Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (One-Plus-One)
Primary Purpose
Mitral Regurgitation Functional
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MitraClip implantation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Mitral Regurgitation Functional focused on measuring Mitral Regurgitation, transcatheter mitral valve repair, MitraClip
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Absence of a structural abnormality of the mitral valve giving rise to MR.
- MR severity of US grade 3+ or 4+ of central or noncentral origin
- Patient must consent to randomization in the hybrid operating theater upon successful implantation of a single MitraClip. Written informed consent must be provided prior to the MitraClip procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with primary regurgitation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
One CLIP
Two CLIPs
Arm Description
Implantation of single MitraClip
Implantation of second MitraClip (after successful Implantation of single MitraClip)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Evaluation of number of participants who died death within one year
death
Evaluation of number of rehospitalizations due to heart failure among patients receiving one or two clips
heart failure rehospitalization
Evaluation of number of participants with recurrent regurgitation within one year
recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>grade 2+ at 1 year)
Secondary Outcome Measures
death
freedom from death (1-year)
heart failure
freedom from heart failure (1-year)
rehospitalization
rehospitalization
regurgitation
freedom from recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>2+; 1-year)
success rate
procedural success rate in 2-clip arm
procedure duration
procedure duration
total device time
total device time
fluoroscopy time
fluoroscopy time
contrast volume
contrast volume
complications
periprocedural (30-day) complications
echocardiographic variables
The following echocardiographic variables will be assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at 12 months: Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; LV outflow tract diameter and velocity time integral in LV outflow tract (to calculate forward stroke volume).
changes in echocardiographic variables
Changes from baseline to 12 months in echocardiographically assessed (at both time points) LV end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; and forward stroke volume.
NYHA
NYHA functional class
6-minutes walk
6-minutes walk distance
quality of life
Assessment of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) quality-of-life score. The questionnaire consists of 21 quality-of-life questions to be answered by the patient on a grading scale of 0 (best) to 5 (worst). Thus, the overall MLHFQ score ranges from 0 to 105.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03503851
First Posted
March 6, 2018
Last Updated
January 2, 2019
Sponsor
Asklepios proresearch
Collaborators
Abbott
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03503851
Brief Title
Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Acronym
One-Plus-One
Official Title
Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (One-Plus-One)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Delay during study initiation. Change of MitraClip design in meantime.
Study Start Date
May 2018 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
November 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Asklepios proresearch
Collaborators
Abbott
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Implantation of the MitraClip has become the most frequently used percutaneous technique to treat significant (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) in elderly patients deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk. In Europe, about two-thirds of patients treated with the MitraClip suffer from MR of functional origin secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. At present, there is debate among operators on whether stabilizing/supporting a single adequately implanted clip with a second clip is beneficial for patients with functional MR.
Detailed Description
Implantation of the MitraClip has become the most frequently used percutaneous technique to treat significant (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) in elderly patients deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk. In Europe, about two-thirds of patients treated with the MitraClip suffer from MR of functional origin secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. At present, there is debate among operators on whether stabilizing/supporting a single adequately implanted clip with a second clip is beneficial for patients with functional MR.
Purpose To demonstrate the noninferiority of a 1-clip strategy vs. a 2-clip strategy of MitraClip implantation, when the second clip in the 2-clip study arm is implanted for stabilizing/supporting purposes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mitral Regurgitation Functional
Keywords
Mitral Regurgitation, transcatheter mitral valve repair, MitraClip
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-arm trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
One CLIP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implantation of single MitraClip
Arm Title
Two CLIPs
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implantation of second MitraClip (after successful Implantation of single MitraClip)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MitraClip implantation
Intervention Description
Device to approximate the mitral valve leaflets
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluation of number of participants who died death within one year
Description
death
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Evaluation of number of rehospitalizations due to heart failure among patients receiving one or two clips
Description
heart failure rehospitalization
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Evaluation of number of participants with recurrent regurgitation within one year
Description
recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>grade 2+ at 1 year)
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
death
Description
freedom from death (1-year)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
heart failure
Description
freedom from heart failure (1-year)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
rehospitalization
Description
rehospitalization
Time Frame
1-year
Title
regurgitation
Description
freedom from recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>2+; 1-year)
Time Frame
1-year
Title
success rate
Description
procedural success rate in 2-clip arm
Time Frame
1-year
Title
procedure duration
Description
procedure duration
Time Frame
1-year
Title
total device time
Description
total device time
Time Frame
1-year
Title
fluoroscopy time
Description
fluoroscopy time
Time Frame
1-year
Title
contrast volume
Description
contrast volume
Time Frame
1-year
Title
complications
Description
periprocedural (30-day) complications
Time Frame
1-year
Title
echocardiographic variables
Description
The following echocardiographic variables will be assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at 12 months: Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; LV outflow tract diameter and velocity time integral in LV outflow tract (to calculate forward stroke volume).
Time Frame
1-year
Title
changes in echocardiographic variables
Description
Changes from baseline to 12 months in echocardiographically assessed (at both time points) LV end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; and forward stroke volume.
Time Frame
1-year
Title
NYHA
Description
NYHA functional class
Time Frame
1-year
Title
6-minutes walk
Description
6-minutes walk distance
Time Frame
1-year
Title
quality of life
Description
Assessment of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) quality-of-life score. The questionnaire consists of 21 quality-of-life questions to be answered by the patient on a grading scale of 0 (best) to 5 (worst). Thus, the overall MLHFQ score ranges from 0 to 105.
Time Frame
1-year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Absence of a structural abnormality of the mitral valve giving rise to MR.
MR severity of US grade 3+ or 4+ of central or noncentral origin
Patient must consent to randomization in the hybrid operating theater upon successful implantation of a single MitraClip. Written informed consent must be provided prior to the MitraClip procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
patients with primary regurgitation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Dept. of Cardiology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26718672
Citation
Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, Smart SC, Trento A, Siegel RJ, Apruzzese P, Fail P, Rinaldi MJ, Smalling RW, Hermiller JB, Heimansohn D, Gray WA, Grayburn PA, Mack MJ, Lim DS, Ailawadi G, Herrmann HC, Acker MA, Silvestry FE, Foster E, Wang A, Glower DD, Mauri L; EVEREST II Investigators. Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: 5-Year Results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 29;66(25):2844-2854. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21463154
Citation
Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, Kar S, Rinaldi MJ, Fail PS, Smalling RW, Siegel R, Rose GA, Engeron E, Loghin C, Trento A, Skipper ER, Fudge T, Letsou GV, Massaro JM, Mauri L; EVEREST II Investigators. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 14;364(15):1395-406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009355. Epub 2011 Apr 4. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):189. Glower, Donald G [corrected to Glower, Donald D].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20219746
Citation
Franzen O, Baldus S, Rudolph V, Meyer S, Knap M, Koschyk D, Treede H, Barmeyer A, Schofer J, Costard-Jackle A, Schluter M, Reichenspurner H, Meinertz T. Acute outcomes of MitraClip therapy for mitral regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients: emphasis on adverse valve morphology and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(11):1373-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq050. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22685268
Citation
Baldus S, Schillinger W, Franzen O, Bekeredjian R, Sievert H, Schofer J, Kuck KH, Konorza T, Mollmann H, Hehrlein C, Ouarrak T, Senges J, Meinertz T; German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions (TRAMI) investigators. MitraClip therapy in daily clinical practice: initial results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Sep;14(9):1050-5. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs079. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23433761
Citation
Grasso C, Capodanno D, Scandura S, Cannata S, Imme S, Mangiafico S, Pistritto A, Ministeri M, Barbanti M, Caggegi A, Chiaranda M, Dipasqua F, Giaquinta S, Occhipinti M, Ussia G, Tamburino C. One- and twelve-month safety and efficacy outcomes of patients undergoing edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair (from the GRASP Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2013 May 15;111(10):1482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.300. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23343688
Citation
Surder D, Pedrazzini G, Gaemperli O, Biaggi P, Felix C, Rufibach K, der Maur CA, Jeger R, Buser P, Kaufmann BA, Moccetti M, Hurlimann D, Buhler I, Bettex D, Scherman J, Pasotti E, Faletra FF, Zuber M, Moccetti T, Luscher TF, Erne P, Grunenfelder J, Corti R. Predictors for efficacy of percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system: the results of the MitraSwiss registry. Heart. 2013 Jul;99(14):1034-40. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303105. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23747789
Citation
Maisano F, Franzen O, Baldus S, Schafer U, Hausleiter J, Butter C, Ussia GP, Sievert H, Richardt G, Widder JD, Moccetti T, Schillinger W. Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 17;62(12):1052-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.094. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25169171
Citation
Nickenig G, Estevez-Loureiro R, Franzen O, Tamburino C, Vanderheyden M, Luscher TF, Moat N, Price S, Dall'Ara G, Winter R, Corti R, Grasso C, Snow TM, Jeger R, Blankenberg S, Settergren M, Tiroch K, Balzer J, Petronio AS, Buttner HJ, Ettori F, Sievert H, Fiorino MG, Claeys M, Ussia GP, Baumgartner H, Scandura S, Alamgir F, Keshavarzi F, Colombo A, Maisano F, Ebelt H, Aruta P, Lubos E, Plicht B, Schueler R, Pighi M, Di Mario C; Transcatheter Valve Treatment Sentinel Registry Investigators of the EURObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology. Percutaneous mitral valve edge-to-edge repair: in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up of 628 patients of the 2011-2012 Pilot European Sentinel Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 2;64(9):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1166.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25601532
Citation
Eggebrecht H, Schelle S, Puls M, Plicht B, von Bardeleben RS, Butter C, May AE, Lubos E, Boekstegers P, Ouarrak T, Senges J, Schmermund A. Risk and outcomes of complications during and after MitraClip implantation: Experience in 828 patients from the German TRAnscatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86(4):728-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25838. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
Description
Related Info
Learn more about this trial
Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs