mHealth Usage Among Nigeria Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
Primary Purpose
Breast Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Nigeria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mHealth psychoeducational intervention
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Chemotherapy, Women, Psychoeducation, mHealth, Nursing, Psychological issues, Nigeria
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Include females who are:
- newly diagnosed with breast cancer within the recent three months
- currently receiving chemotherapy,
- have access to a smartphone and internet,
- are able to read and write in English,
- are cognitively capable of completing the questionnaires,
- consent to join the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Include females:
- with a concurrent physical or mental illness (as these might act as a confounder)
- cognitively impaired
Sites / Locations
- Lagos State University Teaching Hospital
- Lagos University Teaching Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
mHealth psychoeducational intervention
Control Group
Arm Description
The intervention group will receive six weeks mHealth psychoeducational intervention (mPEI) delivered through a mobile application.
No psychoeducational intervention will be given.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in self-efficacy
Self-efficacy for coping with cancer will be measured with the Cancer Behaviour Inventory-Brief Version (CBI-B). This is a 12-item instrument measuring confidence of individuals in performing activities that show how well they are coping with the demands of cancer and their treatment. Each item will be scored on a nine-point Likert scale with '1' meaning 'not at all confident' and '9' meaning 'totally confident'. The lowest score is 12 and the highest score is 108. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in coping.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Coping
Coping will be assessed through Brief Cope Inventory. This is a 28-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event. Respondents rate items on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1- "I haven't been doing this at all" to 4- "I have been doing this a lot". There are 14 scales in the Brief Cope, with each measuring a specific coping strategy. Each of the 14 scales is comprised of 2 items; total scores on each scale range from 2 (minimum) to 8 (maximum). Higher scores indicate increased utilization of that specific coping strategy. Total scores on each of the scales are calculated by summing the appropriate items for each scale. No items are reverse scored. High scores are indicative of psychological strength, grit, a practical approach to problem-solving and is predictive of positive outcomes.
Change in Anxiety
Anxiety will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Change in Depression
Depression will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Change in Symptom Distress
Symptom distress will be measured with the Monroe Dunaway (M. D.) Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) which comprises 13 items to measure symptom severity and six items to measure the rate of interference of the symptoms with patient's activities of daily living. The MDASI assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 NRS, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine." For symptom severity, there are 13 items, the highest score is 130 and the lowest is 13. Higher scores indicate higher degree of symptom severity. For symptom interference, there are six items. The highest score is 60 and the lowest score is 6. Higher scores indicate higher degree of interference of symptoms with activities of daily living.
Change in Quality of Life
Quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B (FACT-B). This instrument contains 37-items for measuring five domains of health-related quality of life in BC patients on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score for the five domains ranges from 0-148 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05489354
First Posted
August 3, 2022
Last Updated
July 28, 2023
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05489354
Brief Title
mHealth Usage Among Nigeria Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
Official Title
Effect of a mHealth Psycho-educational Intervention (mPEI) on Self-efficacy, Coping, and Psychological Distress Among Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Nigeria: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The research is studying the effect of a mHealth psychoeducational intervention on self-efficacy, coping and psychological distress of Nigerian women diagnosed with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy
The study is a two-arm assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial which will be conducted in two University Teaching Hospitals in Nigeria.
Detailed Description
Aim The study aims to develop and implement a culturally adapted mHealth psychoeducational intervention (mPEI) for Nigerian women diagnosed with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of the programme on self-efficacy (primary outcome), coping, symptom distress, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (secondary outcomes) among women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy
To explore the participants' experiences and feelings towards the intervention.
Hypothesis
It is hypothesised that participants who receive the mPEI program, when compared with the control group at baseline and immediately after the intervention, will demonstrate:
a significantly higher level of self-efficacy,
a significantly higher level of coping,
a significantly higher level of quality of life,
a significantly lower level of symptom distress,
a significantly lower level of anxiety and depression.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Chemotherapy, Women, Psychoeducation, mHealth, Nursing, Psychological issues, Nigeria
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The research assistants who assess outcome data, data entry and analysis will be blinded to avoid the risk of assessor bias. The assistants will not participate in any other stage of implementing the program
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
126 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
mHealth psychoeducational intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will receive six weeks mHealth psychoeducational intervention (mPEI) delivered through a mobile application.
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No psychoeducational intervention will be given.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
mHealth psychoeducational intervention
Intervention Description
The mPEI program will be delivered through a mobile application (app). The app has five components which include: Breast cancer education, coping skills training, discussion forum, nurse-led consultation, and psychological support. Breast cancer education and coping skills training will be conducted by the principal investigator for 30 minutes per week for six weeks and will be delivered via text, audio and video on the mobile app. Group discussion will be moderated by the principal investigator in a text format for 30 minutes per week. Nurse-led consultation and psychological support will be provided by the oncology nurse on the research team through a 15-20-minute call in the first week, third week and fifth week.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in self-efficacy
Description
Self-efficacy for coping with cancer will be measured with the Cancer Behaviour Inventory-Brief Version (CBI-B). This is a 12-item instrument measuring confidence of individuals in performing activities that show how well they are coping with the demands of cancer and their treatment. Each item will be scored on a nine-point Likert scale with '1' meaning 'not at all confident' and '9' meaning 'totally confident'. The lowest score is 12 and the highest score is 108. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in coping.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Coping
Description
Coping will be assessed through Brief Cope Inventory. This is a 28-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event. Respondents rate items on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1- "I haven't been doing this at all" to 4- "I have been doing this a lot". There are 14 scales in the Brief Cope, with each measuring a specific coping strategy. Each of the 14 scales is comprised of 2 items; total scores on each scale range from 2 (minimum) to 8 (maximum). Higher scores indicate increased utilization of that specific coping strategy. Total scores on each of the scales are calculated by summing the appropriate items for each scale. No items are reverse scored. High scores are indicative of psychological strength, grit, a practical approach to problem-solving and is predictive of positive outcomes.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
Title
Change in Anxiety
Description
Anxiety will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
Title
Change in Depression
Description
Depression will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
Title
Change in Symptom Distress
Description
Symptom distress will be measured with the Monroe Dunaway (M. D.) Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) which comprises 13 items to measure symptom severity and six items to measure the rate of interference of the symptoms with patient's activities of daily living. The MDASI assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 NRS, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine." For symptom severity, there are 13 items, the highest score is 130 and the lowest is 13. Higher scores indicate higher degree of symptom severity. For symptom interference, there are six items. The highest score is 60 and the lowest score is 6. Higher scores indicate higher degree of interference of symptoms with activities of daily living.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
Title
Change in Quality of Life
Description
Quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B (FACT-B). This instrument contains 37-items for measuring five domains of health-related quality of life in BC patients on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score for the five domains ranges from 0-148 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Include females who are:
newly diagnosed with breast cancer within the recent three months
currently receiving chemotherapy,
have access to a smartphone and internet,
are able to read and write in English,
are cognitively capable of completing the questionnaires,
consent to join the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Include females:
with a concurrent physical or mental illness (as these might act as a confounder)
cognitively impaired
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ka Ming Chow, DN
Organizational Affiliation
The Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Lagos State University Teaching Hospital
City
Lagos
Country
Nigeria
Facility Name
Lagos University Teaching Hospital
City
Lagos
Country
Nigeria
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
mHealth Usage Among Nigeria Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs