search
Back to results

Optimal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Peripheral Vision

Primary Purpose

Glaucoma

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)
Sponsored by
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Glaucoma focused on measuring glaucoma, non-invasive brain stimulation, peripheral vision

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age range from 18 to 80 years;
  2. Diagnosis of primary open angle or normal tension glaucoma with relative scotoma in both eyes;
  3. A relative scotoma defined as a Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) threshold perimetry loss (mean deviation of ≤-6dB) within the central 30° of the visual field for at least one eye;
  4. Best-corrected distance visual acuity of 6/12 or better (equivalent to 0.3 logMAR acuity or better to confirm that participant's central vision is preserved);
  5. Stable vision and visual field loss for at least 3 months;
  6. With a cognitive functional score of 22 or above in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Hong Kong version (HK-MoCA) (to confirm participant's intact cognitive function).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ocular diseases other than glaucoma (e.g. age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, moderate to severe cataract) or severe hearing impairment (to ensure that participant can hear the instructions clearly during assessments and training);
  2. Severe medical problems (e.g. stroke, Parkinson's disease) or self-reported neurological (e.g. brain surgery, brain tumor, peripheral neuropathy), or cognitive disorders (e.g. diagnosed dementia or cognitive impairment);
  3. Self-reported vestibular or cerebellar dysfunction, history of vertigo;
  4. Using any medications for any neurological conditions or psychiatric drugs (e.g. sedative, hypnotic) that might interfere with motor control;
  5. Contraindications for non-invasive brain stimulation.

Sites / Locations

  • Allen MY CheongRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

tDCS group

tACS group

tRNS group

sham group

Arm Description

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tDCS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tACS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

This group is defined as the participants who will receive tRNS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

This group is defined as the participants who will receive sham stimulation at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

High-resolution perimetry (HRP)
Visual field will be measured using high-resolution perimetry (HRP, HighTechVision, Sweden), which is a valid and reliable computer-based campimetric visual field assessment. Suprathreshold stimuli will be presented in random order at 474 different positions to one eye (i.e. the eye with larger field loss) while fixation is monitored. Detection accuracy and response times will be recorded to map the patient's area of residual vision (i.e. relative scotoma). Testing will occur pre- and immediately post- stimulation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP)
Electrophysiological changes at visual cortex will be measured by multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP), a non-invasive neuroimaging technique related to electroencephalography (EEG) that is well established in the literature as a method for evaluating deficits in the visual field. Suprathreshold sectors of a circular checkerboard pattern will undergo visual reversal in a pseudorandom order to establish a visual evoked potential for each sector. Evoked potentials will be measured using a reference electrode placed at Fpz (i.e. forehead) and an array of 4 measurement electrodes arranged surrounding Oz (i.e. at the back of head). Subjects will be instructed to maintain fixation at the center of the screen while passively viewing the array of the stimulus, which will last approximately 12 minutes per session. Testing will occur pre- and immediately post- stimulation.

Full Information

First Posted
April 12, 2021
Last Updated
January 4, 2023
Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Collaborators
Chinese University of Hong Kong, The University of Hong Kong, University of Waterloo, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04846140
Brief Title
Optimal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Peripheral Vision
Official Title
Identify Optimal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigm for Improving Peripheral Vision
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Collaborators
Chinese University of Hong Kong, The University of Hong Kong, University of Waterloo, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Glaucoma is a complex disease that can result in progressive vision loss. There are no treatments that restore vision lost to glaucoma. However, recent studies have shown that vision can be improved by non-invasive brain (NIBS) stimulation and visual training. In this study, we aim to compare and find out the optimal non-invasive brain stimulation model (transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)) for improving peripheral vision in glaucoma patients. The proposed treatment is the application of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) onto the participant's head, with brain stimulation aimed at the Primary Visual Cortex toward the occipital pole. The investigators hypothesize that the tES will enable higher performance in the reading task and secondary measures due to an increase in the cortical excitability of the stimulated brain cells, and tRNS will generate the greatest acute improvement in peripheral vision than either a-tDCS, tACS, or sham stimulation.
Detailed Description
This study uses a within-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and will be carried out in Hong Kong (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University). Participants who will be recruited are 40 glaucoma patients aged 18 to 80, diagnosed with primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma with relative scotoma in both eyes. All participants will take part in 4 stimulation sessions (completion of active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham stimulation in random order) with at least 48-hour separation between visits to wash out active stimulation effects. The primary outcome is high-resolution perimetry that will be used to measure the visual field of participants. The secondary outcome is multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) that will be used to measure the electrophysiological changes in the visual cortex. The study consists of 5 visits: Visit 1: Eligibility assessment (refer to the inclusion and exclusion criteria). Visits 2 - 5: Stimulation sessions (completion of active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham stimulation in random order) with at least 48-hours separation between visits to wash out active stimulation effects. An established protocol will be used. Briefly, active a-tDCS (2 mA), tACS (2 mA), tRNS (2 mA) or sham a-tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes. The anodal electrode will be placed at Oz (visual cortex) while the cathodal electrode will be placed on the left cheek to facilitate stimulation of cells corresponding to the para-central retina that are located within the calcarine sulcus. Active stimulation will involve the delivery of 2 mA current continuously, while the fade-in-short-stimulation-fade-out approach will be used for the sham condition, in which the stimulation will be ramped down after 30 seconds of stimulation. Both the participant and experimenter will be masked to the stimulation type. The average detection accuracy, response time, and functional connectivity will be analyzed using a within-subjects ANOVA with factors of Stimulation type (a-tDCS vs. tACS vs. tRNS vs. sham) and Time (pre and post-stimulation). Significant interactions will be investigated using post-hoc Bonferroni-adjusted paired sample t-tests. A significant interaction between Stimulation type and Time for the primary outcome followed by a significant post-hoc comparison with a p-value <0.05 favoring tRNS would be consistent with our hypothesis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Glaucoma
Keywords
glaucoma, non-invasive brain stimulation, peripheral vision

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
3 sessions of 3 types of active brain stimulation and 1 session of placebo sham stimulation. Each participant will perform four sessions in a randomly-assigned order.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
tDCS group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group is defined as the participants who will receive tDCS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.
Arm Title
tACS group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group is defined as the participants who will receive tACS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.
Arm Title
tRNS group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group is defined as the participants who will receive tRNS at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.
Arm Title
sham group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group is defined as the participants who will receive sham stimulation at the first session. Participants in this group will receive 4 stimulation types (active a-tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and sham) in random order with at least a 48-hour separation between visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)
Intervention Description
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a form of neuromodulation that uses constant, low direct current delivered via the electrodes on the skull. Three types of tES will be applied in this study, include a-tDCS, tACS, and tRNS. Additionally, sham stimulation will be applied as a placebo-controlled intervention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
High-resolution perimetry (HRP)
Description
Visual field will be measured using high-resolution perimetry (HRP, HighTechVision, Sweden), which is a valid and reliable computer-based campimetric visual field assessment. Suprathreshold stimuli will be presented in random order at 474 different positions to one eye (i.e. the eye with larger field loss) while fixation is monitored. Detection accuracy and response times will be recorded to map the patient's area of residual vision (i.e. relative scotoma). Testing will occur pre- and immediately post- stimulation.
Time Frame
0.5-1 hour
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP)
Description
Electrophysiological changes at visual cortex will be measured by multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP), a non-invasive neuroimaging technique related to electroencephalography (EEG) that is well established in the literature as a method for evaluating deficits in the visual field. Suprathreshold sectors of a circular checkerboard pattern will undergo visual reversal in a pseudorandom order to establish a visual evoked potential for each sector. Evoked potentials will be measured using a reference electrode placed at Fpz (i.e. forehead) and an array of 4 measurement electrodes arranged surrounding Oz (i.e. at the back of head). Subjects will be instructed to maintain fixation at the center of the screen while passively viewing the array of the stimulus, which will last approximately 12 minutes per session. Testing will occur pre- and immediately post- stimulation.
Time Frame
0.5-1 hour

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age range from 18 to 80 years; Diagnosis of primary open angle or normal tension glaucoma with relative scotoma in both eyes; A relative scotoma defined as a Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) threshold perimetry loss (mean deviation of ≤-6dB) within the central 30° of the visual field for at least one eye; Best-corrected distance visual acuity of 6/12 or better (equivalent to 0.3 logMAR acuity or better to confirm that participant's central vision is preserved); Stable vision and visual field loss for at least 3 months; With a cognitive functional score of 22 or above in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Hong Kong version (HK-MoCA) (to confirm participant's intact cognitive function). Exclusion Criteria: Ocular diseases other than glaucoma (e.g. age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, moderate to severe cataract) or severe hearing impairment (to ensure that participant can hear the instructions clearly during assessments and training); Severe medical problems (e.g. stroke, Parkinson's disease) or self-reported neurological (e.g. brain surgery, brain tumor, peripheral neuropathy), or cognitive disorders (e.g. diagnosed dementia or cognitive impairment); Self-reported vestibular or cerebellar dysfunction, history of vertigo; Using any medications for any neurological conditions or psychiatric drugs (e.g. sedative, hypnotic) that might interfere with motor control; Contraindications for non-invasive brain stimulation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Allen Cheong, PhD
Phone
852-27666108
Email
allen.my.cheong@polyu.edu.hk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ben Thompson, PhD
Phone
852-27666108
Email
ben.thompson@uwaterloo.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allen Cheong, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Allen MY Cheong
City
Hong Kong
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allen MY Cheong, PhD
Email
allen.my.cheong@polyu.edu.hk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available upon reasonable request to the research team.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD will be available no later than 6 months following publication and for 1 year.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD will be shared with investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Learn more about this trial

Optimal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Peripheral Vision

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs