New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Study II (HAL-RCT-II)
Primary Purpose
Stroke, Ambulation Difficulty, Hemiparesis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)
1st control group
2nd control group
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Rehabilitation, Robotics
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1-10 years since stroke onset
- Able to walk but not independently, i.e. need of manual support or close supervision due to lower extremity paresis, FAC score 2-3 or FAC 4 combined with gait speed <0.8m/s according to 10 meter walk test, which corresponds to limitations in community ambulation (Bowden et al 2008)
- Ability to understand training instructions as well as written and oral study information and to express informed consent or by proxy
- Body size compatible with the HAL suit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contracture restricting gait movements at any lower limb joint
- Cardiovascular or other somatic condition incompatible with intensive gait training
- Severe, contagious infections (e.g. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) or Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase bacteria).
Sites / Locations
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Study group Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)
1st control group
2nd control group
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in 6 min walk test
walking ability and endurance
Secondary Outcome Measures
Fugl Meyer Scale for lower extremities
Sensory and motor function in lower extremities
Modified Ashworth Scale
Spasticity
Spasticity measured with Neuroflexor foot module
Spasticity
Berg Balance Scale
Balance
10 meters walk test
Walking
2 minutes walk test
Walking
Functional Ambulation Categories
Walking
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE)
Interview
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Hospital anxiety and Depression Scale
Interview
Barthel Index
Independence in mobility and personal care
Stroke Impact Scale
Functioning and disability, Interview
Physical activity in everyday life using SenseWear
Registers physical activity in everyday life
Objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke, using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Stroke severity
Modified Ranking Scale
Interview
Body Mass Index
Weight
Height
Blood pressure
Registered in everyday life
HbA1c
Blood test
Plasma lipid profile
Blood test
Perception of the intervention
Interview. Study group using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) only.
Smoking
Interview
Alcohol
Interview
Drug use
From medical records
Health care consumption
From County Council
Stroke type and localization
From medical records
Dysexecutive Questionnaire
Filled in by significant other
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02545088
First Posted
August 24, 2015
Last Updated
December 17, 2020
Sponsor
Danderyd Hospital
Collaborators
University of Tsukuba, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, Umeå University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02545088
Brief Title
New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Study II
Acronym
HAL-RCT-II
Official Title
New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Phase II Trials, Study II
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Danderyd Hospital
Collaborators
University of Tsukuba, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, Umeå University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The overall purpose of this project is to establish the added value of training with the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) exoskeleton system as part of regular rehabilitation intervention programs after stroke.
The main specific aims are:
(i) to compare potential effects on functioning and disability of gait and mobility training long-term after stroke by comparing A) HAL-training combined with conventional rehabilitation interventions to B) conventional rehabilitation interventions without HAL and to C) no intervention.
Detailed Description
The effectiveness of the interventions will be assessed in terms aspects of body function, walking ability and endurance as well as level of activity in daily living and participation assessed at the end of intervention and at a 6 and 12 months follow-up.
Intensive gait training with HAL is performed 1 session/day, 3 days/week for 6 weeks and each session will not exceed 60 min of effective walking time with HAL. In addition, each session will include conventional gait training that will not exceed 30 min effective training time. To standardize the training procedure, training with HAL is performed on a treadmill and to enable body weight support. Body weight support is used to prevent falls and to unburden the weight of the suit (9 kg). The training program is performed by physiotherapists, trained in the HAL method and the study procedures. At the end of the 6 weeks, the physiotherapist that has been engaged in the patient's conventional training will perform 1-2 home visits to inform/educate the patient and those who are providing assistance to the patient in how the patient can make use of any gains in gait function during activities of daily living.
The 1st control group will receive conventional gait training performed 1 session/day, 3 days/week for 6 weeks that will not exceed 1h 30 min effective training time.
The 2nd control group will not receive an intervention. The conventional gait training is performed according to current best evidence based practice and may include over ground walking with assistance and/or assistant devices as well as the use of a treadmill and body weight support and training of gait function in activities of daily living
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Ambulation Difficulty, Hemiparesis
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Robotics
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Study group Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
1st control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
2nd control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)
Intervention Description
Intensive gait training with Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) is performed 1 session/day, 3 days/week for 6 weeks and each session will not exceed 60 min of effective walking time with HAL. In addition, each session will include conventional gait training that will not exceed 30 min effective training time.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
1st control group
Intervention Description
Conventional gait training performed 1 session/day, 3 days/week for 6 weeks that will not exceed 1h 30 min effective training time.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
2nd control group
Intervention Description
The 2nd control group will not receive an intervention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in 6 min walk test
Description
walking ability and endurance
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fugl Meyer Scale for lower extremities
Description
Sensory and motor function in lower extremities
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Modified Ashworth Scale
Description
Spasticity
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Spasticity measured with Neuroflexor foot module
Description
Spasticity
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Berg Balance Scale
Description
Balance
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
10 meters walk test
Description
Walking
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
2 minutes walk test
Description
Walking
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Functional Ambulation Categories
Description
Walking
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE)
Description
Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Hospital anxiety and Depression Scale
Description
Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Barthel Index
Description
Independence in mobility and personal care
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Stroke Impact Scale
Description
Functioning and disability, Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Physical activity in everyday life using SenseWear
Description
Registers physical activity in everyday life
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 3 weeks of intervention, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Objectively quantify the impairment caused by a stroke, using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Description
Stroke severity
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline
Title
Modified Ranking Scale
Description
Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline
Title
Body Mass Index
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Weight
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Height
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Blood pressure
Description
Registered in everyday life
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
HbA1c
Description
Blood test
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Plasma lipid profile
Description
Blood test
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Perception of the intervention
Description
Interview. Study group using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) only.
Time Frame
after 6 weeks of intervention
Title
Smoking
Description
Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Alcohol
Description
Interview
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Drug use
Description
From medical records
Time Frame
Assessment at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 6 and 12 month post intervention
Title
Health care consumption
Description
From County Council
Time Frame
12 month post intervention
Title
Stroke type and localization
Description
From medical records
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Dysexecutive Questionnaire
Description
Filled in by significant other
Time Frame
At baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1-10 years since stroke onset
Able to walk but not independently, i.e. need of manual support or close supervision due to lower extremity paresis, FAC score 2-3 or FAC 4 combined with gait speed <0.8m/s according to 10 meter walk test, which corresponds to limitations in community ambulation (Bowden et al 2008)
Ability to understand training instructions as well as written and oral study information and to express informed consent or by proxy
Body size compatible with the HAL suit.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contracture restricting gait movements at any lower limb joint
Cardiovascular or other somatic condition incompatible with intensive gait training
Severe, contagious infections (e.g. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) or Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase bacteria).
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital
City
Danderyd
State/Province
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
18288
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24890413
Citation
Nilsson A, Vreede KS, Haglund V, Kawamoto H, Sankai Y, Borg J. Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton--the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 2;11:92. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-92.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25859191
Citation
Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training-a systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;9:48. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33967683
Citation
Palmcrantz S, Wall A, Vreede KS, Lindberg P, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS, Hager CK, Borg J. Impact of Intensive Gait Training With and Without Electromechanical Assistance in the Chronic Phase After Stroke-A Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial With a 6 and 12 Months Follow Up. Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;15:660726. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.660726. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
New Technology for Individualised, Intensive Training of Gait After Stroke- Study II
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs