search
Back to results

Open Lung Strategy, Gas Distribution and Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients

Primary Purpose

ARDS, Human, Lung Injury, Acute, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PEEP ARDSnet
PEEP LRM
Sponsored by
Massachusetts General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ARDS, Human focused on measuring ARDS, PEEP titration, Open Lung Strategy, Right heart function, Lung recruitment maneuver, Esophageal Pressure, Respiratory system compliance

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ARDS diagnosis within 72h after intubation
  • Severe to moderate ARDS (PaO2 / FiO2 < 200 mmHg) with PEEP>5 cmH2O
  • Presence of an arterial line
  • Between 18 and 85 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and/or >180 mmHg despite the use of vasopressor or vasodilators
  • Increment in vasopressors over the past two hour just before enrollment of: more than 15 mcg/min for norepinephrine and dopamine, more than 10 mcg/min in epinephrine; and more than 50 mcg/ min for phenylephrine.
  • Advanced lung disease confirmed by computed tomography findings
  • Presence or history of pneumothorax
  • Severe coagulopathy (INR ≥ 4)
  • Severe thrombocytopenia (Platelets count ≤ 5,000/mm3)
  • Usage of any devices with electric current generation such as pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator
  • Recent esophageal trauma or surgery
  • Known presence of esophageal varices
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Massachussets General HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

PEEP_titration

Arm Description

There is no randomization in this interventional, crossover, physiological study. All participants will receive the same procedures in the same order. The investigators will compare two PEEPs ("PEEPARDSnet" vs. "PEEPLRM"). Interventions: PEEP ARDSnet: we will select the PEEP based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table (ARDSnet). PEEP LRM: we will perform a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and select PEEP based on transpulmonary pressure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Driving Pressure (cmH2O)
The primary endpoint of this study is to describe the airways driving pressures (defined as Plateau Pressure minus PEEP) during "PEEP ARDSnet" and "PEEP LRM".

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 26, 2017
Last Updated
November 8, 2022
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03202641
Brief Title
Open Lung Strategy, Gas Distribution and Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients
Official Title
Open Lung Strategy, Gas Distribution and Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients: an Open Lung is a Better Heart
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional crossover study, in intubated and mechanically ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients, is to compare two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration techniques regarding: respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, changes in aeration, ventilation/perfusion matching its impact on cardiac function, especially the right heart (RH). The PEEP titration techniques are: PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet") and lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) plus PEEPdec titration based on the best compliance of the respiratory system("PEEPLRM").
Detailed Description
A recent large observational study published on JAMA showed that Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality and developed in 10.4% of 29,144 patients admitted to the intensive care unit from 50 countries across 5 continents. Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone for lung treatment during ARDS. Lung protective ventilation improved ARDS outcome significantly. However, it is still unclear what method should be used to select levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In the current study proposal, the investigators hypothesized that, when ARDS lungs are recruitable, a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and PEEP titration ("PEEPLRM") improve ventilation/perfusion matching and decreased right heart workload when compared to the actual standard of care PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet"). The investigators will test this hypothesis in an interventional crossover study. 50 patients with ARDS will be enrolled in a physiological and lung and heart imaging study. The protocol is divided in the following phases: A) "PEEPARDSnet": setting PEEP according to the ARDSnet table (low PEEP/ high FiO2) B) Recruitability assessment sequence: P-V curve tool (Hamilton ventilator): evaluate patient recruitability, among three criteria, two must be positive to consider a subject recruitable: (1) Presence of a lower inflection point (2) Linear compliance measured more than 2 times higher than the dynamic compliance (3) Increase in volume of more than 300mL during the descendant limb of the PV curve at a same given pressure (20 cmH2O)(Hysteresis property). C)"PEEPLRM": LRM plus PEEP decremental trial guided by best compliance. Lung and heart response to "PEEPLRM": we will compare the driving pressure (DP) value (DP = Plateau pressure - PEEP) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the values at PEEPARDSnet. In the advent of an increased DP and/or new onset of abnormal values at the TTE, we will resume the PEEPARDSnet settings during the 48h follow-up phase. Before and after the lung recruitment maneuver and decremental PEEP trial, we will collect: Respiratory system mechanics Lung volumes Gas exchange Hemodynamic parameters Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) ventilation and perfusion data Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function Follow-up phase: In 24 and 48 hours, if the subject did not present a negative response to "PEEPLRM" as described above , we will repeat the recruitment maneuver and the decremental PEEP trial and and we will collect: Respiratory system mechanics (i.e. driving pressure) Lung volumes Gas exchange Hemodynamic parameters EIT ventilation and perfusion data Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function before and after the aforementioned intervention.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ARDS, Human, Lung Injury, Acute, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Alveolar Edema, Right Heart Failure, Right Ventricular Dysfunction
Keywords
ARDS, PEEP titration, Open Lung Strategy, Right heart function, Lung recruitment maneuver, Esophageal Pressure, Respiratory system compliance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Physiologic crossover study. There is no randomization.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PEEP_titration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There is no randomization in this interventional, crossover, physiological study. All participants will receive the same procedures in the same order. The investigators will compare two PEEPs ("PEEPARDSnet" vs. "PEEPLRM"). Interventions: PEEP ARDSnet: we will select the PEEP based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table (ARDSnet). PEEP LRM: we will perform a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and select PEEP based on transpulmonary pressure.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PEEP ARDSnet
Intervention Description
PEEP settings based on the low PEEP/high FiO2 table
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PEEP LRM
Intervention Description
A lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) followed by PEEP guided by transpulmonary pressure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Driving Pressure (cmH2O)
Description
The primary endpoint of this study is to describe the airways driving pressures (defined as Plateau Pressure minus PEEP) during "PEEP ARDSnet" and "PEEP LRM".
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet") and 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM") after the beginning of the study procedures
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Chest wall and lung elastances (cmH2O/L)
Description
This exploratory outcome represents the respiratory system elastance. The respiratory system elastance (ERS = EL + ECW) is the sum of lung elastance (EL) and chest wall (ECW) elastance. In order to measure ERS, we will need airway pressure (measured by connecting the endotracheal tube with a pressure transducer) and pleural pressure (measured by placing an esophageal balloon connected to a pressure transducer, the esophageal pressure is a surrogate of the pleural pressure).
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Dead space (%)
Description
This exploratory outcome is the volume (as a percent) of a breath that does not participate in gas exchange.The measure will be made using infrared absorption technology by a mainstream analyzer positioned distally to the Y piece and connected to a capnogram.
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Right heart function (Transthoracic Echocardiography)
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Gas distribution, gas content, end-expiratory lung volume (using Electrical Impedance Tomography)
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Ventilation/perfusion matching (using Electrical Impedance Tomography)
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Blood arterial and central venous pressures
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
1h (Phase A: "PEEP ARDSnet"), 2h (Phase C: "PEEP LRM"), 24h and 48h after the beginning of the study procedures
Title
Days free of mechanical ventilation
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
28 days
Title
ICU length of stay
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Hospital length of stay
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Mortality
Description
Exploratory outcome
Time Frame
28 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: ARDS diagnosis within 72h after intubation Severe to moderate ARDS (PaO2 / FiO2 < 200 mmHg) with PEEP>5 cmH2O Presence of an arterial line Between 18 and 85 years old Exclusion Criteria: Persistent systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and/or >180 mmHg despite the use of vasopressor or vasodilators Increment in vasopressors over the past two hour just before enrollment of: more than 15 mcg/min for norepinephrine and dopamine, more than 10 mcg/min in epinephrine; and more than 50 mcg/ min for phenylephrine. Advanced lung disease confirmed by computed tomography findings Presence or history of pneumothorax Severe coagulopathy (INR ≥ 4) Severe thrombocytopenia (Platelets count ≤ 5,000/mm3) Usage of any devices with electric current generation such as pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator Recent esophageal trauma or surgery Known presence of esophageal varices Pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lorenzo Berra, MD
Phone
6176437733
Email
lberra@partners.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Kacmarek, RRT, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lorenzo Berra, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roberta De Santis Santiago, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachussets General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lorenzo Berra, MD
Phone
617-643-7733

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
4143721
Citation
Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967 Aug 12;2(7511):319-23. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90168-7. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22797452
Citation
ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10793162
Citation
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12370679
Citation
Lachmann B. Open Lung in ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 Sep;68(9):637-42; discussion 640, 643. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26672923
Citation
Kacmarek RM, Villar J, Sulemanji D, Montiel R, Ferrando C, Blanco J, Koh Y, Soler JA, Martinez D, Hernandez M, Tucci M, Borges JB, Lubillo S, Santos A, Araujo JB, Amato MB, Suarez-Sipmann F; Open Lung Approach Network. Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001383.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26903337
Citation
Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. Erratum In: JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350. JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):350.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24597883
Citation
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):980. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1400293. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16690982
Citation
Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, Souza CE, Victorino JA, Kacmarek RM, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug 1;174(3):268-78. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC. Epub 2006 May 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22226331
Citation
de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, Fontana MF, Albaladejo R, Caserta RE, Santos DC, Borges JB, Amato MB, Barbas CS. How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care. 2012 Jan 8;16(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/cc10602.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26584196
Citation
Pirrone M, Fisher D, Chipman D, Imber DA, Corona J, Mietto C, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Recruitment Maneuvers and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in Morbidly Obese ICU Patients. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):300-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001387.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28708679
Citation
Fumagalli J, Berra L, Zhang C, Pirrone M, Santiago RRS, Gomes S, Magni F, Dos Santos GAB, Bennett D, Torsani V, Fisher D, Morais C, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM. Transpulmonary Pressure Describes Lung Morphology During Decremental Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Trials in Obesity. Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;45(8):1374-1381. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002460.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24760121
Citation
Pinsky MR. My paper 20 years later: Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):935-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3294-8. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24743042
Citation
Lansdorp B, Hofhuizen C, van Lavieren M, van Swieten H, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Mechanical ventilation-induced intrathoracic pressure distribution and heart-lung interactions*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000345.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6734293
Citation
Matamis D, Lemaire F, Harf A, Brun-Buisson C, Ansquer JC, Atlan G. Total respiratory pressure-volume curves in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest. 1984 Jul;86(1):58-66. doi: 10.1378/chest.86.1.58.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18575846
Citation
Demory D, Arnal JM, Wysocki M, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G, Durand-Gasselin J. Recruitability of the lung estimated by the pressure volume curve hysteresis in ARDS patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2019-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1167-8. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11549535
Citation
Maggiore SM, Jonson B, Richard JC, Jaber S, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Alveolar derecruitment at decremental positive end-expiratory pressure levels in acute lung injury: comparison with the lower inflection point, oxygenation, and compliance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep 1;164(5):795-801. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2006071.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19186406
Citation
Costa EL, Lima RG, Amato MB. Electrical impedance tomography. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Feb;15(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283220e8c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27596161
Citation
Frerichs I, Amato MB, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Zhao Z, Grychtol B, Bodenstein M, Gagnon H, Bohm SH, Teschner E, Stenqvist O, Mauri T, Torsani V, Camporota L, Schibler A, Wolf GK, Gommers D, Leonhardt S, Adler A; TREND study group. Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):83-93. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208357. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19001507
Citation
Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2095-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Open Lung Strategy, Gas Distribution and Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs