search
Back to results

MRI in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
biologic sample preservation procedure
laboratory biomarker analysis
study of socioeconomic and demographic variables
diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
quality-of-life assessment
transperineal prostate biopsy
transrectal prostate biopsy
ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
Sponsored by
University College London Hospitals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring stage I prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Men at risk of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy
  • Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ confined)
  • Serum PSA ≤ 15 ng/mL within the past 3 months

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Fit for general/spinal anesthesia
  • Fit to undergo all protocol procedures including a transrectal ultrasound
  • No evidence of a urinary tract infection or history of acute prostatitis within the past 3 months
  • No contraindication to MRI (e.g., claustrophobia, pacemaker, or estimated GFR ≤ 50)
  • No other medical condition precluding procedures described in the protocol

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • No prior prostate biopsy, prostate surgery, or treatment for prostate cancer (interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia/bladder outflow obstruction are acceptable)
  • No prior hip replacement surgery

Sites / Locations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Safety of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI)
    Recruitment
    Proportion of men who could safely avoid biopsy as determined by specificity and negative predictive values
    Proportion of men correctly identified by MP-MRI to have clinically significant prostate cancer as determined by sensitivity and positive predictive values

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Proportion of men who could safely avoid biopsy
    Proportion of men testing positive on MP-MRI
    Performance characteristics of TRUS versus template prostate mapping (TPM)
    Evaluation of the optimal combination of MP-MRI functional parameters
    Intra-observer variability in the reporting of MP-MRI
    Evaluation of socio-demographic, clinical, imaging and radiological variables in relation to the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D questionnaire
    Resource use and costs for further economic evaluation
    Translational research

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 8, 2011
    Last Updated
    August 6, 2013
    Sponsor
    University College London Hospitals
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01292291
    Brief Title
    MRI in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer
    Official Title
    PROMIS - Prostate MRI Imaging Study - Evaluation of Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Characterization of Prostate Cancer
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2011
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    April 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 2013 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    University College London Hospitals

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may help find prostate cancer and learn the extent of disease. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying the safety of MRI and to see how well it works in diagnosing prostate cancer.
    Detailed Description
    OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) to identify men who can safely avoid unnecessary biopsy. To assess the ability of the MP-MRI-based diagnostic pathway to improve the rate of detection of clinically significant cancer as compared to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of an MP-MRI based diagnostic pathway. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted MRI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI) followed by template prostate mapping and transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Some patients may undergo blood, urine, and tissue sample collection periodically for biomarker studies. Samples are banked for future research analysis. Patients complete a quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline, during, and after completion of study. An economic analysis will be performed for cost-effectiveness. After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up periodically.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Prostate Cancer
    Keywords
    stage I prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Enrollment
    714 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    biologic sample preservation procedure
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    laboratory biomarker analysis
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    study of socioeconomic and demographic variables
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    quality-of-life assessment
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    transperineal prostate biopsy
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    transrectal prostate biopsy
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Safety of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI)
    Title
    Recruitment
    Title
    Proportion of men who could safely avoid biopsy as determined by specificity and negative predictive values
    Title
    Proportion of men correctly identified by MP-MRI to have clinically significant prostate cancer as determined by sensitivity and positive predictive values
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Proportion of men who could safely avoid biopsy
    Title
    Proportion of men testing positive on MP-MRI
    Title
    Performance characteristics of TRUS versus template prostate mapping (TPM)
    Title
    Evaluation of the optimal combination of MP-MRI functional parameters
    Title
    Intra-observer variability in the reporting of MP-MRI
    Title
    Evaluation of socio-demographic, clinical, imaging and radiological variables in relation to the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Title
    Health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D questionnaire
    Title
    Resource use and costs for further economic evaluation
    Title
    Translational research

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Men at risk of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ confined) Serum PSA ≤ 15 ng/mL within the past 3 months PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Fit for general/spinal anesthesia Fit to undergo all protocol procedures including a transrectal ultrasound No evidence of a urinary tract infection or history of acute prostatitis within the past 3 months No contraindication to MRI (e.g., claustrophobia, pacemaker, or estimated GFR ≤ 50) No other medical condition precluding procedures described in the protocol PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior prostate biopsy, prostate surgery, or treatment for prostate cancer (interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia/bladder outflow obstruction are acceptable) No prior hip replacement surgery
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mark Emberton, MD, FRCS, MBBS
    Organizational Affiliation
    University College London Hospitals
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    30040065
    Citation
    Brown LC, Ahmed HU, Faria R, El-Shater Bosaily A, Gabe R, Kaplan RS, Parmar M, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Bott S, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Ghei M, Henderson A, Persad R, Rosario DJ, Shergill I, Winkler M, Soares M, Spackman E, Sculpher M, Emberton M. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390.
    Results Reference
    derived
    PubMed Identifier
    28110982
    Citation
    Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    MRI in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs