search
Back to results

Organ-substituting Technologies in the Treatment of Heart and Pulmonary Failure (OST)

Primary Purpose

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Septic Shock, Sepsis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Kazakhstan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cytokine adsorber filter
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge
Sponsored by
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome focused on measuring Organ-substituting technologies, Heart failure, Pulmonary failure, Sepsis, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Adsorber

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

-

ICU patients with ECMO:

  • Hemodynamic support with vasopressors
  • Procalcitonin level ≥ 1 ng/ml
  • Invasive hemodynamic monitoring
  • Written informed content

ICU patients with the septic shock of medical origin:

  • Signs of hypoperfusion: serum lactate >2 mmol/L, low central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (<70%) or high ScvO2 (>85%), metabolic acidosis, oligo-anuria, high venous-to-arterial CO2-gap (dCO2 >6 mm Hg)
  • Hemodynamic support with vasopressors
  • Procalcitonin level ≥ 1 ng/ml
  • Invasive hemodynamic monitoring
  • Written informed content

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ICU patients with ECMO:

    • age < 18 years
    • acute liver or kidney failure straight before transplantation
    • the patient declines to participate in the study

ICU patients with the septic shock of medical origin:

  • Patients under 18 years
  • Pregnancy (bHCG test positivity)
  • Surgical intervention in context with the septic insult New York Heart Association IV heart failure
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Acute hematological malignancies
  • Immunosuppression, systemic steroid therapy (>10mg prednisolone/day)
  • Human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV) and active AIDS
  • Patients with donated organs
  • Thrombocytopenia (<20.000/ml)
  • More than 10%-of body surface area with third-degree burn

Sites / Locations

  • National Research Center for Cardiac SurgeryRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

No Intervention

Arm Label

Cytokine adsorber patients on ECMO

Cytokine adsorber patients with sepsis

Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge patients on ECMO

Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge patients with sepsis

Control (subgroups)1

Control (subgroups) 2

Arm Description

Cytokine adsorber filter will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients on ECMO)

Cytokine adsorber filter will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients with sepsis)

Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients on ECMO)

Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients with sepsis)

No filter will be installed into the ECMO in this study group (15 patients)

No filter will be installed into the patient with sepsis (15 patients)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference of Cytokine response - ECMO patients
Level of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alfa) before initiation of ECMO, 2 hours after initiation ECMO support, at explantation of ECMO support, 6-12-24 hours after explantation of ECMO support.
Difference of Cytokine response - Patients with septic shock
Level of procalcitonin, Level of C-reactive protein, Level of interleukin-1, Level of interleukin-6, Level of interleukin-8, Level of interleukin-10, Level of Tumor Necrosis Factor- αinterleukin-8, interleukin-10, Tumor Necrosis Factor- α at 24, 48 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Inflammatory reaction - Patients with septic shock
Level of C reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells and procalcitonin immediately after induction of anesthesia, before initiation of adsorber, 2 hours after initiation of adsorber, at termination of adsorber, 6-12-24 hours after wean of adsorber.
Ventilator free days (VFD) - ECMO patients
ventilator days. VFD=0, if the patient dies in the first 30 days after randomization
Time to extubation from ventilation and explantation from ECMO - ECMO patients
Time to extubation from ventilation and explantation from ECMO. Death under ventilation and/or ECMO will be analyzed as a competing event. The time will be censored at the time of last visit for surviving patients under ventilation and/or ECMO.
Difference of d-dimers - ECMO patients
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Difference of Serum lactate - ECMO patients
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
SOFA-Score - ECMO patients
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score at 24, 48, 72 h (values from 6 to 24, where the higher values explain higher disease severity)
serious adverse device effects - ECMO patients
serious complications or malfunctions related to the CytoSorb device
adverse event of special interest: air in the ECMO system - ECMO patients
unintended air in the ECMO system during operation of the device
adverse event of special interest: blood-clotting in the ECMO system
unintended blood-clotting in the ECMO system during operation of the device
adverse event of special interest: bleeding complications - ECMO patients
major bleeding events
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level - Patients with septic shock
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 48, 72 h
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level - Patients with septic shock
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level - Patients with septic shock
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Difference of serum procalcitonin level - Patients with septic shock
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h

Full Information

First Posted
August 20, 2021
Last Updated
September 6, 2021
Sponsor
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
Collaborators
Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Kazakhstan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05042622
Brief Title
Organ-substituting Technologies in the Treatment of Heart and Pulmonary Failure
Acronym
OST
Official Title
Innovative Solutions to Organ-substituting Technologies in the Treatment of Heart and Pulmonary Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
Collaborators
Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Kazakhstan

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The implementation of this project will improve the effectiveness of surgical treatment and reduce the level of complications and mortality among patients with heart failure and heart failure in the terminal stage. The goal of the study. Improvement of organ-substituting technologies in the treatment of heart and respiratory failure. Objectives of the study. Objective 1. To study the restoration of organ function during implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), as an organ replacement, in cardiac and / or respiratory failure. Objective 2. To study the results of applying organ-substituting technologies in the treatment of sepsis.
Detailed Description
The implementation of this project will improve the effectiveness of surgical treatment and reduce the level of complications and mortality among patients with heart failure and heart failure in the terminal stage. 2.2. The goal of the program. Improvement of organ-substituting technologies in the treatment of heart and respiratory failure. 2.3. Objectives of the program. Objective 1. To study the restoration of organ function during implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), as an organ replacement, in cardiac and/or respiratory failure. Subtask 1.1. Evaluation of the recovery of organ function during ECMO using extracorporal hemo correction procedure. Subtask 1.2. Evaluation of the normalization of the organism's immune response and restoration of organ function when conducting ECMO using the extracorporeal cytokine adsorber. Subtask 1.3. Evaluation of the normalization of the organism's immune response and restoration of organ function when conducting ECMO using the extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge. Objective 2. To study the results of applying organ-substituting technologies in the treatment of sepsis. Subtask 2.1. Assessment of the recovery of organ function in the application of extracorporal hemo correction in septic patients. Subtask 2.2. Evaluation of the normalization of the organism immune response and restoration of organ function when using the extracorporeal cytokine adsorber in septic patients. Subtask 2.3. Evaluation of the normalization of the organism's immune response and restoration of organ function when using the extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge. In this study, will be developed methods to restore the function of affected organs after implantation of ECMO and patients with sepsis in combination with extracorporeal hem correction, which will improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with end-cardiac and respiratory failure. New methods developed to restore the function of affected organs after implantation of mechanical support devices and patients with sepsis will be of great importance both for Kazakhstan and for countries with similar categories of patients, which will improve the efficiency of surgical treatment and reduce the level of complications and mortality. Clinical research data will form the basis of practical protocols for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and patients with sepsis, which will improve organ repair, reduce postoperative complications, improve quality of life and reduce mortality after surgery. Research methods and ethical issues Patients before implantation of ECMO and/or patients with sepsis will be enrolled in the study after giving a written, signed informed consent. The participants will be randomized into 3 groups: Intervention group #1 a cytokine adsorber will be used (30 patients): patients on ECMO - subgroup A; septic patients - subgroup B. Intervention group #2 an extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be used (30 patients): patients on ECMO - subgroup C, septic patients - subgroup D. Control group #3 without using extracorporeal adsorber (30 patients): patients on ECMO subgroup - E, septic patients - subgroup F. The investigators will collect demographic, clinical, and laboratory data about patients before, during, and after the operation The incidence of early cellular or humoral rejection, length of ventilation, ICU and hospital stay, the use of vasopressors and inotropes in the perioperative period, and incidence of perioperative complications and survival will be documented. The level of cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alfa) and complements before, during, and after the use of ECMO, patients with sepsis will be determined if the investigators find the relevant differences between the two groups in clinical variables. Study Design Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial) Estimated Enrollment: 90 Participants Allocation: randomized Interventional Model: Parallel assignment Masking: None (Open Label)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Septic Shock, Sepsis
Keywords
Organ-substituting technologies, Heart failure, Pulmonary failure, Sepsis, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Adsorber

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Study Design Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial) Estimated Enrollment: 90 Participants Allocation: randomized Interventional Model: Parallel assignment Masking: None (Open Label)
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cytokine adsorber patients on ECMO
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cytokine adsorber filter will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients on ECMO)
Arm Title
Cytokine adsorber patients with sepsis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cytokine adsorber filter will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients with sepsis)
Arm Title
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge patients on ECMO
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients on ECMO)
Arm Title
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge patients with sepsis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be installed into the (hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (15 patients with sepsis)
Arm Title
Control (subgroups)1
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No filter will be installed into the ECMO in this study group (15 patients)
Arm Title
Control (subgroups) 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No filter will be installed into the patient with sepsis (15 patients)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cytokine adsorber filter
Intervention Description
• Intervention group #1 a cytokine adsorber will be used (30 patients): patients on ECMO - subgroup A; septic patients - subgroup B.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge
Intervention Description
• Intervention group #2 an extracorporeal hemoperfusion cartridge will be used (30 patients): patients on ECMO - subgroup C, septic patients - subgroup D.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of Cytokine response - ECMO patients
Description
Level of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alfa) before initiation of ECMO, 2 hours after initiation ECMO support, at explantation of ECMO support, 6-12-24 hours after explantation of ECMO support.
Time Frame
6-24 hours
Title
Difference of Cytokine response - Patients with septic shock
Description
Level of procalcitonin, Level of C-reactive protein, Level of interleukin-1, Level of interleukin-6, Level of interleukin-8, Level of interleukin-10, Level of Tumor Necrosis Factor- αinterleukin-8, interleukin-10, Tumor Necrosis Factor- α at 24, 48 hours.
Time Frame
24-48 hours of septic shock
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Inflammatory reaction - Patients with septic shock
Description
Level of C reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells and procalcitonin immediately after induction of anesthesia, before initiation of adsorber, 2 hours after initiation of adsorber, at termination of adsorber, 6-12-24 hours after wean of adsorber.
Time Frame
6-24 hours
Title
Ventilator free days (VFD) - ECMO patients
Description
ventilator days. VFD=0, if the patient dies in the first 30 days after randomization
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Time to extubation from ventilation and explantation from ECMO - ECMO patients
Description
Time to extubation from ventilation and explantation from ECMO. Death under ventilation and/or ECMO will be analyzed as a competing event. The time will be censored at the time of last visit for surviving patients under ventilation and/or ECMO.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Difference of d-dimers - ECMO patients
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
Difference of Serum lactate - ECMO patients
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
SOFA-Score - ECMO patients
Description
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score at 24, 48, 72 h (values from 6 to 24, where the higher values explain higher disease severity)
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
serious adverse device effects - ECMO patients
Description
serious complications or malfunctions related to the CytoSorb device
Time Frame
30 days
Title
adverse event of special interest: air in the ECMO system - ECMO patients
Description
unintended air in the ECMO system during operation of the device
Time Frame
30 days
Title
adverse event of special interest: blood-clotting in the ECMO system
Description
unintended blood-clotting in the ECMO system during operation of the device
Time Frame
30 days
Title
adverse event of special interest: bleeding complications - ECMO patients
Description
major bleeding events
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level - Patients with septic shock
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 48, 72 h
Time Frame
48, 72 hours
Title
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level - Patients with septic shock
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level - Patients with septic shock
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
Difference of serum procalcitonin level - Patients with septic shock
Description
Comparison to enrollment or between 3 groups at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Overall survival time
Description
Overall survival time, defined as time from randomization to death. The time will be censored at the time of last visit for surviving patients.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Days on intensive care unit (ICU)
Description
Days on intensive care unit (ICU)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Vasopressor dosage
Description
Vasopressor dosage of adrenaline, noradrenaline, vasopressin, and dobutamine at 24, 48,72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
Fluid substitution and fluid balance
Description
Total fluid[ml] substitution and fluid balance [ml] at 24, 48, 72 h
Time Frame
24, 48, 72 hours
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
Days at hospital
Time Frame
up to 1 months
Title
Mortality
Description
The period of occurrence of mortality
Time Frame
First 72 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: - ICU patients with ECMO: Hemodynamic support with vasopressors Procalcitonin level ≥ 1 ng/ml Invasive hemodynamic monitoring Written informed content ICU patients with the septic shock of medical origin: Signs of hypoperfusion: serum lactate >2 mmol/L, low central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (<70%) or high ScvO2 (>85%), metabolic acidosis, oligo-anuria, high venous-to-arterial CO2-gap (dCO2 >6 mm Hg) Hemodynamic support with vasopressors Procalcitonin level ≥ 1 ng/ml Invasive hemodynamic monitoring Written informed content Exclusion Criteria: ICU patients with ECMO: age < 18 years acute liver or kidney failure straight before transplantation the patient declines to participate in the study ICU patients with the septic shock of medical origin: Patients under 18 years Pregnancy (bHCG test positivity) Surgical intervention in context with the septic insult New York Heart Association IV heart failure Acute coronary syndrome Acute hematological malignancies Immunosuppression, systemic steroid therapy (>10mg prednisolone/day) Human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV) and active AIDS Patients with donated organs Thrombocytopenia (<20.000/ml) More than 10%-of body surface area with third-degree burn
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rymbay Kaliyev, MD
Phone
+77055965060
Email
rymbay@mail.ru
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Zhuldyz Nurmykhametova, MD
Phone
+77781115377
Email
zhyzik-nur@mail.ru
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Timur Lesbekov, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
National research Center for Cardiac Surgery JSC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery
City
Astana
ZIP/Postal Code
010000
Country
Kazakhstan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Timur Lesbekov, PhD, MD
Phone
+77019659151
Email
lesbekovt@mail.ru
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhuldyz Nurmykhametova, MD
Phone
+77781115377
Email
zhyzik-nur@mail.ru
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rymbay Kaliyev, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aydyn Kuanyshbek, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
all collected IPD
IPD Sharing Time Frame
01.01.2021 - 31.12.2023
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
All patients will receive voluntary informed consent of the established sample with permission to use clinical data for scientific purposes. In addition, the study will be strictly controlled by researchers for the absence of plagiarism, falsification and fabrication of data in order to achieve the most ethical conduct of the study. The obtained patient data will be kept strictly confidential, ensuring privacy by strictly limited access to data, de-identification of data and destruction after the end of the study.
IPD Sharing URL
http://heartcenter.kz
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23725873
Citation
Venet F, Lukaszewicz AC, Payen D, Hotchkiss R, Monneret G. Monitoring the immune response in sepsis: a rational approach to administration of immunoadjuvant therapies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013 Aug;25(4):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16855261
Citation
Hunt SA. Taking heart--cardiac transplantation past, present, and future. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):231-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068048. No abstract available. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):967.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18702960
Citation
Hunt SA, Haddad F. The changing face of heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 19;52(8):587-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.020.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25242124
Citation
Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Benden C, Christie JD, Dipchand AI, Dobbels F, Goldfarb SB, Levvey BJ, Meiser B, Yusen RD, Stehlik J; International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-first official adult heart transplant report--2014; focus theme: retransplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):996-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 14. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18724223
Citation
Banner NR, Thomas HL, Curnow E, Hussey JC, Rogers CA, Bonser RS; Steering Group of the United Kingdom Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit. The importance of cold and warm cardiac ischemia for survival after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2008 Aug 27;86(4):542-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818149b9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20622755
Citation
Russo MJ, Iribarne A, Hong KN, Ramlawi B, Chen JM, Takayama H, Mancini DM, Naka Y. Factors associated with primary graft failure after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Aug 27;90(4):444-50. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e6f1eb.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26036425
Citation
Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, Szeto WY, Burke JA, Kapur NK, Kern M, Garratt KN, Goldstein JA, Dimas V, Tu T; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI); Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA); Society for Thoracic Surgeons (STS); American Heart Association (AHA); American College of Cardiology (ACC). 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention). J Card Fail. 2015 Jun;21(6):499-518. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.03.002.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18646070
Citation
Mugford M, Elbourne D, Field D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001340. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001340.pub2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25277608
Citation
Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 7;64(14):1407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26686427
Citation
McCarthy FH, McDermott KM, Kini V, Gutsche JT, Wald JW, Xie D, Szeto WY, Bermudez CA, Atluri P, Acker MA, Desai ND. Trends in U.S. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use and Outcomes: 2002-2012. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Summer;27(2):81-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24183903
Citation
Maxwell BG, Powers AJ, Sheikh AY, Lee PH, Lobato RL, Wong JK. Resource use trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998-2009. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Aug;148(2):416-21.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.033. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25608845
Citation
Tramm R, Ilic D, Davies AR, Pellegrino VA, Romero L, Hodgson C. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 22;1(1):CD010381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010381.pub2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27199466
Citation
Chang CH, Chen HC, Caffrey JL, Hsu J, Lin JW, Lai MS, Chen YS. Survival Analysis After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Critically Ill Adults: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Circulation. 2016 Jun 14;133(24):2423-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019143. Epub 2016 May 19.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23352391
Citation
Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, Birks E, Lietz K, Moore SA, Morgan JA, Arabia F, Bauman ME, Buchholz HW, Deng M, Dickstein ML, El-Banayosy A, Elliot T, Goldstein DJ, Grady KL, Jones K, Hryniewicz K, John R, Kaan A, Kusne S, Loebe M, Massicotte MP, Moazami N, Mohacsi P, Mooney M, Nelson T, Pagani F, Perry W, Potapov EV, Eduardo Rame J, Russell SD, Sorensen EN, Sun B, Strueber M, Mangi AA, Petty MG, Rogers J; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Feb;32(2):157-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.013. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26051981
Citation
Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. The direct costs of intensive care management and risk factors for financial burden of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2015 Oct;30(5):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23899564
Citation
Iskander KN, Osuchowski MF, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Kurosawa S, Stepien D, Valentine C, Remick DG. Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolving understanding. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jul;93(3):1247-88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2012.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23544148
Citation
Kwan A, Hubank M, Rashid A, Klein N, Peters MJ. Transcriptional instability during evolving sepsis may limit biomarker based risk stratification. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060501. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16497588
Citation
Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):783-801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24232462
Citation
Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 Dec;13(12):862-74. doi: 10.1038/nri3552. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26258150
Citation
Laszlo I, Trasy D, Molnar Z, Fazakas J. Sepsis: From Pathophysiology to Individualized Patient Care. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:510436. doi: 10.1155/2015/510436. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19531784
Citation
Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Foltran F, Brienza N, Donati A, Malcangi V, Petrini F, Volta G, Bobbio Pallavicini FM, Rottoli F, Giunta F, Ronco C. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2445-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.856.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11395904
Citation
Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Ronco C. Extracorporeal blood purification therapy for sepsis and systemic inflammation: its biological rationale. Contrib Nephrol. 2001;(132):367-74. doi: 10.1159/000060105.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22751621
Citation
Namas RA, Namas R, Lagoa C, Barclay D, Mi Q, Zamora R, Peng Z, Wen X, Fedorchak MV, Valenti IE, Federspiel WJ, Kellum JA, Vodovotz Y. Hemoadsorption reprograms inflammation in experimental gram-negative septic peritonitis: insights from in vivo and in silico studies. Mol Med. 2012 Dec 20;18(1):1366-74. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00106.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18434884
Citation
Peng ZY, Carter MJ, Kellum JA. Effects of hemoadsorption on cytokine removal and short-term survival in septic rats. Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1573-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170b9a7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21918497
Citation
Peng ZY, Wang HZ, Carter MJ, Dileo MV, Bishop JV, Zhou FH, Wen XY, Rimmele T, Singbartl K, Federspiel WJ, Clermont G, Kellum JA. Acute removal of common sepsis mediators does not explain the effects of extracorporeal blood purification in experimental sepsis. Kidney Int. 2012 Feb;81(4):363-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.320. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18090355
Citation
Kellum JA, Venkataraman R, Powner D, Elder M, Hergenroeder G, Carter M. Feasibility study of cytokine removal by hemoadsorption in brain-dead humans. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):268-72. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000291646.34815.BB.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28871441
Citation
Friesecke S, Trager K, Schittek GA, Molnar Z, Bach F, Kogelmann K, Bogdanski R, Weyland A, Nierhaus A, Nestler F, Olboeter D, Tomescu D, Jacob D, Haake H, Grigoryev E, Nitsch M, Baumann A, Quintel M, Schott M, Kielstein JT, Meier-Hellmann A, Born F, Schumacher U, Singer M, Kellum J, Brunkhorst FM. International registry on the use of the CytoSorb(R) adsorber in ICU patients : Study protocol and preliminary results. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Nov;114(8):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28101605
Citation
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10470572
Citation
Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, Takala J, Sprung C, Antonelli M, Bruining H, Willatts S. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):686-96. doi: 10.1007/s001340050931.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24811308
Citation
Hetz H, Berger R, Recknagel P, Steltzer H. Septic shock secondary to beta-hemolytic streptococcus-induced necrotizing fasciitis treated with a novel cytokine adsorption therapy. Int J Artif Organs. 2014 May;37(5):422-6. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000315. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28343448
Citation
Kogelmann K, Jarczak D, Scheller M, Druner M. Hemoadsorption by CytoSorb in septic patients: a case series. Crit Care. 2017 Mar 27;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1662-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28127437
Citation
David S, Thamm K, Schmidt BMW, Falk CS, Kielstein JT. Effect of extracorporeal cytokine removal on vascular barrier function in a septic shock patient. J Intensive Care. 2017 Jan 21;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0208-1. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29377282
Citation
Nemeth E, Kovacs E, Racz K, Soltesz A, Szigeti S, Kiss N, Csikos G, Koritsanszky KB, Berzsenyi V, Trembickij G, Fabry S, Prohaszka Z, Merkely B, Gal J. Impact of intraoperative cytokine adsorption on outcome of patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation-an observational study. Clin Transplant. 2018 Apr;32(4):e13211. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13211. Epub 2018 Feb 27. Erratum In: Clin Transplant. 2019 Jun;33(6):e13556. Abstract corrected.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27288610
Citation
Trasy D, Tanczos K, Nemeth M, Hankovszky P, Lovas A, Mikor A, Laszlo I, Hajdu E, Osztroluczki A, Fazakas J, Molnar Z; EProK study group. Early procalcitonin kinetics and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2016 Aug;34:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22704255
Citation
Riedel S. Procalcitonin and the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of sepsis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;73(3):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.002.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9635646
Citation
Nylen ES, Whang KT, Snider RH Jr, Steinwald PM, White JC, Becker KL. Mortality is increased by procalcitonin and decreased by an antiserum reactive to procalcitonin in experimental sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;26(6):1001-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199806000-00015.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29084247
Citation
Schadler D, Pausch C, Heise D, Meier-Hellmann A, Brederlau J, Weiler N, Marx G, Putensen C, Spies C, Jorres A, Quintel M, Engel C, Kellum JA, Kuhlmann MK. The effect of a novel extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device on IL-6 elimination in septic patients: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187015. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28757818
Citation
Trasy D, Molnar Z. Procalcitonin - Assisted Antibiotic Strategy in Sepsis. EJIFCC. 2017 May 1;28(2):104-113. eCollection 2017 May.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29886501
Citation
Pomare Montin D, Ankawi G, Lorenzin A, Neri M, Caprara C, Ronco C. Biocompatibility and Cytotoxic Evaluation of New Sorbent Cartridges for Blood Hemoperfusion. Blood Purif. 2018;46(3):187-195. doi: 10.1159/000489921. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30253409
Citation
Ankawi G, Fan W, Pomare Montin D, Lorenzin A, Neri M, Caprara C, de Cal M, Ronco C. A New Series of Sorbent Devices for Multiple Clinical Purposes: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Blood Purif. 2019;47(1-3):94-100. doi: 10.1159/000493523. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23519193
Citation
Rodriguez LE, Suarez EE, Loebe M, Bruckner BA. Ventricular assist devices (VAD) therapy: new technology, new hope? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013 Jan-Mar;9(1):32-7. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-9-1-32.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17638928
Citation
Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Milano CA, Rogers JG, Naka Y, Mancini D, Miller LW. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23888228
Citation
Hetzer R, Delmo Walter EM. Trends and outcomes in heart transplantation: the Berlin experience. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2013;5(2):76-80.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15276536
Citation
Chen YF, Tsai WC, Lin CC, Tsai LY, Lee CS, Huang CH, Pan PC, Chen ML. Effect of leukocyte depletion on endothelial cell activation and transendothelial migration of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):634-42; discussion 642-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.091.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Organ-substituting Technologies in the Treatment of Heart and Pulmonary Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs