search
Back to results

Non-operative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using Dynamic Rehabilitation. Influence of Early Weight-bearing Compared With Non-weight-bearing

Primary Purpose

Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Early weight-bearing
Sponsored by
Hvidovre University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture focused on measuring Achilles tendon, rupture, non-operative, treatment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-60 years.
  • The patient must be able to speak and understand Danish.
  • The patient must be able to give informed consent.
  • The patient should be able to follow a regimen with a removable ankle orthosis.
  • The patient must be able to determine when rupture occurred, and it can't be over 4 days old.
  • The patient should be able to follow the postoperative controls.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Terminal illness.
  • Former achilles tendon rupture
  • Former surgery on the achilles tendon
  • Treatment with fluoroquinolones during the last 6 months.
  • Tendinosis treated with a tablet or injection with corticosteroids within the last 6 months.
  • Diagnosis of arterial insufficient in the leg.
  • Lack of palpable pulse in the foot
  • Severe medical illness: ASA score greater than 2
  • Distance from calcaneus to the rupture is less than 1 cm

Sites / Locations

  • Hvidovre Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Non-weight-bearing

Early weight-bearing

Arm Description

The group of non-weightbearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 6 No weightbearing. Crutches are obligatory. Week 7 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Dynamic rehabilitation From day 15 patients of both groups must do ankle exercises. Minimum 5 times a day the patient must take of the orthosis. Sitting at a table with the leg hanging freely over the edge a series of 25 active dorsal flexion and passive plantar flexion exercises must be made.

The group allowed early weight-bearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 2 Weightbearing is allowed with in pain limit. Crutches are recommended. Week 3 to 4 Full weightbearing is allowed. Week 5 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Crutches should be avoided.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

ATRS (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score)
Patient-reported validated scoring tool developed for assessment of symptoms and physical activity after treatment for acute achilles tendon rupture.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Heel-rise-work test
The accummulated work made doing repetetive heel-rises is messured on each leg.

Full Information

First Posted
November 9, 2011
Last Updated
August 17, 2013
Sponsor
Hvidovre University Hospital
Collaborators
DJO Incorporated
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01470833
Brief Title
Non-operative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using Dynamic Rehabilitation. Influence of Early Weight-bearing Compared With Non-weight-bearing
Official Title
Non-operative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using Dynamic Rehabilitation. The Influence of Early Weight-bearing Compared With Non-weight-bearing
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hvidovre University Hospital
Collaborators
DJO Incorporated

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Acute achilles tendon rupture is relatively frequent (11 to 37 per 100,000). There are great social benefits in optimizing treatment and shortening recovery. There is no consensus concerning the best treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture. Traditionally, surgical treatment is considered superior, but more recent studies show evidence that non-operative treatment with early dynamic rehabilitation gives the same functional outcome with fewer side effects. Traditionally non-operative treatment involves non-weightbearing for 6 weeks. This is not evidence based rather due to tradition. It is well documented that mechanical load improves tendon healing in general and has no detrimental effect on the healing of operated achilles tendons. The objective of this randomized study is to compare early weight-bearing with non-weight-bearing following non-operative treatment of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons.
Detailed Description
Background Acute achilles tendon rupture is relatively frequent (11 to 37 per 100,000) and potentially debilitating. Age distribution is bimodal, with a maximum incidence of sports-related injuries around 40 years of age. This is followed by a second and smaller increase in the incidence 50-60 years of age due to other, non sports-related injuries (1-3). The disease costs millions of dollars in treatment and lost earnings. There is no consensus on the best treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture. It is the authors' belief that the decision on non-operative or operative treatment significantly differ between the orthopedic surgical departments and individual orthopedic surgeons. Surgery is traditionally considered superior to conservative treatment due to a lower risk of rerupture of the achilles tendon (4). Despite the fact that surgery has a significantly increased risk of serious side effects such as deep infection (4). The decision of operative treatment is based on studies comparing surgical treatment and early dynamisation with non-operative treatment without dynamisation. Recent studies show increasing evidence that non-operative treatment with early dynamisation of the ankle gives the same functional outcome as operative treatment without significantly increased risk of rerupture (5.6). The same studies show that the overall complication rate is higher with surgery than with non-operative treatment. The surgical complications include infection, nerve damage, adhesion, contracture and cosmetic problems. Pajala et. al have compared outcome for patients who suffered rerupture with those who suffered a deep wound infection. They conclude that outcome after rerupture without complicating infection is satisfactory, whereas the outcome after deep wound infection is devastating (7). The risk of a debilitating complication is thus greater with surgery than is the case for conservative treatment. Traditionally non-operative treatment involves non-weightbearing for 6 weeks. This is not evidence based rather due to tradition. Suchak et. al have shown that early weight bearing after surgical treatment of ASR improves health related quality of life in the period after surgery and has no negative effect on tendon healing.(9) It is well documented that mechanical load improves tendon healing (10). Thus it is reasonable to believe that early loading of the tendon under controlled conditions will affect tendon healing beneficially. Objective of the study Primary purpose The objective of this randomized study is to compare early weight-bearing with non-weight-bearing following non-operative treatment of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons. All patients are treated with dynamic rehabilitation in a DJO Walker orthosis. Functional outcome is self assessed using Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and biomechanically by quantification of the stiffness of the achilles tendon and force development at concentric and eccentric work. Secondary objectives Rerupture, time to return to work, time to return to sports. Method and subjects: The survey is conducted as a clinical randomized trial (RCT). Patients allowed to bear weight from day 1 are compared with patients who are not allowed to bear weight the first 6 weeks of treatment. The orthosis is equipped with a pressure sensor that detects when the patient bear weight on the foot. The project has been approved by the medical ethic committee. Population 30 persons will be included in each group. Altogether 60 persons will be included. Timeplan The study is planned for a period of 3 years. Recruitment of patients started 1st of April 2011 and is expected to be completed in 2012. The follow up period is 2 years. Procedures In the emergency room an ankle orthosis (DJO Walker) is applied with the foot in 30 degree plantar flexion. The orthosis is worn for 8 weeks gradually bringing the foot to 0 degrees. From day 15 dynamisation of the ankle joint is performed. Treatment Week 1 to 2 3 wedges. The orthosis must be worn 24 hours a day. Can not be removed by bathing or at night. Week 3 to 4 2 wedges. Dynamic rehabilitation. The boot can not be removed at night. Week 5 to 6 1 wedge. Dynamic rehabilitation. The boot can not be removed at night. Week 7 to 8 No wedges. Dynamic rehabilitation. The boot can be removed at night. The group allowed early weight-bearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 2 Weightbearing is allowed with in pain limit. Crutches are recommended. Week 3 to 4 Full weightbearing is allowed. Week 5 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Crutches should be avoided. The group of non-weightbearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 6 No weightbearing. Crutches are obligatory. Week 7 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Dynamic rehabilitation From day 15 patients of both groups must do ankle exercises. Minimum 5 times a day the patient must take of the orthosis. Sitting at a table with the leg hanging freely over the edge a series of 25 active dorsal flexion and passive plantar flexion exercises must be made. Verification of compliance All DJO walkers used in the study are equipped with an integrated pressure sensor that detects when load is applied in the boot. Rehabilitation After 8 weeks the patient is seen at the out patient clinic. They are instructed rehabilitation regime by a physiotherapist. Rehabilitation is designed as a home exercise program with emphasis on movement, stability, coordination and strength. Week 9 to 16 The patient may cycle and swim. Week 16 to 26 Jogging on soft surfaces. Week 26 Sports can be resumed. We do not recommend badminton, tennis and squash as well as contact sports before week 40 - 52. Week 52 No restrictions

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture
Keywords
Achilles tendon, rupture, non-operative, treatment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Non-weight-bearing
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The group of non-weightbearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 6 No weightbearing. Crutches are obligatory. Week 7 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Dynamic rehabilitation From day 15 patients of both groups must do ankle exercises. Minimum 5 times a day the patient must take of the orthosis. Sitting at a table with the leg hanging freely over the edge a series of 25 active dorsal flexion and passive plantar flexion exercises must be made.
Arm Title
Early weight-bearing
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group allowed early weight-bearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 2 Weightbearing is allowed with in pain limit. Crutches are recommended. Week 3 to 4 Full weightbearing is allowed. Week 5 to 8 Full weightbearing is allowed. Crutches should be avoided.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Early weight-bearing
Intervention Description
The group allowed early weight-bearing is instructed as follows: Week 1 to 2 Weight-bearing is allowed with in pain limit. Crutches are recommended. Week 3 to 4 Full weight-bearing is allowed. Week 5 to 8 Full weight-bearing is allowed. Crutches should be avoided. Dynamic rehabilitation From day 15 patients of both groups must do ankle exercises. Minimum 5 times a day the patient must take of the orthosis. Sitting at a table with the leg hanging freely over the edge a series of 25 active dorsal flexion and passive plantar flexion exercises must be made.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ATRS (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score)
Description
Patient-reported validated scoring tool developed for assessment of symptoms and physical activity after treatment for acute achilles tendon rupture.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heel-rise-work test
Description
The accummulated work made doing repetetive heel-rises is messured on each leg.
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-60 years. The patient must be able to speak and understand Danish. The patient must be able to give informed consent. The patient should be able to follow a regimen with a removable ankle orthosis. The patient must be able to determine when rupture occurred, and it can't be over 4 days old. The patient should be able to follow the postoperative controls. Exclusion Criteria: Terminal illness. Former achilles tendon rupture Former surgery on the achilles tendon Treatment with fluoroquinolones during the last 6 months. Tendinosis treated with a tablet or injection with corticosteroids within the last 6 months. Diagnosis of arterial insufficient in the leg. Lack of palpable pulse in the foot Severe medical illness: ASA score greater than 2 Distance from calcaneus to the rupture is less than 1 cm
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristoffer W Barfod, Medical Doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Hvidovre University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hvidovre Hospital
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Non-operative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using Dynamic Rehabilitation. Influence of Early Weight-bearing Compared With Non-weight-bearing

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs