search
Back to results

Mobilization With Movement Versus Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Primary Purpose

Patellofemoral Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Pakistan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Moblization with Movement
Mulligan knee taping
Sponsored by
Riphah International University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Patellofemoral Syndrome focused on measuring Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 45 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:• Anterior knee Pain durations lasting longer than two months,

  • Pain scoring three or more according to Numeric pain Rating scale (NPRS) during at least two activities
  • Age between 20 and 45 years
  • Both Genders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Past history of total knee artthroplasty

    • Intra articular steroid injection
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Use of Assistive devices e.g. canes, walkers and braces
    • Knee injury

Sites / Locations

  • Pakistan Railway hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

MWM Group

Mulligan Taping Group

Arm Description

This group will receive Mobilization with Movement (MWM) i.e. straight leg raised with traction,Tibial Gliding

This group will receive Mulligan knee taping

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Active knee extension test
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Active knee extension test:(2nd week)
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Active knee extension test:(6 week)
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Sit and reach Test
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Sit and reach Test
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Sit and reach Test( 6 week)
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.

Secondary Outcome Measures

NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale
(NPRS)is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 2nd week]
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 6th week ]
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Kujala pain Rating score:(Baseline)
The Kujala pain rating scale is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100.
Kujala pain Rating scale : (2nd week)
The Kujala pain Rating scale [ is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100
Kuala pain Rating Scale: (6th week)
The kujala pain rating scale is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100

Full Information

First Posted
November 20, 2019
Last Updated
January 14, 2020
Sponsor
Riphah International University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04173468
Brief Title
Mobilization With Movement Versus Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Official Title
Comparison of Mobilization With Movement and Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Riphah International University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study intends to determine the effects of MWM verses Mulligan knee taping on patellofemoral pain syndrome.
Detailed Description
This is a single blinded randomized controlled trial, will be conducted at Pakistan railway general hospital Rawalpindi. Both MWM and Mulligan knee taping Techniques are used in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Sample size of 34 individuals was calculated through Open Epi tool version 3 with 95 % confidence interval (CI), and power 80%. 34 individuals were screened out on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Individuals of this selected population were randomly allocated as 17 individuals in MWM (straight leg raise with traction and tibial gliding) group and 17 individuals Mulligan knee taping group by sealed envelope method. And after this Both groups will receive conventional therapy. Assesment will be done at baseline, 2nd week and after 6 weeks Data will be analyzed on SPSS version 21.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patellofemoral Syndrome
Keywords
Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
There will be two groups of participant. One group will receive MWM along with conventional therapy and the second group group will receive Mulligan knee taping along with conventional therapy.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
This study will be single blinded randomized control trail, participants will be unaware of treatment groups, they will be randomly allocated through sealed envelope method.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
34 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MWM Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive Mobilization with Movement (MWM) i.e. straight leg raised with traction,Tibial Gliding
Arm Title
Mulligan Taping Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive Mulligan knee taping
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Moblization with Movement
Intervention Description
patients with group 1 will receive two techniques pertaining to MWM intervention (straight leg raised with traction and tibial Gliding) Repeat it 10 times,3 sets and 1 mint interval. .For Tibial Gliding we will asks the patient to perform 10 repetitive active knee extensions. Practice will be performed by doing 10 reps for 3 sets with 1 min interval. After this home exercises will b guided stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold, strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Mulligan knee taping
Intervention Description
patient with group 2 will receive Mulligan taping technique. Tape will be applied for two days then we will change it. After this home based exercise will be guided which is stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold , strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time up and Go test
Description
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Time up and Go test
Description
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Time Frame
Post 2nd week
Title
Time up and Go test
Description
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Time Frame
Post 6 week
Title
Active knee extension test
Description
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Active knee extension test:(2nd week)
Description
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Time Frame
Post 2nd Week
Title
Active knee extension test:(6 week)
Description
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle < 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Time Frame
Post 6th Week
Title
Sit and reach Test
Description
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Sit and reach Test
Description
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Time Frame
Post 2nd week
Title
Sit and reach Test( 6 week)
Description
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Time Frame
Post 6th Week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
(NPRS)is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 2nd week]
Description
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Time Frame
Post 2nd week
Title
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 6th week ]
Description
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is used to assess pain. It scores ranges from 0-10, 0 means No pain and 10 means Severe pain. Patient will be asked to verbally report the pain score.
Time Frame
Post 6th Week
Title
Kujala pain Rating score:(Baseline)
Description
The Kujala pain rating scale is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Kujala pain Rating scale : (2nd week)
Description
The Kujala pain Rating scale [ is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100
Time Frame
Post 2nd week
Title
Kuala pain Rating Scale: (6th week)
Description
The kujala pain rating scale is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format. For example, a 'Limp' score would be scored as follows: none (5), slight/periodic (3), constant (0). Total scores range from 0 to 100
Time Frame
Post 6th week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:• Anterior knee Pain durations lasting longer than two months, Pain scoring three or more according to Numeric pain Rating scale (NPRS) during at least two activities Age between 20 and 45 years Both Genders Exclusion Criteria: • Past history of total knee artthroplasty Intra articular steroid injection Rheumatoid Arthritis Use of Assistive devices e.g. canes, walkers and braces Knee injury
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Huma Riaz, PHD*
Organizational Affiliation
Riphah International University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pakistan Railway hospital
City
Rawalpindi
State/Province
Punjab
ZIP/Postal Code
40100
Country
Pakistan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29054803
Citation
Demirci S, Kinikli GI, Callaghan MJ, Tunay VB. Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26903215
Citation
Hickey A, Hopper D, Hall T, Wild CY. The Effect of the Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain and Lower Limb Biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1179-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629418. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22513943
Citation
Callaghan MJ, Selfe J. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD006717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006717.pub2.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Mobilization With Movement Versus Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs