search
Back to results

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) for Peanut Allergy (PnOIT3)

Primary Purpose

Peanut Hypersensitivity

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peanut OIT
Placebo
Sponsored by
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peanut Hypersensitivity focused on measuring Peanut Allergy

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 6 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 1- 6 years all of either sex, any race, any ethnicity at the time of the initial visit
  • The presence of IgE specific to peanuts (a positive skin prick test to peanuts (diameter of wheal >3.0 mm) and a positive in vitro IgE [CAP-FEIA] > 7 kUA/L
  • A history of significant clinical symptoms occurring within 60 minutes after ingesting peanuts
  • Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut as defined by hypoxia, hypotension, or neurological compromise (Cyanosis or oxygen saturation < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence)
  • Currently participating in a study using an investigational new drug
  • Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the past 12 months
  • Subjects with a known wheat food allergy will be excluded because of cross contamination of oat with wheat
  • Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
  • Moderate to severe persistent asthma
  • Currently being treated with greater than medium daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids, as defined by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and oral food challenges (OFCs)

Sites / Locations

  • University of North Carolina

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Peanut OIT

Placebo

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to receive active treatment with peanut protein flour.

Subjects randomized to receive placebo in the form of oat flour.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Tolerance as Defined by a Negative DBPCFC 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Peanut OIT Therapy.
Upon completion of 60 months of peanut OIT treatment, subjects discontinued peanut OIT for 4 weeks. The primary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 5 gm peanut protein double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) without developing symptoms 4 weeks after discontinuing peanut OIT.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The Percentage of Subjects Achieving Full Desensitization as Defined by a Negative DBPCFC After 60 Months of Peanut OIT Therapy.
Upon completion of 60 months of peanut OIT treatment, subjects underwent a double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) to assess desensitization. The secondary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 5 gm peanut protein double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) without developing symptoms after completing peanut OIT therapy.
The Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated the Initial-day Escalation to 6 mg of Peanut
The first day of peanut OIT dosing involved multiple increasing doses of peanut flour in what was called an initial escalation day up to a maximum dose of 6 mg of peanut protein. The secondary outcome measure assessed the percentage of subjects were successfully able to reach this 6 mg dose.
The Percentage of Subjects Who Are Successfully Able to Escalate up to the 4000 mg Maximum Maintenance Dose of Peanut Protein OIT During the 60 Month Desensitization Phase of the Study
During the desensitization phase of the study, subjects under go an initial day escalation up to a maximum of 6 mg of peanut protein. They then undergo biweekly dose escalation over approximately 10 months up to a maximum dose of 4000 mg of peanut protein. This outcome reports the percentage of subjects that achieve this.
Incidence of All Serious Adverse Events During the Study
All serious adverse events during the blinded and open-label phases of the study were recorded and reported as a safety outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
December 26, 2008
Last Updated
February 27, 2018
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00815035
Brief Title
Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) for Peanut Allergy
Acronym
PnOIT3
Official Title
Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy- Peanut Oral Immunotherapy (PnOIT3)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 12, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 12, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Peanut allergy is known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions.The goal of this proposal is to produce a new treatment that would benefit subjects who have peanut allergy by lowering the risk of anaphylactic reactions (desensitization), and changing the peanut-specific immune response in subjects who have peanut allergy (tolerance).
Detailed Description
Peanut allergy is known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions. Compared with other food allergies it tends to be more persistent and also its prevalence seems to be rising. Currently there is no proven treatment other than strict avoidance. We are attempting to decrease the risk of anaphylaxis on accidental ingestion by desensitizing subjects to peanut using peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). We are also studying the effect of peanut OIT on the peanut specific immune response to determine if tolerance to peanut protein will develop. Children ages one to six years of age with peanut allergy will be randomized to peanut OIT or placebo (active subjects). Thirty subjects will also be recruited as controls. These subjects will not receive any peanut or placebo but only have skin prick testing and lab work in addition to a history and physical exam. Active subjects will undergo a modified rush immunotherapy on the first day and then increase the doses at least every two weeks up to a maintenance dose of 4 grams (equivalent to about 13 peanuts). Doses will be taken daily at home except for dose increases which will be done on the research unit. Outcome variables of interest include response to double-blind placebo controlled food challenge, skin prick testing, peanut specific IgE, and adverse events. These results will be compared between the start and end of peanut OIT using appropriate statistical analysis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peanut Hypersensitivity
Keywords
Peanut Allergy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Peanut OIT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to receive active treatment with peanut protein flour.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to receive placebo in the form of oat flour.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Peanut OIT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Peanut flour
Intervention Description
Peanut flour that is orally ingested in a graded fashion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Oat flour
Intervention Description
Oat flour used as a placebo that is orally ingested a graded fashion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Tolerance as Defined by a Negative DBPCFC 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Peanut OIT Therapy.
Description
Upon completion of 60 months of peanut OIT treatment, subjects discontinued peanut OIT for 4 weeks. The primary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 5 gm peanut protein double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) without developing symptoms 4 weeks after discontinuing peanut OIT.
Time Frame
61 months for those randomized to active treatment and 73 months for those randomized to placebo for the initial 12 months of therapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Percentage of Subjects Achieving Full Desensitization as Defined by a Negative DBPCFC After 60 Months of Peanut OIT Therapy.
Description
Upon completion of 60 months of peanut OIT treatment, subjects underwent a double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) to assess desensitization. The secondary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 5 gm peanut protein double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCPFC) without developing symptoms after completing peanut OIT therapy.
Time Frame
60 months for those randomized to active treatment and 72 months for those randomized to placebo for the initial 12 months of therapy
Title
The Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated the Initial-day Escalation to 6 mg of Peanut
Description
The first day of peanut OIT dosing involved multiple increasing doses of peanut flour in what was called an initial escalation day up to a maximum dose of 6 mg of peanut protein. The secondary outcome measure assessed the percentage of subjects were successfully able to reach this 6 mg dose.
Time Frame
first day of peanut OIT dosing
Title
The Percentage of Subjects Who Are Successfully Able to Escalate up to the 4000 mg Maximum Maintenance Dose of Peanut Protein OIT During the 60 Month Desensitization Phase of the Study
Description
During the desensitization phase of the study, subjects under go an initial day escalation up to a maximum of 6 mg of peanut protein. They then undergo biweekly dose escalation over approximately 10 months up to a maximum dose of 4000 mg of peanut protein. This outcome reports the percentage of subjects that achieve this.
Time Frame
approximately 40 weeks (10 months)
Title
Incidence of All Serious Adverse Events During the Study
Description
All serious adverse events during the blinded and open-label phases of the study were recorded and reported as a safety outcome.
Time Frame
61 months for those randomized to active peanut OIT and 73 months for those randomized to placebo for the initial 12 months of the study.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 1- 6 years all of either sex, any race, any ethnicity at the time of the initial visit The presence of IgE specific to peanuts (a positive skin prick test to peanuts (diameter of wheal >3.0 mm) and a positive in vitro IgE [CAP-FEIA] > 7 kUA/L A history of significant clinical symptoms occurring within 60 minutes after ingesting peanuts Provide signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut as defined by hypoxia, hypotension, or neurological compromise (Cyanosis or oxygen saturation < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence) Currently participating in a study using an investigational new drug Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the past 12 months Subjects with a known wheat food allergy will be excluded because of cross contamination of oat with wheat Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis Moderate to severe persistent asthma Currently being treated with greater than medium daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids, as defined by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and oral food challenges (OFCs)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wesley Burks, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of North Carolina
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12562461
Citation
Patriarca G, Nucera E, Roncallo C, Pollastrini E, Bartolozzi F, De Pasquale T, Buonomo A, Gasbarrini G, Di Campli C, Schiavino D. Oral desensitizing treatment in food allergy: clinical and immunological results. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb;17(3):459-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01468.x. Erratum In: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 May 1;17(9):1205.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17208602
Citation
Buchanan AD, Green TD, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Christie L, Althage KA, Steele PH, Pons L, Helm RM, Lee LA, Burks AW. Egg oral immunotherapy in nonanaphylactic children with egg allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jan;119(1):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) for Peanut Allergy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs