search
Back to results

Paragastric Autonomic Blockade to Prevent Visceral Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (PG-ANB)

Primary Purpose

Visceral Pain, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Colombia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Paragastric autonomic neural blockade
Sponsored by
Universidad Simón Bolívar
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Visceral Pain focused on measuring Paragastric, Autonomic Block, Visceral pain, Opioids, Multimodal pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients who were scheduled for LSG at each participating institution from 25 August 2021 to 8 February 2022 and consented to study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the exclusion criteria were an age of <18 years.
  • the performance of concomitant procedures in addition to LSG.
  • allergies to medications included in the postoperative management protocol.
  • anesthetic complications related to the LSG that would alter the postoperative management protocol.
  • surgical complications related to the LSG that would alter the postoperative management protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • Clinica Portoazul

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

PG-ANB Block

Control

Arm Description

The paragastric lesser omentum neural block is performed with a 25-gauge needle attached to a venous catheter extension introduced through the left 12-mm port. The needle is capped during its introduction, and the cap is removed inside the abdomen using a grasper and kept under direct vision. Infiltration of 20 mL of non-diluted 0.5% bupivacaine is performed at six levels with careful aspiration preceding fluid infiltration. Four of the areas are next to the vagus nerves and branches, and two are in the vicinity of the common hepatic and left gastric arteries

No paragastric neural block is performed in the control group. The same standard analgesic protocol consisting of acetaminophen (1 g) and morphine (3-5 mg) is used in all patients before extubation and TAP block is performed in both groups (control and experimental)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The patient-reported pain scores using an 11-point visual analog scale for pain( 11 being the worse pain).
An analog pain scale survey was administered by an investigator blinded to the patients' groups at 1 hour postoperatively (in the recovery room), 8 hours postoperatively, and the following morning

Secondary Outcome Measures

The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirements.
The investigator recorded the need for additional doses of the analgesics, established in the protocol, at one, eight and twenty four hours after surgery.
The secondary outcome was present of nauseas
The investigator recorded the present of nausea at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcome was present of vomiting
The investigator recorded the present of vomiting at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcome was present of retching
The investigator recorded the present of retching at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcome was present of excessive salivation
The investigator recorded the present of excessive salivation at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcome was present of hiccups
The investigator recorded the present of hiccups at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcomes was the mean arterial blood pressure
The investigator recorded the mean arterial blood pressure 10 minutes after blockade.
The secondary outcomes was the median heart rate
The investigator recorded the median heart rate 10 minutes after blockade.
The secondary outcomes was the mean arterial blood pressure.
The investigator recorded the mean arterial blood pressure at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
The secondary outcomes was the median heart rate.
The investigator recorded the median heart rate at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.

Full Information

First Posted
April 16, 2022
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Sponsor
Universidad Simón Bolívar
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05353426
Brief Title
Paragastric Autonomic Blockade to Prevent Visceral Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Acronym
PG-ANB
Official Title
Paragastric Lesser Omentum Neural Block to Prevent Visceral Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 3, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 21, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Simón Bolívar

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Visceral pain (VP) following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy remains a substantial problem. VP is associated with autonomic symptoms, especially nausea and vomiting, and is unresponsive to traditional pain management algorithms aimed at alleviating somatic (incisional) pain. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic paragastric autonomic neural blockade (PG-ANB) in managing the symptoms associated with VP following sleeve gastrectomy.
Detailed Description
Introduction Although seldom discussed, visceral pain (VP) is the most significant source of pain in the first 24 hours following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and other laparoscopic procedures (1). The somatic pain induced by surgical trauma to the abdominal wall after LSG is effectively managed using conventional analgesia and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks (2-4). In contrast, the visceral, colicky pain patients experience after LSG does not respond well to traditional pain management regimens. During the last 15 years at our institutions, we have used many analgesic strategies to manage these burdensome symptoms in more than 2000 LSG procedures. Despite these efforts, no analgesic strategies have been satisfactorily effective (5,8,9). Autonomic nerve blocks have been described in the pain management literature. Specifically, celiac ganglia blocks have been reported in managing chronic pain caused by foregut malignancies or pancreatitis (11,12). In these patients, neuraxial blocks have been demonstrated to be safe and effective methods of chronic pain management. To our knowledge, however, paragastric autonomic neural blockade (PG-ANB) has not been performed as part of perioperative multimodal pain management algorithms in gastrointestinal surgery. The two proposed main mechanisms of action of this autonomic blockade are a reduction in the parasympathetic influence over the stomach, which reverses its increased muscular tone and deactivates mechanosensitive receptors in the organ wall, and blockade of the afferent sympathetic fibers that convey VP to the spinal cord (13). In a pilot observational study involving 35 patients, we observed improvement in the severity of VP in the epigastric and retrosternal areas as well as improvement in associated autonomic symptoms following PG-ANB (14). The effect was most pronounced during the immediate postoperative period but persisted until discharge. Analgesic requirements and the presence of nausea and vomiting were also reduced. The current study was performed to further validate these preliminary findings through a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. Study design This prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involved patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at two high-volume institutions. The patients were randomized to laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with or without PG-ANB. Sample size Previously published data have indicated that differences of 1 to 2 points on an 11-point visual analog pain scale are clinically significant (15-17). Based on these prior studies, we chose a difference of 1 point as the minimum clinically significant difference for sample size calculation and assumed a standard deviation of 2 points. With a p-value of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, we estimated that a total of 128 patients would need to be enrolled in this study. To allow for any potential loss to follow-up, we enrolled 150 patients in the study. Randomization and blinding Randomization was performed using sealed envelopes prepared by the data manager and stratified by institution in blocks of six. The data manager stored the randomization list containing the final treatment assignments. Only the data manager had access to the randomization list throughout the study. These sealed envelopes were placed in the patients' charts and could not be opened until the patient was in the operating room under general anesthesia. At that point, the surgeon became cognizant of the procedure to perform but did not participate in assessing the patient or collecting data. Both the patient and the investigator assessing the patient were blinded to the treatment arm assignments. The investigator evaluated the patients for vital signs, pain scores, autonomic symptoms, and analgesic requirements and recorded the information. Data collection The patients' age, sex, body mass index, current medications, and medical and surgical history were prospectively recorded at the preoperative clinic visit during study enrollment with informed consent. An analog pain scale survey was administered by an investigator blinded to the patients' groups at 1 hour postoperatively (in the recovery room), 8 hours postoperatively, and the following morning. The investigator recorded the need for analgesics; the presence of nausea, vomiting, retching, excessive salivation, hiccups; and vital signs. Statistical analysis Continuous outcome variables were compared with two-sample t-tests. Categorical and binary outcome variables were compared using chi-squared tests. Patient-reported pain scores were further compared using linear regression with the surgeon who operated and the location of the procedure as covariates to assess the effect of the surgeon and location on the primary outcome. Postoperative recovery protocol All patients received proton pump inhibitors, conventional antiemetics, and a scheduled baseline analgesic such as acetaminophen (1 g intravenously every 6 hours) or dipyrone (1 g intravenously every 6 hours). The first-line rescue analgesic was a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug such as diclofenac (intravenously every 12 hours) together with hyoscine butylbromide (0.2 mg intravenously every 12 hours), and the second-line rescue analgesic was tramadol (1 mg per ideal body weight intravenously every 6 hours). Tramadol was the only opioid derivative used. A popsicle was offered the afternoon after surgery, and clear fluids were started the following day. Patients were discharged from the hospital at noon the day after surgery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Visceral Pain, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Pain, Postoperative, Vomiting, Postoperative, Nausea, Postoperative
Keywords
Paragastric, Autonomic Block, Visceral pain, Opioids, Multimodal pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
145 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PG-ANB Block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The paragastric lesser omentum neural block is performed with a 25-gauge needle attached to a venous catheter extension introduced through the left 12-mm port. The needle is capped during its introduction, and the cap is removed inside the abdomen using a grasper and kept under direct vision. Infiltration of 20 mL of non-diluted 0.5% bupivacaine is performed at six levels with careful aspiration preceding fluid infiltration. Four of the areas are next to the vagus nerves and branches, and two are in the vicinity of the common hepatic and left gastric arteries
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No paragastric neural block is performed in the control group. The same standard analgesic protocol consisting of acetaminophen (1 g) and morphine (3-5 mg) is used in all patients before extubation and TAP block is performed in both groups (control and experimental)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Paragastric autonomic neural blockade
Other Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic transverses abdomens plane (TAP) block (To Both the control and experimental arms), Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG) to all patients
Intervention Description
Paragastric autonomic neural blockade with Bupivacaine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The patient-reported pain scores using an 11-point visual analog scale for pain( 11 being the worse pain).
Description
An analog pain scale survey was administered by an investigator blinded to the patients' groups at 1 hour postoperatively (in the recovery room), 8 hours postoperatively, and the following morning
Time Frame
Outcomes were assessed up to 24 hours after surgery during the period of inpatient admission following LSG.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirements.
Description
The investigator recorded the need for additional doses of the analgesics, established in the protocol, at one, eight and twenty four hours after surgery.
Time Frame
The recorded administered doses of analgesics were assessed up 24 hours after surgery during the period of inpatient admission following LSG.
Title
The secondary outcome was present of nauseas
Description
The investigator recorded the present of nausea at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcome was present of vomiting
Description
The investigator recorded the present of vomiting at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcome was present of retching
Description
The investigator recorded the present of retching at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcome was present of excessive salivation
Description
The investigator recorded the present of excessive salivation at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcome was present of hiccups
Description
The investigator recorded the present of hiccups at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcomes was the mean arterial blood pressure
Description
The investigator recorded the mean arterial blood pressure 10 minutes after blockade.
Time Frame
Recorded at 10 minutes after blockade
Title
The secondary outcomes was the median heart rate
Description
The investigator recorded the median heart rate 10 minutes after blockade.
Time Frame
Recorded at 10 minutes after blockade.
Title
The secondary outcomes was the mean arterial blood pressure.
Description
The investigator recorded the mean arterial blood pressure at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
The secondary outcomes was the median heart rate.
Description
The investigator recorded the median heart rate at 1, 8 and 24 hours after surgery.
Time Frame
Recorded up to 24 hours after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients who were scheduled for LSG at each participating institution from 25 August 2021 to 8 February 2022 and consented to study participation. Exclusion Criteria: the exclusion criteria were an age of <18 years. the performance of concomitant procedures in addition to LSG. allergies to medications included in the postoperative management protocol. anesthetic complications related to the LSG that would alter the postoperative management protocol. surgical complications related to the LSG that would alter the postoperative management protocol.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorge Daes, MD FACS
Organizational Affiliation
Academic Director Clinica portoazul, Barranquilla, Colombia
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinica Portoazul
City
Barranquilla
State/Province
Atlantico
ZIP/Postal Code
081007
Country
Colombia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22915063
Citation
Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Daza JC, Dennis R. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique. Obes Surg. 2012 Dec;22(12):1874-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0746-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25428846
Citation
Browning KN, Travagli RA. Central nervous system control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion and modulation of gastrointestinal functions. Compr Physiol. 2014 Oct;4(4):1339-68. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130055.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16129244
Citation
Akinci D, Akhan O. Celiac ganglia block. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Sep;55(3):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.03.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10201454
Citation
Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, Ikenberry S, Lehman G. A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):900-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01042.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27177956
Citation
Ruiz-Tovar J, Munoz JL, Gonzalez J, Zubiaga L, Garcia A, Jimenez M, Ferrigni C, Duran M. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: comparison of three analgesic schemes (isolated intravenous analgesia, epidural analgesia associated with intravenous analgesia and port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine associated with intravenous analgesia). Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4961-3. Epub 2016 May 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31687018
Citation
Iamaroon A, Tangwiwat S, Nivatpumin P, Lertwacha T, Rungmongkolsab P, Pangthipampai P. Risk Factors for Moderate to Severe Pain during the First 24 Hours after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery While Receiving Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;2019:6593736. doi: 10.1155/2019/6593736. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34323436
Citation
Tian C, Lee Y, Oparin Y, Hong D, Shanthanna H. Benefits of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2021 Aug;24(5):345-358.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7618731
Citation
Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):379-84. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00029.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Daes J, Pantoja R, Hanssen A, et al.Paragastric, lesser omentum neural block to prevent early visceral pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized clinical trial protocol. Revista Colombiana de Cirugia 2022;37:27-32. https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.1017
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Paragastric Autonomic Blockade to Prevent Visceral Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs