Novel Dynamic Foot Abduction Bar for Treatment of Clubfoot

This is an assessor-blinded randomized feasibility trial evaluating a new dynamic bar for foot abduction bracing for clubfoot treatment. Eligible patients must have a well-corrected idiopathic clubfoot (Pirani Score ≤ 0.5) and be in the minimum 12 hours per day bracing stage of the Ponseti clubfoot treatment protocol. The overall study period will be 90 days in length. For the first 30 days, the experimental cohort will wear the new Dynamic Bar (DB) with standard ankle-foot orthoses (boots) and the control cohort will continue wearing the standard Straight Bar (SB). After this 30-day period, the experimental cohort will return to wearing their standard SB. All patients will be evaluated on Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period to monitor for recurrence of the clubfoot deformity, complications of brace wearing, to submit brace wear logs, and to complete parent-reported questionnaires regarding their perceptions of the Foot Abduction Brace (FAB) and their child's comfort. A minimum of 10 patients per arm will be recruited. A temperature sensor will be added in each participant's boots during the 90-day study period to objectively measure time of brace wear. It is hypothesized that when patients are wearing the DB they will experience higher brace tolerance defined as increased wear time of the brace as measured by the temperature sensors, and higher comfort levels as reported by parents, without an increase in clubfoot deformity recurrence compared to the SB.

Primary objective: To evaluate the ease of recruiting and retaining participants for a randomized-controlled effectiveness trial of a novel FAB bar. Primary endpoint: Recruitment rate, dropout rate, and related responses on the parent-reported survey. Secondary objectives: To compare parental perception of the child's comfort in the SB versus the DB for foot abduction bracing in Ponseti clubfoot treatment. To compare patient tolerance of the SB to the DB as measured by parent self-reporting and by how many hours the brace is worn per day as recorded by temperature sensors placed in the boots. To perform a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the DB at preventing clubfoot recurrence during the bracing phase when the brace is worn as prescribed for a 30-day trial period. Secondary endpoints: Patient comfort levels determined by parent-reported surveys with 5-point Likert scale responses completed at Day 0, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period. Daily brace wear hours as measured by a parent self-reported log and by temperature sensors implanted inside the boots. Presence of clubfoot recurrence defined as a Pirani score > 0.5 representing any new development of cavus, adduction and/or hindfoot varus, or a loss of passive ankle dorsiflexion (equinus) of < 10 degrees above neutral or a reduction of 5 or more degrees from the previous visit. Clubfoot patients are normally reviewed in clinic every 3-6 months. If scheduling permits, Day 0 of the study period will align with patient's already scheduled follow up visit. All patients will therefore require either 3 or 4 extra visits (possibly on Day 0, and surely on Day 7, Day 30, and Day 90). These extra visits will consist of the same evaluations done in the routine clubfoot monitoring protocol, in addition to the study-related questionnaire, brace wear log, video recording (on Day 30 only), and temperature sensor data collection. Three surveys will be administered to parents on Day 0, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period. These surveys will be collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) hosted at SickKids. Parents will also be asked to complete a brace wear log to be submitted at Day 30 and Day 90 of the study period. Most patient information that will be reviewed in this study is data being collected and stored per the REB-approved Clubfoot Research Registry protocol (REB #1000053919). All patients enrolled in study this will also be enrolled in Clubfoot Research Registry, if not already enrolled. Each patient will be assigned a unique study ID. Patients will be assigned to an arm by drawing lots. This will be done by preparing 20 opaque, sealed envelopes. 10 of these envelopes will contain the word "Experimental," and the remaining 10 will contain the word "Control." On Day 0 of the study period, each participant will choose an envelope at random, and be assigned to that arm. This technique will ensure that the ratio between patients in each arm is 1:1. To minimize bias, the outcomes assessor, who is an advanced practice physiotherapist clubfoot provider, will be independent of the study and design teams and blinded, so they will not know which bar has been assigned to which patient. To ensure that the outcomes assessor remains blinded, a member of the study team will check in the patient at the beginning of each visit, remind the patient and parent about the blinding, and ensure that the bar is removed and hidden from view before the outcome assessor enters the evaluation room. Unblinding may occur for any participant who has experienced an adverse event, such as clubfoot recurrence, and must return to their original SB, if not already using it. Unblinding will occur for all participants if any severe adverse event occurs that is related to the use of the DB. For unblinding to occur, the outcomes assessor must notify a member of the study team, and any member of the study team may unblind the outcomes assessor. All intentional and unintentional breaking of the blind will be documented in the study's enrollment log, along with the reason(s) for unblinding. Per protocol, the Data Safety Monitoring Board and Research Ethics Board will also be notified of any adverse events or unblinding. Participation in this trial is completely voluntary and parents may choose not to participate and may withdraw at any time. If parents choose to withdraw, this will be noted in the study enrollment log and their collected data will be deleted upon request. As an incentive for visit attendance, all participants will receive $20 CAD for each extra clinical visit (possibly on Day 0, and surely on Day 7, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period) as reimbursement for travel expenses, given on the day of the final study visit. STUDY INTERVENTIONS An example of a standard SB is the Ponseti bar, which is a rigid, metal bar that clips on and off of the patient's boots by means of a patented "Quick Clip" mechanism. This bar is available in 3 sizes, depending on the patient's shoulder width. Designated as a class 1 medical device, this bar is used as standard care for clubfoot treatment. The DB prototype is a 3-part bar, consisting of a crossbar with two L-shaped components on each end, which connect to the boots by the same "Quick Clip" mechanism. Each L-component is connected to the crossbar via a low friction slider, which allows for independent axial translation perpendicular to the crossbar, and a modified ball joint linkage, which allows for independent sagittal rotation. The ball joint linkages also provide a small amount of independent axial and coronal rotation. This provides the patient with extra ankle dorsiflexion and abduction up to a maximum of 30 degrees in each direction. This allows for added movement through the knee and hips, reduces strain at the patient's joints, and reduces stress concentration at the hinges of the bar. The ball joint linkages therefore reduce potential discomfort for the patient and reduce the chance that the bar will break while in use. The L-components are machined using 5052-H32 aluminum and have a soft protective end cap to reduce the risk of any unintentional self-injuries. The crossbar and sliders are 3D printed using medical grade ABS plastic. They are attached using adhesive, two steel ball joint linkages, and various fasteners made out of steel and brass. Ideal foot position for clubfoot is approximately 10 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion, and 60 degrees of external rotation with the feet held shoulder-width apart. This position is maintained as the DB is pre-bent to provide 10 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion, the external rotation can be adjusted with bolts, and the length of the bar can be adjusted with set screws. While the DB provides extra mobility, the ball joint linkages prevent patients' ankle dorsiflexion of less than 10 degrees and abduction of less than 60 degrees at all times during use. We anticipate that providing patients with more ankle dorsiflexion and external rotation than required will have no negative effects on patient outcomes. Both bars are compatible with the same boots. STUDY INTERVENTION COMPLIANCE Standard care for clubfoot treatment is to assess bracing compliance by asking the parent about the patient's daily wear time at each scheduled appointment. Studies have shown that parents over-report brace wear by approximately 30%. In order to objectively measure bracing compliance, a temperature sensor will be added in each patient's boots during the 90-day study period. The temperature sensors that will be used are the DS1921G-F5 Thermochron iButtons, designed and manufactured by iButtonLink Technology in Wisconsin, USA. Each device is a battery powered data logger equipped with a temperature sensor. The devices will be set to record the temperature of the boots' insoles every 45 minutes and launched on Day 0 and Day 30 on the study period. The device complies with medical standards and is calibrated against a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable source. Thermochron iButtons have previously been used in a similar clubfoot bracing adherence study. The data obtained from these temperature sensors will be used to calculate the daily brace wear time of each patient during the interventions, by measuring the temperature increase when the child is in the brace. For unilateral clubfoot cases, the temperature sensor will be placed in the boot that holds the clubfoot. For bilateral cases, the sensor will be placed on the right boot. To implant each sensor, technicians at SickKids will drill a hole through the sole of the boot and insert the iButton with an interference fit. This hole will be located directly over top of the slider in the "Quick Clip" mechanism, so that the slider secures the sensor and prevents it from falling out. The insole of the boot will be then covered with a layer of ShearBan® in order to ensure patient comfort and to ensure that the temperature sensor never comes into contact with skin. ShearBan is a self-adhesive film often used in insoles and orthopaedic braces. This procedure mimics that of another clubfoot brace compliance study, for which an installation video has been created. The orthotics department will ensure that implantation of the iButton does not compromise the fit or function of the boots. Depending on the size and model of the participant's current boots, each participant will either receive a new boot that is pre-fitted with an iButton sensor, or the iButton sensor will be inserted into their current boot on Day 0 of the study period. If a new boot was given, the study team will collect this boot on Day 90 of the study period, and the participant will return to their original boot. To launch and retrieve data from the temperature sensors, a member of the study team will have to briefly remove the sensor from the boot on Day 0, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period. When reinserting the sensor, the research team will ensure that the hole is re-covered with a layer of ShearBan. If the participant is using their original boots and the parent wishes to remove the sensor after the study is complete, the research team will remove the sensor and cover the hole with a layer of ShearBan. Participants are free to withdraw from participation in the study at any time upon request. STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES The physical exam that will be performed at each study visit will be done according to standard care for clubfoot. The only physical assessments that are not part of standard clubfoot care is measuring the patients' tibia length to ensure appropriate fit of the DB, as well as measuring the patients' height and weight to explore any possible reasons for bar malfunction or breakage. The height and weight of each participant will be measured and recorded by the blinded outcome assessor, with or without help of the clinic nurse, who routinely collects this data at SickKids. To quantify parent perception and feedback, three different surveys will be administered to the parents/caregiver at scheduled times throughout the trial. This includes a survey at Day 0, Day 30, and Day 90 of the study period. Surveys will be completed in-person at the time of clinic visits, or via email after the visit if there was insufficient time to collect the data. The purpose of the first survey on Day 0 is to assess parental perception of the standard SB prior to the study period. For the experimental arm, the second survey will assess parental perception of the new DB immediately after 30 days of wear, and the third survey will assess parental impression of returning to the SB after use of the DB at Day 90. For the control arm, the Day 30 and 90 surveys will serve as a test-retest reliability measure from Day 0 to assess if any variation over time (due to change in foot shape, treatment, recurrence, or environment) can be detected. ADVERSE EVENTS AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in a study participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of the DB, whether or not considered related to the investigational intervention. Stable chronic conditions which are present prior to entry in the study and do not worsen are not considered AE. These pre-existing conditions will be documented in the participant's medical history. We do not foresee any SAEs occurring that are related to the use of the DB. That being said, all SAEs will be documented and reported for any incident that: is related to a failure of the dynamic bar or a deterioration in its effectiveness, or any inadequacy in its directions for use; and has led to the death or a serious deterioration in the state of health of a patient, user or other person, or could do so were it to recur. "Serious deterioration in the state of health" means: a life-threatening disease, disorder or abnormal physical state; the permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure; or a condition that necessitates an unexpected medical or surgical intervention to prevent such a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state or permanent impairment or damage. Known risks associated with all standard bars include pressure sores, skin rashes, unintentional self-injuries, and clubfoot recurrence for suboptimal brace wear or application. We anticipate that the same risks are associated with the dynamic bar prototype, in addition to the risk of bar malfunction or breakage due to lack of extensive material evaluations, and an increased risk of clubfoot recurrence due to the unprecedented mobility provided to patients. If any of these events occur during the study, they will be documented in the patient's chart, and on REDCap as specified by the Clubfoot Research Registry protocol. These events might also result in the participant being withdrawn from the study or temporarily discontinued from the study intervention. It should be noted that pressure sores may break skin. While patients are encouraged to wear socks with their boots, if they choose to not wear socks, this may result in the ShearBan adhesive, which will be placed on top of the temperature sensor inside the boot, coming into contact with intact or non-intact skin. The severity of an AE will be assessed by the study team's physiotherapists and/or PI, who will use the following definitions when assessing the intensity of an AE: Mild - Events require minimal or no treatment and do not interfere with the participant's daily activities. Moderate - Events result in a low level of inconvenience or concern with the therapeutic measures. Moderate events may cause some interference with functioning. Severe - Events interrupt a participant's usual daily activity and may require systemic drug therapy or other treatment. Severe events are usually potentially life-threatening or incapacitating. Of note, the term "severe" does not necessarily equate to "serious". The only "severe" AE that is foreseen to potentially occur during the study is clubfoot recurrence. Clubfoot recurrence would likely be treated by serial casting, as is standard care for clubfoot treatment. Mild to moderate AEs may potentially include pressure sores, skin rashes, and unintentional self-injuries. All of these AEs are known risks associated with FABs. All Adverse Events (AEs) will have their relationship to the DB assessed by the study team's physiotherapists and/or PI based on temporal relationship and their clinical judgment. The degree of certainty about causality will be graded using the categories below. Definitely Related - There is clear evidence to suggest a causal relationship, and other possible contributing factors can be ruled out. The clinical event occurs in a plausible time relationship to study intervention administration and cannot be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals. The response to withdrawal of the study intervention should be clinically plausible. Probably Related - There is evidence to suggest a causal relationship, and the influence of other factors is unlikely. The clinical event occurs within a reasonable time after administration of the study intervention, is unlikely to be attributed to concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals, and follows a clinically reasonable response on withdrawal. Possibly Related - There is some evidence to suggest a causal relationship (e.g., the event occurred within a reasonable time after administration of the study intervention). However, other factors may have contributed to the event (e.g., the participant's clinical condition, other concomitant events). Unlikely to be related - A clinical event whose temporal relationship to study intervention administration makes a causal relationship improbable (e.g., the event did not occur within a reasonable time after administration of the study intervention) and in which other drugs or chemicals or underlying disease provides plausible explanations (e.g., the participant's clinical condition, other concomitant treatments). Unrelated - The AE is completely independent of study intervention administration, and/or evidence exists that the event is definitely related to another etiology. All unexpected AEs will be reported to The Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board according to The Hospital for Sick Children's Adverse Event Reporting Requirements. TIME PERIOD AND FREQUENCY FOR EVENT ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOW-UP All AEs and SAEs occurring while on study will be documented regardless of relationship. Information to be collected will include event description, date of onset, date of resolution, outcome, and the assessment of seriousness, expectedness, relationship to study intervention, and severity by the study team's physiotherapists and/or PI. Any baseline condition recorded in the medical history that deteriorates at any time during the study, will be recorded as an AE or SAE. Changes in the severity of an AE will be documented to allow an assessment of the duration of the event at each level of severity to be performed. Events will be followed for outcome information until resolution or in the opinion of the study team's physiotherapists and/or PI, the participant is stable and does not require further follow-up, or the participant is deemed lost to follow-up. Participants and/or their parent/legal guardian will be informed in a timely manner of any new information, including safety information, that is relevant to that participant's willingness to continue participation. The communication of this information will be documented through a revised REB approved Informed Consent Form, where possible, based on the timeliness of the information. SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION The intent of this study is to obtain preliminary data on the current prototype and evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger-scale clinical trial. Therefore, only a minimum of 10 patients will be enrolled in each arm. In a future effectiveness randomized controlled trial, we plan to use a sample size of 124, with 62 patients per arm. This sample size will ensure that the study has sufficient statistical power to detect a minimal clinically detectable difference in recurrence rates of at least 20% between the SB and DB group. Note this is assuming that the recurrence rates in the control arm will be 30%, as reported recurrence rates after correction range from 20-41% (6). This power analysis was conducted based on 80% power and 5% type 1 error. The Clubfoot Clinic at SickKids sees approximately 35 patients per week. Based on the frequency of clinical visits required for patients at different stages in the Ponseti treatment, it is expected that approximately 15% of these patients will be between the ages of 1 and 3 and in the minimum 12-hour per day bracing stage of the Ponseti treatment. Furthermore, approximately 80% of all clubfoot patients are idiopathic, and it is expected that 75% of eligible patients will be willing to participate in the trial (22). Therefore, it is foreseen that it will take approximately 2 months to register all 20 participants. POPULATIONS FOR ANALYSES The following study populations are defined and will be analyzed as specified below: Intent to treat population: the total population of patients registered in the study. Experimental arm population: all registered participants in the experimental arm with DB. Control arm population: all registered participants in the control arm with SB. Safety population: all registered participants who wore their FAB as prescribed for the full 90-day study period. Brace discomfort population: all registered participants who have any history of brace intolerance or indicated in the parent-reported survey that they are not comfortable/have concerns with their original FAB. Brace comfort population: all registered participants who have no history of brace intolerance and indicated in the parent-reported survey that they are comfortable/have no concerns with their original FAB. STATISTICAL ANALYSES All data will be deidentified before analysis. Due to the small sample size, the analysis will consist of descriptive statistics, as defined in terms of means, standard deviations, and percentile ranks where applicable. ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY ENDPOINT Parent-reported comfort levels will be determined by parent-reported surveys with 5-point Likert scale responses. Results from these surveys will be analyzed with descriptive statistics for the intent to treat population, the brace discomfort population, and the brace comfort population. The enrollment log will also record the age and fit issues of patients that do not adequately fit the available prototype but are otherwise eligible. This will serve to inform future adaptations of the new DB for future trials. ANALYSIS OF THE SECONDARY ENDPOINTS Daily bracing times will be measured by a temperature sensor added in each patient's boots for the entire 90-day study period. The number of hours the brace is worn per day will be divided by the standard number of desirable hours in brace (12 hours) in order to obtain a fraction that quantifies the patient's adherence to the FAB. Mean 'adherence fractions' will be calculated for patients in each arm, and then compared using descriptive statistics. This analysis will be performed for the intent to treat population, the brace discomfort population, and the brace comfort population. This data will be compared to the self-reported brace wear hours by parents in their daily logs. To ensure minimal efficacy of the DB prototype, all signs of clubfoot recurrence will be carefully examined at each study visit. The null hypothesis is that 'the dynamic bar does not lead to higher rates of clubfoot recurrence,' and it will be rejected if the number of patients in the safety population that develop clubfoot recurrence during the 90-day study period, is substantially greater in the experimental arm than it is in the control arm (i.e. more than 2 instances of clubfoot recurrence in the experimental arm than in the control arm). Note that this endpoint is not intended to prove safety or efficacy, but rather to ensure that the design may prevent early recurrence before a larger-scale trial is conducted. Clubfoot recurrence is defined as a Pirani score > 0.5, a new occurrence of cavus, adduction and/or hindfoot varus, or a loss of passive ankle dorsiflexion (equinus) of < 10 degrees above neutral or a reduction of 5 or more degrees from the previous visit. Note that all clinical tests required to diagnose recurrence are routinely performed as standard clubfoot care. If consent is provided by the parents, a member of the study team will also record a video of each patient wearing their prescribed bar on Day 30 of the study period. These videos will be closely studied to compare the range of motion provided by the SB to the DB, and to verify that the DB consistently maintains proper foot position during use. Videos will be recorded on a password-protected personal device, audio will be removed, then the video will be uploaded each day to the patient's REDCap forms. The video will then be deleted from the personal device. All efforts will be made to made to only include the patient's feet and legs in the field of the video, and to blur or remove any identifiable physical marks like unique birthmarks and tattoos on the patient's skin. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS This study may be temporarily suspended or prematurely terminated if there is sufficient reasonable cause. Written notification, documenting the reason for study suspension or termination, will be provided by the suspending or terminating party to study participants and the REB. Study participants will be contacted, as applicable, and be informed of changes to study visit schedule. Circumstances that may warrant termination or suspension include, but are not limited to: Determination of unexpected, significant, or unacceptable risk to participants by use of the dynamic bar Insufficient compliance to protocol requirements Data that are not sufficiently complete and/or evaluable Determination of futility The study may resume once concerns about safety, protocol compliance, and data quality are addressed, and satisfy the Sponsor and REB. All research activities will be conducted in as private a setting as possible. Study data will be entered into REDCap, a secure, web-based application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies. The application and data are housed on servers provided by the Hospital for Sick Children. These servers are located within SickKids secure data center. Most patient health information that will be analyzed for this trial will be collected, stored, and destroyed as specified by the Clubfoot Research Registry (REB #1000053919). The clinical evaluations performed at each study visit will be standard care. A separate electronic enrollment log will track enrollment of patients by MRN number and name and assign a study ID to those patients that consent to participate in the trial. Data collected will not link to participants' OHIP number. Patient confidentiality will be ensured except when legally required. Only members of the research team will have access to the research data. Any data exported for statistical analysis will be de-identified. All identifying information will be kept behind 2 security measures or as per equivalent institutional policy, under the supervision of the PI and will not be transferred outside of the hospital. To enable evaluations and/or audits from the Sponsor or REB, the Principal Investigator agrees to keep records, including all original signed informed consent forms, consent discussion forms, the enrollment log, and surveys in a secure location for a minimum of 7 years in accordance with SickKids policy. Subsequently, all identifying data will be destroyed.

The clinician assessing foot shape for recurrence will be blinded to the brace type. Clinicians involved in fitting the brace will not be.

After Ponseti treatment of serial casting and tenotomy for clubfoot, patients are braced full time x 3 months then night time until age 5. This study compares the standard straight bar in a foot abduction brace to our novel dynamic bar. This group uses the novel bar.

After Ponseti treatment of serial casting and tenotomy for clubfoot, patients are braced full time x 3 months then night time until age 5. This study compares the standard straight bar in a foot abduction brace to our novel dynamic bar. This group uses the standard bar.

To evaluate the ease of recruiting participants for a randomized-controlled effectiveness trial of a novel FAB bar. This will be defined as time required to recruit desired sample size - if over 3 months it will be considered difficult and protocols for a future study should be revisited to improve recruitment strategies.

To evaluate the ease of retaining participants for a randomized-controlled effectiveness trial of a novel FAB bar. Retention will be defined as the dropout rate. We hope for 100% retention or a 0% dropout rate. Anything over 20% drop out will be considered a poor indicator for ease of participant retention.

To compare parental perception of the child's comfort in the SB versus the DB for foot abduction bracing in Ponseti clubfoot treatment.

To compare patient tolerance of the SB to the DB as measured by parent self-reporting and by how many hours the brace is worn per day as recorded by temperature sensors placed in the boots.

To perform a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the DB at preventing clubfoot recurrence during the bracing phase when the brace is worn as prescribed for a 30-day trial period.

Inclusion Criteria: Ability of parent/care giver to complete brace wear log/surveys in English Diagnosis of idiopathic clubfoot (unilateral or bilateral). Current use of a standard SB with their Foot Abduction Brace. In the minimum 12-hour per day bracing stage of the Ponseti treatment Aged 1 to 3 years (as the DB prototype was designed based on the average size and strength of a child within that age group). Well-corrected clubfoot/clubfeet (Pirani score ≤ 0.5) Enrollment in the SickKids Clubfoot Research Registry. Exclusion Criteria: Recurrent clubfoot deformity at time of recruitment and/or Day 0 in study period: Pirani score above 0.5; Presence of cavus, adduction, or hindfoot varus; Less than 10 degrees of passive ankle dorsiflexion. Current complaint of significant brace intolerance. Any condition or diagnosis, that could in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or delegate interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study instructions, might confound the interpretation of the study results, or put the participant at risk, i.e., skin conditions such as eczema, neurologic conditions or any non-idiopathic clubfoot, any acute or chronic illness perceived to be causing the child discomfort such as a cold or flu or other concurrent painful procedure. The patient does not adequately fit the available prototype, e.g., shoulder width distance is too narrow or wide for prototype bar width. However, these patients will be recorded in the study enrollment log to identify the size of this subset. The age and fit issues of these patients will also be recorded to allow future adaptations of the new DB to accommodate this subset. The patient is using an older boot model, in which a temperature sensor cannot be inserted, and the patient does not adequately fit the available boots, in which the temperature sensors have already been installed.

Anand A, Sala DA. Clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jan;42(1):22-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.38576.

Alves C. Bracing in clubfoot: do we know enough? J Child Orthop. 2019 Jun 1;13(3):258-264. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190069.

Hospital for Special Surgery [Internet]. New York: HSS. Method for Correcting Clubfoot: Overview for Parent; 2019 Sept 12 [cited 2021 Jan 11] Available from: https://www.hss.edu/conditions_thse-ponseti-method-for-clubfoot-correction.asp.

Garg S, Porter K. Improved bracing compliance in children with clubfeet using a dynamic orthosis. J Child Orthop. 2009 Aug;3(4):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0182-9. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

Azarpira MR, Emami MJ, Vosoughi AR, Rahbari K. Factors associated with recurrence of clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method. World J Clin Cases. 2016 Oct 16;4(10):318-322. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.318.

Zhao D, Liu J, Zhao L, Wu Z. Relapse of clubfoot after treatment with the Ponseti method and the function of the foot abduction orthosis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):245-52. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.245. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [Internet]. Illinois: AAOS. Study Finds Ponseti Method Remains an Effective Treatment for Clubfoot, Bracing Is Paramount; 2021 Jan 18 [cited 2021 May 25] Available from: https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2020/aaos-now-special-edition/research/662_pediatrics.

Gelfer Y, Wientroub S, Hughes K, Fontalis A, Eastwood DM. Congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review of relapse as a primary outcome of the Ponseti method. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):639-645. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1421.R1.

Morgenstein A, Davis R, Talwalkar V, Iwinski H Jr, Walker J, Milbrandt TA. A randomized clinical trial comparing reported and measured wear rates in clubfoot bracing using a novel pressure sensor. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Mar;35(2):185-91. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000205.

Aroojis A, Pandey T, Dusa A, Krishnan AG, Ghyar R, Ravi B. Development of a functional prototype of a SMART (Sensor-integrated for Monitoring And Remote Tracking) foot abduction brace for clubfoot treatment: a pre-clinical evaluation. Int Orthop. 2021 Sep;45(9):2401-2410. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05042-0. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

Sangiorgio SN, Ho NC, Morgan RD, Ebramzadeh E, Zionts LE. The Objective Measurement of Brace-Use Adherence in the Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1598-1605. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00170.

Masrouha KZ, Moses MJ, Sala DA, Litrenta J, Lehman WB, Chu A. The Validity of Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Parent Proxy Instruments to Assess Function in Children With Talipes Equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Nov/Dec;39(10):e787-e790. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001368.

Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life?: an analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 3;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-1.

Mitchell JR, inventor. Quick clip for a club foot device. United States patent US 20160113803A1. 2002 Jun 9.

C-Pro Direct [Internet]. Ponseti AFO Standard Sandals with Bar; [cited 2021 May 25] Available from: https://c-prodirect.com/ponseti-afo-standard-sandals-with-bar.

MD Orthopaedics [Internet]. Massachusetts: MD Orthopaedics. Ponseti® Bar; [cited 2021 May 25] Available from: https://mdorthopaedics.easyordershop.com/link/en/bars/ponseti/a/.

iButtonLink Technology [Internet]. DS1922L-F5# Thermochron iButton 8K -40 to 85°C; [cited 2021 July 1] Available from: https://www.ibuttonlink.com/products/ds1922l.

Dobbs MB, Frick SL, Mosca VS, Raney E, VanBosse HJ, Lerman JA, Talwalkar VR, Steger-May K, Gurnett CA. Design and descriptive data of the randomized Clubfoot Foot Abduction Brace Length of Treatment Study (FAB24). J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Mar;26(2):101-107. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000387.

Tamarack Habilitation Technologies, Inc. [Internet] ShearBan® Self-Adhesive, Low-Friction Sheets for Foot Blister and Ulcer Care; [cited 2021 August 2] Available from: https://tamarackhti.com/resources/shearban

Youtube [Internet]. Installing I-Button in Ponseti AFO; [cited 2021 July 1] Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YACSbFn-lOA.

Sadler B, Gurnett CA, Dobbs MB. The genetics of isolated and syndromic clubfoot. J Child Orthop. 2019 Jun 1;13(3):238-244. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190063.

D-Bar Enterprises [Internet]. Missouri: D-Bar Enterprises. Product Guide and Catalog ® Bar; 2015 [cited 2021 May 27] Available from: https://www.dobbsbrace.com/products.