PASCAL Laser Versus ETDRS Laser Associated With Intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) Versus Only IVR for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Primary Purpose
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intravitreal Ranibizumabe
panfotocoagulation (PASCAL)
panfotocoagulation (PRP) single shoot (ETDRS)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy focused on measuring Diabetis, Retinal Neovascularization, laser treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diabetic patients older than 18 years
- Presence of PDR (presence of retinal neovascularization, defined as active neovessels (fine retinal vessels with saccular dilatations or extremities covered with blood or associated with recurrent vitreous hemorrhage) with visual acuity better than 20/800 and with no previous laser treatment
- Giving written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of advanced PDR, i.e.: vitreous hemorrhage that would prevent documentation of the eye fundus or adequate retinal photocoagulation, or presence of traction retinal detachment
- Presence of ring-shaped retinal neovascularization extending along both temporal arcades and the optic disc
- Any abnormality of the vitreoretinal interface in the macular region for which the investigator would consider vitrectomy via pars plana to be necessary
- Intravitreous injection of corticosteroids or of other antiangiogenic drugs 6 months before the evaluation for entry into the study
- Inability to fixate and to conclude the automated static perimetry exam
- Cataract surgery within the last three months
- Posterior vitrectomy with scleral introflexion at any time
- Acute ocular infection
- Allerghy to fluorescein
- Medical or psychological conditions that would prevent the patient from giving informed consent and concluding the study
- Significant uncontrolled diseases which, in the opinion of the investigator, would exclude the patient from the study
- Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant or renal insufficiency with creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl
- Untreated diabetes mellitus
- Severe (blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg or diastolic > 100 mmHg) AND untreated hypertension
- Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures.
- Impaired or limited legal capacity
- Participation in another clinical study in the last 30 days.
Sites / Locations
- Retina and Vitreous service of the University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto-USP (HCFMRP)
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
SS-PRP arm
MS-PRP arm
IVR arm
Arm Description
panfotocoagulation (PRP) single shoot (ETDRS) + 0,05ml intravitreal injection anti-VEGF (ranibizumabe)
Multiple shoot panfotocoagulation (PASCAL) plus IVR
only IVR (intravitreal Ranibizumabe)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
fluorescein angiography leakage area
The primary endpoint for this study is the mean change in the total area of active retinal neovessels, as measured by fluorescein angiography leakage area, in mm2.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02005432
First Posted
December 3, 2013
Last Updated
December 6, 2013
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02005432
Brief Title
PASCAL Laser Versus ETDRS Laser Associated With Intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) Versus Only IVR for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Official Title
Three Arm, Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Study Comparing Ranibizumab Plus Green Diode Laser Versus Ranibizumab Plus Pattern Scan Laser (Pascal) Versus Ranibizumab (Monotherapy) for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2014 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Objectives:
Primary objective:
To evaluate the effects on retinal morphophysiology of full scatter single target panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus full scatter multiple target panretinal photocoagulation (both combined with intravitreous injections of ranibizumab) versus intravitreous ranibizumab (IVR) alone in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Primary outcome:
The primary endpoint for this study is the mean change in the total area of active retinal neovessels, as measured by fluorescein angiography leakage area, in mm2, from baseline to week 48.
Secondary objectives:
To assess the mean changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean changes in central subfield foveal thickness (CSFT), the mean changes in wave B amplitude and oscillatory potentials on a full-field electroretinogram (ERG), and the mean changes on the peripheral visual field by static perimetry (30:2 strategy), from baseline to week 48.
To assess the incidence of adverse events during the study.
Strategic goal:
In the era of anti-VEGF treatment for retinal neovascularization 1, 2, 3, 4 , it is time to determine what would be the best association of PRP + anti-VEGF for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or still, if just intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment would be even better regarding morphologic (new vessels area and CSFT) and functional parameters (BCVA, ERG response and visual field).
Detailed Description
Photocoagulation (thermal laser) was the first modality to be described for the treatment of PDR. Different types of laser such as xenon, krypton, argon, red diode and green diode can be used for this treatment. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) showed the benefit of early treatment of PDR and of macular edema with laser photocoagulation.
However, several studies have reported loss of visual field after laser photocoagulation of the bilateral full-scatter type (PRP) due to the expansion of the thermal injury, possibly even compromising the ability to drive automotive vehicles according to the standards of the transit authorities of some countries. Thus, this implies a greater impact on the quality of life of the patient, especially if he is a young diabetic.6
The objective of new laser photocoagulation technologies is to provide a treatment that will permit the development of a regenerative response of photoreceptors and of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with the minimum loss of photoreceptors and the minimum cicatricial expansion of the thermal injury on the targeted RPE.7
The PASCAL photocoagulator (OptiMedica, Santa Clara, California) (a standard scanning laser) was introduced in 2005 for retinal photocoagulation. The device functions as if it partially automated the procedure by means of a shorter laser pulse (short pulse strategy) combined with multiple simultaneous firings in a pattern, performing the procedure within a shorter period of time and with less damage to the outer retina or the RPE, in addition to providing better patient comfort.8
Regarding combined therapy, the combination of intravitreous injection of ranibizumab with PRP (ETDRS) proved to be more promising in terms of improved visual acuity, stability of macular thickness and a greater regression rate of neovessel areas than the use of PRP alone (ETDRS) in patients with high risk PDR.1
Thus, in the present study we would like to determine which would be the best therapeutic combination of laser and an anti-VEGF drug for our patients, or whether treatment with an anti-VEGF drug alone would be better in terms of the anatomical and functional parameters proposed.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Keywords
Diabetis, Retinal Neovascularization, laser treatment
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
31 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
SS-PRP arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
panfotocoagulation (PRP) single shoot (ETDRS) + 0,05ml intravitreal injection anti-VEGF (ranibizumabe)
Arm Title
MS-PRP arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Multiple shoot panfotocoagulation (PASCAL) plus IVR
Arm Title
IVR arm
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
only IVR (intravitreal Ranibizumabe)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intravitreal Ranibizumabe
Intervention Description
Intravitreal injection 0,05ml Ranibizumabe
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
panfotocoagulation (PASCAL)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
panfotocoagulation (PRP) single shoot (ETDRS)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
fluorescein angiography leakage area
Description
The primary endpoint for this study is the mean change in the total area of active retinal neovessels, as measured by fluorescein angiography leakage area, in mm2.
Time Frame
from baseline to week 48.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diabetic patients older than 18 years
Presence of PDR (presence of retinal neovascularization, defined as active neovessels (fine retinal vessels with saccular dilatations or extremities covered with blood or associated with recurrent vitreous hemorrhage) with visual acuity better than 20/800 and with no previous laser treatment
Giving written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of advanced PDR, i.e.: vitreous hemorrhage that would prevent documentation of the eye fundus or adequate retinal photocoagulation, or presence of traction retinal detachment
Presence of ring-shaped retinal neovascularization extending along both temporal arcades and the optic disc
Any abnormality of the vitreoretinal interface in the macular region for which the investigator would consider vitrectomy via pars plana to be necessary
Intravitreous injection of corticosteroids or of other antiangiogenic drugs 6 months before the evaluation for entry into the study
Inability to fixate and to conclude the automated static perimetry exam
Cataract surgery within the last three months
Posterior vitrectomy with scleral introflexion at any time
Acute ocular infection
Allerghy to fluorescein
Medical or psychological conditions that would prevent the patient from giving informed consent and concluding the study
Significant uncontrolled diseases which, in the opinion of the investigator, would exclude the patient from the study
Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant or renal insufficiency with creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl
Untreated diabetes mellitus
Severe (blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg or diastolic > 100 mmHg) AND untreated hypertension
Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures.
Impaired or limited legal capacity
Participation in another clinical study in the last 30 days.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous service of the University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto-USP (HCFMRP)
City
Ribeirao Preto
State/Province
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33470281
Citation
Barroso RMP, Messias K, Garcia DM, Cardillo JA, Scott IU, Messias A, Jorge R. ETDRS panretinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal ranibizumab versus PASCAL panretinal photocoagulation with intravitreal ranibizumab versus intravitreal ranibizumab alone for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;83(6):526-534. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200096.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
PASCAL Laser Versus ETDRS Laser Associated With Intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) Versus Only IVR for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs