search
Back to results

Onlay Versus Inlay Humeral Component in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Primary Purpose

Arthritis Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Injuries

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tornier Ascend Flex stem
Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+
Sponsored by
William Beaumont Hospitals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis Shoulder focused on measuring shoulder function, shoulder pain, shoulder range of motion

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the following components:

    1. Onlay group: Ascend Flex stem, Perform Reversed standard +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36 mm glenosphere
    2. Inlay group: Perform Stem Reverse, Perform Reversed +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36mm glenosphere
  • Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or primary osteoarthritis with cuff tear
  • Negative external rotation lag sign, ability to externally rotate beyond neutral
  • Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision arthroplasty
  • Prior open shoulder surgery
  • Concomitant tendon transfer (Latissimus Dorsi, Pectoralis Tendon, Lower Trapezius)
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability
  • Patients not undergoing a standardized physical therapy protocol
  • Patient anatomy does not accommodate the study implants per surgeon discretion (e.g. excessive bone loss)
  • Pregnant, patient-reported
  • Minors (under 18 years of age)
  • Cognitively impaired based on a diagnosis of dementia, psychiatric disorder, or any cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent or answering of study questionnaires

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Onlay Component-Tornier Ascend Flex stem

    Inlay Component-Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+

    Arm Description

    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using onlay component (tray placed at top of humerus)

    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using inlay component (tray placed in humerus)

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Active external rotation, 2 years
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Active external rotation, 3 months
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Active external rotation, 1 year
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Strength during active external rotation, 3 months
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during active external rotation, 1 year
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during active external rotation, 2 years
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds
    Active forward elevation, 3 months
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Active forward elevation, 1 year
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Active forward elevation, 2 years
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Strength during active forward elevation, 3 months
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during active forward elevation, 1 year
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during active forward elevation, 2 years
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Abduction, 3 months
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Abduction, 1 year
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Abduction, 2 years
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Strength during abduction, 3 months
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during abduction, 1 year
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during abduction, 2 years
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Internal rotation, 3 months
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Internal rotation, 1 year
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Internal rotation, 2 years
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Strength during Internal rotation, 3 months
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during Internal rotation, 1 year
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Strength during Internal rotation, 2 years
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    External rotation lag sign test, 3 months
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    External rotation lag sign test, 1 year
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    External rotation lag sign test, 2 years
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    Drop arm test, 3 months
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Drop arm test, 1 year
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Drop arm test, 2 years
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Lift off test, 3 months
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Lift off test, 1 year
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Lift off test, 2 years
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Belly press test, 3 months
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Belly press test, 1 year
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Belly press test, 2 years
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 3 months
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 1 year
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 2 years
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 3 months
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 1 year
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 2 years
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 3 months
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 1 year
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 2 years
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 3 months
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 1 year
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 2 years
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Scapular notching, 3 months
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Scapular notching, 1 year
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Scapular notching, 2 years
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Reoperation
    Number of patients requiring reoperation of the same shoulder within 2 years.
    Study-related adverse events
    All adverse events determined by the PI to be probably or definitely related to study interventions (surgery or device).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 16, 2022
    Last Updated
    September 21, 2023
    Sponsor
    William Beaumont Hospitals
    Collaborators
    Stryker Nordic
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05297305
    Brief Title
    Onlay Versus Inlay Humeral Component in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Official Title
    Onlay Versus Inlay Humeral Component in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    December 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    William Beaumont Hospitals
    Collaborators
    Stryker Nordic

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The goal of this study is to compare the effect of different ways to place the component that goes at the top of the humerus (upper arm) in reverse total shoulder replacement. Some surgeons place the humeral tray component sitting on the bone while others place it in the bone. Changing the way that the humeral component is placed may change how much the arm can raise up or turn out/in after surgery for some patients. This study compares patients with inlay humeral component (tray sits in the upper arm bone) versus onlay humeral component (tray sits on top of the upper arm bone) to see if there are differences in range of motion or function after surgery.
    Detailed Description
    This study aims to determine if active external rotation two years postoperatively varies based on whether an inlay or onlay humeral component is used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The study also aims to determine whether active forward elevation, abduction, scapular notching, and functional outcomes two years postoperatively vary based on whether an inlay or onlay humeral component is used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients undergoing primary RTSA by Dr. J. Michael Wiater, Dr. Brett Wiater, or Dr. Alexander Martusiewicz at Beaumont Health will be screened for eligibility. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised (1:1) to one of the following groups: 1) RTSA with inlay humeral component (Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+) or 2) RTSA with onlay humeral component (Tornier Ascend Flex stem). At baseline, participants will complete study questionnaires, receive a range-of-motion (ROM) exam, and standard of care x-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans. These evaluations will be repeated at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Arthritis Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Injuries
    Keywords
    shoulder function, shoulder pain, shoulder range of motion

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Prospective randomized double-blind trial of two active comparators.
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Key personnel not collecting data will perform randomization and inform surgeon of the group assignment, keeping data collection blinded. The participant will also remain blinded to their assignment.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    154 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Onlay Component-Tornier Ascend Flex stem
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using onlay component (tray placed at top of humerus)
    Arm Title
    Inlay Component-Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using inlay component (tray placed in humerus)
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Tornier Ascend Flex stem
    Intervention Description
    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using onlay component (tray placed at top of humerus)
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+
    Intervention Description
    Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using inlay component (tray placed in humerus)
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Active external rotation, 2 years
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Active external rotation, 3 months
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Active external rotation, 1 year
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active external rotation, 3 months
    Description
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active external rotation, 1 year
    Description
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active external rotation, 2 years
    Description
    Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Active forward elevation, 3 months
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Active forward elevation, 1 year
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Active forward elevation, 2 years
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active forward elevation, 3 months
    Description
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active forward elevation, 1 year
    Description
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Strength during active forward elevation, 2 years
    Description
    Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Abduction, 3 months
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Abduction, 1 year
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Abduction, 2 years
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Strength during abduction, 3 months
    Description
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Strength during abduction, 1 year
    Description
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Strength during abduction, 2 years
    Description
    Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Internal rotation, 3 months
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Internal rotation, 1 year
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Internal rotation, 2 years
    Description
    Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Strength during Internal rotation, 3 months
    Description
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Strength during Internal rotation, 1 year
    Description
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Strength during Internal rotation, 2 years
    Description
    Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    External rotation lag sign test, 3 months
    Description
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    External rotation lag sign test, 1 year
    Description
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    External rotation lag sign test, 2 years
    Description
    Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Drop arm test, 3 months
    Description
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Drop arm test, 1 year
    Description
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Drop arm test, 2 years
    Description
    Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Lift off test, 3 months
    Description
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Lift off test, 1 year
    Description
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Lift off test, 2 years
    Description
    Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Belly press test, 3 months
    Description
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Belly press test, 1 year
    Description
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Belly press test, 2 years
    Description
    Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 3 months
    Description
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 1 year
    Description
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 2 years
    Description
    Patients will complete a questionnaire of shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 3 months
    Description
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 1 year
    Description
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 2 years
    Description
    Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 3 months
    Description
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 1 year
    Description
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 2 years
    Description
    Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 3 months
    Description
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 1 year
    Description
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 2 years
    Description
    Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Scapular notching, 3 months
    Description
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    3 months postoperative
    Title
    Scapular notching, 1 year
    Description
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    1 year postoperative
    Title
    Scapular notching, 2 years
    Description
    Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Reoperation
    Description
    Number of patients requiring reoperation of the same shoulder within 2 years.
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative
    Title
    Study-related adverse events
    Description
    All adverse events determined by the PI to be probably or definitely related to study interventions (surgery or device).
    Time Frame
    2 years postoperative

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the following components: Onlay group: Ascend Flex stem, Perform Reversed standard +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36 mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere Inlay group: Perform Stem Reverse, Perform Reversed +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or primary osteoarthritis with cuff tear Negative external rotation lag sign, ability to externally rotate beyond neutral Age 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: Revision arthroplasty Prior open shoulder surgery Concomitant tendon transfer (Latissimus Dorsi, Pectoralis Tendon, Lower Trapezius) Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability Patients not undergoing a standardized physical therapy protocol Patient anatomy does not accommodate the study implants per surgeon discretion Pregnant, patient-reported Minors (under 18 years of age) Cognitively impaired based on a diagnosis of dementia, psychiatric disorder, or any cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent or answering of study questionnaires
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Grace SanAgustin, BSN
    Phone
    248-551-6679
    Email
    Grace.SanAgustin@beaumont.org
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alex Martusiewicz, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Beaumont Health
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Onlay Versus Inlay Humeral Component in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs