search
Back to results

MsFLASH-01: Escitalopram for Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women

Primary Purpose

Hot Flashes, Menopause, Vasomotor Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Escitalopram
Placebo
Sponsored by
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hot Flashes focused on measuring Hot flashes, Menopause, Vasomotor symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 62 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria, Common to all MsFLASH Studies:

  • Females aged 40-62 years.
  • Menopausal, including:

    • Women with a uterus who have skipped 2 or more menstrual cycles with an amenorrhea interval ≥60 days in the past 12 months.
    • Women who have had a bi-lateral oophorectomy (surgical removal of both ovaries).
    • Women without a uterus who still have ovaries, under certain conditions determined during screening.
  • Having bothersome hot flashes.
  • In general good health as determined by medical history and physical measures.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria, Common to all MsFLASH Studies:

  • Use of hormone therapy or hormonal contraceptives during the 2 months before enrollment and for the duration of the study. Certain exceptions apply, determined during screening.
  • Use of any other therapy that is taken specifically for hot flashes, including prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal therapies in the past month and duration of the study.
  • Any current severe or unstable medical illness.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (>160/100) or resting heart rate >110.
  • History of endometrial or ovarian cancer; MI, angina, or cerebrovascular events.
  • Pregnancy, intending pregnancy, breast feeding.
  • Current participation in another drug trial or intervention study.
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete the study procedures.
  • Certain other conditions, determined during screening.

Exclusion Criteria, Specific to MsFLASH-01:

  • Use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) or aromatase inhibitors during the two months before enrollment.
  • Use of gabapentin, pregabalin, triptans, warfarin (Coumadin®), or St. John's Wort.
  • Known hypersensitivity to escitalopram (Lexapro®) or citalopram (Celexa®).
  • Use of antidepressants during the past 30 days before starting Study 01, including SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and anxiolytics.
  • Not using a medically approved method of birth control, if sexually active and not 12 or more months since last menstrual period.
  • History of liver, gall bladder, renal disease, or uncontrolled seizure disorder.
  • Certain other conditions, determined during screening.

Sites / Locations

  • Northern California Kaiser, Division of Research
  • Indiana University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Escitalopram

Placebo

Arm Description

Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)

Inactive pill

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Per Day Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Baseline hot flash frequency per day was calculated as the daily mean of the daily totals reported during the first two screening weeks.
Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 4 visit.
Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 8. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 8 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 8 visit.
Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Daily hot flash severity scores were calculated by by selecting the highest severity rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash severity from baseline to week 4 was calculated as the mean difference in hot flash severity ratings between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean from the first two weeks of hot flash severity ratings. Week 4 severity ratings were calculated as the daily mean from the ratings for the week prior to the week 4 visit. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash severity between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings for the first two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Daily Hot Flash Bother, Recorded on Daily Diaries
Daily Hot flash bother scores were calculated by selecting the highest bother rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 4 as Recorded on Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash bother was calculated as the mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the highest of the daily bother ratings during the week prior to the week 4 visit. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Secondary Outcome: Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 8 as Recorded on Daily Diaries
Change in daily hot flash bother between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline daily bother was the mean of the highest daily ratings for two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 bother was daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).

Full Information

First Posted
May 5, 2009
Last Updated
March 5, 2013
Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00894543
Brief Title
MsFLASH-01: Escitalopram for Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women
Official Title
Menopause Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers for Symptoms and Health: Efficacy of a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) for Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether a medication reduces the number, severity and bothersomeness of menopausal hot flashes. Escitalopram (also called Lexapro®) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). It is sold by prescription for depression and general anxiety disorder. An SSRI increases serotonin, a brain substance that is believed to influence mood. Serotonin may also affect brain levels of estradiol, a hormone related to hot flashes. This research study will test whether escitalopram reduces menopausal hot flashes.
Detailed Description
The MsFLASH-01 study, Efficacy of a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) for Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm clinical trial. The design includes: 3 weeks of daily recording of hot flashes prior to drug treatment; 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram or placebo with dose escalation at 4 weeks among non-responders; 1 week of drug taper for those on higher dose, followed by 2 weeks with no treatment; and a telephone follow-up post-treatment. This study is one of five clinical trials to be conducted as part of the Menopause Strategies - Finding Lasting Answers for Symptoms and Health (MsFLASH) study, a network of investigators and clinical trials designed to find new ways to alleviate the most common, bothersome symptoms of the menopausal transition.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hot Flashes, Menopause, Vasomotor Symptoms
Keywords
Hot flashes, Menopause, Vasomotor symptoms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
205 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Escitalopram
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Inactive pill
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Escitalopram
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lexapro®.
Intervention Description
10 mg (1 pill) escitalopram daily for the first four weeks. Dose increased to 20 mg (2 pills) escitalopram daily if relief from hot flashes has not occurred during the first four weeks of the daily 10 mg dose.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Inactive pill (1 pill or 2 pills) daily for the 8-11 weeks of the trial.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Per Day Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Baseline hot flash frequency per day was calculated as the daily mean of the daily totals reported during the first two screening weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 4 visit.
Time Frame
week 4 minus baseline
Title
Change in Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash frequency was calculated as the daily mean difference between baseline and week 8. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the frequencies for the first two screening weeks. Week 8 was calculated as the daily mean of the daily frequencies during the week prior to the week 8 visit.
Time Frame
week 8 minus baseline
Title
Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Daily hot flash severity scores were calculated by by selecting the highest severity rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 4 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash severity from baseline to week 4 was calculated as the mean difference in hot flash severity ratings between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean from the first two weeks of hot flash severity ratings. Week 4 severity ratings were calculated as the daily mean from the ratings for the week prior to the week 4 visit. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
week 4 minus baseline
Title
Change in Daily Severity of Hot Flashes Between Baseline and Week 8 as Assessed by Prospective Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash severity between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings for the first two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 severity ratings were calculated as daily mean ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash severity was rated as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
week 8 minus baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Daily Hot Flash Bother, Recorded on Daily Diaries
Description
Daily Hot flash bother scores were calculated by selecting the highest bother rating for hot flashes or night sweats for each woman in each 24-hour day. The score was set to missing on on any day data were missing or or hot flashes equaled 0. The daily mean of daily ratings for the first 2 screening weeks is reported. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 4 as Recorded on Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash bother was calculated as the mean difference between baseline and week 4. Baseline was calculated as the daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the first two screening weeks. Week 4 was calculated as the daily mean of the highest of the daily bother ratings during the week prior to the week 4 visit. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), or 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
week 4 minus baseline
Title
Secondary Outcome: Change in Daily Hot Flash Bother Between Baseline and Week 8 as Recorded on Daily Diaries
Description
Change in daily hot flash bother between baseline & week 8 was calculated as mean difference. Baseline daily bother was the mean of the highest daily ratings for two screening weeks pre-baseline. Week 8 bother was daily mean of the highest daily bother ratings during the week before week 8. Modified intention to treat analysis included all randomized participants who provided diary data, which were analyzed regardless of adherence to treatment assignment. Hot flash bother was rated as 1 (none), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), 4 (a lot) as adopted from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN).
Time Frame
week 8 minus baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
62 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria, Common to all MsFLASH Studies: Females aged 40-62 years. Menopausal, including: Women with a uterus who have skipped 2 or more menstrual cycles with an amenorrhea interval ≥60 days in the past 12 months. Women who have had a bi-lateral oophorectomy (surgical removal of both ovaries). Women without a uterus who still have ovaries, under certain conditions determined during screening. Having bothersome hot flashes. In general good health as determined by medical history and physical measures. Signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria, Common to all MsFLASH Studies: Use of hormone therapy or hormonal contraceptives during the 2 months before enrollment and for the duration of the study. Certain exceptions apply, determined during screening. Use of any other therapy that is taken specifically for hot flashes, including prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal therapies in the past month and duration of the study. Any current severe or unstable medical illness. Uncontrolled hypertension (>160/100) or resting heart rate >110. History of endometrial or ovarian cancer; MI, angina, or cerebrovascular events. Pregnancy, intending pregnancy, breast feeding. Current participation in another drug trial or intervention study. Inability or unwillingness to complete the study procedures. Certain other conditions, determined during screening. Exclusion Criteria, Specific to MsFLASH-01: Use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) or aromatase inhibitors during the two months before enrollment. Use of gabapentin, pregabalin, triptans, warfarin (Coumadin®), or St. John's Wort. Known hypersensitivity to escitalopram (Lexapro®) or citalopram (Celexa®). Use of antidepressants during the past 30 days before starting Study 01, including SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and anxiolytics. Not using a medically approved method of birth control, if sexually active and not 12 or more months since last menstrual period. History of liver, gall bladder, renal disease, or uncontrolled seizure disorder. Certain other conditions, determined during screening.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ellen W Freeman, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrea Z LaCroix, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Garnet L Anderson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kris Ensrud, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Northern California Kaiser, Division of Research
City
Oakland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Chestnut Hill
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02467
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21245182
Citation
Freeman EW, Guthrie KA, Caan B, Sternfeld B, Cohen LS, Joffe H, Carpenter JS, Anderson GL, Larson JC, Ensrud KE, Reed SD, Newton KM, Sherman S, Sammel MD, LaCroix AZ. Efficacy of escitalopram for hot flashes in healthy menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2016.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22480818
Citation
Carpenter JS, Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Freeman EW, Joffe H, Reed SD, Ensrud KE, LaCroix AZ. Effect of escitalopram on hot flash interference: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1399-404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22433978
Citation
Ensrud KE, Joffe H, Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Reed SD, Newton KM, Sternfeld B, Lacroix AZ, Landis CA, Woods NF, Freeman EW. Effect of escitalopram on insomnia symptoms and subjective sleep quality in healthy perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2012 Aug;19(8):848-55. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3182476099.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22353950
Citation
Reed SD, Guthrie KA, Joffe H, Shifren JL, Seguin RA, Freeman EW. Sexual function in nondepressed women using escitalopram for vasomotor symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;119(3):527-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182475fa4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23031421
Citation
LaCroix AZ, Freeman EW, Larson J, Carpenter JS, Joffe H, Reed SD, Newton KM, Seguin RA, Sternfeld B, Cohen L, Ensrud KE. Effects of escitalopram on menopause-specific quality of life and pain in healthy menopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. 2012 Dec;73(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23435022
Citation
Joffe H, Guthrie KA, Larson J, Cohen LS, Carpenter JS, Lacroix AZ, Freeman EW. Relapse of vasomotor symptoms after discontinuation of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram: results from the menopause strategies: finding lasting answers for symptoms and health research network. Menopause. 2013 Mar;20(3):261-8. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31826d3108.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32701665
Citation
Diem SJ, LaCroix AZ, Reed SD, Larson JC, Newton KM, Ensrud KE, Woods NF, Guthrie KA. Effects of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions on menopause-related quality of life: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from four MsFLASH trials. Menopause. 2020 Oct;27(10):1126-1136. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001597.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29165623
Citation
Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Ensrud KE, Anderson GL, Carpenter JS, Freeman EW, Joffe H, LaCroix AZ, Manson JE, Morin CM, Newton KM, Otte J, Reed SD, McCurry SM. Effects of Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Insomnia Symptoms and Self-reported Sleep Quality in Women With Hot Flashes: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Four MsFLASH Trials. Sleep. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):zsx190. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx190.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26241433
Citation
Guthrie KA, LaCroix AZ, Ensrud KE, Joffe H, Newton KM, Reed SD, Caan B, Carpenter JS, Cohen LS, Freeman EW, Larson JC, Manson JE, Rexrode K, Skaar TC, Sternfeld B, Anderson GL. Pooled Analysis of Six Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Vasomotor Symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):413-422. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000927.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23760428
Citation
Newton KM, Carpenter JS, Guthrie KA, Anderson GL, Caan B, Cohen LS, Ensrud KE, Freeman EW, Joffe H, Sternfeld B, Reed SD, Sherman S, Sammel MD, Kroenke K, Larson JC, Lacroix AZ. Methods for the design of vasomotor symptom trials: the menopausal strategies: finding lasting answers to symptoms and health network. Menopause. 2014 Jan;21(1):45-58. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31829337a4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

MsFLASH-01: Escitalopram for Menopausal Symptoms in Midlife Women

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs