Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate
Primary Purpose
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, Bi-ventricular Pacing
Status
Completed
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DDD-80
DDD-60
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
- CRT device implanted (with initial indication in accordance with European guidelines) at least 6 months prior to inclusion.
- New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) class II-IV
- Sinus rhythm,
- Hemodynamically stable
- Biventricular pacing > 90% of the time
- On optimal medical treatment for heart failure with no changes in medications during the past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- NYHA I
- unable to perform exercise test (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe arthritis)
- cancer
- plasma creatinine > 200 micromole per litre
- an admission for decompensated HF or acute coronary syndrome in the preceding 3 months.
Sites / Locations
- Rigshospitalet, University hospital of Copenhagen
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
DDD-80 pacing
DDD-60 pacing
Arm Description
To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 80-bpm (DDD-80) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and (iii) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 60-bpm (DDD-60) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide
Observing the change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in 15 patients
Secondary Outcome Measures
Autonomic nerve function
Autonomic nerve function by micro-neurography measured in bursts/min and bursts/cardiac cycle in 15 patients
Peak oxygen consumption (pVO2)
pVO2 measured by a symptom limiting bicycle exercise test in 15 patients
Self-perceived quality of life
Measured with the LIfHE and SF-36 questionnaires in 15 patients
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02258061
First Posted
September 29, 2014
Last Updated
October 6, 2014
Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02258061
Brief Title
Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate
Official Title
Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-ischemic Heart Failure Patients: a Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The optimal pacing rate during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not known. Investigators investigate the impact of changing basal pacing frequencies on autonomic nerve function, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
Detailed Description
This is a double-blinded randomized crossover pilot study testing two basal pacing rates: DDD-60 versus DDD-80. Each patient is paced for 2 periods of 90 days with DDD-60 and DDD-80 in a randomly sequence.
Blood samples NT-proBNP plasma levels are analysed at baseline and at the end of each phase using electrochemiluminescence-immunoassay. Patients rest for 15 minutes before the samples are taken.
These result are monitored by supervisory group to ensure that increase of more than 15% than baseline values result in termination of study.
Investigators conduct two distinct questionnaires (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (LIfHE) questionnaire and Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)) A symptom limiting bicycle (Ergoline, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) exercise test is performed to measure maximum work capacity and oxygen consumption at each phase.
Recordings of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) are sought in all patients at both rates of pacing. All patients are studied on the same set-up in the semi-recumbent position after 30 minutes of rest. Tungsten microelectrodes (Iowa Bioengineering) are inserted into the common peroneal nerve just below the knee.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, Bi-ventricular Pacing, Sympathetic Activity, Quality of Life
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
15 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
DDD-80 pacing
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 80-bpm (DDD-80) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and (iii) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
Arm Title
DDD-60 pacing
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 60-bpm (DDD-60) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
DDD-80
Intervention Description
Basal pacing rate set to 80-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
DDD-60
Intervention Description
Basal pacing rate set to 60-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide
Description
Observing the change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in 15 patients
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Autonomic nerve function
Description
Autonomic nerve function by micro-neurography measured in bursts/min and bursts/cardiac cycle in 15 patients
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Peak oxygen consumption (pVO2)
Description
pVO2 measured by a symptom limiting bicycle exercise test in 15 patients
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self-perceived quality of life
Description
Measured with the LIfHE and SF-36 questionnaires in 15 patients
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
CRT device implanted (with initial indication in accordance with European guidelines) at least 6 months prior to inclusion.
New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) class II-IV
Sinus rhythm,
Hemodynamically stable
Biventricular pacing > 90% of the time
On optimal medical treatment for heart failure with no changes in medications during the past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
NYHA I
unable to perform exercise test (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe arthritis)
cancer
plasma creatinine > 200 micromole per litre
an admission for decompensated HF or acute coronary syndrome in the preceding 3 months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adam A Ghotbi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet, University hospital of Copenhagen
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23952584
Citation
Kuniyoshi RR, Martinelli M, Negrao CE, Siqueira SF, Rondon MU, Trombetta IC, Kuniyoshi FH, Laterza MC, Nishioka SA, Costa R, Tamaki WT, Crevelari ES, Peixoto Gde L, Ramires JA, Kalil R. Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;37(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12254. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23881847
Citation
Agostoni P, Corra U, Cattadori G, Veglia F, Battaia E, La Gioia R, Scardovi AB, Emdin M, Metra M, Sinagra G, Limongelli G, Raimondo R, Re F, Guazzi M, Belardinelli R, Parati G, Magri D, Fiorentini C, Cicoira M, Salvioni E, Giovannardi M, Mezzani A, Scrutinio D, Di Lenarda A, Mantegazza V, Ricci R, Apostolo A, Iorio A, Paolillo S, Palermo P, Contini M, Vassanelli C, Passino C, Piepoli MF; MECKI Score Research Group. Prognostic value of indeterminable anaerobic threshold in heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):977-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000471. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23861381
Citation
Stockburger M, de Teresa E, Lamas G, Desaga M, Koenig C, Habedank D, Cobo E, Navarro X, Wiegand U. Exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: results from the PREVENT-HF German Substudy. Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut217. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23801020
Citation
Brenyo A, Barsheshet A, Rao M, Huang DT, Zareba W, McNitt S, Hall WJ, Peterson DR, Solomon SD, Moss AJ, Goldenberg I. Brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):998-1004. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000174. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23380000
Citation
Shukla A, Curtis AB, Mehra MR, Albert NM, Gheorghiade M, Heywood JT, Liu Y, O'Connor CM, Reynolds D, Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Fonarow GC. Factors associated with improvement in utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in eligible heart failure patients: findings from IMPROVE HF. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;36(4):433-43. doi: 10.1111/pace.12090. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22830441
Citation
Martin DO, Day JD, Lai PY, Murphy AL, Nayak HM, Villareal RP, Weiner S, Kraus SM, Stolen KQ, Gold MR. Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1317-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02402.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26382243
Citation
Ghotbi AA, Sander M, Kober L, Philbert BT, Gustafsson F, Hagemann C, Kjaer A, Jacobsen PK. Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138124. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs