Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment for In Vitro Fertilization (FOLFO)
Primary Purpose
Subfertility
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mild Ovarian Stimulation Treatment
Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Subfertility focused on measuring Folic Acid, Homocysteine, Ovarian response, In Vitro Fertilization
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All couples with an indication for IVF/ICSI treatment in the Erasmus Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior oocyte donation
- Endometriosis
- Hydrosalpinx
- MESA/PESA
- Age >37
- BMI <18 or >29kg/m2
- Menstrual cycle disruptions
- Indication for Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)
- Prior IVF treatment without embryo transplant
- History of recurrent abortion
- Abnormal karyotype of male/female
- Uterine abnormalities
Sites / Locations
- Erasmus Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Mild Ovarian Stimulation
Conventional Ovarian Stimulation
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Endocrine, metabolic biomarkers and proteins and Fertility outcome parameters
Secondary Outcome Measures
Homocysteine-methionine cycle biomarker, endocrine and folate levels in serum
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00985062
First Posted
September 24, 2009
Last Updated
September 25, 2009
Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00985062
Brief Title
Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment for In Vitro Fertilization
Acronym
FOLFO
Official Title
Food Lifestyle and Fertility Outcome
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2006 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an assisted reproductive technique to achieve pregnancy in subfertile couples of which the average success rate is only 25%. Mild ovarian stimulation treatment yields less oocytes, has less adverse effects but has a comparable clinical outcome compared to conventional stimulation treatment. There is high inter- and intra person variability in ovarian response and fertility outcome parameters after stimulation treatment and little is known about explanatory variables herefore.
Nutrition and in particular folate, or its synthetic derivative folic acid, is a B-vitamin which has been widely asssociated with reproductive outcome and subfertility. Therefore, in this study we aim to investigate the influence of preconception nutrition and folic acid use on ovarian response after mild/conventional stimulation treatment and to identify biomarkers in the follicular fluid which can indicate oocyte quality and other fertility outcomes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subfertility
Keywords
Folic Acid, Homocysteine, Ovarian response, In Vitro Fertilization
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
54 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mild Ovarian Stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Conventional Ovarian Stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Mild Ovarian Stimulation Treatment
Intervention Description
Administration of a fixed dose of 150 IU/day rFSH s.c. (Puregon® NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) from cycle day 5 onwards. As soon as the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14mm, a GnRH-antagonist (Orgalutran®, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was administered at 0.25 mg/day s.c.. To induce final oocyte maturation a single s.c. dose of 10.000 IE hCG (Pregnyl®, NV Organon. Oss, The Netherlands) was administered.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment
Intervention Description
Administration of GnRH agonist Triptorelin (Decapeptyl®, Ferring BV, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) at 0.1 mg/day s.c., starting on cycle day 21 of the menstrual cycle preceding the actual stimulation cycle. After two weeks of the GnRH regimen, co-treatment with rFSH 225 IU/day s.c. (Puregon®, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was initiated. To induce final oocyte maturation a single s.c. dose of 10.000 IE hCG (Pregnyl®, NV Organon. Oss, The Netherlands) was administered
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Endocrine, metabolic biomarkers and proteins and Fertility outcome parameters
Time Frame
At menstrual cycle day 2 before stimulation, on the day of hCG administration after stimulation treatment and after embryo transplantation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Homocysteine-methionine cycle biomarker, endocrine and folate levels in serum
Time Frame
At menstrual cycle day 2 before stimulation and on the day of hCG administration after stimulation treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
37 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All couples with an indication for IVF/ICSI treatment in the Erasmus Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior oocyte donation
Endometriosis
Hydrosalpinx
MESA/PESA
Age >37
BMI <18 or >29kg/m2
Menstrual cycle disruptions
Indication for Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)
Prior IVF treatment without embryo transplant
History of recurrent abortion
Abnormal karyotype of male/female
Uterine abnormalities
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
Zuid-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
3015GD
Country
Netherlands
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18701335
Citation
Forges T, Pellanda H, Diligent C, Monnier P, Gueant JL. [Do folates have an impact on fertility?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008 Sep;36(9):930-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 12. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18006561
Citation
Fauser BC, Diedrich K, Devroey P; Evian Annual Reproduction Workshop Group 2007. Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-14. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm034. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19091754
Citation
Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Macklon NS, Heijnen EM, Baart EB, Hohmann FP, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ. The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):5-12. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn053.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19091755
Citation
Verberg MF, Macklon NS, Nargund G, Frydman R, Devroey P, Broekmans FJ, Fauser BC. Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-29. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn056.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17204525
Citation
Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers NG, Verhoeff A, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007 Apr;22(4):980-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del484. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation Treatment for In Vitro Fertilization
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs