Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy Trial: A First Feasibility Trial (MSCT)
Primary Purpose
Colonoscopy, Safety Issues, Adenoma
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Colonoscopy focused on measuring Colonoscopy, motorized spiral endoscopy, adenoma detection rate
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Screening for colorectal neoplasia
- Surveillance after previous polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
- Positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests
- Evaluation of clinical symptoms of non overt gastrointestinal bleeding
- Indeterminate iron-deficiency anaemia
- Chronic diarrhoea
- Indeterminate large-bowel symptoms requiring evaluation for colorectal disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years
- Health status American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) level ≥ 3
- Pregnancy
- Known coagulopathy (INR≥2.0, Platelets < 70/nl)
- Anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants (other than aspirin) within last 7 days
- History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
- Previously identified colorectal polyps/lesions with indication for endoscopic resection
- Any medical contraindication to standard colonoscopy
- Any prior abdominal surgery of the mid or lower gastrointestinal tract (except uncomplicated appendectomy)
- Known or suspected bowel obstruction or stenosis
- Known hemorrhoids 3rd degree
- Suspected perforation of the GI tract
- Inability to tolerate sedation for any reason
- Absence of a signed informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
Arm Description
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy (MSC) with the novel motorized spiral endoscope represents a new technology which offers all of the advantageous options of spiral-assisted endoscopy with a faster and less invasive approach
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Cecal intubation rate
Secondary Outcome Measures
Ileum intubation rate
Procedure time
rate of need for external compression
external compression necessary during intervention, yes/no?
adenoma detection rate
success rate for removal of polyps
amount of propofol needed for sedation
maximum level of sedation during procedure
sedation depth assessed by ESGE-guideline, level 1-3
patient satisfaction score
1-10 visual analog scale
adverse event rate
maximum pain during procedure
1-10 visual analog scale
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03000361
First Posted
December 15, 2016
Last Updated
July 28, 2017
Sponsor
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Collaborators
Olympus
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03000361
Brief Title
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy Trial: A First Feasibility Trial
Acronym
MSCT
Official Title
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy Trial (MSCT): A First Feasibility Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Collaborators
Olympus
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of the Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscope to examine the colon. The study is conceived as proof of concept trial with the primary aim to achieve a cecal intubation rate of at least 90 % according to quality guidelines recommendations. All other clinically relevant quality parameters of standard colonoscopy will be evaluated as secondary aims comparable to our recent trial. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of using a motorized spiral assisted endoscope for examination of the colon with potential advantages for patients in terms of effectiveness and convenience of colonoscopy.
Detailed Description
Colonoscopy has been widely accepted for the diagnosis and treatment of colon diseases. Properly performed, colonoscopy is generally safe, accurate, and well-tolerated. Diagnostic colonoscopy is the preferred method to evaluate the colon in most patients with large-bowel symptoms, iron deficiency anemia, abnormal results on radiographic studies of the colon, positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance, and diagnosis and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, colonoscopy has been introduced for CRC screening in some Western countries e.g. in the United States and Germany. Recent trials showed that screening colonoscopy has a large potential for prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. Diagnostic colonoscopy is usually combined with endoscopic resection of small and medium sized polyps and flat neoplastic lesions. Patients in whom larger lesions are detected at a diagnostic colonoscopy are usually rescheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy in an appropriate setting.
Quality parameters for colonoscopy were recently reported. In terms of intraprocedural indicators a cecal intubation rate of ≥ 90% for all cases of colonoscopy is widely accepted. Even experienced endoscopists classify up to 10% of colonoscopies as difficult and intubation of the cecum may then be impossible. A recent study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeating colonoscopy in 520 patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy. Reasons for failure to complete colonoscopy in referring institutions were "looping/redundant colon" in 53.8% of the cases, "sigmoid fixation/angulation" in 38.8%, "both sigmoid angulation and looping colon" in 5.8% of the cases. Issues with sedation caused failures in 1.5% of the patients. Conventional colonoscopy can be difficult in particular in these anatomical variations because pushing the endoscope tends to form loops with limited or no advancement of the tip of the instrument. Techniques like alternating pushing and pulling the endoscope or external compression of the abdomen are used to overcome these limitations. Loop formation and stretching the colon with the adjacent mesenterium as well as external compression are inconvenient or even painful for the patient. In addition these maneuvers prolong the procedural duration. We recently compared the use of ultrathin colonoscopies with standard colonoscope in a randomized trial in terms of cecal intubation rate, level of sedation, amount of propofol needed for sedation, number of external compressions, pain score patient satisfaction and other parameters. The results indicate that these parameters can be well used for evaluation of a new technique of colonoscopy.
Spiral assisted endoscopy is based on a completely different concept of advancing an endoscope by pleating of bowel on the instrumentation shaft by rotation. This technique has been widely used for antegrade enteroscopy. For this purpose a manually rotatable overtube is used through which a thin flexible enteroscope is inserted. The distal end of the overtube contains a raised spiral thread for pleating the small intestine over the overtube. By manually rotating the spiral element the bowel pleats onto the overtube, allowing the operator to access and visualize the more distal portions of the small intestine. Spiral assisted endoscopy has been also approved and evaluated for retrograde enteroscopy via the anal route. It promises advantage for intubation of the cecum and the terminal ileum by its principle of pleating at least parts of the colon with consecutive shortening and less loop formation. These effects should reduce the need for external compression and they may cause less pain for patients. In addition, the spiral should stabilize the position of the colonoscope which is advantageous for careful examination and targeted interventions. Spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy achieved a success rate of cecal intubation in 92% of 24 patients in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed. However conventional spiral endoscopy is cumbersome to use and requires assistance by a second endoscopist for its appropriate use.
The Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscope represents a new technology which offers all of the advantageous options of spiral-assisted endoscopy with a faster and less invasive approach. The system is similar to other currently marketed endoscopes in that it incorporates a flexible insertion tube, light source, digital imaging, and channels for passing accessories for sample collection or therapeutic interventions. The system is unique in that it incorporates a user-controlled motor contained in the endoscope's handle to rotate a spiral cuff located on the endoscope's insertion tube. Rotation of this cuff, which has soft spiral-shaped "fins", pleats the colon on to the endoscope's insertion tube, thereby allowing rapid and atraumatic access into the colon. The system also includes a display monitor, a motor control unit, device to display measured motor current and signal torque, and a set of foot pedals. It is currently being evaluated in a prospective study in patients with indications for antegrade enteroscopy ("European Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscopy Trial (ENMSET)) in the two centers conducting this study. So far more than 60 patients were successfully examined without major adverse events.
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of the Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscope to examine the colon. The study is conceived as proof of concept trial with the primary aim to achieve a cecal intubation rate of at least 90 % according to quality guidelines recommendations. All other clinically relevant quality parameters of standard colonoscopy will be evaluated as secondary aims comparable to our recent trial. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of using a motorized spiral assisted endoscope for examination of the colon with potential advantages for patients in terms of effectiveness and convenience of colonoscopy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colonoscopy, Safety Issues, Adenoma
Keywords
Colonoscopy, motorized spiral endoscopy, adenoma detection rate
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy (MSC) with the novel motorized spiral endoscope represents a new technology which offers all of the advantageous options of spiral-assisted endoscopy with a faster and less invasive approach
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
standard endoscopic interventions (not experimental)
Intervention Description
For any pathological finding during colonoscopy standard endoscopic techniques, e.g. forceps biopsy, injection, endoscopic mucosal resection, argon plasma coagulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame
3 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ileum intubation rate
Time Frame
3 days
Title
Procedure time
Time Frame
3 days
Title
rate of need for external compression
Description
external compression necessary during intervention, yes/no?
Time Frame
3 days
Title
adenoma detection rate
Time Frame
3 days
Title
success rate for removal of polyps
Time Frame
3 days
Title
amount of propofol needed for sedation
Time Frame
3 days
Title
maximum level of sedation during procedure
Description
sedation depth assessed by ESGE-guideline, level 1-3
Time Frame
3 days
Title
patient satisfaction score
Description
1-10 visual analog scale
Time Frame
3 days
Title
adverse event rate
Time Frame
3 days
Title
maximum pain during procedure
Description
1-10 visual analog scale
Time Frame
3 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Screening for colorectal neoplasia
Surveillance after previous polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
Positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests
Evaluation of clinical symptoms of non overt gastrointestinal bleeding
Indeterminate iron-deficiency anaemia
Chronic diarrhoea
Indeterminate large-bowel symptoms requiring evaluation for colorectal disease
Exclusion Criteria:
Age under 18 years
Health status American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) level ≥ 3
Pregnancy
Known coagulopathy (INR≥2.0, Platelets < 70/nl)
Anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants (other than aspirin) within last 7 days
History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
Previously identified colorectal polyps/lesions with indication for endoscopic resection
Any medical contraindication to standard colonoscopy
Any prior abdominal surgery of the mid or lower gastrointestinal tract (except uncomplicated appendectomy)
Known or suspected bowel obstruction or stenosis
Known hemorrhoids 3rd degree
Suspected perforation of the GI tract
Inability to tolerate sedation for any reason
Absence of a signed informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Horst Neuhaus, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
City
Dusseldorf
ZIP/Postal Code
40217
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29253918
Citation
Beyna T, Schneider M, Pullmann D, Gerges C, Kandler J, Neuhaus H. Motorized spiral colonoscopy: a first single-center feasibility trial. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):518-523. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123577. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy Trial: A First Feasibility Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs