Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions
Primary Purpose
Peripheral Artery Disease
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PEB
PES
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Artery Disease focused on measuring femoropopliteal lesions
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia
- de novo stenosis ≥ 50% or occlusion of at least 40 mm in length located in femoropopliteal arteries
- presence of a clear healthy segment between the lesion in superficial femoral and common femoral artery and between popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk
- presence of at least 1 patent tibial vessel with distal run-off (below-the-knee artery was considered patent if free from obstructive lesions determining angiographic stenosis >70%)
Exclusion Criteria:
- life expectancy <1 year
- contraindication for combined antiplatelet therapy or known allergy to nickel or paclitaxel
- need for major amputation (MA) at the time of enrolment
- Failure to recanalize intended below-the-knee arteries in CLI patients at risk of major amputation
Sites / Locations
- Cardiovascular Department, Ospedale S.DonatoRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
PEB
PES
Arm Description
PEB angioplasty plus provisional nitinol stent implantation
Systematic PES angioplasty
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
angiographic binary restenosis
incidence of binary restenosis
Secondary Outcome Measures
Composite of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.
incidence of composite endpoint of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01969630
Brief Title
Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ospedale San Donato
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To determine in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions whether percutaneous revascularization with paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (PEB) and provisional nitinol stent is superior with respect to the 12-month incidence of restenosis compared to treatment with systematic paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) angioplasty
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
Keywords
femoropopliteal lesions
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
250 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PEB
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PEB angioplasty plus provisional nitinol stent implantation
Arm Title
PES
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Systematic PES angioplasty
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PEB
Intervention Description
Paclitaxel eluting balloon angioplasty plus provisional nitinol stent implantation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PES
Intervention Description
Systematic Paclitaxel eluting stent angioplasty
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
angiographic binary restenosis
Description
incidence of binary restenosis
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.
Description
incidence of composite endpoint of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia
de novo stenosis ≥ 50% or occlusion of at least 40 mm in length located in femoropopliteal arteries
presence of a clear healthy segment between the lesion in superficial femoral and common femoral artery and between popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk
presence of at least 1 patent tibial vessel with distal run-off (below-the-knee artery was considered patent if free from obstructive lesions determining angiographic stenosis >70%)
Exclusion Criteria:
life expectancy <1 year
contraindication for combined antiplatelet therapy or known allergy to nickel or paclitaxel
need for major amputation (MA) at the time of enrolment
Failure to recanalize intended below-the-knee arteries in CLI patients at risk of major amputation
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Department, Ospedale S.Donato
City
Arezzo
State/Province
AR
ZIP/Postal Code
52100
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francesco Liistro, MD
Email
francescoliistro@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leonardo Bolognese, MD, FESC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni Falsini, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paolo Angioli, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Ducci, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francesco Liistro, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simone Grotti, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Italo Porto, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31296293
Citation
Liistro F, Angioli P, Porto I, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Ricci L, Scatena A, Grotti S, Bolognese L. Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Complex Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions: The DRASTICO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 16;74(2):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.057.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs