search
Back to results

Optos Versus Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for ROP Screening Examination (Optos vs BIO Study)

Primary Purpose

Pre-Term

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging (Optos California)
Sponsored by
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Pre-Term focused on measuring opthalmology, neonatal, premature

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants eligible for routine ROP screening using UK ROP screening guidelines (Any infant born at or before 32 weeks gestation and/or weigh 1500 grams or less).
  • Infants with parents who have conversational English and who can give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants not eligible for routine ROP screening under UK ROP screening guidelines.
  • Infants who are deemed not well enough by a consultant neonatologist (SO) for retinal examination or retinal imaging.
  • Any premature infant with media opacities that prevents adequate visualisation of the retina.
  • Inability of the parents to understand verbal and written English.

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard then Intervention

Intervention then Standard

Arm Description

Infant will undergo standard method of examination with binocular indirect opthalmoscope (BIO) followed by retinal imaging with Optos ultra-wide field retinal imaging device.

Infant will undergo retinal imaging with Optos ultra-wide field retinal imaging device followed by standard method of examination with binocular indirect opthalmoscope (BIO).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Blood pressure (BP)
Blood pressure (BP)
Number of infants that develop bradycardia
Defined as less than 100 beats per minute
Oxygen saturation
Number of infants who develop oxygen saturations below 85%
Development of respiratory distress
Number of infacnts who develop respiratory distress, defined as respiratory rate less than 30 breaths per minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Determine and compare time taken to perform interventions
Time of each intervention recorded

Full Information

First Posted
February 26, 2020
Last Updated
February 28, 2020
Sponsor
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04292015
Brief Title
Optos Versus Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for ROP Screening Examination (Optos vs BIO Study)
Official Title
Impact of Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Examination on Cardiorespiratory Indices - A Comparison of Optos Ultra-Widefield Retinal Imaging and Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscopy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 14, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 22, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 22, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
ROP is a preventable cause of blindness in premature infants. It is routinely screened for by using an indirect ophthalmoscope, a scleral depressor, and a condensing lens. This method of screening can cause significant cardiorespiratory distress to infants. A new camera (Optos California) has recently been used to image infants with different severities of ROP. The Optos California is capable of capturing up to 200 degrees of retina in a single image without contact with the eye. The non eye contact nature of the Optos California may cause less distress to infants who are due a ROP screening examination. The present study is to compare the impact of ROP screening examination between the Optos retinal camera and conventional binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy using cardiorespiratory indices (such as heart rate, oxygen saturations, blood pressure, and respiratory rate) as a measure of distress.
Detailed Description
This is a pilot prospective randomised study. As part of the routine clinical care at RDH, all premature infants eligible for ROP screening as stated by the UK ROP screening guidelines will undergo the gold standard screening examination by a Consultant Ophthalmologist. Each infant eligible for ROP screening will be routinely scheduled for several ROP screening examinations prior to discharge from the neonatal unit. For each infant who is eligible and whose parent(s) or legal guardian have agreed for them to be enrolled in the study, two additional procedures to the gold standard examination with the binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (as stated above) will be carried out at each of its routinely scheduled ROP screening examination. The first additional procedure will be the acquisition of images of both fundi by Ophthalmology Specialty Registrar with the Optos ultra-widefield retinal-imaging device. Cardiorespiratory indices will be collected at different time points of the Optos retinal imaging procedure. The second additional procedure will be the collection of cardiorespiratory indices (including the heart rate,respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, and blood pressure) by the paediatric research nurse at the time of the gold standard examination with the binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. The equipment used will be the same as those used to measure the cardiorespiratory indices during different time points of the Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging procedure (see above).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pre-Term
Keywords
opthalmology, neonatal, premature

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Each premature infant recruited into the study will undergo retinal imaging with the Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging device as well as the gold standard method of examination with the binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. The order of the procedures to be carried out in each infant will be determined by randomisation via sealed envelopes prepared remotely by a member of the pilot team not involved in the recruitment of patients or their screenings.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard then Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Infant will undergo standard method of examination with binocular indirect opthalmoscope (BIO) followed by retinal imaging with Optos ultra-wide field retinal imaging device.
Arm Title
Intervention then Standard
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Infant will undergo retinal imaging with Optos ultra-wide field retinal imaging device followed by standard method of examination with binocular indirect opthalmoscope (BIO).
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging (Optos California)
Intervention Description
retinal imaging device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Blood pressure (BP)
Description
Blood pressure (BP)
Time Frame
Baseline to 10 minutes following completion of both interventions
Title
Number of infants that develop bradycardia
Description
Defined as less than 100 beats per minute
Time Frame
Baseline to 10 minutes following completion of both interventions
Title
Oxygen saturation
Description
Number of infants who develop oxygen saturations below 85%
Time Frame
Baseline to 10 minutes following completion of both interventions
Title
Development of respiratory distress
Description
Number of infacnts who develop respiratory distress, defined as respiratory rate less than 30 breaths per minute
Time Frame
Baseline to 10 minutes following completion of both interventions
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine and compare time taken to perform interventions
Description
Time of each intervention recorded
Time Frame
During intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Infants eligible for routine ROP screening using UK ROP screening guidelines (Any infant born at or before 32 weeks gestation and/or weigh 1500 grams or less). Infants with parents who have conversational English and who can give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Infants not eligible for routine ROP screening under UK ROP screening guidelines. Infants who are deemed not well enough by a consultant neonatologist (SO) for retinal examination or retinal imaging. Any premature infant with media opacities that prevents adequate visualisation of the retina. Inability of the parents to understand verbal and written English.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust
City
Derby
State/Province
Derbyshire
ZIP/Postal Code
DE22 3DT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Optos Versus Indirect Ophthalmoscopy for ROP Screening Examination (Optos vs BIO Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs