search
Back to results

OBELIX Study: A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With XELOX in Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum.

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bevacizumab [Avastin]
Oxaliplatin
Xeloda
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer;
  • no previous treatment with chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
  • at least one measurable lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • radiotherapy to any site within 4 weeks before study;
  • untreated brain metastases or primary brain tumors;
  • clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
  • chronic daily treatment with high dose aspirin (>325 mg/day);
  • other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within last 5 years.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

1

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease or Death
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
PFS: Time to Event
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented that neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Among Participants in the ITT Population Who Had at Least 1 Post-Baseline Assessment
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis less than [<]10 millimeters [mm]). No new lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Percentage of Participants With a CR or PR Among Participants in the ITT Population
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Time to CR or PR Overall Response - Time to Event
Time to overall response (CR or PR) was calculated as the time between the date of start of treatment until first documented response (CR or PR defined per RECIST v1.0). Participants who did not achieve CR or PR were censored at the date of progression, death, or at last adequate tumor assessment date. Median time to CR or PR overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR During First Line Treatment
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Duration of Overall Response Among Participants Whose Best Response Was CR or PR During First Line Treatment - Time to Event
For participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, the duration of overall response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR or PR (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With a Stable Response During First Line Treatment
Stable response defined as participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Duration of Stable Response
For participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD during first line treatment, the duration of stable response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR, PR, or SD (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of stable response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment-failure was defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including the following qualifying events: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent).
Time to Treatment Failure
Time to treatment-failure was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent). For participants who did not experience a qualifying event, their data were censored at the earlier of either the date of last tumour assessment or the date of the last intake of study medication. Median time to treatment-failure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival: Percentage of Participants That Died Due to Any Cause
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Overall Survival: Time to Event
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Surgical Intervention With Residual Disease Status Post-surgery
The percentage of participants who underwent surgery during the study period with an evaluation of their disease status after surgery. The surgery during the study period was described by reason: curative, palliative, biopsy, other, or unknown. Residual disease status after surgery was described as: no residual disease due to radical surgery, presence of residual disease, unknown or not applicable.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR by Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (K-Ras)/V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (B-Raf) Mutation Status
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. The K-Ras and/or the B-Raf gene mutation status of participants was evaluated by the central laboratory using tumor samples. Wild-type participants did not have a mutation in either gene.
European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Raw-Index Score
Quality of life (QoL) assessments were used to derive pre-specified QoL scores according to the QoL manual "EQ-5D-3 Level (3L)" user guide for instrument version 4.0. The EQ-5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The visual analog scale (VAS) component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The overall health score absolute changes were calculated for each participant as follows: (score at the end of treatment minus score at baseline). EQ-5D health states were converted into EQ-5D-3L raw index value by applying the scoring algorithm based on the European EQ-net VAS set. The raw index was chosen instead of rescaled index, since the questionnaire was used in order to obtain a quality of life assessment. The raw index scores ranged from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state).

Full Information

First Posted
December 18, 2007
Last Updated
July 21, 2015
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00577031
Brief Title
OBELIX Study: A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With XELOX in Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum.
Official Title
Open-label, Efficacy and Safety Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Combination With XELOX (Oxaliplatin Plus Xeloda®) for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum - 'OBELIX'
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of Avastin and XELOX (oxaliplatin + Xeloda) in patients with metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum. Patients will receive 21-day cycles of treatment, comprising Avastin 7.5mg/kg iv on day 1, oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 iv on day 1, and Xeloda 1000mg/m2 po twice daily on days 1-14, for a maximum of 6 months. Patients with stable disease or complete or partial response may continue on Avastin therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
205 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
bevacizumab [Avastin]
Intervention Description
7.5mg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oxaliplatin
Intervention Description
130mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Xeloda
Intervention Description
1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease or Death
Description
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
PFS: Time to Event
Description
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented that neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Among Participants in the ITT Population Who Had at Least 1 Post-Baseline Assessment
Description
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis less than [<]10 millimeters [mm]). No new lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With a CR or PR Among Participants in the ITT Population
Description
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Title
Time to CR or PR Overall Response - Time to Event
Description
Time to overall response (CR or PR) was calculated as the time between the date of start of treatment until first documented response (CR or PR defined per RECIST v1.0). Participants who did not achieve CR or PR were censored at the date of progression, death, or at last adequate tumor assessment date. Median time to CR or PR overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR During First Line Treatment
Description
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Duration of Overall Response Among Participants Whose Best Response Was CR or PR During First Line Treatment - Time to Event
Description
For participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, the duration of overall response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR or PR (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Stable Response During First Line Treatment
Description
Stable response defined as participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Duration of Stable Response
Description
For participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD during first line treatment, the duration of stable response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR, PR, or SD (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of stable response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Description
Treatment-failure was defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including the following qualifying events: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent).
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Time to Treatment Failure
Description
Time to treatment-failure was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent). For participants who did not experience a qualifying event, their data were censored at the earlier of either the date of last tumour assessment or the date of the last intake of study medication. Median time to treatment-failure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Title
Overall Survival: Percentage of Participants That Died Due to Any Cause
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Title
Overall Survival: Time to Event
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Surgical Intervention With Residual Disease Status Post-surgery
Description
The percentage of participants who underwent surgery during the study period with an evaluation of their disease status after surgery. The surgery during the study period was described by reason: curative, palliative, biopsy, other, or unknown. Residual disease status after surgery was described as: no residual disease due to radical surgery, presence of residual disease, unknown or not applicable.
Time Frame
At surgery, at least 6 to 8 weeks after last dose of bevacizumab up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR by Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (K-Ras)/V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (B-Raf) Mutation Status
Description
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. The K-Ras and/or the B-Raf gene mutation status of participants was evaluated by the central laboratory using tumor samples. Wild-type participants did not have a mutation in either gene.
Time Frame
Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Title
European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Raw-Index Score
Description
Quality of life (QoL) assessments were used to derive pre-specified QoL scores according to the QoL manual "EQ-5D-3 Level (3L)" user guide for instrument version 4.0. The EQ-5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The visual analog scale (VAS) component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The overall health score absolute changes were calculated for each participant as follows: (score at the end of treatment minus score at baseline). EQ-5D health states were converted into EQ-5D-3L raw index value by applying the scoring algorithm based on the European EQ-net VAS set. The raw index was chosen instead of rescaled index, since the questionnaire was used in order to obtain a quality of life assessment. The raw index scores ranged from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state).
Time Frame
Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles), at end-of-treatment up to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients, >=18 years of age; locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer; no previous treatment with chemotherapy for metastatic disease; at least one measurable lesion. Exclusion Criteria: radiotherapy to any site within 4 weeks before study; untreated brain metastases or primary brain tumors; clinically significant cardiovascular disease; chronic daily treatment with high dose aspirin (>325 mg/day); other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within last 5 years.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Bologna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
City
Brescia
ZIP/Postal Code
25122
Country
Italy
City
Cagliari
ZIP/Postal Code
09100
Country
Italy
City
Cagliari
ZIP/Postal Code
09121
Country
Italy
City
Caserta
ZIP/Postal Code
81100
Country
Italy
City
Catanzaro
ZIP/Postal Code
88100
Country
Italy
City
Cefalu
ZIP/Postal Code
90015
Country
Italy
City
Fano
ZIP/Postal Code
61032
Country
Italy
City
Firenze
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
City
Frattaminore
ZIP/Postal Code
80026
Country
Italy
City
Grosseto
ZIP/Postal Code
58100
Country
Italy
City
Ivrea
ZIP/Postal Code
10015
Country
Italy
City
Latisana
ZIP/Postal Code
33053
Country
Italy
City
Lecce
ZIP/Postal Code
73100
Country
Italy
City
Legnago
ZIP/Postal Code
37045
Country
Italy
City
Legnano
ZIP/Postal Code
20025
Country
Italy
City
Macerata
ZIP/Postal Code
62100
Country
Italy
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
City
Negrar
ZIP/Postal Code
37024
Country
Italy
City
Orbassano
ZIP/Postal Code
10043
Country
Italy
City
Padova
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
City
Palermo
ZIP/Postal Code
90127
Country
Italy
City
Palermo
ZIP/Postal Code
90146
Country
Italy
City
Pavia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
City
Reggio Calabria
ZIP/Postal Code
89100
Country
Italy
City
Reggio Emilia
ZIP/Postal Code
42100
Country
Italy
City
Rionero in Vulture
ZIP/Postal Code
85028
Country
Italy
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00152
Country
Italy
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00184
Country
Italy
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00186
Country
Italy
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00189
Country
Italy
City
Salerno
ZIP/Postal Code
84131
Country
Italy
City
San Giovanni Rotondo
ZIP/Postal Code
71013
Country
Italy
City
Sondrio
ZIP/Postal Code
23100
Country
Italy
City
Taormina
ZIP/Postal Code
98030
Country
Italy
City
Torino
ZIP/Postal Code
10125
Country
Italy
City
Torino
ZIP/Postal Code
10153
Country
Italy
City
Verbania
ZIP/Postal Code
28921
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26109816
Citation
Antonuzzo L, Giommoni E, Pastorelli D, Latiano T, Pavese I, Azzarello D, Aieta M, Pastina I, Di Fabio F, Bertolini A, Corsi DC, Mogavero S, Angelini V, Pazzagli M, Di Costanzo F. Bevacizumab plus XELOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: The OBELIX study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7281-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7281.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

OBELIX Study: A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With XELOX in Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs