search
Back to results

Neuromodulatary Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Severe Refractory Primary Dysmenorrhea

Primary Purpose

Primary Dysmenorrhea

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active tDCS
Sham tDCS
Sponsored by
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Dysmenorrhea focused on measuring Dysmenorrhea, Neuromodulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Neuroplasticity, Neuroimaging

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 35 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20-35 years old PDM patients
  • Right-handedness
  • A regular menstrual cycle: 27-32 days
  • Cramping pain during the menstrual period in the last 6 months , VAS ≧ 7
  • Abstinence for daily activities due to PDM
  • Need analgesic or Physical therapy despite of no prominent effect

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of head injury
  • Pathological pituitary gland disease
  • Organic pelvic disease, psychiatric disorder
  • Pregnancy, childbirth
  • A metal or pacemaker implant.
  • Take hormone agents within 6 months

Sites / Locations

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active tDCS

Sham tDCS

Arm Description

The anode sponge electrode will be placed on the scalp over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathode sponge electrode will be positioned over the right supraorbital cortex (SO). Active stimulation consists of 2 mA current applied continuously for 20 minutes.

The anode sponge electrode will be placed on the scalp over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathode sponge electrode will be positioned over the right supraorbital cortex (SO). The 2 mA current will be applied for 30 seconds at the beginning of the session.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
pain scale; from 0 to 10; score 0: no pain, score 10: unbearable pain
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to experimental pain
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) is a well established magnetoencephalographic (MEG) cortical response evoked by electric stimulation. SEFs to experimental pain stimulation using electrical stimulator applied on the skin over the trajectory of median nerve will be used to evaluate pain-evoked cortical response.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quantitative sensory testing (QST)
To assess the threshold of thermal sensation (cold, cold-pain, heat, heat-pain; from 0 to 50 centigrade temperature), according to the established protocol of an ascending limit approach for heat pain and a descending limit approach for cold pain.
Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
To assess anxious symptoms; from 20 to 80; score 20: not anxious, score 80: extremely anxious
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
To assess anxious symptoms; from 0 to 63; score 0: not anxious, score 63: extremely anxious
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
To assess depressive symptoms; from 0 to 63; score 0: not depressed, score 63: extremely depressed
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
To assess pain-maladaptive psychological status; from 0 to 52; score 0: not pain Catastrophizing , score 52: extremely pain Catastrophizing
Long-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
To assess pain status; from 0 to 78; score 0: not painful, score 78: extremely painful
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
To assess quality of life; he SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. From 0 to 100; score 0: equivalent to maximum disability, score 100: no disability.
Blood Hormones Measurement
To assess testosterone, progesterone, estrogen
Genotyping
To genotype the single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping (i.e., BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265), COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680), OPRM1 (rs1799971), 5HTR2A (rs6313), SLC6A4 (rs25531)) from blood specimen
Efficacy of tDCS blinding
To assure blinding efficacy; Patients do self-assessment about whether they receive real tDCS or sham tDCS. Assessment questionnaire:1 or 0. 1: real tDCS; 0: sham tDCS.

Full Information

First Posted
July 24, 2018
Last Updated
February 11, 2019
Sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03608215
Brief Title
Neuromodulatary Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Severe Refractory Primary Dysmenorrhea
Official Title
Neuromodulation Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Severe Refractory Primary Dysmenorrhea: BDNF and MEG Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 8, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Primary Dysmenorrhea (PDM), defined as menstrual pain without discernable organic causes, is inexorably common in adolescent women, about 40-90% of women may suffer from it, and 20% of them can be severe in the context of being refractory to medication, daily function impairment, and having pain of severe degree. Novel therapeutic method is in need for pain alleviation for this particular phenotype. It has been reported that PDM females may engage motor-cortex based descending pain modulation system in our resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) and thermal pain-activation fMRI studies. Based on the reported analgesic efficacy of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex for various experimental painful conditions and clinical pain disorders, it is plausible that tDCS can be effective for the severe and medication-refractory PDM patients. This study aim to investigate the analgesic efficacy of tDCS in severe PDMs and to elucidate the dynamic brain neuroplasticity in the context of experimental pain after tDCS intervention. Thirty severe PDMs will be recruited and randomly allocated to either real or sham group in a triple-blind manner. Experimental pain electrical stimulation will be performed before and after the tDCS intervention. The experimental pain-evoked magnetoencephamographic (MEG) data will be correlated with behavioral and psychological measurements. This is the first study in the literature investigating the tDCS efficacy for acute pain in severe PDM. The result can promise a new possibility for clinical application.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Primary Dysmenorrhea
Keywords
Dysmenorrhea, Neuromodulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Neuroplasticity, Neuroimaging

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
active, sham
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
31 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active tDCS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The anode sponge electrode will be placed on the scalp over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathode sponge electrode will be positioned over the right supraorbital cortex (SO). Active stimulation consists of 2 mA current applied continuously for 20 minutes.
Arm Title
Sham tDCS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The anode sponge electrode will be placed on the scalp over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathode sponge electrode will be positioned over the right supraorbital cortex (SO). The 2 mA current will be applied for 30 seconds at the beginning of the session.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active tDCS
Intervention Description
The anode and cathode sponge electrode (51 cm2) will be placed over C3 and FP2 (10-20 system) respectively. 2 mA current will be applied continuously for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham tDCS
Intervention Description
The anode and cathode sponge electrode (51 cm2) will be placed over C3 and FP2 (10-20 system) respectively. 2 mA current will be applied for 30 seconds at the beginning.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
pain scale; from 0 to 10; score 0: no pain, score 10: unbearable pain
Time Frame
change from baseline (1st menstrual phase, before tDCS) at one month (2nd menstrual phase, with tDCS), change from baseline (1st menstrual phase, before tDCS) at two months (3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to experimental pain
Description
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) is a well established magnetoencephalographic (MEG) cortical response evoked by electric stimulation. SEFs to experimental pain stimulation using electrical stimulator applied on the skin over the trajectory of median nerve will be used to evaluate pain-evoked cortical response.
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS, before 2nd menstrual phase) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS, before 2nd menstrual phase) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quantitative sensory testing (QST)
Description
To assess the threshold of thermal sensation (cold, cold-pain, heat, heat-pain; from 0 to 50 centigrade temperature), according to the established protocol of an ascending limit approach for heat pain and a descending limit approach for cold pain.
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Description
To assess anxious symptoms; from 20 to 80; score 20: not anxious, score 80: extremely anxious
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Description
To assess anxious symptoms; from 0 to 63; score 0: not anxious, score 63: extremely anxious
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Description
To assess depressive symptoms; from 0 to 63; score 0: not depressed, score 63: extremely depressed
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Description
To assess pain-maladaptive psychological status; from 0 to 52; score 0: not pain Catastrophizing , score 52: extremely pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Long-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Description
To assess pain status; from 0 to 78; score 0: not painful, score 78: extremely painful
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Description
To assess quality of life; he SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. From 0 to 100; score 0: equivalent to maximum disability, score 100: no disability.
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at five weeks (after the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Blood Hormones Measurement
Description
To assess testosterone, progesterone, estrogen
Time Frame
change from baseline (before tDCS) at one week (after tDCS completion), change from baseline (before tDCS) at four weeks (before the 3rd menstrual phase)
Title
Genotyping
Description
To genotype the single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping (i.e., BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265), COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680), OPRM1 (rs1799971), 5HTR2A (rs6313), SLC6A4 (rs25531)) from blood specimen
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Efficacy of tDCS blinding
Description
To assure blinding efficacy; Patients do self-assessment about whether they receive real tDCS or sham tDCS. Assessment questionnaire:1 or 0. 1: real tDCS; 0: sham tDCS.
Time Frame
At 1 months after tDCS intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 20-35 years old PDM patients Right-handedness A regular menstrual cycle: 27-32 days Cramping pain during the menstrual period in the last 6 months , VAS ≧ 7 Abstinence for daily activities due to PDM Need analgesic or Physical therapy despite of no prominent effect Exclusion Criteria: History of head injury Pathological pituitary gland disease Organic pelvic disease, psychiatric disorder Pregnancy, childbirth A metal or pacemaker implant. Take hormone agents within 6 months
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
112
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Neuromodulatary Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Severe Refractory Primary Dysmenorrhea

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs