search
Back to results

Novel Arm Restraint in the Intensive Care Unit

Primary Purpose

Acute Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Novel restraint
Sponsored by
University of Vermont
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Acute Respiratory Failure

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. >65 years old
  2. Physician order for use of bilateral wrist restraints
  3. Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of >48 hours
  4. Expected ICU stay >3 days after enrollment (to permit adequate exposure to proposed intervention)
  5. Not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score > -2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Upper extremity impairments that prevent use of novel restraint device (e.g. amputation, arm injury)
  2. Limited mobility of either upper extremity prior to admission (e.g. frozen shoulder, severe arthritis)
  3. Pre-existing primary systemic neuromuscular disease (e.g. Guillain-Barre)
  4. Neuromuscular blocker infusion (eligible once infusion discontinued if other inclusion criteria met)
  5. Pre-existing severe cognitive impairment or language barrier prohibiting outcome assessment
  6. Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 6 days from enrollment
  7. Incarcerated
  8. Severe skin breakdown on either upper extremity

Sites / Locations

  • University of Vermont College of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Novel restraint first, then traditional restraint

Traditional restraint first, then novel restraint

Arm Description

Participants will be randomized to wear the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.

Participants will be randomized to wear traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Severe Adverse Events [Safety]
Safety will be measured by <20% mean incidence across all of the following measures listed below (each listed as individual measure)
Incidence of clinician or patient laceration
Grade 2b or higher skin laceration (per Skin Tear Audit Research [STAR] Skin Tear Classification System) in patient or clinician from any sharp edges of device. The STAR grading system ranges from grade 1a at best to 3 at worst. Each laceration is given an individual score based on appearance.
Incidence of pressure ulcer from device
Development of pressure ulcer from device of Stage 3 or greater per 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Stages. This staging system provides an individual score to each pressure ulcer based on appearance from stage 1 (best) to stage 4 (worst)
Incidence of self-removal of novel restraint
Self-removal of novel restraint
Incidence of damage to hospital bed rendering it non-functional
Any damage to hospital bed from restraint device rendering it non-functional
incidence of damage to ICU equipment
Any damage to ICU equipment (e.g. ventilator) rendering it non-functional

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of self-extubation
Will record instances where participants remove own endotracheal tube
Enrolling adequate number of patients
Demonstrate that conducting a future RCT is feasible by consent/recruitment into this study of 8 patients over 7 months
Upper extremity mobility
Actigraphy counts as measured by Philliips actigraph, a device that records individual movements
Sedation/agitation score
Agitation measured by the Richmond agitation sedation score [RASS] every hour while wearing restraints. This score measures sedation and agitation from a scale of -5 (most sedated) to +4 (most agitated)
Delirium score
Delirium measured Confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU) delirium score every 4 hours. This score is binary (i.e., delirium yes/no) based on answers to 4 questions.
Satisfaction with novel device
Satisfaction with the novel restraint device will be measured with the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) satisfaction tool. This 12-item questionnaire is scored from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction).

Full Information

First Posted
July 23, 2018
Last Updated
March 8, 2022
Sponsor
University of Vermont
Collaborators
Healthy Design, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03621475
Brief Title
Novel Arm Restraint in the Intensive Care Unit
Official Title
Pilot Study of a Novel Arm Restraint For Critically Ill Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 11, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Vermont
Collaborators
Healthy Design, LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot is to evaluate a novel restraint device in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible.
Detailed Description
The goal of this Fast-Track Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to optimize and test a novel arm restraint in older critically ill mechanically ventilated patients that may increase mobility; reduce agitation, use of sedative medications, and delirium; and exhibit high satisfaction and acceptability among hospital staff, family members, and patients. Older mechanically ventilated patients are often immobilized with wrist restraints to prevent self-extubation and are sedated to reduce agitation caused by their restraints and endotracheal (breathing) tube. This sedation and immobility lead to complications, including delirium and muscle weakness, that are independently associated with long term cognitive impairment, reduced physical functioning, and mortality. Specifically, the incidence and duration of delirium in the ICU are strongly and independently associated with long-term cognitive impairment that is similar to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. Healthy Design has developed a novel restraint device that allows arm mobility but prohibits hands from reaching oral/nasal endotracheal and feeding tubes or intravenous lines. Because it permits mobility, the novel restraint may reduce agitation and the need for sedatives. The objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate the novel restraint in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future RCT is feasible.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Respiratory Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
8 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Novel restraint first, then traditional restraint
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be randomized to wear the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.
Arm Title
Traditional restraint first, then novel restraint
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be randomized to wear traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Novel restraint
Intervention Description
Use of a novel arm restraint
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Severe Adverse Events [Safety]
Description
Safety will be measured by <20% mean incidence across all of the following measures listed below (each listed as individual measure)
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
Incidence of clinician or patient laceration
Description
Grade 2b or higher skin laceration (per Skin Tear Audit Research [STAR] Skin Tear Classification System) in patient or clinician from any sharp edges of device. The STAR grading system ranges from grade 1a at best to 3 at worst. Each laceration is given an individual score based on appearance.
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
Incidence of pressure ulcer from device
Description
Development of pressure ulcer from device of Stage 3 or greater per 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Stages. This staging system provides an individual score to each pressure ulcer based on appearance from stage 1 (best) to stage 4 (worst)
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
Incidence of self-removal of novel restraint
Description
Self-removal of novel restraint
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
Incidence of damage to hospital bed rendering it non-functional
Description
Any damage to hospital bed from restraint device rendering it non-functional
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
incidence of damage to ICU equipment
Description
Any damage to ICU equipment (e.g. ventilator) rendering it non-functional
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of self-extubation
Description
Will record instances where participants remove own endotracheal tube
Time Frame
Through study day 2
Title
Enrolling adequate number of patients
Description
Demonstrate that conducting a future RCT is feasible by consent/recruitment into this study of 8 patients over 7 months
Time Frame
Study day 1
Title
Upper extremity mobility
Description
Actigraphy counts as measured by Philliips actigraph, a device that records individual movements
Time Frame
Continuously through study day 2
Title
Sedation/agitation score
Description
Agitation measured by the Richmond agitation sedation score [RASS] every hour while wearing restraints. This score measures sedation and agitation from a scale of -5 (most sedated) to +4 (most agitated)
Time Frame
Every hour through study day 2
Title
Delirium score
Description
Delirium measured Confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU) delirium score every 4 hours. This score is binary (i.e., delirium yes/no) based on answers to 4 questions.
Time Frame
Every 8 hours through study day 2
Title
Satisfaction with novel device
Description
Satisfaction with the novel restraint device will be measured with the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) satisfaction tool. This 12-item questionnaire is scored from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction).
Time Frame
Study day 2

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: >65 years old Physician order for use of bilateral wrist restraints Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of >48 hours Expected ICU stay >3 days after enrollment (to permit adequate exposure to proposed intervention) Not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score > -2) Exclusion Criteria: Upper extremity impairments that prevent use of novel restraint device (e.g. amputation, arm injury) Limited mobility of either upper extremity prior to admission (e.g. frozen shoulder, severe arthritis) Pre-existing primary systemic neuromuscular disease (e.g. Guillain-Barre) Neuromuscular blocker infusion (eligible once infusion discontinued if other inclusion criteria met) Pre-existing severe cognitive impairment or language barrier prohibiting outcome assessment Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 6 days from enrollment Incarcerated Severe skin breakdown on either upper extremity
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Vermont College of Medicine
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05405
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Novel Arm Restraint in the Intensive Care Unit

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs