search
Back to results

MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS (REST)

Primary Purpose

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
Sponsored by
University Medical Center Groningen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sleep Apnea, Obstructive focused on measuring cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, treatment, CPAP, MRA, compliance

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have been subjected to polysomnography and are diagnosed as having moderate (AHI 15-30) OSAS;
  • Aged ≥ 18 years;

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical and psychological criteria:

  • Patients previously treated for OSAS (e.g. CPAP, MRA);
  • Morphologic abnormalities of the upper airway (e.g., a compromised nasal passage, enlarged tonsils or adenoids, or upper airway soft-tissue or craniofacial abnormality);
  • Reported or documented unstable endocrine dysfunction (hypothyroidism, acromegaly, or pituitary adenoma); Reported or documented severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity
  • Clinically concurrent cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, heart failure,cardiac arrhythmias)
  • CVA within 6 months prior to randomisation
  • Daytime respiratory insufficiency
  • Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (GOLD 3 or 4; FEV1 / FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 50%);
  • Other diseases that may impact the evaluation of the results of the study according to the investigator's judgement.
  • Reported or documented psychological condition precluding informed consent (e.g., mental retardation, depression or schizophrenia);

Whether the patient has unstable endocrine dysfunction, severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity or a psychological condition precluding informed consent, will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical record.

Dental exclusion criteria:

  • Extensive periodontal disease or tooth decay;
  • Active temporomandibular joint disease (including severe bruxism);
  • Restrictions in mouth opening (< 25mm) or advancement of the mandible <5mm);
  • Partial or complete edentulism (less than eight teeth in upper or lower jaw).

Sites / Locations

  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

MRA therapy

CPAP therapy

Arm Description

During 12 months patients will be treated with a bibloc MRA (SomnoDent® MAS, SomnoMed Australia/Europe AG). The MRA will be customized by certified dentists or dental-specialists experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine.

During 12 months patients will be treated with Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).Treatment with CPAP prevents upper airway collapse by pneumatically "splinting" the upper airway during sleep.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction and quality adjusted life years
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction measured during polysomnography and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in quality of life
EQ5D, SF-36, FOSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Cardiovascular risk
smoking status, change from baseline ambulant blood pressure measurements after 12 months, blood samples, urine sample, accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in skin tissue
Change in polysomnographic outcomes
total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal oxyhemoglobin saturation, arousals, sleep stages
Change in activities of daily living
Total distance on 6 minutes walking test Number of steps measured with pedometer
Compliance
objective compliance by reading out devices subjective compliance by questionnaire
Side effects
self-reported side effects from device dental and maxillofacial side-effects from both MRA and CPAP

Full Information

First Posted
April 25, 2012
Last Updated
May 14, 2018
Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
VitalAire Nederland BV, SomnoMed Goedegebuure
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01588275
Brief Title
MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS
Acronym
REST
Official Title
Cost-effectiveness of obstRuctivE Sleep Apnea Therapy (REST Study): Comparison of MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 24, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
VitalAire Nederland BV, SomnoMed Goedegebuure

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) versus Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in patients with moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).
Detailed Description
Study design: In a randomized parallel controlled study 86 patients will be randomly assigned to either MRA therapy or CPAP therapy. Group A receives MRA. Group B receives CPAP. The total duration of the study is 12 months. Measurements will be done at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months. Intervention: Group A will be treated with a bibloc MRA (Somnodent). The mandible will be set at 70% of the patient's maximum advancement and will be adjusted to the convenience of the patient. Titration will be continued until symptoms abate or until further advancement causes discomfort. Group B will be treated with CPAP. Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately. Patients are fitted with a comfortable CPAP mask before titration of the CPAP-pressure. For CPAP-titration, patients are instructed to adopt their own typical sleeping habits.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Keywords
cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, treatment, CPAP, MRA, compliance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
86 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MRA therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
During 12 months patients will be treated with a bibloc MRA (SomnoDent® MAS, SomnoMed Australia/Europe AG). The MRA will be customized by certified dentists or dental-specialists experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine.
Arm Title
CPAP therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
During 12 months patients will be treated with Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).Treatment with CPAP prevents upper airway collapse by pneumatically "splinting" the upper airway during sleep.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)
Other Intervention Name(s)
bibloc SomnoDent
Intervention Description
bibloc MRA type SomnoDent starting at 70% protrusion of the mandibula
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
Intervention Description
Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction and quality adjusted life years
Description
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction measured during polysomnography and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in quality of life
Description
EQ5D, SF-36, FOSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Change in Cardiovascular risk
Description
smoking status, change from baseline ambulant blood pressure measurements after 12 months, blood samples, urine sample, accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in skin tissue
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
Change in polysomnographic outcomes
Description
total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal oxyhemoglobin saturation, arousals, sleep stages
Time Frame
3 and 12 months
Title
Change in activities of daily living
Description
Total distance on 6 minutes walking test Number of steps measured with pedometer
Time Frame
3 and 12 months
Title
Compliance
Description
objective compliance by reading out devices subjective compliance by questionnaire
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months
Title
Side effects
Description
self-reported side effects from device dental and maxillofacial side-effects from both MRA and CPAP
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals who have been subjected to polysomnography and are diagnosed as having moderate (AHI 15-30) OSAS; Aged ≥ 18 years; Exclusion Criteria: Medical and psychological criteria: Patients previously treated for OSAS (e.g. CPAP, MRA); Morphologic abnormalities of the upper airway (e.g., a compromised nasal passage, enlarged tonsils or adenoids, or upper airway soft-tissue or craniofacial abnormality); Reported or documented unstable endocrine dysfunction (hypothyroidism, acromegaly, or pituitary adenoma); Reported or documented severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity Clinically concurrent cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, heart failure,cardiac arrhythmias) CVA within 6 months prior to randomisation Daytime respiratory insufficiency Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (GOLD 3 or 4; FEV1 / FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 50%); Other diseases that may impact the evaluation of the results of the study according to the investigator's judgement. Reported or documented psychological condition precluding informed consent (e.g., mental retardation, depression or schizophrenia); Whether the patient has unstable endocrine dysfunction, severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity or a psychological condition precluding informed consent, will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical record. Dental exclusion criteria: Extensive periodontal disease or tooth decay; Active temporomandibular joint disease (including severe bruxism); Restrictions in mouth opening (< 25mm) or advancement of the mandible <5mm); Partial or complete edentulism (less than eight teeth in upper or lower jaw).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Grietje E de Vries, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter J Wijkstra, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
City
Leeuwarden
State/Province
Fryslan
ZIP/Postal Code
8901 BR
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700 RB
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700 RM
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35088708
Citation
Uniken Venema JAM, Knol-de Vries GE, van Goor H, Westra J, Hoekema A, Wijkstra PJ. Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of a mandibular advancement device and continuous positive airway pressure in moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Jun 1;18(6):1547-1555. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9908.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31739856
Citation
de Vries GE, Hoekema A, Claessen JQPJ, Stellingsma C, Stegenga B, Kerstjens HAM, Wijkstra PJ. Long-Term Objective Adherence to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Nov 15;15(11):1655-1663. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8034.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31596213
Citation
de Vries GE, Hoekema A, Vermeulen KM, Claessen JQPJ, Jacobs W, van der Maten J, van der Hoeven JH, Stegenga B, Kerstjens HAM, Wijkstra PJ. Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mandibular Advancement Device Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Oct 15;15(10):1477-1485. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7980.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs