Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement (LBP-ED)
Primary Purpose
Back Pain, X-rays, MRI
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gentle Nudge
Usual Standard Procedure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Back Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults with Lower Back Pain receiving treatment at Los Angeles Department of Health Services Facility (LAC-DHS)
- Adults whose physicians order Imaging Studies (CT SCANs and MRIs)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-LAC-DHS patients
- Patient without Lower Back Pain
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Intervention Group
Control
Arm Description
A "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice)
No "nudge"
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
Change in the percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Appropriate, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
Change in the percentage of Appropriateness, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03381885
First Posted
October 12, 2017
Last Updated
December 20, 2017
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, American Board of Internal Medicine
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03381885
Brief Title
Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement
Acronym
LBP-ED
Official Title
Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles Department of Health Services, American Board of Internal Medicine
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Back pain costs the U.S. over $100 billion annually, and much of this spending is wasteful due to the overuse of advanced diagnostic imaging. Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Real-time electronic clinical decision support (CDS) at the point of care has been increasingly emphasized as an important strategy to improve the value of back pain management; however, studies suggest that CDS at best only modestly influences practice patterns. The aim is to implement a behavioral economic-based intervention in the ED to promote the use of CDS system.
Detailed Description
Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Few studies have rigorously investigated the causes of CDS' limited influence on care as well as interventions to enhance CDS' impact on reducing low value imaging. The implementation of CDS to reduce low value MRI and CT imaging studies for back pain at a large safety net health system was monitored. The CDS systems was integrated into the electronic health record system. Clinicians answered several questions and select from a list of basic imaging indications and CDS provides an American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria score. Appropriate scores ranged from 7-9, borderline scores ranging from 4-6, and inappropriate scores ranging from 1-3 (clinicians are encouraged to cancel inappropriate orders).
Electronic order data on imaging studies was pulled using CPT billable data and imaging studies were categorized as appropriate, canceled, changed, and unscored orders. Early observation of CDS implementation revealed that LAC+USC Medical Center (one of 16 sites) had high percentages of unscored orders. At this intervention site, a "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice) was provided where clinicians ordering medium or high scoring studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology. This natural experiment was evaluated using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DinD) analysis to measure whether high scores increased and unscored studies decreased at the intervention site vs. 15 control sites over time. Generalized linear regression models were used that accounted for clustering by practice site and adjusting for patient and clinician characteristics.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Back Pain, X-rays, MRI, CT Scan, Clinical Decision Support Tool
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
20000 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A "nudge" grounded in behavioral economic theory (nudge=gentle incentive, preserving freedom of choice)
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
No "nudge"
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Gentle Nudge
Intervention Description
Clinicians ordering medium or high scoring imaging studies could bypass the usual mandatory phone call to radiology.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Standard Procedure
Intervention Description
Clinicians ordering imaging studies required mandatory phone to radiology
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
Description
Change in the percentage of Unscored Imaging Orders
Time Frame
6 months from the date of intervention implementation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Appropriate, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
Description
Change in the percentage of Appropriateness, Borderline and Inappropriate Imaging Orders
Time Frame
6 months from the date of intervention implementation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults with Lower Back Pain receiving treatment at Los Angeles Department of Health Services Facility (LAC-DHS)
Adults whose physicians order Imaging Studies (CT SCANs and MRIs)
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-LAC-DHS patients
Patient without Lower Back Pain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Natural Experiment: "Gentle Nudge" Intervention, Eliminating Phone Call Requirement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs