search
Back to results

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement for CRT Optimization (NICaS-CRT)

Primary Purpose

Congestive Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NICaS guided CRT optimization
Sponsored by
Sheba Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Congestive Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart Failure, Cardiac Resyncronization Therapy, Optimization, Non-invasive cardiac system, Impedance measured cardiac output

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients implanted with a CRT device at least 6 months before, in concordance with AHA/ACC or ESC/EHRA Guidelines (Class I or II) for CRT implantation
  • NYHA class I - III heart failure
  • Stable sinus rhythm
  • Bi-ventricular pacing ≥ 90%
  • Patient provides informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NYHA class IV heart failure
  • Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Bi-ventricular pacing <90%
  • Inability to perform the six-minute walk test

Sites / Locations

  • Sheba Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

NICaS guided CRT optimization

Arm Description

For each subject, we will determine a set of AV and VV delays values, for which the NICaS measured CO will be maximum. In each patient, the CRT device will then be programmed according to these values.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Predictors for significant cardiac output improvement
Using logistic regression, we will look for predictors (clinical, ECG, echocardiographic, hemodynamic) of significant (at least 20%) acute cardiac output improvement (as assessed by NICaS), after NICaS guided AV and VV delays optimization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Acute six-minute walk test changes after NICaS optimization
After NICaS guided AV and VV delays optimization, each patient will perform a six-minute walk test, which will be compared to the baseline (before NICaS optimization) six-minute walk test. A 10% change will be considered significant.
Reverse remodeling
Each patient will undergo routinely a 6-month echocardiography which will be compared to the baseline (inclusion day) echocardiography. A relative reduction of 10% of the left ventricular end-systolic volume will be considered as positive reverse remodeling.
Hospitalization rate for heart failure
Hospitalization rate for acute heart failure during the first 6 months following NICaS guided CRT optimization
Supraventricular arrhythmia occurrence
CRT device measurement of the total time spent in auto-mode switch during the first 6 months following NICaS guided CRT optimization, and comparison to the 6 months prior to the optimization.
Clinical improvement
Clinical improvement at 6 months after CRT optimization will be assessed using a composite score combining NYHA class, QoL and the 6MWT. Each will be classified as improved (+1), stable (0) or worsened (-1) and the three components will be summed. The patient will be considered improved if he will have had ≥1 class reduction in his NYHA class, worsened if he will have had ≥1 class increase and unchanged if he will have had no change in his baseline NYHA class. Similar definitions will be used for absolute variation (improvement or deterioration) of 10 points in QoL, or relative 10%change in six-minute walk distance. A clinical improvement will be considered in the presence of a summed score ≥+1 without death during the first 6 months of follow-up after CRT optimization.

Full Information

First Posted
April 27, 2014
Last Updated
August 5, 2015
Sponsor
Sheba Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02126241
Brief Title
Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement for CRT Optimization
Acronym
NICaS-CRT
Official Title
The Use of Impedance-Based Non-invasive Cardiac Output Measurement (NICaS) for Optimizing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: a Pilot Clinical Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sheba Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This proposal aims to evaluate the added clinical and echocardiographic benefit of using the non-invasive impedance-based cardiac output measurement system (NICaS) for optimizing atrio-ventricular and inter-ventricular delays in chronic (more than 6 months) CRT recipients.
Detailed Description
Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an efficient treatment in heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and wide QRS. It is associated with improved exercise capacity, quality of life and left ventricular ejection fraction, as well as reverse remodeling, mitral regurgitation reduction, and mortality reduction. Predicting response to CRT is important as 30% of patients have no or minimal clinical improvement following CRT. Several parameters have been shown to influence response following implantation. Some relate to patients' characteristics including underlying heart disease, comorbidities and arrhythmias, type and severity of conduction disorder, presence and degree of dyssynchrony, presence and extent of scar tissue and functional myocardial reserve. Others are associated with technical aspects, including electrical and anatomical positioning of LV lead, programming mode and percentage of effective bi-ventricular pacing. Optimization of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay and inter-ventricular (VV) delays can be used for maximizing CRT benefit, but is not routinely recommended by current guidelines. Standard optimization is performed under echocardiography guidance - a time and resource consuming method. Other non-invasive methods, such as impedance cardiography, can be used for AV delay optimization. Rationale for CRT optimization using NICaS The non-invasive cardiac system (NICaS) is a whole-body bioimpedance measurement method allowing real-time cardiac output (CO) assessment. It has been FDA approved for assisting in the diagnosis, monitoring and care management of patients with congestive heart failure as well as for cardiac pacemaker optimization. Clinical trials have shown its utility for the follow-up of outpatient monitoring chronic heart failure, for monitoring patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. NICaS is sensitive enough for detecting real-time small changes in CO. Based on NICaS measured CO changes following AV and VV delays modifications, small series support its use for CRT optimization in a clinical setting, suggesting it may be associated with a reduction in non-responder rate. Hypothesis We hypothesize that the use of NICaS for optimization of AV and VV delays in chronic (more than 6 months) CRT recipients may result in an added clinical and echocardiographic benefit. Specific Aims Identify the CRT recipients who are prone to benefit following CRT optimization, by finding the predictors (clinical, ECG, echocardiographic, hemodynamic) for significant cardiac output improvement after NICaS guided CRT optimization Correlate the degree of cardiac output improvement (as measured by NICaS) after NICaS guided CRT optimization, with clinical and echocardiographic changes at 6 months Timeline: I. At Inclusion I.A. Baseline assessment. Patients included in the study will benefit from the following at baseline assessment, performed in an outpatient setting: Clinical evaluation: history; NYHA class; six-minute walk test (6MWT); Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire for the quality of life (QoL); status following CRT (responder/non-responder); physical evaluation; current medication ECG Device interrogation Transthoracic echocardiography (including dyssynchrony parameters) I.B. NICaS protocol for optimal AV and VV delays assessment. After baseline assessment is completed, patients will benefit from NICaS hemodynamic assessment and CRT programming according to NICaS guided optimal AV and VV delays. (for NICaS protocol for optimal AV and VV delays measurements - see Interventions) I.C. After NICaS guided CRT programming, patients will perform a 6MWT II. At 6 months follow-up. At 6 months, patients will benefit from the following evaluations: Clinical: NYHA class, 6MWT, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire for the quality of life, current medication ECG Device interrogation Transthoracic echocardiography

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Congestive Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart Failure, Cardiac Resyncronization Therapy, Optimization, Non-invasive cardiac system, Impedance measured cardiac output

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
42 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NICaS guided CRT optimization
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
For each subject, we will determine a set of AV and VV delays values, for which the NICaS measured CO will be maximum. In each patient, the CRT device will then be programmed according to these values.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
NICaS guided CRT optimization
Intervention Description
Baseline CO measurement by NICaS AV delay optimization: AV delay will be changed (increase and decrease) by 30 ms steps , and for each new AV value, the CO will be real-time measured by NICaS The AV delay yielding the maximal CO, will be considered the optimal AV delay The device will be programmed using the optimal AV delay VV delay optimization: After Step 2, the baseline VV delay will be changed (increase and decrease; meaning that we will be pacing alternatively the LV before the RV, then the RV before the LV), by 30 ms steps, and for each new VV value, the CO will be real-time measured by NICaS The VV delay yielding the maximal CO, will be considered the optimal VV delay The device will be programmed using the optimal VV delay
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Predictors for significant cardiac output improvement
Description
Using logistic regression, we will look for predictors (clinical, ECG, echocardiographic, hemodynamic) of significant (at least 20%) acute cardiac output improvement (as assessed by NICaS), after NICaS guided AV and VV delays optimization.
Time Frame
Within the first year after beginning of study
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute six-minute walk test changes after NICaS optimization
Description
After NICaS guided AV and VV delays optimization, each patient will perform a six-minute walk test, which will be compared to the baseline (before NICaS optimization) six-minute walk test. A 10% change will be considered significant.
Time Frame
Within the first 24 hours after enrollment
Title
Reverse remodeling
Description
Each patient will undergo routinely a 6-month echocardiography which will be compared to the baseline (inclusion day) echocardiography. A relative reduction of 10% of the left ventricular end-systolic volume will be considered as positive reverse remodeling.
Time Frame
At 6 months after enrollment
Title
Hospitalization rate for heart failure
Description
Hospitalization rate for acute heart failure during the first 6 months following NICaS guided CRT optimization
Time Frame
Within the first 6 months after enrollment
Title
Supraventricular arrhythmia occurrence
Description
CRT device measurement of the total time spent in auto-mode switch during the first 6 months following NICaS guided CRT optimization, and comparison to the 6 months prior to the optimization.
Time Frame
At 6 months after enrollment
Title
Clinical improvement
Description
Clinical improvement at 6 months after CRT optimization will be assessed using a composite score combining NYHA class, QoL and the 6MWT. Each will be classified as improved (+1), stable (0) or worsened (-1) and the three components will be summed. The patient will be considered improved if he will have had ≥1 class reduction in his NYHA class, worsened if he will have had ≥1 class increase and unchanged if he will have had no change in his baseline NYHA class. Similar definitions will be used for absolute variation (improvement or deterioration) of 10 points in QoL, or relative 10%change in six-minute walk distance. A clinical improvement will be considered in the presence of a summed score ≥+1 without death during the first 6 months of follow-up after CRT optimization.
Time Frame
At 6 months after enrollment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients implanted with a CRT device at least 6 months before, in concordance with AHA/ACC or ESC/EHRA Guidelines (Class I or II) for CRT implantation NYHA class I - III heart failure Stable sinus rhythm Bi-ventricular pacing ≥ 90% Patient provides informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: NYHA class IV heart failure Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation Bi-ventricular pacing <90% Inability to perform the six-minute walk test
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Glikson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sheba Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sheba Medical Center
City
Ramat Gan
ZIP/Postal Code
52621
Country
Israel

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23801822
Citation
Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, Cleland J, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Elliott PM, Gorenek B, Israel CW, Leclercq C, Linde C, Mont L, Padeletti L, Sutton R, Vardas PE; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; Document Reviewers; Kirchhof P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Badano LP, Aliyev F, Bansch D, Baumgartner H, Bsata W, Buser P, Charron P, Daubert JC, Dobreanu D, Faerestrand S, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Le Heuzey JY, Mavrakis H, McDonagh T, Merino JL, Nawar MM, Nielsen JC, Pieske B, Poposka L, Ruschitzka F, Tendera M, Van Gelder IC, Wilson CM. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150. Epub 2013 Jun 24. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23493410
Citation
Delnoy PP, Ritter P, Naegele H, Orazi S, Szwed H, Zupan I, Goscinska-Bis K, Anselme F, Martino M, Padeletti L. Association between frequent cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization and long-term clinical response: a post hoc analysis of the Clinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization (CLEAR) pilot study. Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1174-81. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut034. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19372625
Citation
Tanino Y, Shite J, Paredes OL, Shinke T, Ogasawara D, Sawada T, Kawamori H, Miyoshi N, Kato H, Yoshino N, Hirata K. Whole body bioimpedance monitoring for outpatient chronic heart failure follow up. Circ J. 2009 Jun;73(6):1074-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-0847. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17496288
Citation
Heinroth KM, Elster M, Nuding S, Schlegel F, Christoph A, Carter J, Buerke M, Werdan K. Impedance cardiography: a useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices. Europace. 2007 Sep;9(9):744-50. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum086. Epub 2007 May 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20176716
Citation
Turcott RG, Witteles RM, Wang PJ, Vagelos RH, Fowler MB, Ashley EA. Measurement precision in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 May;3(3):395-404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.900076. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement for CRT Optimization

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs