search
Back to results

Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves (MITRAL)

Primary Purpose

Mitral Valve Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
Sponsored by
Mayra Guerrero
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mitral Valve Disease

Eligibility Criteria

22 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria in Native Mitral Valve arm

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

  1. Patient has severe calcific native mitral valve stenosis with mitral annular calcification with echocardiographically derived mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2, or severe mitral regurgitation with severe mitral annular calcification and at least moderate mitral valve stenosis. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
  2. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test.
  3. The patient is at least 22 years old.
  4. The heart team agrees (and verified in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
  5. The heart team agrees that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the STS score is ≥15% or the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity is ≥ 50%. The surgeons' consult notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion and include a printout of the calculation of the STS score to additionally identify the risks in the patient (some medical factors and definitions are provided below). At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have physically evaluated the patient. All patients must be approved by the Patient Selection and Procedure Management Steering Committee (at least 2 member votes, one must be a cardiac surgeon).
  6. The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
  7. The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years and analysis close date visits, which will be conducted as a phone follow-up.

Inclusion Criteria in Valve-in-Ring arm

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

  1. Patient has a failing surgical ring in the mitral position with severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis (echocardiographically derived mitral valve area [MVA] of ≤1.5 cm2. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
  2. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test, or severe hemolytic anemia requiring blood transfusions and no other cause of hemolytic anemia is found after extensive work up.

Inclusion Criteria items #3 to 7 will be the same as in Native MV arm described above

Inclusion Criteria in Valve-in-Valve arm

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

  1. Patient has a failing surgical bioprosthesis in the mitral position with severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis with echocardiographically derived mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
  2. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test.

Inclusion Criteria items #3 to 7 will be the same as in Native MV arm described above

Exclusion Criteria:

Candidates will be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are present:

  1. Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient is a surgical candidate).
  2. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
  3. Mitral annulus is not calcified (only applies to patients included in Native MV arm).
  4. Complex untreated coronary artery disease:

    1. Unprotected left main coronary artery
    2. Syntax score > 32 (in the absence of prior revascularization)
  5. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not excluded.
  6. Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BMV) within 30 days of the procedure (unless BMV is a bridge to procedure after a qualifying ECHO).
  7. Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
  8. Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL).
  9. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).
  10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
  11. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  12. Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%.
  13. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  14. Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure.
  15. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
  16. For patients enrolled in the Native MV arm: Native mitral annulus size < 275 mm2 or > 740 mm2 as measured by CT scan.

    For patients in Valve-in-Ring arm: surgical ring with a true mean internal diameter ≤18 mm or ≥ 29 mm or an area < 275 mm2 or > 740 mm2 as measured by CT scan. Caution recommended in:

    • Incomplete bands due to risk of paravalvular leak and risk of LVOT obstruction. Careful measurements by CT and CT-guided procedural planning is recommended.
    • Non-circular rigid or semi-flexible rings (e.g., D-shaped, saddle shaped, etc) due to risk of para-valvular leak and/or out of round or incomplete valve expansion.

    For patients in Valve-in-Valve arm: surgical bioprosthesis with a true internal diameter ≤18 mm or ≥ 29 mm

  17. Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure.
  18. Estimated life expectancy < 24 months (730 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease.
  19. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of mitral stenosis
  20. Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.

Sites / Locations

  • Banner University Medical Center
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • MedStar Washington Medical Center
  • Piedmont HealtCare
  • Evanston Hospital / North Shore University HealthSystem
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Henry Ford Hospital
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center
  • Intermountain Medical Center
  • University of Washington Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Native mitral valve with severe MAC

Valve-in-Ring

Valve-in-Valve

Arm Description

Patients with symptomatic severe calcific native mitral valve disease with severe mitral annular calcification who have extremely high surgical risk for standard surgical mitral valve replacement, will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

Patients with symptomatic failing surgical rings resulting in severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement (valve-in-ring).

Patients with symptomatic failing surgical bioprostheses resulting in severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement (Valve-in-valve).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Technical Success at Exit From the Cath Lab.
Number of subject to achieve technical success (at exit from cath lab) is defined as: Successful vascular delivery and retrieval of transcatheter valve delivery system Deployment of single valve Correct position of transcatheter valve Adequate performance of prosthesis (MVA > 1.5 cm2) without residual MR grade ≥2 (+) No need for additional surgery or re-intervention Patient leaves cath lab alive
Absence of MR Grade 2 (+) or Greater
Number of subjects to have absence of MR grade 2 (+) or greater assessed with echocardiography. MR severity grading system ranging from Grade 1=mild; Grade 4=severe.
Mitral Valve Gradient (MVG)
MVG assessed by echocardiography measured in mmHg

Secondary Outcome Measures

Procedural Success
Number of subject to have procedural success as defined as no device/procedure related SAE's including: death, stroke, MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG, stage 2 or 3 AKI including dialysis, life threatening bleeding, major vascular or access complications (arterial, venous, or TA - any event requiring additional unplanned surgical or transcatheter intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices including intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 hrs, or any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention.

Full Information

First Posted
February 18, 2015
Last Updated
October 3, 2023
Sponsor
Mayra Guerrero
Collaborators
Henry Ford Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02370511
Brief Title
Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves
Acronym
MITRAL
Official Title
The Safety and Feasibility of the SAPIEN XTTM Transcatheter Heart Valve With NovaFlex and Ascendra Delivery Systems and SAPIEN 3 With Commander Delivery System in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Calcific Mitral Valve Disease With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification and Patients With Failing Mitral Surgical Rings or Bioprostheses Who Are Not Candidates for Mitral Valve Surgery.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 25, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mayra Guerrero
Collaborators
Henry Ford Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to establish the safety and feasibility of the Edwards SAPIEN XT™and SAPIEN 3™ device and delivery systems in patients with severe symptomatic calcific mitral valve disease with severe mitral annular calcification who are not candidates for standard mitral valve surgery.
Detailed Description
Design: A prospective pilot study enrolling extremely high surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe calcific mitral valve disease undergoing implantation of an Edwards Sapien XT or SAPIEN 3 valve in the mitral position. There are three arms in this study evaluating three separate patient populations described below: Native Mitral Valve with severe Mitral Annular Calcification (MAC): Patients with symptomatic severe disease of a native mitral valve due to severe mitral annular calcification. Valve-in-Ring: Patients with symptomatic failing surgical rings resulting in severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis. Valve-in-Valve: Patients with failing bioprosthetic surgical valves with severe regurgitation or stenosis The delivery approaches include: standard transeptal, modified transeptal approach with a guidewire externalized through a sheath percutaneously placed in the left ventricle, surgical trasnapical and surgical transatrial delivery approach with or without surgical resection of the anterior mitral valve (MV) leaflet (in the native mitral valve arm). The MITRAL Trial site investigative team (heart team) consists of dedicated representatives from cardiac surgery, interventional cardiology, echocardiology, neurology, study coordination and other multi-disciplinary team members consistent with a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) model. Endpoints Most endpoints were defined following the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) recommendations with minor modifications.73 The primary safety endpoint is: technical success at exit from the cath lab • Technical success (at exit from the cath lab) is defined as: Successful vascular and/or TA access, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system Deployment of a single valve Correct position of transcatheter valve in the mitral annulus Adequate performance of the prosthetic heart valve (mean mitral valve gradient (MVG) <10 mmHg) without residual mitral regurgitation (MR) grade ≥2 (+) No need for additional surgery or re-intervention (includes drainage of pericardial effusion) The patient leaves the cath lab alive The primary performance endpoint is: absence of MR grade 2 (+) or greater or mean MVG ≥10 mmHg at 30 days and 1 year. Secondary safety endpoints include: Procedural success and all -cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Procedural Success (30 days) in defined as: Device success at 30 days No device/procedure related severe adverse event (SAE's) including: death, stroke, MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG, stage 2 or 3 AKI including dialysis, life threatening bleeding, major vascular or access complications (arterial, venous, or TA - any event requiring additional unplanned surgical or transcatheter intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices including intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 hrs, or any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention. Device success is defined as: Stroke free survival with original valve in place No need for additional surgery or re-intervention related to the procedure, access or to the replacement valve Proper placement and intended function of the replacement valve, including No migration, fracture, thrombosis, hemolysis or endocarditis No replacement valve stenosis (MV gradient < 10 mmHg) Replacement valve regurgitation < 2 + (including central and paravalvular leak) and without associated hemolysis No increase in AI from baseline (more than 1 grade) and LVOT gradient < 20 mmHg increase from baseline Additional secondary safety and effectiveness endpoints will be evaluated at two time points: (1) acute, covering events occurring out to 30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer; and (2) longer-term, covering events from 31 days to 1 year, and include the following: Additional Safety Endpoints: Freedom from all stroke and TIA (MVARC) myocardial infarction major vascular complication (MVARC) life-threatening bleeding (MVARC) mitral valve reoperation or catheter-based intervention for: valve thrombosis, valve displacement, or other valve placed procedure-related complication hemolysis endocarditis moderate or severe central mitral insufficiency ≥ 2 (+), and/or moderate or severe perivalvular leak causing ≥ 2 (+) mitral insufficiency significant mitral stenosis (mean MVG >10 mmHg) new permanent pacemaker insertion new aortic valve dysfunction (difference greater than 1(+) severity compared with baseline) new LVOT gradient ≥ 20 mmHg, or ≥ 20 mmHg increase from baseline LVOT gradient. acute kidney injury (MVARC) new onset atrial fibrillation blood transfusion access site infection need for iatrogenic ASD closure after index procedure Additional Effectiveness Endpoints: Rehospitalization at 1 year and Total days alive and out of hospital (from date of index procedure) Clinical improvement per NYHA Class (from baseline) by at least 1 class. Clinical improvement per Quality of Life instruments (>10 points from baseline): (KCCQ 12) (Appendix N) Clinical improvement per 6 Minute Walk Test (> 50 meters from baseline) and 5 meter walk test. (Appendix H) Mean ICU and total index procedure hospital length of stay Additional Valve Performance Endpoints: Freedom from major mitral paravalvular leak Improvement in hemodynamic function: mean gradient Freedom from structural valve deterioration Total mitral regurgitation

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mitral Valve Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Native mitral valve with severe MAC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with symptomatic severe calcific native mitral valve disease with severe mitral annular calcification who have extremely high surgical risk for standard surgical mitral valve replacement, will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement.
Arm Title
Valve-in-Ring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with symptomatic failing surgical rings resulting in severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement (valve-in-ring).
Arm Title
Valve-in-Valve
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with symptomatic failing surgical bioprostheses resulting in severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement (Valve-in-valve).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
Intervention Description
Implantation of a balloon expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in the mitral position.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical Success at Exit From the Cath Lab.
Description
Number of subject to achieve technical success (at exit from cath lab) is defined as: Successful vascular delivery and retrieval of transcatheter valve delivery system Deployment of single valve Correct position of transcatheter valve Adequate performance of prosthesis (MVA > 1.5 cm2) without residual MR grade ≥2 (+) No need for additional surgery or re-intervention Patient leaves cath lab alive
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Absence of MR Grade 2 (+) or Greater
Description
Number of subjects to have absence of MR grade 2 (+) or greater assessed with echocardiography. MR severity grading system ranging from Grade 1=mild; Grade 4=severe.
Time Frame
30 days and 1 year
Title
Mitral Valve Gradient (MVG)
Description
MVG assessed by echocardiography measured in mmHg
Time Frame
30 days and 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural Success
Description
Number of subject to have procedural success as defined as no device/procedure related SAE's including: death, stroke, MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG, stage 2 or 3 AKI including dialysis, life threatening bleeding, major vascular or access complications (arterial, venous, or TA - any event requiring additional unplanned surgical or transcatheter intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices including intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 hrs, or any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention.
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria in Native Mitral Valve arm All Candidates must meet the following criteria: Patient has severe calcific native mitral valve stenosis with mitral annular calcification with echocardiographically derived mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2, or severe mitral regurgitation with severe mitral annular calcification and at least moderate mitral valve stenosis. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test. The patient is at least 22 years old. The heart team agrees (and verified in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient. The heart team agrees that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the STS score is ≥15% or the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity is ≥ 50%. The surgeons' consult notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion and include a printout of the calculation of the STS score to additionally identify the risks in the patient (some medical factors and definitions are provided below). At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have physically evaluated the patient. All patients must be approved by the Patient Selection and Procedure Management Steering Committee (at least 2 member votes, one must be a cardiac surgeon). The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site. The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years and analysis close date visits, which will be conducted as a phone follow-up. Inclusion Criteria in Valve-in-Ring arm All Candidates must meet the following criteria: Patient has a failing surgical ring in the mitral position with severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis (echocardiographically derived mitral valve area [MVA] of ≤1.5 cm2. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test, or severe hemolytic anemia requiring blood transfusions and no other cause of hemolytic anemia is found after extensive work up. Inclusion Criteria items #3 to 7 will be the same as in Native MV arm described above Inclusion Criteria in Valve-in-Valve arm All Candidates must meet the following criteria: Patient has a failing surgical bioprosthesis in the mitral position with severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis with echocardiographically derived mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure. Patient is symptomatic from mitral valve disease, as demonstrated by reported NYHA Functional Class II or greater, or symptoms during stress test. Inclusion Criteria items #3 to 7 will be the same as in Native MV arm described above Exclusion Criteria: Candidates will be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are present: Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient is a surgical candidate). Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)]. Mitral annulus is not calcified (only applies to patients included in Native MV arm). Complex untreated coronary artery disease: Unprotected left main coronary artery Syntax score > 32 (in the absence of prior revascularization) Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not excluded. Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BMV) within 30 days of the procedure (unless BMV is a bridge to procedure after a qualifying ECHO). Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL). Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation. Need for emergency surgery for any reason. Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure. For patients enrolled in the Native MV arm: Native mitral annulus size < 275 mm2 or > 740 mm2 as measured by CT scan. For patients in Valve-in-Ring arm: surgical ring with a true mean internal diameter ≤18 mm or ≥ 29 mm or an area < 275 mm2 or > 740 mm2 as measured by CT scan. Caution recommended in: Incomplete bands due to risk of paravalvular leak and risk of LVOT obstruction. Careful measurements by CT and CT-guided procedural planning is recommended. Non-circular rigid or semi-flexible rings (e.g., D-shaped, saddle shaped, etc) due to risk of para-valvular leak and/or out of round or incomplete valve expansion. For patients in Valve-in-Valve arm: surgical bioprosthesis with a true internal diameter ≤18 mm or ≥ 29 mm Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure. Estimated life expectancy < 24 months (730 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of mitral stenosis Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mayra E. Guerrero, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Banner University Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
MedStar Washington Medical Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont HealtCare
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evanston Hospital / North Shore University HealthSystem
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Hospital
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Intermountain Medical Center
City
Murray
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
48107
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24532349
Citation
Guerrero M, Greenbaum A, O'Neill W. First in human percutaneous implantation of a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve in a severely stenosed native mitral valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):E287-91. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25441. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23828829
Citation
Sinning JM, Mellert F, Schiller W, Welz A, Nickenig G, Hammerstingl C. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement using a balloon-expandable prosthesis in a patient with calcified native mitral valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(33):2609. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht254. Epub 2013 Jul 4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23918190
Citation
Hasan R, Mahadevan VS, Schneider H, Clarke B. First in human transapical implantation of an inverted transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis to treat native mitral valve stenosis. Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):e74-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001466. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24835326
Citation
Fassa AA, Himbert D, Brochet E, Depoix JP, Cheong AP, Alkhoder S, Nataf P, Vahanian A. Transseptal transcatheter mitral valve implantation for severely calcified mitral stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(6):696-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.204. Epub 2014 May 14. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25240553
Citation
Ribeiro HB, Doyle D, Urena M, Allende R, Amat-Santos I, Pasian S, Bilodeau S, Mohammadi S, Paradis JM, DeLarochelliere R, Rodes-Cabau J, Dumont E. Transapical mitral implantation of a balloon-expandable valve in native mitral valve stenosis in a patient with previous transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):e137-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Sep 17. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23847181
Citation
Ferrari E, Niclauss L, Locca D, Marcucci C. On-pump fibrillating heart mitral valve replacement with the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Apr;45(4):749-51. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt364. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25500243
Citation
Himbert D, Bouleti C, Iung B, Nejjari M, Brochet E, Depoix JP, Ghodbane W, Fassa AA, Nataf P, Vahanian A. Transcatheter valve replacement in patients with severe mitral valve disease and annular calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 16;64(23):2557-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.047. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33888229
Citation
Guerrero M, Wang DD, Eleid MF, Pursnani A, Salinger M, Russell HM, Kodali SK, George I, Bapat VN, Dangas GD, Tang GHL, Inglesis I, Meduri CU, Palacios I, Reisman M, Whisenant BK, Jermihov A, Kaptzan T, Lewis BR, Tommaso C, Krause P, Thaden J, Oh JK, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Leon MB, Rihal CS, Feldman T, O'Neill WW. Prospective Study of TMVR Using Balloon-Expandable Aortic Transcatheter Valves in MAC: MITRAL Trial 1-Year Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):830-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.052.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33888230
Citation
Guerrero M, Wang DD, Pursnani A, Salinger M, Russell HM, Eleid M, Chakravarty T, Ng MH, Kodali SK, Meduri CU, Pershad A, Satler L, Waksman R, Palacios I, Smalling R, Reisman M, Gegenhuber M, Kaptzan T, Lewis B, Tommaso C, Krause P, Thaden J, Oh J, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Kar S, Makkar R, Leon MB, Feldman T, Rihal C, O'Neill WW. Prospective Evaluation of TMVR for Failed Surgical Annuloplasty Rings: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Ring Arm 1-Year Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):846-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.051.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33888231
Citation
Guerrero M, Pursnani A, Narang A, Salinger M, Wang DD, Eleid M, Kodali SK, George I, Satler L, Waksman R, Meduri CU, Rajagopal V, Inglessis I, Palacios I, Reisman M, Eng MH, Russell HM, Pershad A, Fang K, Kar S, Makkar R, Saucedo J, Pearson P, Bokhary U, Kaptzan T, Lewis B, Tommaso C, Krause P, Thaden J, Oh J, Lang RM, Hahn RT, Leon MB, O'Neill WW, Feldman T, Rihal C. Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Valve Arm 1-Year Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):859-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.027.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
37758379
Citation
Guerrero ME, Eleid MF, Wang DD, Pursnani A, Kodali SK, George I, Palacios I, Russell H, Makkar RR, Kar S, Satler LF, Rajagopal V, Dangas G, Tang GHL, McCabe JM, Whisenant BK, Fang K, Balan P, Smalling R, Kaptzan T, Lewis B, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Thaden J, Oh JK, Leon M, O'Neill W, Rihal C. 5-Year Prospective Evaluation of Mitral Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Outcomes: MITRAL Trial Final Results. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep 25;16(18):2211-2227. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.041.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33888232
Citation
Sticchi A, Reineke D, Praz F, Windecker S. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Mitral Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Using Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):873-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.034. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs