Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
Primary Purpose
Urologic Diseases, Urological System Complication of Procedure
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intraureteral stent
Conventional Double-J stent
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Urologic Diseases focused on measuring urology, ureteral stent
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Those undergoing ureteral stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Intraureteral stent group
Conventional Double-J stent
Arm Description
Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. This group will be the experimental group.
Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of a double-J ureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and the bladder. This group will serve as the control.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Stent migration
The distance that the stent migrates into the bladder or into the kidney.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient comfort level
Patient comfort level, as assessed via the Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04763837
First Posted
January 28, 2021
Last Updated
April 21, 2022
Sponsor
University of Louisville
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04763837
Brief Title
Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
Official Title
Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
unable to continue
Study Start Date
February 2027 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
April 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2028 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Louisville
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if stents placed with only one loop in the kidney move more than stents placed with a loop in both the kidney and a bladder. Participants in this study will undergo placement of a stent into the ureter that drains urine from the kidney into the bladder. The stent will be placed in 1 of 2 ways: either with only a loop of the stent is left in the kidney or in the regular manner where a loop of the stent is left in both the kidney and in the bladder. The position of the stent will be measured at the time of placement. When the stent is removed, the position of the stent will be measured prior to pulling the stent.
Detailed Description
The ureteral stent is one of the most extensively used tools in the field of urology. They are used for aiding post-operative healing of the ureter, visualizing the ureteral during procedures, and alleviating ureteral obstruction (eg. nephrolithiasis). Double-J stents, which are secured by loops in both the renal pelvis and the bladder, have become most urologists' go-to choice for ureteral stents since they were introduced in the 1970s. Unfortunately, it has been shown that 80-90% of patients with ureteral stents have urinary complaints following stent placement.
Interestingly, a recent study suggested utility of intraureteral stents. These stents have one loop in the renal pelvis while their distal end is positioned proximal to the ureteral orifice. The above-mentioned study showed that patients with intraureteral stents had less discomfort as opposed to the those that had double-J stents.
Due to the immense number of patients that require ureteral stent placement, this improvement in comfort is very promising for the urological field. However, no one has studied if stents placed intraureterally migrate from the time they are placed to the time they are removed. If stents migrate proximally toward the renal pelvis, it is possible that retrieval could be more difficult, and the ureteral patency established by the stent could be compromised.
The objective of this study is to determine if intraureterally placed stents migrate as compared to ureteral stents placed via the conventional method.
This study will be a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded trial. The subjects will include up to 140 patients (about 70 subjects per group) from ages 1-100 years old that are to undergo stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer.
Prior to the procedure, each patient that has agreed to participate in this study will be randomly assigned to receive a stent placed intraureterally or a stent placed in the conventional manner. After each intraureteral stent is placed via cystoscopy, the distance of the distal end of the stent to the ureteral orifice will be measured via fluoroscopy that was calibrated prior to the procedure. After each double-J stent is placed via cystoscopy, the length of stent that is present in the bladder will also be measured using calibrated fluoroscopy . Subjects will not be informed of which group they are assigned to. When the patients return for stent removal, the previously mentioned distances will be measured again prior to pulling the stent. They will also be asked to complete the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) to assess stent-associated discomfort. The primary endpoint of the study would be stent migration distance (mm). Secondary endpoints would include patient comfort level.
All medical records will be accessed on secure devices and networks. All subjects will be assigned a subject number upon enrolled in the study. When a researcher needs to record data from a patient's medical records, they will record this information with the patient's corresponding subject number. Only the researchers involved in this study will have access to the document that includes patient identifiers and their subject number. At the conclusion of this study, the document with patient identifiers and subject numbers will be destroyed.
Data will be collected from electronic medical records of patients from ULP (University of Louisville Physicians) Urology.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urologic Diseases, Urological System Complication of Procedure
Keywords
urology, ureteral stent
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study will be a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded trial. The subjects will include up to 140 patients (about 70 subjects per group) from ages 1-100 years old that are to undergo stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer. They will be randomized to one of two groups: intraureteral stent or conventional double-J stent. Upon removal of the stent, migration distance will be measured via fluoroscopy using a calibrated x-ray system.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Subjects will not be informed of which type of ureteral stent will be used.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intraureteral stent group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. This group will be the experimental group.
Arm Title
Conventional Double-J stent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of a double-J ureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and the bladder. This group will serve as the control.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Intraureteral stent
Other Intervention Name(s)
Polaris™ Loop Ureteral Stent - Boston Scientific
Intervention Description
This intervention involves the placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. The distal end of the tube will stay in the ureter just proximal to the opening to the bladder.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional Double-J stent
Intervention Description
This intervention involves the placement of a conventional double-J stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and in the bladder.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stent migration
Description
The distance that the stent migrates into the bladder or into the kidney.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient comfort level
Description
Patient comfort level, as assessed via the Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ).
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Those undergoing ureteral stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
none
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kellen B Choi, DO, FACOS
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Professor, University of Louisville Department of Urology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11905888
Citation
Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. 1978. J Urol. 2002 Feb;167(2 Pt 2):1135-8; discussion 1139. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(02)80361-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11927301
Citation
Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002 Apr;59(4):511-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01644-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2961892
Citation
Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents. J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):37-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42282-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30829132
Citation
Yoshida T, Inoue T, Taguchi M, Matsuzaki T, Murota T, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Efficacy and Safety of Complete Intraureteral Stent Placement versus Conventional Stent Placement in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms: A Randomized, Prospective, Single Blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):164-170. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000196. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12576846
Citation
Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1060-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs