search
Back to results

Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (NEAT-HFpeF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Isosorbide Mononitrate
Placebo
Sponsored by
Adrian Hernandez
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart Failure, Preserved Ejection Fraction

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 50 years
  2. Symptoms of dyspnea (NYHA class II-IV) without evidence of a non-cardiac or ischemic explanation for dyspnea
  3. Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% as determined on imaging study within 12 months of enrollment with no change in clinical status suggesting potential for deterioration in systolic function
  4. Stable medical therapy for 30 days as defined by:

    • No addition or removal of ACE, Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or aldosterone antagonists
    • No change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers,CCBs or aldosterone antagonists of more than 100%
  5. One of the following within the last 12 months

    • Previous hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary venous hypertension, vascular congestion, interstitial edema, pleural effusion) or
    • Catheterization documented elevated filling pressures at rest (LVEDP≥15 or PCWP≥20) or with exercise (PCWP≥25) or
    • Elevated NT-proBNP (> 400 pg/ml) or BNP (> 200 pg/ml) or
    • Echo evidence of diastolic dysfunction / elevated filling pressures (at least two) E/A > 1.5 + decrease in E/A of > 0.5 with valsalva Deceleration time ≤ 140 ms Pulmonary vein velocity in systole < diastole (PVs<PVd)sinus rhythm) E/e'≥15 Left atrial enlargement (≥ moderate) Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 40 mmHg Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy
    • LV mass/BSA ≥ 96 (♀) or ≥ 116 (♂) g/m2
    • Relative wall thickness ≥ 0.43 (♂ or ♀) [(IVS+PW)/LVEDD]
    • Posterior wall thickness ≥ 0.9 (♀) or 1.0 (♂) cm
  6. No chronic nitrate therapy or infrequent (≤ 1x week) use of intermittent sublingual nitroglycerin within last 3 months
  7. Ambulatory (not wheelchair / scooter / walker / cane dependent)
  8. HF is the primary factor limiting activity as indicated by answering # 2 to the following question:

My ability to be active is most limited by:

  1. Joint, foot, leg, hip or back pain
  2. Shortness of breath and/or fatigue and/or chest pain
  3. Unsteadiness or dizziness
  4. Lifestyle, weather, or I just don't like to be active

9. Body size allows wearing of the accelerometer belt as confirmed by ability to comfortably fasten the test belt provided for the screening process (belt designed to fit persons with BMI 20-40 Kg/m2 but belt may fit some persons outside this range)

10. Willingness to wear the accelerometer belt for the duration of the trial 11. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent (< 3 months) hospitalization for HF
  2. Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dl
  3. Glomerular filtration rate < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 on most recent clinical laboratories
  4. SBP < 110 mmHg or > 180 mmHg at consent
  5. Diastolic blood pressure < 40 mmHg or > 100 mmHg at consent
  6. Resting HR > 110 bpm at consent
  7. Previous adverse reaction to nitrates necessitating withdrawal of therapy
  8. Chronic therapy with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (intermittent use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction is allowable if the patient is willing to hold for the duration of the trial)
  9. Regularly (> 1x per week) swims or does water aerobics
  10. Significant COPD thought to contribute to dyspnea
  11. Ischemia thought to contribute to dyspnea
  12. Documentation of previous EF < 50%
  13. Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months defined by electrocardiographic changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
  14. Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 3 months
  15. Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  16. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloid)
  17. Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
  18. Active myocarditis
  19. Complex congenital heart disease
  20. Active collagen vascular disease
  21. More than mild aortic or mitral stenosis
  22. Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with moderate to severe or severe mitral, tricuspid or aortic regurgitation
  23. Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment
  24. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  25. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another therapeutic clinical trial in the next 3 months
  26. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  27. Pregnant women

Sites / Locations

  • Christiana Care Health Services
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Northwestern University
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Boston V.A. Healthcare System
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
  • Metro Health System
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Lancaster General Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System
  • Jefferson Medical College
  • Temple University Hospital
  • Michael E Debakey VA Medical Center
  • University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics
  • V.A. Medical Center
  • The University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Isosorbide Mononitrate

Isosorbide Mononitate Placebo

Arm Description

Isosorbide Mononitrate with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)

Isosorbide Mononitrate placebo with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.
Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28

Full Information

First Posted
January 3, 2014
Last Updated
October 7, 2016
Sponsor
Adrian Hernandez
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Mayo Clinic, University of Vermont
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02053493
Brief Title
Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Acronym
NEAT-HFpeF
Official Title
Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Adrian Hernandez
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Mayo Clinic, University of Vermont

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study to assess effect of isosorbide mononitrate with dose up-titration on activity tolerance as assessed by (hip-worn, tri-axial) accelerometry.
Detailed Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart Failure, Preserved Ejection Fraction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Isosorbide Mononitrate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Isosorbide Mononitrate with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)
Arm Title
Isosorbide Mononitate Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Isosorbide Mononitrate placebo with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Isosorbide Mononitrate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Imdur, ISMO, Monoket
Intervention Description
Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg ISMN Week 4: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg ISMN Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg ISMN Week 10: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg ISMN
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg Placebo Week 4: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg Placebo Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg Placebo Week 10: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Time Frame
5-6 weeks
Title
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Time Frame
11-12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Time Frame
Week 7
Title
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Time Frame
Week 13
Title
Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.
Description
Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.
Time Frame
Week 13
Title
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Time Frame
Week 7
Title
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Time Frame
Week 13
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).
Time Frame
Week 7
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.
Time Frame
Week 13
Title
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Time Frame
Week 7
Title
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Time Frame
Week 13
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Time Frame
5-6 weeks
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Time Frame
11-12 weeks
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Time Frame
3-6 weeks
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Time Frame
9-12 weeks
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
Time Frame
3-6 weeks
Title
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)
Description
To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
Time Frame
9-12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 50 years Symptoms of dyspnea (NYHA class II-IV) without evidence of a non-cardiac or ischemic explanation for dyspnea Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% as determined on imaging study within 12 months of enrollment with no change in clinical status suggesting potential for deterioration in systolic function Stable medical therapy for 30 days as defined by: No addition or removal of ACE, Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or aldosterone antagonists No change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers,CCBs or aldosterone antagonists of more than 100% One of the following within the last 12 months Previous hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary venous hypertension, vascular congestion, interstitial edema, pleural effusion) or Catheterization documented elevated filling pressures at rest (LVEDP≥15 or PCWP≥20) or with exercise (PCWP≥25) or Elevated NT-proBNP (> 400 pg/ml) or BNP (> 200 pg/ml) or Echo evidence of diastolic dysfunction / elevated filling pressures (at least two) E/A > 1.5 + decrease in E/A of > 0.5 with valsalva Deceleration time ≤ 140 ms Pulmonary vein velocity in systole < diastole (PVs<PVd)sinus rhythm) E/e'≥15 Left atrial enlargement (≥ moderate) Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 40 mmHg Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy LV mass/BSA ≥ 96 (♀) or ≥ 116 (♂) g/m2 Relative wall thickness ≥ 0.43 (♂ or ♀) [(IVS+PW)/LVEDD] Posterior wall thickness ≥ 0.9 (♀) or 1.0 (♂) cm No chronic nitrate therapy or infrequent (≤ 1x week) use of intermittent sublingual nitroglycerin within last 3 months Ambulatory (not wheelchair / scooter / walker / cane dependent) HF is the primary factor limiting activity as indicated by answering # 2 to the following question: My ability to be active is most limited by: Joint, foot, leg, hip or back pain Shortness of breath and/or fatigue and/or chest pain Unsteadiness or dizziness Lifestyle, weather, or I just don't like to be active 9. Body size allows wearing of the accelerometer belt as confirmed by ability to comfortably fasten the test belt provided for the screening process (belt designed to fit persons with BMI 20-40 Kg/m2 but belt may fit some persons outside this range) 10. Willingness to wear the accelerometer belt for the duration of the trial 11. Willingness to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Recent (< 3 months) hospitalization for HF Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dl Glomerular filtration rate < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 on most recent clinical laboratories SBP < 110 mmHg or > 180 mmHg at consent Diastolic blood pressure < 40 mmHg or > 100 mmHg at consent Resting HR > 110 bpm at consent Previous adverse reaction to nitrates necessitating withdrawal of therapy Chronic therapy with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (intermittent use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction is allowable if the patient is willing to hold for the duration of the trial) Regularly (> 1x per week) swims or does water aerobics Significant COPD thought to contribute to dyspnea Ischemia thought to contribute to dyspnea Documentation of previous EF < 50% Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months defined by electrocardiographic changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent) Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 3 months Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloid) Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade Active myocarditis Complex congenital heart disease Active collagen vascular disease More than mild aortic or mitral stenosis Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with moderate to severe or severe mitral, tricuspid or aortic regurgitation Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year Enrollment or planned enrollment in another therapeutic clinical trial in the next 3 months Inability to comply with planned study procedures Pregnant women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin Anstrom, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eugene Braunwald, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Christiana Care Health Services
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University School of Medicine
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston V.A. Healthcare System
City
West Roxbury
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
St Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metro Health System
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lancaster General Hospital
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17604
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Health System
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jefferson Medical College
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Temple University Hospital
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Michael E Debakey VA Medical Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
V.A. Medical Center
City
Salt Lake CIty
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84148
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05401
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After the study results have been published, site-specific participant data will be shared with sites upon request. Sites are expected to follow their specific institutional policies regarding sharing results with their participants.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32150314
Citation
Reddy YNV, Rikhi A, Obokata M, Shah SJ, Lewis GD, AbouEzzedine OF, Dunlay S, McNulty S, Chakraborty H, Stevenson LW, Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. Quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: importance of obesity, functional capacity, and physical inactivity. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):1009-1018. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1788. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28588021
Citation
Snipelisky D, Kelly J, Levine JA, Koepp GA, Anstrom KJ, McNulty SE, Zakeri R, Felker GM, Hernandez AF, Braunwald E, Redfield MM. Accelerometer-Measured Daily Activity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical Correlates and Association With Standard Heart Failure Severity Indices. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;10(6):e003878. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003878.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26549714
Citation
Redfield MM, Anstrom KJ, Levine JA, Koepp GA, Borlaug BA, Chen HH, LeWinter MM, Joseph SM, Shah SJ, Semigran MJ, Felker GM, Cole RT, Reeves GR, Tedford RJ, Tang WH, McNulty SE, Velazquez EJ, Shah MR, Braunwald E; NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Isosorbide Mononitrate in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 10;373(24):2314-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510774. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs