search
Back to results

Movement Visualization in Patients With Hemophilic Arthropathy

Primary Purpose

Hemophilia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Experimental group
Sponsored by
Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemophilia focused on measuring Hemophilic arthropathy, Educative intervention, Pain, Quality of life, Anxiety, Stress

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with hemophilia A and B
  • Medical diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy
  • Chronic joint pain
  • Over 18 years
  • On prophylactic treatment or on demand with FVIII / FIX concentrates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological or cognitive disorders that impede the understanding of the questionnaires
  • Painless patients
  • Amputee, epileptic or seriously impaired vision patients
  • Patients receiving physiotherapy treatment at the time of the study
  • Patients who have not signed the informed consent document.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Experimental group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    All patients included in the experimental group should be on prophylactic treatment with factor 8 (FVIII) or factor 9 (FIX) concentrates. Likewise, the factor should be administered on the same day that they receive each movement display therapy treatment sessions. Each session will last approximately 40 minutes, with 7 physiotherapy sessions a week taking place over a period of 4 weeks.

    Subjects included in the control group will not receive physical therapy through mirror therapy and motion display. They will continue with their usual routine of physical activity and exercise, and with the same pharmacological treatment regimen with factor 8 (FVIII) or factor 9 (FIX) concentrates. At the end of the study period the intervention will be applied under the same conditions as the experimental group, analyzing the overall sample at the end of the study.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change from baseline joint bleeding frequency after treatment and at 6 months
    A self-registration of hemorrhages will be used to assess the frequency of bleeding, and with it the safety of the technique. In the self-registration of bleeding, which will be delivered to each patient at the beginning of the study, the patient must fill in the number of hemarthrosis and the main characteristics of these: date, origin (traumatic or spontaneous) and location (knee, ankle or elbow). The self-registration will be delivered to the evaluator in each of the evaluations of the study (post-treatment and follow-up).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change from baseline joint pain after treatment and at 6 months
    The visual analogue scale will be used to assess the perception of joint pain, assessing with a range of 0 to 10 points (from no pain to the maximum pain suffered or imaginable) ankle joint pain.
    Change from baseline joint pain perception after treatment and at 6 months
    With a pressure algometer (model Wagner, Wagner Instruments, CT, USA). We will measure pain at pressure, both at the articular level and at a distance (in another part of the body) of patients with hemophilic arthropathy. This device measures in Newton / cm2 the pressure at which the subject perceives pain at the pressure. A pressure will be made on the chosen point, which will increase at an approximate speed of 50 kilopascal / s until the patient warns us that the sensation begins to be painful.
    Change from baseline muscle strength after treatment and at 6 months
    With a pressure hand dynamometer the strength of the brachial biceps, quadriceps and sural triceps muscles will be measured. This device measures in Newton the force that the patient performs in the requested muscular action. The higher the value, the greater the muscular strength. We will perform the measurements bilaterally. In measuring the strength of all the muscles evaluated, the average value of the 4 measurements obtained will be used as a measure.
    Change from baseline electrical muscle activity after treatment and at 6 months
    Using surface electromyography we will evaluate the electrical activity of the musculature and its activation level. The placement of the electrodes will be marked on the standing subjects, and will be placed following the European recommendations for the use of the surface electromyography. A bipolar surface electromyography system with circular electrodes of 10 mm in diameter, 20 mm apart, placed longitudinally, in the direction of the fibers of the studied muscle, and with a remote reference electrode will be used. A baseline measurement will be performed before the intervention and another during the movement visualization in order to measure the change. The unit of measure is microvolts (µV). The higher the score, the greater the muscular activation.
    Change from baseline perception of quality of life after treatment and at 6 months
    The perception of quality of life of the patients included in the study will be measured with the Short Form 12 questionnaire (SF-12v2). It consists of 12 items and a range of 0 to 100 points (where a higher score indicates a better perception of quality of life).
    Change from baseline anxiety perception after treatment and at 6 months
    The anxiety perception of the patients included in the study will be measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. The state and anxiety trait of each subject is evaluated with a score of 0 to 30 points for each scale, where a higher score indicates a higher index of anxiety in the trait or state.
    Change from baseline fear of movement after treatment and at 6 months
    We will measure the fear of movement of the patients included in the study with the Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV) questionnaire. It consists of 11 items. Their values have a range of 1 to 4 points, where the higher the score, the greater the fear of movement.
    Change from baseline catastrophism after treatment and at 6 months
    We will measure the catastrophism of the patients included in the study with the Pain catastrophizing scale questionnaire. The scale, composed of 13 items, is valued with a range of 0 to 4 points (lower score indicates lower catastrophism).
    Change from baseline anxiety perceived after treatment and at 6 months
    The anxiety perceived by the patients included in the study at the time of the intervention will be measured with the Subjective Units of Discomfort Scales questionnaire. This scale, graduated from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the worst anxiety or discomfort lived or imaginable by the subject, consists of anchored scale a 100mm line will be used where the corresponding value will be marked.
    Change from baseline endogenous pain inhibitory system after treatment and at 6 months
    The evaluation of the endogenous pain inhibitory system, by facilitating or inhibiting the responses to a conditioned stimulus, will be measured with the Conditioned Pain Modulation Index (CPMI). To perform the evaluation of the diffuse descending inhibitor system, tonic pain will occur by pressing on a non-painful area. First, we will measure the threshold of pain at pressure at the base of the dorsal part of the distal phalanx of the thumb, and then we will cause the conditioned stimulus using the ischemia test on the contralateral upper limb. In this case, for the ischemia test, a sphygmomanometer will be used that will be placed in the arm about 14 cm from the ulnar fossa. The sphygmomanometer will inflate to 240 mmHg and the arm will be placed horizontally.
    Change from baseline joint status after treatment and at 6 months
    The joint status of patients with hemophilic arthropathy will be measured with the Hemophilia Joint Health Score. This specific scale for use in patients with hemophilia evaluates 8 items: inflammation and duration, pain, atrophy and muscle strength, crepitations, and loss of flexion and extension. It has a score of 0 (no joint damage) to 20 points (maximum joint damage) per joint (elbows, knees and ankles). To the 120 points a gait rating is added (range 0-4 points), the maximum rating of this scale being 124 points.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 19, 2020
    Last Updated
    January 23, 2020
    Sponsor
    Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04237766
    Brief Title
    Movement Visualization in Patients With Hemophilic Arthropathy
    Official Title
    Safety and Effectiveness of a Physiotherapy Intervention Through Movement Visualization in the Approach of Pain in Patients With Hemophilic Arthropathy. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Study.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    May 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    May 1, 2021 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Background. The recurrence of hemarthrosis in patients with hemophilia favors the development of an intra-articular, degenerative and progressive lesion (hemophilic arthropathy). Pain is one of the main clinical manifestations of this arthropathy. Objective. Assess the safety and efficacy of an intervention in pain through visualization of the movement using a mobile application of augmented reality and immersive 360º video, regarding the frequency of bleeding and the improvement of pain perception and quality of life, joint state , strength and functionality in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. Study design. Randomized, multicenter, simple blind clinical study. Method. 140 patients with hemophilia A and B will be recruited in this study. Patients will be recruited in 5 regions of Spain. The 8 dependent variables will be: frequency of bleeding (self-registration), pain (measured with the visual analogue scale and pressure algometer, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale), quality of life (SF-12 scale), anxiety (questionnaire Anxiety State-Trait-STAI), joint state (Hemophilia Joint Health Score scale), muscular strength (dynamometer) and functionality (6-Minutes Walking test, Quick Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Three evaluations will be carried out: pre-treatment, post-treatment and after a 6-month follow-up period. Expected results. Observe the effectiveness of movement visualization in the characteristics of pain, and its implication in functionality, joint state, muscular strength and the perception of quality of life in patients with hemophilic arthropathy.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hemophilia
    Keywords
    Hemophilic arthropathy, Educative intervention, Pain, Quality of life, Anxiety, Stress

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    140 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Experimental group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    All patients included in the experimental group should be on prophylactic treatment with factor 8 (FVIII) or factor 9 (FIX) concentrates. Likewise, the factor should be administered on the same day that they receive each movement display therapy treatment sessions. Each session will last approximately 40 minutes, with 7 physiotherapy sessions a week taking place over a period of 4 weeks.
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Subjects included in the control group will not receive physical therapy through mirror therapy and motion display. They will continue with their usual routine of physical activity and exercise, and with the same pharmacological treatment regimen with factor 8 (FVIII) or factor 9 (FIX) concentrates. At the end of the study period the intervention will be applied under the same conditions as the experimental group, analyzing the overall sample at the end of the study.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Experimental group
    Intervention Description
    The intervention will consist of the visualization of the movement through the Mirror Therapy application, or through the reproduction of an immersive 360º video emitted on a mobile device and visualized with virtual reality glasses. The movements observed with both technologies will be the same. The knee extension and dorsal ankle flexion movements (quadriceps and triceps sural), together with the elbow flexion (elbow flexors) will be the movements to be performed, based on their functional need (ambulation and feeding, respectively).
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change from baseline joint bleeding frequency after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    A self-registration of hemorrhages will be used to assess the frequency of bleeding, and with it the safety of the technique. In the self-registration of bleeding, which will be delivered to each patient at the beginning of the study, the patient must fill in the number of hemarthrosis and the main characteristics of these: date, origin (traumatic or spontaneous) and location (knee, ankle or elbow). The self-registration will be delivered to the evaluator in each of the evaluations of the study (post-treatment and follow-up).
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change from baseline joint pain after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The visual analogue scale will be used to assess the perception of joint pain, assessing with a range of 0 to 10 points (from no pain to the maximum pain suffered or imaginable) ankle joint pain.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline joint pain perception after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    With a pressure algometer (model Wagner, Wagner Instruments, CT, USA). We will measure pain at pressure, both at the articular level and at a distance (in another part of the body) of patients with hemophilic arthropathy. This device measures in Newton / cm2 the pressure at which the subject perceives pain at the pressure. A pressure will be made on the chosen point, which will increase at an approximate speed of 50 kilopascal / s until the patient warns us that the sensation begins to be painful.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline muscle strength after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    With a pressure hand dynamometer the strength of the brachial biceps, quadriceps and sural triceps muscles will be measured. This device measures in Newton the force that the patient performs in the requested muscular action. The higher the value, the greater the muscular strength. We will perform the measurements bilaterally. In measuring the strength of all the muscles evaluated, the average value of the 4 measurements obtained will be used as a measure.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline electrical muscle activity after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    Using surface electromyography we will evaluate the electrical activity of the musculature and its activation level. The placement of the electrodes will be marked on the standing subjects, and will be placed following the European recommendations for the use of the surface electromyography. A bipolar surface electromyography system with circular electrodes of 10 mm in diameter, 20 mm apart, placed longitudinally, in the direction of the fibers of the studied muscle, and with a remote reference electrode will be used. A baseline measurement will be performed before the intervention and another during the movement visualization in order to measure the change. The unit of measure is microvolts (µV). The higher the score, the greater the muscular activation.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline perception of quality of life after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The perception of quality of life of the patients included in the study will be measured with the Short Form 12 questionnaire (SF-12v2). It consists of 12 items and a range of 0 to 100 points (where a higher score indicates a better perception of quality of life).
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline anxiety perception after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The anxiety perception of the patients included in the study will be measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. The state and anxiety trait of each subject is evaluated with a score of 0 to 30 points for each scale, where a higher score indicates a higher index of anxiety in the trait or state.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline fear of movement after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    We will measure the fear of movement of the patients included in the study with the Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV) questionnaire. It consists of 11 items. Their values have a range of 1 to 4 points, where the higher the score, the greater the fear of movement.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline catastrophism after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    We will measure the catastrophism of the patients included in the study with the Pain catastrophizing scale questionnaire. The scale, composed of 13 items, is valued with a range of 0 to 4 points (lower score indicates lower catastrophism).
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline anxiety perceived after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The anxiety perceived by the patients included in the study at the time of the intervention will be measured with the Subjective Units of Discomfort Scales questionnaire. This scale, graduated from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the worst anxiety or discomfort lived or imaginable by the subject, consists of anchored scale a 100mm line will be used where the corresponding value will be marked.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline endogenous pain inhibitory system after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The evaluation of the endogenous pain inhibitory system, by facilitating or inhibiting the responses to a conditioned stimulus, will be measured with the Conditioned Pain Modulation Index (CPMI). To perform the evaluation of the diffuse descending inhibitor system, tonic pain will occur by pressing on a non-painful area. First, we will measure the threshold of pain at pressure at the base of the dorsal part of the distal phalanx of the thumb, and then we will cause the conditioned stimulus using the ischemia test on the contralateral upper limb. In this case, for the ischemia test, a sphygmomanometer will be used that will be placed in the arm about 14 cm from the ulnar fossa. The sphygmomanometer will inflate to 240 mmHg and the arm will be placed horizontally.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit
    Title
    Change from baseline joint status after treatment and at 6 months
    Description
    The joint status of patients with hemophilic arthropathy will be measured with the Hemophilia Joint Health Score. This specific scale for use in patients with hemophilia evaluates 8 items: inflammation and duration, pain, atrophy and muscle strength, crepitations, and loss of flexion and extension. It has a score of 0 (no joint damage) to 20 points (maximum joint damage) per joint (elbows, knees and ankles). To the 120 points a gait rating is added (range 0-4 points), the maximum rating of this scale being 124 points.
    Time Frame
    Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after six months follow-up visit

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Male
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients diagnosed with hemophilia A and B Medical diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy Chronic joint pain Over 18 years On prophylactic treatment or on demand with FVIII / FIX concentrates Exclusion Criteria: Patients with neurological or cognitive disorders that impede the understanding of the questionnaires Painless patients Amputee, epileptic or seriously impaired vision patients Patients receiving physiotherapy treatment at the time of the study Patients who have not signed the informed consent document.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Cuesta-Barriuso
    Phone
    +34 913146508
    Email
    ruben.cuestab@gmail.com

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Movement Visualization in Patients With Hemophilic Arthropathy

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs