search
Back to results

Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management

Primary Purpose

Tinnitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Progressive Tinnitus Management
Wait List Control
Sponsored by
US Department of Veterans Affairs
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus focused on measuring Tinnitus, Counseling, Education, Rehabilitation of hearing impaired, Triage, Evaluation studies, Quality of health care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • are eligible for audiology services at their respective VAMC;
  • report the chronic presence of tinnitus (i.e., they have tinnitus that they can usually hear when they listen for it in a quiet room);
  • report that their tinnitus is at least a "small" problem; and
  • are willing to give verbal consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • are not Veterans;
  • have received previous tinnitus services at their VAMC;
  • report that their tinnitus is "no problem";
  • are unable (for any reason) to fulfill all of the requirements of the study.

Sites / Locations

  • VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
  • VA Medical Center, Memphis

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Description

Progressive Tinnitus Management

Wait List Control

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Tinnitus Functional Index Change Score
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a tinnitus outcome measure that has been validated for "responsiveness" (Meikle et al., 2012). Prior to the TFI, no tinnitus questionnaire had been specifically designed and tested to maximize responsiveness to treatment-related change. Completion of the 25-item TFI results in an index score that can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater problems associated with tinnitus. The following is a general guide to facilitate interpretation of TFI scores: <25 = relatively mild tinnitus (little or no need for intervention) 25-50 = significant problems with tinnitus (possible need for intervention) •>50 = tinnitus severe enough to qualify for more aggressive intervention Data from the TFI development study (Meikle et al., 2012) suggest that a reduction in the TFI score of at least 13 points would indicate a clinical improvement that a patient would consider important or meaningful.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
November 16, 2009
Last Updated
December 11, 2014
Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01015781
Brief Title
Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management
Official Title
Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This multi-site study evaluated the implementation of Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM), which combines both Audiology and Psychology approaches to Tinnitus Management. Those Veterans who require intervention for tinnitus have different levels of need, and this progressive approach gives them the appropriate level of intervention.
Detailed Description
Objectives. We completed a single-site pilot project to develop and evaluate Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM). PTM takes into account the fact that most Veterans who complain of tinnitus do not require extensive intervention. The method thus is "progressive" in that a hierarchical approach is used to provide clinical services only to the degree needed by individual patients. Preliminary analyses of our pilot data provide evidence that PTM is an effective and efficient means of providing tinnitus management services to Veterans. Importantly, The Veterans Affairs (VA) Audiology and Speech Pathology Program Office has identified PTM as a standardized method of tinnitus management for use at all VA medical centers. It is essential to more definitively evaluate PTM for routine application at VA medical centers. Accordingly, the specific aim of this study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial at multiple VA medical centers to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical utility of PTM as compared to Wait List Control. Plan. The 3-year study was based at the VA National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), and PTM was implemented and evaluated in a randomized clinical trial at the Memphis VA Medical Center and at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System (West Haven). During months 0-6: (a) All clinical materials for conducting PTM were modified (especially with the addition of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy - CBT); (b) training materials were developed (the web-based PTM training program for VA audiologists was updated; PTM training will be developed for VA psychologists); (c) by random selection, five audiologists (two in Memphis, three in West Haven) were identified to conduct PTM and five (two in Memphis, three in West Haven) were identified to conduct usual care; (d) the five PTM audiologists (the West Haven study psychologist developed the training). By month 7, the randomized clinical trial was implemented at the two VA sites and continued through year 3. Methods. Prior to conducting the clinical trial, PTM was modified to incorporate critical components of CBT at all levels of intervention so as to address the psychological effects of tinnitus. Qualifying Veteran subjects (n=150 at each site) were randomized into either PTM or Wait List Control. Self-perceived tinnitus handicap was evaluated pre- and post-intervention for each subject using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. The five audiologists and two psychologists who participate in this study were interviewed to determine their level of satisfaction with the PTM protocol to which they are assigned. Evaluation of the program will determine its efficacy, and will identify areas of needed improvement. Relevance to VA's Mission. Although tinnitus is the second most common service-connected disability, most VA medical centers do not provide comprehensive clinical services for Veterans suffering from tinnitus. This study extends our current work, which has focused on the development of a comprehensive tinnitus management protocol that can be implemented efficiently in VA hospitals. Further development of PTM has the potential of providing needed tinnitus services to Veterans across the country for a relatively small cost and with minimal impact on individual VA hospitals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus
Keywords
Tinnitus, Counseling, Education, Rehabilitation of hearing impaired, Triage, Evaluation studies, Quality of health care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Progressive Tinnitus Management
Arm Title
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Wait List Control
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Progressive Tinnitus Management
Other Intervention Name(s)
PTM
Intervention Description
The program follows a five-level "progressive intervention" model that addresses the various needs of tinnitus patients in a systematic and hierarchical manner-from initial contact with a VA provider through long-term treatment. The five levels of progressive intervention are: 1) Triage; 2) Audiologic Evaluation; 3) Group Education; 4) Interdisciplinary Evaluation; 5) Individualized Support
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Wait List Control
Intervention Description
VA audiologists typically (a) perform an audiologic evaluation; (b) fit hearing aids if necessary; and (c) provide basic information about tinnitus in the form of one-time, one-on-one informational counseling and/or a tinnitus handout. We therefore will provide these procedures for subjects who are randomized to receive usual care. Usual care subjects also can be referred for other clinical services as deemed appropriate.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tinnitus Functional Index Change Score
Description
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a tinnitus outcome measure that has been validated for "responsiveness" (Meikle et al., 2012). Prior to the TFI, no tinnitus questionnaire had been specifically designed and tested to maximize responsiveness to treatment-related change. Completion of the 25-item TFI results in an index score that can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater problems associated with tinnitus. The following is a general guide to facilitate interpretation of TFI scores: <25 = relatively mild tinnitus (little or no need for intervention) 25-50 = significant problems with tinnitus (possible need for intervention) •>50 = tinnitus severe enough to qualify for more aggressive intervention Data from the TFI development study (Meikle et al., 2012) suggest that a reduction in the TFI score of at least 13 points would indicate a clinical improvement that a patient would consider important or meaningful.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months (from Baseline)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: are eligible for audiology services at their respective VAMC; report the chronic presence of tinnitus (i.e., they have tinnitus that they can usually hear when they listen for it in a quiet room); report that their tinnitus is at least a "small" problem; and are willing to give verbal consent. Exclusion Criteria: are not Veterans; have received previous tinnitus services at their VAMC; report that their tinnitus is "no problem"; are unable (for any reason) to fulfill all of the requirements of the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James A Henry, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
City
West Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06516
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97201
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Medical Center, Memphis
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Multi-Site Evaluation of Progressive Tinnitus Management

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs