search
Back to results

Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus)
Rapamycin-eluting stent
Sponsored by
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients at least 18 years old Stable or unstable angina or a positive stress test "de novo" coronary artery lesions Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Myocardial infarction within 48 h. before enrollment Target lesion located in left main trunk Contraindication or known allergy to aspirin, heparin, thienopyridines, rapamycin, paclitaxel or stainless steel

Sites / Locations

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
  • First Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Due to randomisation patients got a Paclitaxel-eluting stent

Due to randomization patients got a Rapamycin-eluting stent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

In-stent late luminal loss

Secondary Outcome Measures

Angiographic restenosis at follow-up angiography
Need for target lesion revascularization due restenosis at 9 months

Full Information

First Posted
August 31, 2005
Last Updated
January 10, 2008
Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Collaborators
Bayerische Forschungsstiftung Muenchen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00140530
Brief Title
Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)
Official Title
A Randomized Trial of a Nonpolymer-Based Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Versus a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2008
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
June 2005 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Collaborators
Bayerische Forschungsstiftung Muenchen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent compared to standard polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent to reduce reblockage of coronary arteries.
Detailed Description
Drug-eluting stents represent a major advance in the treatment of restenosis. They have dramatically reduced the need of repeat revascularization procedures, and, thanks to the excellent results obtained in various patient subsets, these devices are now used in almost 90% of the stent implantation procedures performed in US hospitals. Along with the increasing number of patients receiving drug-eluting stents and availability of long-term follow-up data, concern has arisen regarding the safety of these devices. At the core of this concern is the potential for increased inflammatory and thrombogenic responses and their life-threatening consequences associated with the polymers employed for the delivery of antirestenotic agents. A growing interest has been shown on polymer-free stents with a microporous surface as an alternative to stents employing polymeric coating for local drug delivery. Recently, we developed a mobile system which enables coating in the catheterization laboratory of polymeric free stents with different drug doses or combinations. Using a porcine coronary model of restenosis, we found that coating with rapamycin of a polymer-free microporous stent is feasible and effectively reduces neointimal proliferation. More recently, in a clinical study in which the efficacy of several doses of rapamycin was assessed, we showed that non-polymer coating with rapamycin is safe and leads to a dose-dependent reduction in restenosis. While the advantage deriving from the lack of polymeric cover in on-site coated rapamycin-eluting stents is readily understandable, their relative efficacy as compared with commercially available polymer-based drug-eluting stents has yet to be evaluated. Comparison: Polymer-free microporous stents coated with rapamycin versus standard polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
450 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Due to randomisation patients got a Paclitaxel-eluting stent
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Due to randomization patients got a Rapamycin-eluting stent.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Taxus
Intervention Description
patients has been implanted the Paclitaxel-eluting stent.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Rapamycin-eluting stent
Intervention Description
patients has been implanted the Rapamycin-eluting stent.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
In-stent late luminal loss
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Angiographic restenosis at follow-up angiography
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Need for target lesion revascularization due restenosis at 9 months
Time Frame
9 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients at least 18 years old Stable or unstable angina or a positive stress test "de novo" coronary artery lesions Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Myocardial infarction within 48 h. before enrollment Target lesion located in left main trunk Contraindication or known allergy to aspirin, heparin, thienopyridines, rapamycin, paclitaxel or stainless steel
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Albert Schomig, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adnan Kastrati, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
City
Munich
ZIP/Postal Code
80636
Country
Germany
Facility Name
First Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
City
Munich
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15975990
Citation
Hausleiter J, Kastrati A, Wessely R, Dibra A, Mehilli J, Schratzenstaller T, Graf I, Renke-Gluszko M, Behnisch B, Dirschinger J, Wintermantel E, Schomig A; investigators of the individualizable durg-eluting Stent System to Abrogate Restenosis Project. Prevention of restenosis by a novel drug-eluting stent system with a dose-adjustable, polymer-free, on-site stent coating. Eur Heart J. 2005 Aug;26(15):1475-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi405. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14724301
Citation
Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):221-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12438288
Citation
Virmani R, Liistro F, Stankovic G, Di Mario C, Montorfano M, Farb A, Kolodgie FD, Colombo A. Mechanism of late in-stent restenosis after implantation of a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system in humans. Circulation. 2002 Nov 19;106(21):2649-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041632.02514.14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14744976
Citation
Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, Musumeci G, Grieco N, Motta T, Mihalcsik L, Tespili M, Valsecchi O, Kolodgie FD. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 2004 Feb 17;109(6):701-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000116202.41966.D4. Epub 2004 Jan 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16391155
Citation
Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Wessely R, Dibra A, Hausleiter J, Jaschke B, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Restenosis--Test Equivalence Between 2 Drug-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST) Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of a nonpolymer-based rapamycin-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent for the reduction of late lumen loss. Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):273-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.575977. Epub 2006 Jan 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22431239
Citation
King L, Byrne RA, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A, Pache J. Five-year clinical outcomes of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a permanent polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent: final results of the intracoronary stenting and angiographic restenosis - test equivalence between two drug-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):E23-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24375. Epub 2012 May 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Nonpolymer- and Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents for Restenosis (ISAR-TEST-1)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs