search
Back to results

Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement (LBP-ED)

Primary Purpose

Back Pain, X-rays, MRI

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gentle Nudge
Usual Standard Procedure
Sponsored by
University of California, Los Angeles
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with Lower Back Pain receiving treatment at Los Angeles Department of Health Services Facility (LAC-DHS)
  • Adults whose physicians order Imaging Studies (CT SCANs and MRIs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-LAC-DHS patients
  • Patient without Lower Back Pain

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    Intervention Group

    Control

    Arm Description

    A "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice)

    No "nudge"

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
    Change in the percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of Appropriate, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
    Change in the percentage of Appropriateness, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 12, 2017
    Last Updated
    December 20, 2017
    Sponsor
    University of California, Los Angeles
    Collaborators
    LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, American Board of Internal Medicine
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03381885
    Brief Title
    Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement
    Acronym
    LBP-ED
    Official Title
    Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    December 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    February 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of California, Los Angeles
    Collaborators
    LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, American Board of Internal Medicine

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Back pain costs the U.S. over $100 billion annually, and much of this spending is wasteful due to the overuse of advanced diagnostic imaging. Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Real-time electronic clinical decision support (CDS) at the point of care has been increasingly emphasized as an important strategy to improve the value of back pain management; however, studies suggest that CDS at best only modestly influences practice patterns. The aim is to implement a behavioral economic-based intervention in the ED to promote the use of CDS system.
    Detailed Description
    Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Few studies have rigorously investigated the causes of CDS' limited influence on care as well as interventions to enhance CDS' impact on reducing low value imaging. The implementation of CDS to reduce low value MRI and CT imaging studies for back pain at a large safety net health system was monitored. The CDS systems was integrated into the electronic health record system. Clinicians answered several questions and select from a list of basic imaging indications and CDS provides an American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria score. Appropriate scores ranged from 7-9, borderline scores ranging from 4-6, and inappropriate scores ranging from 1-3 (clinicians are encouraged to cancel inappropriate orders). Electronic order data on imaging studies was pulled using CPT billable data and imaging studies were categorized as appropriate, canceled, changed, and unscored orders. Early observation of CDS implementation revealed that LAC+USC Medical Center (one of 16 sites) had high percentages of unscored orders. At this intervention site, a "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice) was provided where clinicians ordering medium or high scoring studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology. This natural experiment was evaluated using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DinD) analysis to measure whether high scores increased and unscored studies decreased at the intervention site vs. 15 control sites over time. Generalized linear regression models were used that accounted for clustering by practice site and adjusting for patient and clinician characteristics.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Back Pain, X-rays, MRI, CT Scan, Clinical Decision Support Tool

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Health Services Research
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    20000 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Intervention Group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    A "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice)
    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    No "nudge"
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Gentle Nudge
    Intervention Description
    Clinicians ordering medium or high scoring imaging studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Usual Standard Procedure
    Intervention Description
    Clinicians ordering imaging studies required mandatory phone to radiology
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
    Description
    Change in the percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
    Time Frame
    6 months from the date of intervention implementation
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of Appropriate, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
    Description
    Change in the percentage of Appropriateness, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
    Time Frame
    6 months from the date of intervention implementation

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adults with Lower Back Pain receiving treatment at Los Angeles Department of Health Services Facility (LAC-DHS) Adults whose physicians order Imaging Studies (CT SCANs and MRIs) Exclusion Criteria: Non-LAC-DHS patients Patient without Lower Back Pain

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs