search
Back to results

NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in Subjects With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System Ablation
Sponsored by
Angiodynamics, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma focused on measuring locoregional cancer therapy, pancreatic cancer, unresectable pancreatic cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer, pancreatic cancer tumor ablation, NanoKnife tumor ablation for pancreatic cancer, NanoKnife LEDC system tumor ablation, Non thermal ablation, Irreversible electroporation for pancreatic cancer treatment, IRE for unresectable pancreatic cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. male or female
  2. >/= 18 years of age
  3. meets criteria for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as radiographically proven pancreatic cancer as determined by a surgical oncologist via pancreatic CT or who were initially thought to be resectable; however at the time of surgery were upstaged to unresectability, via direct visualization
  4. tumor size must be < 4 cm and must be measurable
  5. must have an INR <1.5
  6. must be unresponsive to chemotherapy as demonstrated with either CT or MR imaging and not have taken any chemotherapy agents within 14 days of treatment with the NanoKnife LEDC System
  7. are willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements
  8. are able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. a baseline creatinine reported as > 2.0 mg/dL
  2. have any reported baseline lab values with a grade 3 or 4 toxicity as defined by the CTCAE Version 3.0
  3. inability to stop antiplatelet and Coumadin therapy for 7 days prior to and 7 days post treatment with the NanoKnife System
  4. known history of contrast allergy that cannot be medically managed
  5. known hypersensitivity to the metal in the electrodes (stainless steel 304L) that cannot be medically managed
  6. unable to be treated with a muscle blockade agent (e.g. pancuronium bromide, atracurium, cisatracurium, etc)
  7. women who are pregnant or currently breast feeding
  8. women of childbearing potential who are not utilizing an acceptable method of contraception
  9. have taken an investigational agent within 30 days of visit 1
  10. have implanted cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators
  11. have implanted electronic devices or implants with metal parts in the immediate vicinity of a lesion
  12. have a history of epilepsy or cardiac arrhythmia (atrial or ventricular fibrillation)
  13. have a recent history of myocardial infarction (within the past 2 months)
  14. have Q-T intervals greater than 550 ms unless treated with an Accysync Model 72 synchronization system controlling the NanoKnife system's output pulses.

Sites / Locations

  • Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, Department of Surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety
reported adverse events and adverse effects/events (serious and non serious), unanticipated adverse events and device complaints, safety laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, amylase, lipase), vital signs, physical findings (including symptoms, vital signs and weight changes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Efficacy
Evaluation of short term efficacy based upon tumor evaluation and symptomatic response as defined by: imaging will be used to evaluate changes in tumor size in addition to evaluating the completeness of ablation, tumor evaluation by evaluating changes in CA-19-9 marker, symptomatic changes of quality of life questionnaires, physician assessment of the performance status of the subject, pain assessment and subject analgesic consumption, assessment of tumor for downstaging to resectability at the time of imaging

Full Information

First Posted
June 7, 2011
Last Updated
November 7, 2016
Sponsor
Angiodynamics, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01369420
Brief Title
NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in Subjects With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
Official Title
A Safety Evaluation of the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in Subjects With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer - A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Angiodynamics, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System when used to treat unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Safety will be reviewed by means of analysis of adverse events, including serious adverse events, laboratory data, physician exam findings, and vital signs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Keywords
locoregional cancer therapy, pancreatic cancer, unresectable pancreatic cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer, pancreatic cancer tumor ablation, NanoKnife tumor ablation for pancreatic cancer, NanoKnife LEDC system tumor ablation, Non thermal ablation, Irreversible electroporation for pancreatic cancer treatment, IRE for unresectable pancreatic cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System Ablation
Other Intervention Name(s)
◦ Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System, ◦ HVP01 Electroporation System, ◦ NanoKnife LEDC System, ◦ NanoKnife IRE System, ◦ Non-Thermal Irreversible Eletroporation (NTIRE) System, ◦ Angiodynamics IRE System, ◦ Non-Thermal Ablation
Intervention Description
90 pulses of 70 microseconds each in duration will be administered per electrode pair.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety
Description
reported adverse events and adverse effects/events (serious and non serious), unanticipated adverse events and device complaints, safety laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, amylase, lipase), vital signs, physical findings (including symptoms, vital signs and weight changes)
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy
Description
Evaluation of short term efficacy based upon tumor evaluation and symptomatic response as defined by: imaging will be used to evaluate changes in tumor size in addition to evaluating the completeness of ablation, tumor evaluation by evaluating changes in CA-19-9 marker, symptomatic changes of quality of life questionnaires, physician assessment of the performance status of the subject, pain assessment and subject analgesic consumption, assessment of tumor for downstaging to resectability at the time of imaging
Time Frame
90 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: male or female >/= 18 years of age meets criteria for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as radiographically proven pancreatic cancer as determined by a surgical oncologist via pancreatic CT or who were initially thought to be resectable; however at the time of surgery were upstaged to unresectability, via direct visualization tumor size must be < 4 cm and must be measurable must have an INR <1.5 must be unresponsive to chemotherapy as demonstrated with either CT or MR imaging and not have taken any chemotherapy agents within 14 days of treatment with the NanoKnife LEDC System are willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements are able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF) Exclusion Criteria: a baseline creatinine reported as > 2.0 mg/dL have any reported baseline lab values with a grade 3 or 4 toxicity as defined by the CTCAE Version 3.0 inability to stop antiplatelet and Coumadin therapy for 7 days prior to and 7 days post treatment with the NanoKnife System known history of contrast allergy that cannot be medically managed known hypersensitivity to the metal in the electrodes (stainless steel 304L) that cannot be medically managed unable to be treated with a muscle blockade agent (e.g. pancuronium bromide, atracurium, cisatracurium, etc) women who are pregnant or currently breast feeding women of childbearing potential who are not utilizing an acceptable method of contraception have taken an investigational agent within 30 days of visit 1 have implanted cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators have implanted electronic devices or implants with metal parts in the immediate vicinity of a lesion have a history of epilepsy or cardiac arrhythmia (atrial or ventricular fibrillation) have a recent history of myocardial infarction (within the past 2 months) have Q-T intervals greater than 550 ms unless treated with an Accysync Model 72 synchronization system controlling the NanoKnife system's output pulses.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudio Bassi, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, Department of Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, Department of Surgery
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16407624
Citation
Varshney S, Sewkani A, Sharma S, Kapoor S, Naik S, Sharma A, Patel K. Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: feasibility, efficacy and safety. JOP. 2006 Jan 11;7(1):74-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17089173
Citation
Spiliotis JD, Datsis AC, Michalopoulos NV, Kekelos SP, Vaxevanidou A, Rogdakis AG, Christopoulou AN. Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Jan;392(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0098-5. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18333241
Citation
Hadjicostas P, Malakounides N, Varianos C, Kitiris E, Lerni F, Symeonides P. Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(1):61-4. doi: 10.1080/13651820500466673.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16967436
Citation
Wu Y, Tang Z, Fang H, Gao S, Chen J, Wang Y, Yan H. High operative risk of cool-tip radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;94(5):392-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20580.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10630378
Citation
Matsui Y, Nakagawa A, Kamiyama Y, Yamamoto K, Kubo N, Nakase Y. Selective thermocoagulation of unresectable pancreatic cancers by using radiofrequency capacitive heating. Pancreas. 2000 Jan;20(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200001000-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14736529
Citation
Elias D, Baton O, Sideris L, Lasser P, Pocard M. Necrotizing pancreatitis after radiofrequency destruction of pancreatic tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Feb;30(1):85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.10.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16868477
Citation
Connor S, Raraty MG, Neoptolemos JP, Layer P, Runzi M, Steinberg WM, Barkin JS, Bradley EL 3rd, Dimagno E. Does infected pancreatic necrosis require immediate or emergency debridement? Pancreas. 2006 Aug;33(2):128-34. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000234074.76501.a6. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15191686
Citation
Raraty MG, Connor S, Criddle DN, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Acute pancreatitis and organ failure: pathophysiology, natural history, and management strategies. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2004 Apr;6(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s11894-004-0035-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17198179
Citation
Chan YC, Leung PS. Acute pancreatitis: animal models and recent advances in basic research. Pancreas. 2007 Jan;34(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000246658.38375.04.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16534248
Citation
Freitag M, Standl TG, Kleinhans H, Gottschalk A, Mann O, Rempf C, Bachmann K, Gocht A, Petri S, Izbicki JR, Strate T. Improvement of impaired microcirculation and tissue oxygenation by hemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch plus cell-free hemoglobin in acute porcine pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2006;6(3):232-9. doi: 10.1159/000091962. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System in Subjects With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs