search
Back to results

Non-malarial Febrile Illness in Children in Areas of Perennial Malaria Transmission

Primary Purpose

Malaria, Non-malarial Febrile Illness

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Tanzania
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Artemether-Lumefantrine
Sponsored by
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Malaria focused on measuring malaria, presumptive treatment, Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, fever

Eligibility Criteria

6 Months - 59 Months (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 6 to 59 months.
  • Present to health facility with fever (oral or rectal temperature ≥38°C or axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) or history of fever in the past 48 hours.
  • Have negative rapid diagnostic test for malaria.
  • Live within the boundaries of the officially recognized catchment area of Miono Health Center (within approximately 10 km of the health facility).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Plan to travel or leave the area within the next 3 months.
  • Have been treated for malaria in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Have clinical evidence or history of danger signs: convulsions, lethargy, loss of consciousness, unable to eat or drink, vomiting everything.
  • Have severe, life-threatening anemia: hemoglobin ≤5g/ dL.
  • Have very low weight for age, severe pneumonia, or very severe disease as defined in the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness algorithms.
  • Have a history of sensitivity to artemisinin derivatives or Artemether-Lumefantrine.
  • Have previously been enrolled in this study or another ongoing cohort study of malaria treatment options at these health facilities
  • Chronic disease requiring ongoing medical care (i.e HIV on cotrimoxazole).

Sites / Locations

  • Miono Health Center
  • Msata Dispensary

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Artemether-Lumefantrine

No treatment

Arm Description

Receive artemether-lumefantrine with direct observation of am dose on days 0, 1, and 2 of study

No antimalarial treatment given on day 0.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hematological recovery (Hb return to normal)
Mean time to next infection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Etiologic agent of non-malarial febrile illness

Full Information

First Posted
January 6, 2010
Last Updated
March 8, 2013
Sponsor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01043744
Brief Title
Non-malarial Febrile Illness in Children in Areas of Perennial Malaria Transmission
Official Title
Treatment Outcomes for Non-malarial Febrile Illness in Children Aged 6-59 Months in Areas of Perennial Malaria Transmission
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate the causes of non-malarial febrile illness in children living in an area of perennial malaria transmission and to determine if these children who test negative for malaria by rapid diagnostic test receive any benefit from antimalarial therapy.
Detailed Description
Until recently, national and global malaria control authorities recommended clinical diagnosis-based solely on the presence or history of fever-for most malaria treatment settings in sub-Saharan Africa where malaria transmission is sustained and intense. To some extent this recommendation was based on the fact that conventional antimalarial treatments like chloroquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) were relatively affordable and safe and that microscopic diagnosis was complex and difficult to maintain in remote rural settings. It was economically advantageous and logistically more feasible to treat all potential cases as malaria than to extend microscopic diagnosis to every level of the health system. This approach has resulted in extensive over-treatment, particularly among older children and adults, and may have contributed to the rapid development of antimalarial drug resistance. Although much has been written recently on the cost-effectiveness of expanding malaria diagnosis, available information is scarce on a number of other important reasons why clinical diagnosis has been recommended for so long, especially among children living in high transmission settings. First, uncomplicated malaria can progress to severe or fatal illness within 24 to 48 hours of onset. Numerous care-seeking studies have demonstrated that caretakers seldom arrive at formal health facilities within 24 or 48 hours after the onset of uncomplicated febrile illness. If a diagnostic test imposes additional barriers-such as cost, time delay, or referral-requiring a positive parasitological diagnosis could put children whose cause of fever is malaria infection at greater risk of progressing to severe or fatal illness. Second, although the current approach based on clinical diagnosis appears to result in substantial over-treatment, it is still possible to demonstrate that children living in malaria transmission areas benefit from additional scheduled doses of antimalarial treatment, even when they are not ill. For example, a meta-analysis of six trials of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) given to children at routine immunization visits demonstrated an average decrease of 30% in episodes of clinical malaria, 15% in anemia, and 24% in all-cause hospital admissions among children receiving SP compared to children who did not receive the drug at these visits. Finally, providers and clients may be inclined to disregard a negative blood slide or RDT, especially in situations where they have not identified an additional treatable cause of illness. Withholding antimalarial treatments from such children might adversely affect provider and client satisfaction and poor client satisfaction may reduce subsequent health facility utilization. It might also encourage disappointed clients to seek treatment in the private sector where a broad range of antimalarial drugs-most of them single drug treatments that contribute to the development of resistance and which are not recommended in the national treatment policy-can be obtained without diagnostic confirmation. We propose a longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the identifiable causes of treatable fever among 1000 malaria-negative children presenting to outpatient health clinics in Miono, Bagamoyo District, Tanzania using a variety of clinical, microbiological and serologic methods. In addition we intend to follow these 1000 malaria-negative children for up to 91 days or until their next malaria infection to assess their clinical progress and need for further malaria treatment. To compare the relative benefit of providing antimalarial treatment even to malaria-negative children, half of the participants will be randomized to receive first-line treatment for malaria as currently recommended; the other half will receive treatment only for other identified illnesses. Alternative Hypothesis: Febrile, parasite-negative children treated for malaria have better clinical and longitudinal outcomes (as measured by prevalence of anemia at the end of the follow up period, reticulocyte count repeat visits to the health facility, hospitalization, and time to next infection with malaria parasites) than febrile, parasite-negative children not treated for malaria in areas of high transmission.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Malaria, Non-malarial Febrile Illness
Keywords
malaria, presumptive treatment, Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, fever

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1000 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Artemether-Lumefantrine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receive artemether-lumefantrine with direct observation of am dose on days 0, 1, and 2 of study
Arm Title
No treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No antimalarial treatment given on day 0.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Artemether-Lumefantrine
Other Intervention Name(s)
CoArtem, Novartis
Intervention Description
Artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem; Novartis) administered twice daily for three days as tablets containing 20 mg of artemether plus 120 mg of lumefantrine at a dosage of: 1 tablet (for patients weighing 5-14 kg) 2 tablets (for patients weighing 15-24 kg)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hematological recovery (Hb return to normal)
Time Frame
28, 63, 91 days
Title
Mean time to next infection
Time Frame
Weekly
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Etiologic agent of non-malarial febrile illness
Time Frame
Day 0

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
59 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 6 to 59 months. Present to health facility with fever (oral or rectal temperature ≥38°C or axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) or history of fever in the past 48 hours. Have negative rapid diagnostic test for malaria. Live within the boundaries of the officially recognized catchment area of Miono Health Center (within approximately 10 km of the health facility). Exclusion Criteria: Plan to travel or leave the area within the next 3 months. Have been treated for malaria in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment. Have clinical evidence or history of danger signs: convulsions, lethargy, loss of consciousness, unable to eat or drink, vomiting everything. Have severe, life-threatening anemia: hemoglobin ≤5g/ dL. Have very low weight for age, severe pneumonia, or very severe disease as defined in the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness algorithms. Have a history of sensitivity to artemisinin derivatives or Artemether-Lumefantrine. Have previously been enrolled in this study or another ongoing cohort study of malaria treatment options at these health facilities Chronic disease requiring ongoing medical care (i.e HIV on cotrimoxazole).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meredith L McMorrow, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
S. Patrick Kachur, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Larry Slutsker, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Saumu Ahmed, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ifakara Health Institute
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salim MK Abdulla, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Ifakara Health Institute
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Miono Health Center
City
Miono
State/Province
Bagamoyo District
Country
Tanzania
Facility Name
Msata Dispensary
City
Msata
Country
Tanzania

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Non-malarial Febrile Illness in Children in Areas of Perennial Malaria Transmission

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs