Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil vs Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (COMPLEMENT 1)
Primary Purpose
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
chlorambucil, tablets
ofatumumab (GSK1841157) infusion
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic focused on measuring Safety, Untreated, Efficacy, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), untreated, Ofatumumab, Oncology
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- confirmed CLL diagnosis and active CLL requiring treatment
- considered inappropriate for fludarabine-based therapy
- not been treated for CLL before
- fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
- age 18yrs or older
- signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior CLL therapy
- abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver, and kidney function
- certain heart problems, active or chronic infections, serious significant diseases, active autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) requiring treatment, other current cancer or within last 5 years
- CLL transformation
- CLL central nervous system involvement
- current participation in other clinical study
- inability to comply with the protocol activities
- lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Sites / Locations
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
- Novartis Investigative Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
ofatumumab + chlorambucil
chlorambucil
Arm Description
ofatumumab dose: cycle 1 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1 every 28 days; chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 treatment cycles
chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 cycles
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event or death occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time or if new anti-cancer therapy was started were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
MRD was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Overall Survival
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the total IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders (CR, CRi, PR, nPR) were included in the analysis.
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time (>= 12 weeks) were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment. Par. with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders.
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to disease progression (PD). PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.
Time to Next Therapy
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment.
Number of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead. Participants with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are shown..
Number of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)
Assessment for the presence of the following symptoms were performed at Screening, Day 1 of each treatment cycle and at every Follow-up visit: night sweats (without signs of infection); unexplained, unintentional weight loss >= 10% within the previous 6 months; recurrent, unexplained fever of greater than 38 degrees celsius or 100.5 degrees fahrenheit for 2 weeks; and extreme fatigue. The best response refers to overall best response in terms of CR, CRi, PR or nPR. Data are presented for constitutional response= yes and no.
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), Cycle 4 Day 1 (after 3 months of treatment), and at 1 month and 6 months post last dose of ofatumumab. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive and further evaluated in the titration test to obtain a titer of HAHA.
Cmax and Ctrough of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and observed drug concentration prior to the next dose (Ctrough) were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of treatment.
Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab
Plasma clearance is defined as the plasma volume which is totally cleared of drug per unit of time. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
AUC(0-tau) of Ofatumumab
Area under the concentration time curve over the dosing interval [AUC(0-tau)] is a measure of drug exposure over time. AUC(0-tau) is defined as the area under the ofatumumab plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to time tau, where tau is the length of the dosing interval of ofatumumab. For estimation of AUC(0-tau), blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hous after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Ofatumumab
Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) is defined as the distribution of a drug between plasma and the rest of the body at steady state. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at predose and 0.5 hour after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Plasma Half Life (t1/2) of Ofatumumab
The terminal half-life (t1/2) of ofatumumab is defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to reach half of its original concentration. Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma half-life of ofatumumab. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Dose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)
Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of chlorambucil and PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) [No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00].
Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)
Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUC[0-inf]) and over 6 hours (AUC[0-6]) of chlorambucil and AUC(0-6) of PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) [No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00].
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
HRQOL was assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTCQLQC30), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16), EuorQoL-Five Dimension (EQ-5D), and HCQ. Period (P)1 (Day 85, Day 169, Day 253) and P2 (scheduled follow-up (FU) and withdrawal visits) analysis were considered. Baseline (BL) for P1 was defined as score from screening visit and BL for P2 was defined as the last on-treatment score. The 2 principal QoL outcomes were pre-specified as the Global Health scale (GHS/QOL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and fatigue scale of the EORTC QLQ-CLL16. For EORTC QLQ-C30,GHS/Qol, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 100 being 'best') and a positive difference from BL is indicative of better functioning (range -100 to +100). For the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 fatigue scale, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 0 being 'best') and a negative difference from BL represents an improvement in fatigue (range -100 to +100).
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)
Participants with a Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented by treatment cycle. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease
AIHA is a disease where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants diagnosed with AIHA are presented.
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products are counted in this table.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants. Baseline IgA, IgG, and IgM values are the last pre-dose assessment values performed on Cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00748189
First Posted
September 5, 2008
Last Updated
June 5, 2019
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00748189
Brief Title
Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil vs Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Acronym
COMPLEMENT 1
Official Title
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Chlorambucil Versus Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Majority of patients (62%) had been treated with next line therapies, including new highly effective therapies confounding the interpretation of the OS results.
Study Start Date
December 22, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 20, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 17, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to chlorambucil in patients with untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Detailed Description
Chlorambucil, is currently approved for treatment of frontline chronic lymphocytic leukemia, especially, but not limited to the ailing and elderly patient population. Several other more aggressive treatment options are available (e.g. fludarabine), however they are not suitable for all CLL patients, especially the ailing and elderly, due to greater toxicity. Ofatumumab is effective with low toxicity. The addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil offers potentially a more effective therapy, with limited toxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall response and overall survival in subjects with previously untreated CLL with ofatumumab added to chlorambucil versus chlorambucil.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Keywords
Safety, Untreated, Efficacy, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), untreated, Ofatumumab, Oncology
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
447 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ofatumumab + chlorambucil
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ofatumumab dose: cycle 1 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1 every 28 days; chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 treatment cycles
Arm Title
chlorambucil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
chlorambucil, tablets
Intervention Description
2mg tablets, chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ofatumumab (GSK1841157) infusion
Other Intervention Name(s)
chlorambucil, tablets
Intervention Description
iv infusion; dose: cycle 1 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1 every 28 days;
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Description
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event or death occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time or if new anti-cancer therapy was started were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.
Time Frame
From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occured first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to about 49 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
Description
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Time Frame
From randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred, up to about 49 months
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
Description
MRD was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Time Frame
From randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the total IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time Frame
From randomization up to about 111 months
Title
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Description
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders (CR, CRi, PR, nPR) were included in the analysis.
Time Frame
From randomization uo to about 27 months
Title
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
Description
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time (>= 12 weeks) were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment. Par. with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders.
Time Frame
From randomization up to about 43 months
Title
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Description
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to disease progression (PD). PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.
Time Frame
From randomization up to about 49 months
Title
Time to Next Therapy
Description
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment.
Time Frame
From randomization up to about 49 months
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
Description
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead. Participants with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are shown..
Time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, 1 month Follow-up
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)
Description
Assessment for the presence of the following symptoms were performed at Screening, Day 1 of each treatment cycle and at every Follow-up visit: night sweats (without signs of infection); unexplained, unintentional weight loss >= 10% within the previous 6 months; recurrent, unexplained fever of greater than 38 degrees celsius or 100.5 degrees fahrenheit for 2 weeks; and extreme fatigue. The best response refers to overall best response in terms of CR, CRi, PR or nPR. Data are presented for constitutional response= yes and no.
Time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 month Follow-up
Title
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result
Description
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), Cycle 4 Day 1 (after 3 months of treatment), and at 1 month and 6 months post last dose of ofatumumab. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive and further evaluated in the titration test to obtain a titer of HAHA.
Time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, 1 Month Follow-up, and 6 Month Follow-up
Title
Cmax and Ctrough of Ofatumumab
Description
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and observed drug concentration prior to the next dose (Ctrough) were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of treatment.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1,Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, and Cycle 9 Day 1
Title
Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab
Description
Plasma clearance is defined as the plasma volume which is totally cleared of drug per unit of time. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Time Frame
Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
AUC(0-tau) of Ofatumumab
Description
Area under the concentration time curve over the dosing interval [AUC(0-tau)] is a measure of drug exposure over time. AUC(0-tau) is defined as the area under the ofatumumab plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to time tau, where tau is the length of the dosing interval of ofatumumab. For estimation of AUC(0-tau), blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hous after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Ofatumumab
Description
Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) is defined as the distribution of a drug between plasma and the rest of the body at steady state. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at predose and 0.5 hour after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Plasma Half Life (t1/2) of Ofatumumab
Description
The terminal half-life (t1/2) of ofatumumab is defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to reach half of its original concentration. Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma half-life of ofatumumab. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Time Frame
Cycle 4 Day 1
Title
Dose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)
Description
Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of chlorambucil and PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) [No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00].
Time Frame
Cycle 3 Day 1
Title
Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)
Description
Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUC[0-inf]) and over 6 hours (AUC[0-6]) of chlorambucil and AUC(0-6) of PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) [No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00].
Time Frame
Cycle 3 Day 1
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Description
HRQOL was assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTCQLQC30), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16), EuorQoL-Five Dimension (EQ-5D), and HCQ. Period (P)1 (Day 85, Day 169, Day 253) and P2 (scheduled follow-up (FU) and withdrawal visits) analysis were considered. Baseline (BL) for P1 was defined as score from screening visit and BL for P2 was defined as the last on-treatment score. The 2 principal QoL outcomes were pre-specified as the Global Health scale (GHS/QOL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and fatigue scale of the EORTC QLQ-CLL16. For EORTC QLQ-C30,GHS/Qol, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 100 being 'best') and a positive difference from BL is indicative of better functioning (range -100 to +100). For the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 fatigue scale, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 0 being 'best') and a negative difference from BL represents an improvement in fatigue (range -100 to +100).
Time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 4 day 1, cycle 7 day 1, 1 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
Title
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Description
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Time Frame
From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.
Title
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
Description
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time Frame
From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.
Title
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)
Description
Participants with a Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented by treatment cycle. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time Frame
From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.
Title
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease
Description
AIHA is a disease where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants diagnosed with AIHA are presented.
Time Frame
From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.
Title
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Description
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products are counted in this table.
Time Frame
From start of treatment to the last study visit/withdrawal visit (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Description
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants. Baseline IgA, IgG, and IgM values are the last pre-dose assessment values performed on Cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
From start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
confirmed CLL diagnosis and active CLL requiring treatment
considered inappropriate for fludarabine-based therapy
not been treated for CLL before
fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
age 18yrs or older
signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
prior CLL therapy
abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver, and kidney function
certain heart problems, active or chronic infections, serious significant diseases, active autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) requiring treatment, other current cancer or within last 5 years
CLL transformation
CLL central nervous system involvement
current participation in other clinical study
inability to comply with the protocol activities
lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sedona
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
86336
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Murrieta
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92562
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34655
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ocoee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lee's Summit
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64064
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Abilene
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79606-5208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Midland
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Odessa
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77598-4420
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98133
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98684
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Yakima
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98902
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brugge
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Haine-Saint-Paul
ZIP/Postal Code
7100
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
Rio De Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
91350-200
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05651-901
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A1A1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
625 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hradec Kralove
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Creteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pierre Benite
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Karlsruhe
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
76137
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mannheim
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
68161
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70190
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ulm
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Erlangen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91052
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81241
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Regensburg
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
93049
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wuerzburg
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
97070
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
65929
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kassel
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
34119
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lehrte
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
31275
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Koeln
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moenchengladbach-Rheydt
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
41239
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenster
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saarbruecken
State/Province
Saarland
ZIP/Postal Code
66113
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens,
ZIP/Postal Code
11 527
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
564 29
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
57010
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ahmedabad
ZIP/Postal Code
380009
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangalore
ZIP/Postal Code
560029
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400012
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400014
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110029
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411001
Country
India
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cork
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dublin
ZIP/Postal Code
7
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Galway
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
James Street
ZIP/Postal Code
8
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Limerick
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tullamore
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Waterford
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Potenza
State/Province
Basilicata
ZIP/Postal Code
85100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Napoli
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Albano Laziale (Roma)
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00041
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Genova
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brescia
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
25123
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20162
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ascoli Piceno
State/Province
Marche
ZIP/Postal Code
63100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novara
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
28100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bari
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
70124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Palermo
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
90146
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Venezia - Mestre
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
30174
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vicenza
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
36100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Udine
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amersfoort
ZIP/Postal Code
3818 ES
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1105 AZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3075 EA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-276
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chorzow
ZIP/Postal Code
41-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
93-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Slupsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76-200
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-776
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-367
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115478
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125101
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630051
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St'Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
191024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197 089
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona)
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salamanca
ZIP/Postal Code
37007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lulea
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-971 80
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-141 86
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Uppsala
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-751 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Devon
ZIP/Postal Code
PL6 8DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taunton
State/Province
Somerset
ZIP/Postal Code
TA1 5DA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sunderland
State/Province
Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
SR4 7TP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bath
ZIP/Postal Code
BA1 3NG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Belfast
ZIP/Postal Code
BT9 7AB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B9 5SS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bournemouth
ZIP/Postal Code
BH7 7DW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bradford
ZIP/Postal Code
BD9 6RJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cambridge
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 0QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Canterbury, Kent
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Carshalton
ZIP/Postal Code
SM5 1AA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cornwall
ZIP/Postal Code
TR1 3LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dudley
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Exeter
ZIP/Postal Code
EX2 5DW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G12 OYN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS9 7TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8XP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1M 6BQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE5 9RS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milton Keynes
ZIP/Postal Code
MK6 5LD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE7 7DN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Norwich
ZIP/Postal Code
NR4 7UY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Oxford
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 7LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Peterborough
ZIP/Postal Code
PE3 9GZ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rhyl, Denbighshire
ZIP/Postal Code
LL18 5UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Salford
ZIP/Postal Code
M6 8HD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stoke on Trent
ZIP/Postal Code
ST4 6QG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Swindon
ZIP/Postal Code
SN3 6BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Uxbridge
ZIP/Postal Code
UB8 3NN
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33054084
Citation
Tausch E, Beck P, Schlenk RF, Jebaraj BJ, Dolnik A, Yosifov DY, Hillmen P, Offner F, Janssens A, Babu GK, Grosicki S, Mayer J, Panagiotidis P, McKeown A, Gupta IV, Skorupa A, Pallaud C, Bullinger L, Mertens D, Dohner H, Stilgenbauer S. Prognostic and predictive role of gene mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the pivotal phase III study COMPLEMENT1. Haematologica. 2020 Oct 1;105(10):2440-2447. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.229161.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25882396
Citation
Hillmen P, Robak T, Janssens A, Babu KG, Kloczko J, Grosicki S, Doubek M, Panagiotidis P, Kimby E, Schuh A, Pettitt AR, Boyd T, Montillo M, Gupta IV, Wright O, Dixon I, Carey JL, Chang CN, Lisby S, McKeown A, Offner F; COMPLEMENT 1 Study Investigators. Chlorambucil plus ofatumumab versus chlorambucil alone in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (COMPLEMENT 1): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1873-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60027-7. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25103870
Citation
Jewell RC, Laubscher K, Lewis E, Fang L, Gafoor Z, Carey J, McKeown A, West S, Wright O, Sedoti D, Dixon I, Hottenstein CS, Chan G. Assessment of the effect of ofatumumab on cardiac repolarization. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;55(1):114-21. doi: 10.1002/jcph.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil vs Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs