search
Back to results

MGB/OAGB and LSG Effects on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Function

Primary Purpose

Morbid Obesity, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Bariatric Surgery Candidate

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MGB/OAGB
LSG
Sponsored by
Mario Musella MD
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Morbid Obesity focused on measuring Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastro-esophageal sphincter function

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 80 morbid obese patients are going to be studied. All patients presenting with a normal preoperative LES function will be randomly assigned to undergo LSG (arm 1 - 40 pts) or MGB (arm 2 - 40 pts).-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients lost at follow up. Cancer patients at any stage.

Sites / Locations

  • Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department - "Federico II" UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Arm Description

Execution of a laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB)

Execution of a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Modifications in terms of LES function
Does this surgery affect the LES area function in both arm 1 or arm 2 patients determining a possible increase in gastroesophageal acid or non acid reflux? This will be measured by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)
Definition of the best procedure
Does one between the two procedures outperform the other one in terms of eventual LES area modifications? This will be measured in both procedures by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Causes of eventual modifications of LES function in relationship with a specific surgical procedure
In the case of a good performance of LSG or MGB/OAGB or both the procedures, is this to be primarily related to surgery per se or to weight loss? This will be evaluated in both procedures by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)
Causes of eventual modifications of LES function in relationship with weight loss
In the case of a good performance of LSG or MGB/OAGB or both the procedures, is this to be primarily related to surgery per se or to weight loss? This will be evaluated in both procedures by the weight loss expressed as body mass index (BMI) points loss.

Full Information

First Posted
November 28, 2016
Last Updated
July 30, 2019
Sponsor
Mario Musella MD
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02987673
Brief Title
MGB/OAGB and LSG Effects on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Function
Official Title
Effects of Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Function. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mario Musella MD

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background While several articles have reported about the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), to date, just one paper has discussed this issue with regard the Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB). This is expected to be the first randomized trial exploring and comparing these two interventions. Setting "Federico II" University Hospital, Naples - ITALY. Methods Fifty morbid obese patients are going to be studied. All patients presenting with a normal preoperative LES function will be randomly assigned to undergo LSG (arm 1 - 25 pts) or MGB (arm 2 - 25 pts). Patients undergo clinical assessment for reflux symptoms, and esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGDS) plus high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH) before, two months and 1 year after both LSG or MGB/OAGB. Objective Endpoint 1: Does this surgery affect the LES area function in both arm 1 or arm 2 patients determining a possible increase in gastroesophageal acid or non acid reflux? Endpoint 2: Does one between the two procedures outperform the other one in terms of eventual LES area modifications? Endpoint 3: In the case of a good performance of LSG or MGB/OAGB or both the procedures, is this to be primarily related to surgery per se or to weight loss?

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Morbid Obesity, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Keywords
Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastro-esophageal sphincter function

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Execution of a laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB)
Arm Title
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Execution of a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
MGB/OAGB
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
LSG
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Modifications in terms of LES function
Description
Does this surgery affect the LES area function in both arm 1 or arm 2 patients determining a possible increase in gastroesophageal acid or non acid reflux? This will be measured by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Definition of the best procedure
Description
Does one between the two procedures outperform the other one in terms of eventual LES area modifications? This will be measured in both procedures by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Causes of eventual modifications of LES function in relationship with a specific surgical procedure
Description
In the case of a good performance of LSG or MGB/OAGB or both the procedures, is this to be primarily related to surgery per se or to weight loss? This will be evaluated in both procedures by the numbers and the duration of both acidic and non acidic reflux measured by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH)
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months
Title
Causes of eventual modifications of LES function in relationship with weight loss
Description
In the case of a good performance of LSG or MGB/OAGB or both the procedures, is this to be primarily related to surgery per se or to weight loss? This will be evaluated in both procedures by the weight loss expressed as body mass index (BMI) points loss.
Time Frame
6 months and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 80 morbid obese patients are going to be studied. All patients presenting with a normal preoperative LES function will be randomly assigned to undergo LSG (arm 1 - 40 pts) or MGB (arm 2 - 40 pts).- Exclusion Criteria: Patients lost at follow up. Cancer patients at any stage.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Annunziata Marfella
Phone
081746
Ext
2896
Email
segreteriamaster2015@libero.it
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mario Musella, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Federico II University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department - "Federico II" University
City
Naples
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annunziata Marfella
Phone
+39081746
Ext
2896

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24249251
Citation
Del Genio G, Tolone S, Limongelli P, Brusciano L, D'Alessandro A, Docimo G, Rossetti G, Silecchia G, Iannelli A, del Genio A, del Genio F, Docimo L. Sleeve gastrectomy and development of "de novo" gastroesophageal reflux. Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1046-4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26428250
Citation
Melissas J, Braghetto I, Molina JC, Silecchia G, Iossa A, Iannelli A, Foletto M. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2430-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1906-1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26806727
Citation
Casella G, Soricelli E, Giannotti D, Collalti M, Maselli R, Genco A, Redler A, Basso N. Long-term results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a large monocentric series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 May;12(4):757-762. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25979206
Citation
Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, Lucido FS, Fico DI, Docimo L. Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

MGB/OAGB and LSG Effects on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Function

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs