Paraspinous Anesthetic Block for Non-Responsive Pelvic Pain
Primary Purpose
Paraspinous Block, Pelvis Pain Chronic
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
paraspinous anesthetic block
subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Paraspinous Block focused on measuring Paraspinous block, Non-responsive chronic pelvic pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with benign pelvic pain non-responsive to pharmacological treatment, lasting at least 6 months, located in the anatomic pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, infra-umbilical region, lumbossacral region or buttocks. Pain must be hard enough to cause functional impairment or to motivate medical counseling. The absence of physical findings does not decreases the importance of pain, nether excludes the possibility of pelvic pathology.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not want to take part in the study
- Age under 18 years old
- Pelvic pain lasting less than 6 months
- Relief or resolution of pain with pharmacological treatment
- Pain of neoplastic origin
- Known allergy or report of adverse reaction related to lidocaine
Sites / Locations
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
paraspinous block
control
Arm Description
Paraspinous anesthetic block in the thoracolumbar region, in sensitized segments
Subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change of pain from baseline
Primary outcome is the reduction of pain, measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Improvement of scores in SF-36 scale
Quality of life will be evaluated with SF-36 scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.
Improvement of scores in the FSFI scale
Sexual function as a measure of functionality will be evalueted with the FSFI scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01635205
First Posted
December 17, 2011
Last Updated
April 23, 2014
Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01635205
Brief Title
Paraspinous Anesthetic Block for Non-Responsive Pelvic Pain
Official Title
Efficacy of Paraspinous Anesthetic Block in Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain Non-Responsive to Pharmacological Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study examines randomized triple-blind clinical trial and the efficacy of paraspinous anesthetic block on the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in patients non-responsive to pharmacological management. Sixty patients will be randomly divided and allocated into group intervention (paraspinous anesthetic block) and control (placebo procedure in subcutaneous tissue).
Detailed Description
Patients will be allocated into one of two groups (intervention or placebo), and will be submitted to the corresponding procedure (paraspinous anesthetic block or placebo puncture in subcutaneous tissue). In the first appointment, pain will be measured with the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale); quality of life and function basal level will be evaluated by scales SF-36 (Medical Outcome Short-Form (36)Health Survey)and FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), in Portuguese validated versions. Procedure will be realized as planned for each group.
Second appointment will occur one week after the procedure, and VAS scale will be applied.
Third appointment will occur in one month. VAS scale will be applied again,and procedure will be repeated if patient does not have a reduction of at least 30% of pain.
Next consultations will occur at two months, three months, four months and five months, with application of VAS scale to keep monitoring evolution of pain.
At six months of study, VAS scale will be applied along with SF-36 and FSFI questionnaires, to evaluate improvement in pain and in quality of life and function level.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Paraspinous Block, Pelvis Pain Chronic
Keywords
Paraspinous block, Non-responsive chronic pelvic pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
paraspinous block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Paraspinous anesthetic block in the thoracolumbar region, in sensitized segments
Arm Title
control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
paraspinous anesthetic block
Intervention Description
Paraspinous anesthetic block with lidocaine 1% in sensitized segments of the thoracolumbar region
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
subcutaneous puncture with no anesthetic effect
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous puncture with injection needle (no substance will be injected)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of pain from baseline
Description
Primary outcome is the reduction of pain, measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame
Change of pain from baseline at one week, at one month, at two months, at three months, at four months, at five months and at six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement of scores in SF-36 scale
Description
Quality of life will be evaluated with SF-36 scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.
Time Frame
At baseline and at six months
Title
Improvement of scores in the FSFI scale
Description
Sexual function as a measure of functionality will be evalueted with the FSFI scale at baseline and at six months, and scores will be compared at the end of the study.
Time Frame
At baseline and at six months
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with benign pelvic pain non-responsive to pharmacological treatment, lasting at least 6 months, located in the anatomic pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, infra-umbilical region, lumbossacral region or buttocks. Pain must be hard enough to cause functional impairment or to motivate medical counseling. The absence of physical findings does not decreases the importance of pain, nether excludes the possibility of pelvic pathology.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who do not want to take part in the study
Age under 18 years old
Pelvic pain lasting less than 6 months
Relief or resolution of pain with pharmacological treatment
Pain of neoplastic origin
Known allergy or report of adverse reaction related to lidocaine
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen F Rosa, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonio C Santos, doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ricardo F Savaris, doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vinícius A Amantéa, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
Rio Grande do Sul
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25830642
Citation
da Rosa KF, Amantea VA, dos Santos AC, Savaris RF. Efficacy of paraspinal anesthetic block in patients with chronic pelvic pain refractory to drug therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;37(3):105-9. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320150005201.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Paraspinous Anesthetic Block for Non-Responsive Pelvic Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs