking, 3= confined to bed; self-care: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to wash/dress; usual activities: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to do usual activities; pain and discomfort: 1=no pain or discomfort, 2=moderate pain or discomfort, 3= extreme pain or discomfort; anxiety and depression: 1=not anxious or depressed, 2=moderately anxious or depressed, 3= extremely anxious or depressed. The 5-dimensional systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 and 1, where higher score indicated a better health state.
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a participant completed questionnaire consisted of 13 items that assessed fatigue. Each item was scored on a scale of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 4 (no fatigue), higher scores indicate less fatigue. Total FACIT-fatigue score was obtained by addition of scores from 13 items, giving a possible overall range from 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). Higher FACIT-fatigue scores indicated lower level of fatigue, better participant status.
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in HAQ-DI at Weeks 36 and 48
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities. Percentage of participants with an improvement of at least 0.22 units in HAQ scores from baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 36 and 48 were reported in this outcome measure.

Full Information

First Posted
July 11, 2016
Last Updated
November 13, 2019
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02831855
Brief Title
Methotrexate Withdrawal Study of Tofacitinib Modified Release Formulation in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
A PHASE 3B/4 RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY OF METHOTREXATE (MTX) WITHDRAWAL IN SUBJECTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 11MG MODIFIED RELEASE (MR) FORMULATION
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 19, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 17, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib modified release formulation (11mg QD) versus tofacitinib modified release formulation plus continued methotrexate treatment in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are insufficiently responding to their stable dose of methotrexate treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Tofacitinib, CP-690,550, Xeljanz, methotrexate withdrawal, withdrawal study

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
694 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CP-690,550 and methotrexate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded methotrexate capsule
Arm Title
CP-690,550 and placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded matching placebo for methotrexate capsule
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CP-690,550
Other Intervention Name(s)
tofacitinib
Intervention Description
During the open-label run-in phase (Day 1 to Week 24), all subjects will receive one tablet open-label tofacitinib MR 11mg orally QD and open-label methotrexate capsule(s) orally every week at prior stabilized dose. During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the treatment arm will receive the same dosage of tofacitinib and methotrexate as describe above.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Intervention Description
During the open-label run-in phase (Day 1 to Week 24), all subjects will receive one tablet open-label tofacitinib MR 11mg orally QD and open-label methotrexate capsule(s) orally every week at prior stabilized dose. During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the treatment arm will receive the same dosage of tofacitinib and methotrexate as describe above.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the comparison arm will receive 11mg QD tofacitinib and the placebo capsules matching for methotrexate.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) at Week 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]) and participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA) on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 ESR at Week 36
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 36
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 (C-reactive Protein [CRP]) at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) < 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and physician global assessment of arthritis (PhyGA). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by CDAI <=10 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. Percentage of participants with CDAI <=10 were reported. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by SDAI <=11 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicated low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicated remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) Boolean at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission was when a participant satisfied all of the following: tender joint count, swollen joint count (both based on a 28-joint assessment), CRP (in mg/dL), and PtGA (VAS: 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition) and all scores were <=1.
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than [<] 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-ESR<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-CRP<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by CDAI <=2.8 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by SDAI <=3.3 at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Time Frame
Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR20) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
Participants with 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
Participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
Participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey 8 Domain Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized to derive the 2 component scores (physical component scores [PCS], mental component scores [MCS]) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the SF-36 Health Survey Component Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized aggregated to derive the two 2 component scores PCS and MCS ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Scores at Week 36 and 48
Description
WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of rheumatoid arthritis and yields 4 types of outcomes: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment while working), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and daily activity impairment (activity impairment) for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. These 4 outcomes are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
EQ-5D was a participant completed instrument designed to assess impact on quality of life in terms of a single utility score in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. 3 possible answers for mobility: 1=no problem in walking, 2=moderate problems in walking, 3= confined to bed; self-care: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to wash/dress; usual activities: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to do usual activities; pain and discomfort: 1=no pain or discomfort, 2=moderate pain or discomfort, 3= extreme pain or discomfort; anxiety and depression: 1=not anxious or depressed, 2=moderately anxious or depressed, 3= extremely anxious or depressed. The 5-dimensional systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 and 1, where higher score indicated a better health state.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a participant completed questionnaire consisted of 13 items that assessed fatigue. Each item was scored on a scale of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 4 (no fatigue), higher scores indicate less fatigue. Total FACIT-fatigue score was obtained by addition of scores from 13 items, giving a possible overall range from 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). Higher FACIT-fatigue scores indicated lower level of fatigue, better participant status.
Time Frame
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Title
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in HAQ-DI at Weeks 36 and 48
Description
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities. Percentage of participants with an improvement of at least 0.22 units in HAQ scores from baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 36 and 48 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 52 (up to 28 days after last dose) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame
For OL Phase: Baseline up to Week 24; For DB Phase: Week 24 up to Week 52 (up to 28 days after last dose)
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Description
Abnormality criteria: Hemoglobin (Hb),Hematocrit,Erythrocytes(Ery): <0.8*LLN;Ery. Mean corpuscular volume <0.9*lower limit of normal (LLN), >1.1*upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets:<0.5*LLN,>1.75*ULN;WBCs:<0.6*LLN,>1.5*ULN; Lymphocytes/WBCs, Neutrophils/WBCs:<0.8*LLN,>1.2* ULN;Basophils,Basophils/WBCs,Eosinophils,Eosinophils/WBCs,Monocytes, Monocytes/WBCs: >1.2*ULN;Prothrombin Time, Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio:>1.1*ULN; ESR:>1.5*ULN; Bilirubin,Direct Bilirubin,Indirect Bilirubin: >1.5*ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase (AT),Alanine AT,Gamma Glutamyl Transferase,Alkaline Phosphatase:>3.0*ULN; Protein, Albumin: <0.8*LLN, >1.2x ULN; Blood Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, Triglycerides: >1.3*ULN;HDL Cholesterol:<0.8*LLN;Sodium <0.95*LLN, >1.05*ULN;Potassium, Chloride, Calcium, Bicarbonate: <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; Glucose: <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Creatine Kinase: >2.0*ULN; Cholesterol:>1.3*ULN;Specific Gravity:<1.003;pH:<4.5; urine glucose,Ketones,urine protein,urine Hb,WBCs Esterase: >=1.
Time Frame
For OL Phase: Baseline up to Week 24; For DB Phase: Week 24 up to Week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria - Must be 18 years of age or older. Have a score of 6 or greater on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis at and/or prior to Screening Visit. Have ≥4 tender/painful joints on motion and ≥4 swollen joints (28 joint counts) at both Screening Visit and Baseline Visit (Visit 1). Have moderate to severe disease activity as defined by CDAI>10 and DAS28-4(ESR) ≥3.2 at Baseline Visit. Have taken an oral MTX treatment regimen (15-25mg/week) continuously for at least 4 months prior to the screening visit and has taken a stable weekly dose of oral MTX with supplemental folic acid or folinic acid for at least 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit (conversion from parenteral MTX to oral MTX will require stabilization of the treatment regimen for at least 1 month). Subjects must screen negative for active tuberculosis or inadequately treated tuberculosis infection (active or latent). Key Exclusion Criteria Pregnant female subjects; breastfeeding female subjects; male subjects with partners currently pregnant; male subjects able to father children and female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use 2 highly effective methods of contraception as outlined in this protocol for the duration of the study and for at least 3 months after the last dose of investigational product. Subjects with infection or infection history; subjects with any current malignancy or a history of malignancy (except adequately treated or excised non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ); subjects with history of, or current evidence for, severe gastrointestinal narrowing (pathologic or iatrogenic); and subjects with history of documented diverticulitis. Subjects with a history of insufficient response to ≥2 biologics, regardless of the class.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801-4418
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthrocare, Arthritiscare & Research, PC
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
SunValley Arthritis Center, Ltd.
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85381
Country
United States
Facility Name
CHI St. Vincent Medical Group Hot Springs
City
Hot Springs
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
71913
Country
United States
Facility Name
Med Investigations, Inc
City
Fair Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95628
Country
United States
Facility Name
HCP Clinical Research, LLC
City
Huntington Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92646
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sierra Rheumatology
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Arthritis Center Medical Group
City
Santa Maria
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robin K. Dore, MD, Inc.
City
Tustin
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92780
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inland Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Medical Group
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Valley Medical Group
City
Victorville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92395
Country
United States
Facility Name
AARDS Research Inc
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
RASF-Clinical Research Inc
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
Omega Research Consultants
City
DeBary
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32713
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville - Rheumatology Research
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32207
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida, Rheumatology at ACC
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33173
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jeffrey Alper, MD
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medallion Clinical Research Institute, LLC
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
City
New Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34652
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center
City
Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34668
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Coast Medical Center
City
Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34668
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Broward Rheumatology Associates, Inc.
City
Tamarac
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33321
Country
United States
Facility Name
USF Health Morsani Center for Advanced Healthcare
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
BayCare Medical Group, Inc
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Institute of Arthritis Research
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Quincy Medical Group
City
Quincy
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beacon Medical Group Rheumatology Main Street
City
Granger
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Diagnostic Rheumatology and Research, PC
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic Baton Rouge
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70836
Country
United States
Facility Name
Phase III Clinical Research
City
Fall River
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bronson Internal Medicine and Rheumatology
City
Battle Creek
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49007
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Mississippi Medical Clinics, Inc. - Clinical Research
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Associates
City
Freehold
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07728
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radnet
City
Marlton
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08053
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis, Rheumatic & Back Disease Associates, P.A.
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Open MRI & Diagnostic Imaging of Wall
City
Wall
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07719
Country
United States
Facility Name
AAIR Research Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14618
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians East, PA
City
Greenville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27834
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Salisbury
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Trinity Health Center-Medical Arts
City
Minot
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Group Health Associates
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45236
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45242
Country
United States
Facility Name
STAT Research, Inc.
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45417
Country
United States
Facility Name
Health Research of Oklahoma
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF)
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lynn Health Science Institute
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Penn Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Arthritis Clinic
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Articularis Healthcare Group dba ACME Research
City
Orangeburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Articularis Healthcare Group d/b/a Low Country Rheumatology
City
Summerville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29486
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
City
Cypress
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77429
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
City
Chesapeake
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
City
Suffolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Genesis Research Services Pty Ltd
City
Broadmeadow
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2292
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Optimus Clinical Research Pty Ltd
City
Kogarah
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2217
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Unit
City
Maroochydore
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4558
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Emeritus Research
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3124
Country
Australia
Facility Name
ReumaClinic
City
Genk
ZIP/Postal Code
3600
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Delta
City
Roeselare
ZIP/Postal Code
8800
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Dr. G. Stranski EAD
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Plovdiv AD, Rheumatology Department
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Trimontium OOD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Kaspela EOOD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
National Multiprofile Transport Hospital Tsar Boris III
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1233
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Medical Centre Synexus Sofia EOOD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1784
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
CCBR Czech Brno, s.r.o.
City
Brno
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
LEKARNA LANCIER s.r.o.
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Na Lidicke
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o., Revmatologie a interna
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
615 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR Ostrava, s.r.o.
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
702 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Rezidence Nova Karolina
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
702 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav, Lekrna
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Hradebni s.r.o.
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o. Revmatologicka a osteologicka ambulance
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
PV - MEDICAL s.r.o., Revmatologicka ambulance
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmavita s.r.o, Lekarna
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum I
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22391
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DRC Gyogyszervizsgalo Kozpont Kft.
City
Balatonfured
ZIP/Postal Code
8230
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Revita Rendelo
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1027
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Qualiclinic Kft.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
CRU Hungary Kft.
City
Miskolc
ZIP/Postal Code
3529
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Clinical Trial Pharmacy, KyungHee University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
02447
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
KyungHee University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
02447
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
CTC Pharmacy, Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Konkuk University Medical Center
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
05030
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Clinical Trial Pharmacy, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
06591
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul, St. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
06591
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico SC Consultorio Medico de Reumatologia (CINTRE)
City
Mexico
State/Province
Ciudad DE Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
11850
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion SC (Consultorio Anexo)
City
Leon
State/Province
Guanajuato
ZIP/Postal Code
37000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
City
Lipa City
State/Province
Batangas
ZIP/Postal Code
4217
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Far Eastern University - Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, Marian Medical Arts Bldg
City
Quezon City
State/Province
Metro Manila
ZIP/Postal Code
1118
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Zdrowie OSTEO-MEDIC s.c. L i A. Racewicz, A i J. Supronik
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak. Sp. j.
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-879
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Nzoz Bif - Med
City
Bytom
ZIP/Postal Code
41-902
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Krakow
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-002
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne S.C.
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C.
City
Nadarzyn
ZIP/Postal Code
05-830
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MTZ Clinical Research Sp. z o.o.
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-106
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Rheumatology
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115522
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
FSBEI HE "Orenburg State Medical University" of MoH RF
City
Orenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
460000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
FSBEI HE "Orenburg State Medical University" of MoH RF
City
Orenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
460018
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SPb SBIH "Consultative-Diagnostic Centre #85"
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
198260
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
FSBIH "Clinical Hospital #122 n.a. L.G. Sokolov" of FMBA of Russia
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
194291
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SBIH "Samara Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. V.D. Seredavin"
City
Samara
ZIP/Postal Code
443095
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
NSHI "Departmental Hospital at Smolensk station OJSC "Russian Railways"
City
Smolensk
ZIP/Postal Code
214025
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SAHI YR Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.V. Soloviev
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region "Regional Clinical Hospital"
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150062
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
AAGS s.r.o.
City
Dunajska Streda
ZIP/Postal Code
929 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
MEDMAN s.r.o.
City
Martin
ZIP/Postal Code
03601
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
REUMACENTRUM s.r.o.
City
Partizanske
ZIP/Postal Code
958 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.
City
Poprad
ZIP/Postal Code
05801
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Reumex s.r.o
City
Rimavska Sobota
ZIP/Postal Code
979 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
St. Augustine's Hospital
City
Durban
State/Province
Kwazulu Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de Cruces
City
Baracaldo
State/Province
Vizcaya
ZIP/Postal Code
48903
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Infanta Luisa
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Chester
State/Province
Cheshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CH2 1UL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pharmacy (dispensary)
City
Chester
State/Province
Cheshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CH2 1UL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Ellesmere Port
State/Province
Cheshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CH65 6SG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Basingstoke
State/Province
Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
RG24 9NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pharmacy, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Basingstoke
State/Province
Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
RG24 9NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Department of Rheumatology, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wirral
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pharmacy Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wirral
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wirral
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pharmacy Department
City
Dudley
State/Province
WEST Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
City
Dudley
State/Province
WEST Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pharmacy
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18183025
Citation
Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, Chan KW, Ciceri P, Davis MI, Edeen PT, Faraoni R, Floyd M, Hunt JP, Lockhart DJ, Milanov ZV, Morrison MJ, Pallares G, Patel HK, Pritchard S, Wodicka LM, Zarrinkar PP. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):127-32. doi: 10.1038/nbt1358.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20701804
Citation
Meyer DM, Jesson MI, Li X, Elrick MM, Funckes-Shippy CL, Warner JD, Gross CJ, Dowty ME, Ramaiah SK, Hirsch JL, Saabye MJ, Barks JL, Kishore N, Morris DL. Anti-inflammatory activity and neutrophil reductions mediated by the JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor, CP-690,550, in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 Aug 11;7:41. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-41.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17312100
Citation
Murray PJ. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J Immunol. 2007 Mar 1;178(5):2623-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17208301
Citation
O'Sullivan LA, Liongue C, Lewis RS, Stephenson SE, Ward AC. Cytokine receptor signaling through the Jak-Stat-Socs pathway in disease. Mol Immunol. 2007 Apr;44(10):2497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.11.025. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21952978
Citation
Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, Lee EB, Kanik KS, Sadis S, Connell CA, Gruben D, Krishnaswami S, Wallenstein G, Wilkinson BE, Zwillich SH. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):617-29. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22873530
Citation
Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, Schulze-Koops H, Connell CA, Bradley JD, Gruben D, Wallenstein GV, Zwillich SH, Kanik KS; ORAL Solo Investigators. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):495-507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22006202
Citation
Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, Connell CA, French JL, Gomez-Reino J, Gruben D, Kanik KS, Krishnaswami S, Pascual-Ramos V, Wallenstein G, Zwillich SH. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):970-81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24026258
Citation
Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, Fleischmann R, Genovese M, Martin-Mola E, Isaacs JD, Gruben D, Wallenstein G, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich SH, Koncz T, Riese R, Bradley J. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23706795
Citation
Burmester GR, Benda B, Gruben D, Bradley J, Mebus C. Tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis - Authors' reply. Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1812-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61115-0. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22873531
Citation
van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, Lee EB, Garcia Meijide JA, Wagner S, Forejtova S, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Koncz T, Wallenstein GV, Krishnaswami S, Bradley JD, Wilkinson B; ORAL Standard Investigators. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):293.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21294106
Citation
Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J, Aletaha D, Allaart CF, Bathon J, Bombardieri S, Brooks P, Brown A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Choi H, Combe B, de Wit M, Dougados M, Emery P, Furst D, Gomez-Reino J, Hawker G, Keystone E, Khanna D, Kirwan J, Kvien TK, Landewe R, Listing J, Michaud K, Martin-Mola E, Montie P, Pincus T, Richards P, Siegel JN, Simon LS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, Tyndall A, van der Heijde D, Verstappen S, White B, Wolfe F, Zink A, Boers M; American College of Rheumatology; European League Against Rheumatism. American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):573-86. doi: 10.1002/art.30129.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7175852
Citation
Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):789-93. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ware JE KM, Dewey JE. . How to score Version 2 of the SF 36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute forms). In: How to score Version 2 of the SF 36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute forms). Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric, Incorporated. 2000.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9189057
Citation
Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol. 1997 May;36(5):551-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.5.551.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10146874
Citation
Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11900238
Citation
Cella D, Lai JS, Chang CH, Peterman A, Slavin M. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer. 2002 Jan 15;94(2):528-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10245.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35667900
Citation
Cohen SB, Haraoui B, Curtis JR, Smith TW, Woolcott J, Gruben D, Murray CW. Impact of Methotrexate Discontinuation, Interruption, or Persistence in US Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Tofacitinib + Oral Methotrexate Combination. Clin Ther. 2022 Jul;44(7):982-997.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34103405
Citation
Cohen SB, Pope J, Haraoui B, Mysler E, Diehl A, Lukic T, Liu S, Stockert L, Germino R, Menon S, Shi H, Keystone EC. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus methotrexate in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week open-label phase results from a phase 3b/4 methotrexate withdrawal non-inferiority study (ORAL Shift). RMD Open. 2021 Jun;7(2):e001673. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001673.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://pmiform.com/clinical-trial-info-request?StudyID=A3921192
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Methotrexate Withdrawal Study of Tofacitinib Modified Release Formulation in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs