search
Back to results

Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study

Primary Purpose

Urinary Tract Stone

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Holmium laser with Moses lasers
Holmium laser with thulium lasers
Sponsored by
University of Wisconsin, Madison
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urinary Tract Stone focused on measuring Lithotripsy, Holmium laser

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with renal or ureteral urinary stones who require endoscopic treatment in the outpatient operating room
  • Participant's stone size in a single renal unit of 3-10 mm and 11-20 mm. Stone size is defined as the largest diameter of a single stone on pre-operative CT. Participants with multiple stones will be included as long as their largest stone size falls within the above parameters.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants under 18 years of age and over 89 years old.
  • Pregnant participants
  • Participants with transplant kidneys
  • Participants with irreversible coagulopathy
  • Participants with known ureteral stricture disease
  • Participants who do not have a pre-operative CT.
  • Non-English speaking, vulnerable participants such as lacking of decision-making capability, prisoner, adult unable to consent, will not be enrolled.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Participants treated with Holmium laser with the Moses laser

Participants treated with Holmium laser with the thulium laser

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Procedural Time (Minutes)
Time from the minute the ureteroscope is inserted into the participant to the time the ureteroscope has been removed will be reported as procedural time.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Stone Free Rate
Stone free rate (SFR) (%) are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the urinary tract which were defined as ≦ 4mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
Lasing Time (Minutes)
Time the laser was in use, not including pedal pauses
Total Energy Used (Kilojoules)
The total energy used to fragment the stones into small pieces (≤2 mm)
Ablation Efficiency (J/mm^3)
It is a ratio of ablated stone volume to the laser pulse energy (J/mm3)
Number of Participants With Post-operative Complications
Change in Quality of Life Survey (WISQOL Short Form) Both Pre-operatively and Post-operatively
WISQOL short form is a 6 item questionnaire which can be scored from 1(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). The raw score range is 5-30. In the study, standardized total score is used. the range of the standardized total score is 0-100.
Score on the Laser Evaluation Instrument
Physician evaluation of the laser will be done by Laser Evaluation Instrument. It consists of 6 items which can be scored from 0(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). Cumulative score may range from 0-30.
Ablation Speed
The speed to fragment or dust stones

Full Information

First Posted
July 6, 2021
Last Updated
June 16, 2023
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04963062
Brief Title
Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study
Official Title
Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Holmium Laser With Moses Technology Versus SuperPulsed Laser System With Thulium Laser on Renal and Ureteral Stones
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 16, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The incidence of urinary tract stone disease is increasing. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as of 2012, 10.6% of men and 7.1% of women in the United States are affected by renal stone disease. This has led to an increased demand on Urologists for efficient and safe surgical treatment of stone disease. Over the past two decades, ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy has become the treatment of choice for most ureteral and renal stones globally. The holmium laser is considered the gold standard for laser lithotripsy. Holmium laser lithotripsy with Moses and the thulium laser are new technologies meant to improve the efficiency of laser lithotripsy. Both are FDA approved treatment modalities for stone disease. Two in vitro studies have compared Moses versus thulium and shown that thulium has higher ablative volumes then the holmium laser with Moses, but no clinical trials have compared the two treatment modalities. In this study, investigators are going to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial to determine whether there is a difference in procedural time, intraoperative parameters or stone free rate between the Holmium laser with Moses and the thulium laser. This is significant as this may lead to shorter overall operative times, which may result in decreased operative costs and complications.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Tract Stone
Keywords
Lithotripsy, Holmium laser

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomized (ratio 1:1) at the time of enrollment to be treated with either the holmium laser with Moses or the thulium laser. Investigators will use Permuted Block Randomization (stratified by stone size 3 - 10 mm or 11-20 mm) (block size 4).
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
114 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Participants treated with Holmium laser with the Moses laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Participants treated with Holmium laser with the thulium laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Holmium laser with Moses lasers
Intervention Description
The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Holmium laser with thulium lasers
Intervention Description
The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural Time (Minutes)
Description
Time from the minute the ureteroscope is inserted into the participant to the time the ureteroscope has been removed will be reported as procedural time.
Time Frame
up to 6 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stone Free Rate
Description
Stone free rate (SFR) (%) are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the urinary tract which were defined as ≦ 4mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
Time Frame
Baseline(pre-operative) and approximately 8 weeks
Title
Lasing Time (Minutes)
Description
Time the laser was in use, not including pedal pauses
Time Frame
up to 6 hours
Title
Total Energy Used (Kilojoules)
Description
The total energy used to fragment the stones into small pieces (≤2 mm)
Time Frame
up to 6 hours
Title
Ablation Efficiency (J/mm^3)
Description
It is a ratio of ablated stone volume to the laser pulse energy (J/mm3)
Time Frame
up to 6 hours
Title
Number of Participants With Post-operative Complications
Time Frame
approximately 8 weeks (1 month post-operative)
Title
Change in Quality of Life Survey (WISQOL Short Form) Both Pre-operatively and Post-operatively
Description
WISQOL short form is a 6 item questionnaire which can be scored from 1(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). The raw score range is 5-30. In the study, standardized total score is used. the range of the standardized total score is 0-100.
Time Frame
Baseline(pre-operative) and approximately 8 weeks (1 month post-operative)
Title
Score on the Laser Evaluation Instrument
Description
Physician evaluation of the laser will be done by Laser Evaluation Instrument. It consists of 6 items which can be scored from 0(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). Cumulative score may range from 0-30.
Time Frame
Up to 6 hours
Title
Ablation Speed
Description
The speed to fragment or dust stones
Time Frame
0-6 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants with renal or ureteral urinary stones who require endoscopic treatment in the outpatient operating room Participant's stone size in a single renal unit of 3-10 mm and 11-20 mm. Stone size is defined as the largest diameter of a single stone on pre-operative CT. Participants with multiple stones will be included as long as their largest stone size falls within the above parameters. Exclusion Criteria: Participants under 18 years of age and over 89 years old. Pregnant participants Participants with transplant kidneys Participants with irreversible coagulopathy Participants with known ureteral stricture disease Participants who do not have a pre-operative CT. Non-English speaking, vulnerable participants such as lacking of decision-making capability, prisoner, adult unable to consent, will not be enrolled.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Nakada, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs