Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for the Management of Renocardiac Syndrome in Renal Transplant Patients
Primary Purpose
Cardiorenal Syndrome, Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Paricalcitol
Calcitriol
Cholecalciferol
Supplemental
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiorenal Syndrome focused on measuring chronic allograft nephropathy, stem-progenitor cells, cardiorenal syndrome, calcitriol, paricalcitol, cholecalciferol, cardiac repair, renal repair
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40-75
- Male
- History of chronic kidney disease and cardiorenal syndrome
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female
- Acute illness
- Life-threat competitive illness
- Mental disorders
- Endocrinologic diseases (including diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, and other thyroid disorders)
- Need for dialyses
- Hypercalcemia
- Concomitant use of hormone or cytokine medication
- Participation to any drug-investigation during the previous 60 days as checked with VIP check
Sites / Locations
- De Haar Research Foundation
- Ural Institute of Cardiology
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Other
Arm Label
Paricalcitol treatment
Calcitriol treatment
Cholecalciferol
Supplemental
Arm Description
6-8 μg daily per os (orally) without special diet
2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D
alendronate sodium/ cholecalciferol capsules with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day
intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Heart Failure (HF)
NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class verified with veloergometry probe and by NYHA clinical classification NYHA Class Symptoms I No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.
II Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. III Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).
Comfortable only at rest. IV Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated form of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: eGFR = exp (5.228 - 1.154 × ln (serum creatinine) - 0.203 × ln (age). Concerning of GFR with Tc99m DTPA renography was used for the complex analysis of renal function. Camera based GFR estimated from Tc99m DTPA renography was named Gates GFR.
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
CAD degree measured by Banff score after routine renal biopsy (revised 2005/2007 criteria). We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Serum Creatinine
After an overnight fast, plasma concentrations of hemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, glucose, total calcium, and phosphate were measured using an autoanalyzer as described by Adorini L. (2005)
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells
Renal cells and solid tissue were obtained from the normal portion of cortex obtained from surgically removed kidneys or by standart biopsy on day 180. Cytofluorimetric analysis and immunofluorescence were performed as described by Oliver J.A. (2004). Sorting and analysis of different cells was done on a FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting) and by flow cytometry. Cells were analyzed with EPICS systems (Beckman Coulter). Quantification of mRNA expression was achieved using Assays-on-Demand gene expression kits and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystem).
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
Systolic Blood Pressure
SBP measured by routine method
Coronary Calcium Score
Bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the whole body, lumbar spine and hip was performed using Hologic scanners (QDR 1000W or QDR 2000). The total Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured as the sum of calcified plaque scores of all the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium present in the coronary arteries is scored according to the Agatson scale, as follows: 0 - no identifiable disease; 1 to 99 - mild disease; 100 to 399 - moderate disease; 400 or higher - severe disease.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01265615
First Posted
December 22, 2010
Last Updated
May 14, 2015
Sponsor
Ural State Medical University
Collaborators
Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01265615
Brief Title
Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for the Management of Renocardiac Syndrome in Renal Transplant Patients
Official Title
Phase 4 Study of Paricalcitol and Calcitriol for Reparative Management of Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Renocardiac Syndrome in Vitamin D Insufficient Renal Transplant Recipients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ural State Medical University
Collaborators
Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
We hypothesize that paricalcitol and calcitriol in dose-dependent manner are effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). We assume that paricalcitol can have some advantages if compare with calcitriol or cholecalciferol due to absence of calcemic and phosphatemic complications alongside with great beneficial potential.
Detailed Description
Paricalcitol and calcitriol are identically effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). Vitamin D can reduce progression of CAD. Activation of VDR in proximal part of nephron leads to rapid non-genomic beneficial effects with urgent multilevel protection of the most functionally important portion of kidney. Rising expression of VDR in distal portions of nephron stimulates slows genomic effects with some local repair responses.
Hormone D may stimulate recruitment and activity of the different origin stem-progenitor cells (SPCs) with beneficial effects on different stages of regeneration by force of para- and autocrine activity. SPCs are revealing mostly in interstitium and among fibroblast-like cells. Vitamin D did not confirm efficacy as a tool for management of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in human however it needs more research experimental evidences due to multifactorial influence on SPCs in human being including immunosuppressive and bone-marrow-related effects of cyclosporine in kidney transplant (Tx) patients. Paricalcitol and calcitriol can slow down migration and infiltration of MSC into interstitium and vessel wall. The side population of mature and SPCs (first of all, with bone-marrow and mesenchymal phenotype) is the most metabolically and functionally active portion of cells with high sensitivity to vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation that responsible for repair of tissue.
The most optimal scheme of treatment with vitamin D in patients with CAD and CRS is an administration of paricalcitol with dose 2-4 μg daily and supplemental intake of vitamin D including special diet, multivitamins, and others with optimal dose until 1800 international units (IU) but excluding insolation as a factor of skin carcinoma. High-dose medicinal intake of calcitriol (until 6 mcg and higher) showed relatively high efficacy but rather excessive level of complications mediated with mineral metabolism.
Paricalcitol and calcitriol may significantly improve contractility of myocardium and reduce cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF) and hypertension with some beneficial effects on cardiorenal axis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiorenal Syndrome, Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
Keywords
chronic allograft nephropathy, stem-progenitor cells, cardiorenal syndrome, calcitriol, paricalcitol, cholecalciferol, cardiac repair, renal repair
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
109 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Paricalcitol treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
6-8 μg daily per os (orally) without special diet
Arm Title
Calcitriol treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D
Arm Title
Cholecalciferol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
alendronate sodium/ cholecalciferol capsules with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day
Arm Title
Supplemental
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paricalcitol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zemplar
Intervention Description
paricalcitol group (6-8 μg daily per os - orally - without special diet)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Calcitriol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rocaltrol
Intervention Description
calcitriol group (2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cholecalciferol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fosamax
Intervention Description
cholecalciferol group (intake of cholecalciferol with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day)
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Supplemental
Other Intervention Name(s)
Diet, sun, multivitamin drugs, food
Intervention Description
intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Description
Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Time Frame
day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heart Failure (HF)
Description
NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class verified with veloergometry probe and by NYHA clinical classification NYHA Class Symptoms I No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.
II Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. III Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).
Comfortable only at rest. IV Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Time Frame
on day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Title
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Description
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated form of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: eGFR = exp (5.228 - 1.154 × ln (serum creatinine) - 0.203 × ln (age). Concerning of GFR with Tc99m DTPA renography was used for the complex analysis of renal function. Camera based GFR estimated from Tc99m DTPA renography was named Gates GFR.
Time Frame
on day 180
Title
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Description
CAD degree measured by Banff score after routine renal biopsy (revised 2005/2007 criteria). We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Time Frame
on day 90
Title
Serum Creatinine
Description
After an overnight fast, plasma concentrations of hemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, glucose, total calcium, and phosphate were measured using an autoanalyzer as described by Adorini L. (2005)
Time Frame
on day 180 after Tx
Title
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells
Description
Renal cells and solid tissue were obtained from the normal portion of cortex obtained from surgically removed kidneys or by standart biopsy on day 180. Cytofluorimetric analysis and immunofluorescence were performed as described by Oliver J.A. (2004). Sorting and analysis of different cells was done on a FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting) and by flow cytometry. Cells were analyzed with EPICS systems (Beckman Coulter). Quantification of mRNA expression was achieved using Assays-on-Demand gene expression kits and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystem).
Time Frame
on day 180
Title
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium
Description
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
Time Frame
on day 180
Title
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney
Description
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
Time Frame
on day 180
Title
Systolic Blood Pressure
Description
SBP measured by routine method
Time Frame
on day 180
Title
Coronary Calcium Score
Description
Bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the whole body, lumbar spine and hip was performed using Hologic scanners (QDR 1000W or QDR 2000). The total Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured as the sum of calcified plaque scores of all the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium present in the coronary arteries is scored according to the Agatson scale, as follows: 0 - no identifiable disease; 1 to 99 - mild disease; 100 to 399 - moderate disease; 400 or higher - severe disease.
Time Frame
on day 180
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 40-75
Male
History of chronic kidney disease and cardiorenal syndrome
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Female
Acute illness
Life-threat competitive illness
Mental disorders
Endocrinologic diseases (including diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, and other thyroid disorders)
Need for dialyses
Hypercalcemia
Concomitant use of hormone or cytokine medication
Participation to any drug-investigation during the previous 60 days as checked with VIP check
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander Kharlamov, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Ural Institute of Cardiology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander Perrish, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Ural State Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
De Haar Research Foundation
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
South Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
3071PR
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Ural Institute of Cardiology
City
Yekaterinburg
ZIP/Postal Code
620144
Country
Russian Federation
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22839442
Citation
Kharlamov AN, Perrish AN, Gabiskii IaL, Ronne Kh, Ivanova EIu. [Vitamin D in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with chronic nephropathy]. Kardiologiia. 2012;52(3):33-44. Russian.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://www.cardio-burg.ru
Description
Ural Institute of Cardiology
URL
http://www.usma.ru
Description
Ural State Medical Academy
Learn more about this trial
Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for the Management of Renocardiac Syndrome in Renal Transplant Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs