search
Back to results

Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Milennium Matrix® (Control)
Infinnium®
Supralimus®
Sponsored by
Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Restenosis focused on measuring Supralimus®,, Infinnium®,, Matrix®,, Restenosis, Percutaneous, Revascularization, Techniques, Metallic, Platform, Agents, Antiproliferative, Properties

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Symptomatic ischemic heart disease and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia;
  3. De novo coronary lesion (non-restenosis);
  4. Target lesion located in a native artery;
  5. Target lesion located in a vessel with diameter between 2.5-3.5 mm (visual analysis);
  6. Target lesion amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length;
  7. Target lesion with a diameter stenosis > 50% (visual analysis);
  8. Acceptable candidate for surgical revascularization;
  9. Signed informed consent term.

Exclusion Criteria:

GENERAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Q-wave myocardial infarction < 48 hours before the index procedure
  2. Recent myocardial infarction, with or without Q waves, with cardiac markers levels still above the normal upper limits
  3. Left ventricle ejection fraction ≤30%
  4. Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl [>177 µmol/l])
  5. Platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3 or > 700,000 cells/mm3
  6. White cell count < 3.000 cells/mm3
  7. Suspected or known liver disease (including subclinical hepatitis)
  8. Heart transplant recipient
  9. Know allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, paclitaxel, sirolimus, heparin, or stainless steel
  10. Life expectancy < 12 months
  11. Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the ideal participation in study
  12. Current inclusion in another study to investigate drug or other device, or planned inclusion in another study to investigate drug or other device during the follow-up.
  13. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) < 6 months in any segment of the target vessel
  14. Previous coronary angioplasty (with or without stent), at any time, in a coronary segment < 5 mm (proximal or distal) from the target lesion
  15. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) in any segment of the target vessel planned during the next 12 months following the index procedure.

ANGIOGRAPHIC EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Restenotic target lesion
  2. Need for treatment of more than one lesion in the target vessel;
  3. Diameter of the target vessel < 2.5 mm or > 3.5 mm (visual analysis)
  4. Long target lesion, not amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length, according to the operator's discretion
  5. Significant (> 50%) unprotected left main lesion
  6. Angiographic thrombus
  7. Target lesion located in bypass graft
  8. Occluded target vessel (antegrade flow TIMI 0 or 1)
  9. Target lesion in ostial location;
  10. Target lesion in a bifurcation site with a side branch > 2.5 mm or that may require stent implantation;
  11. Calcified target lesion with anticipated unsuccessful balloon pre-dilatation;
  12. Severely tortuous target vessel.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio
  • Hospital Meridional Intercath
  • Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes
  • Hospital Biocor
  • Hospital Natal Center
  • Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS
  • Rede D'Or de Hospitais
  • Hospital São Paulo - UNIFESP
  • Hospital São Camilo
  • Instituto do Coração - InCor
  • Hospital Santa Marcelina

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

3

Arm Description

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

compare the in-stent late loss at 9M of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents.

Secondary Outcome Measures

MACE at 1,9&12M, SAE & ST until 12M. Rate of angiographic & procedural success, TLR & TVR at 1&9M Instent LL between Supralimus®, Infinnium® & Matrix® Insegment binary restenosis at 9M IVUS% neointimal obstruction cost-effectiveness profile at 12M

Full Information

First Posted
September 11, 2008
Last Updated
November 19, 2015
Sponsor
Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited
Collaborators
CMS Medical
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00752362
Brief Title
Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)
Official Title
PercutAneous INTervention With Biodegradable- Polymer Based Paclitaxel-eluting, Sirolimus-eluting, or Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited
Collaborators
CMS Medical

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Objectives: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Safety: To compare the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence de Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. Efficacy: To compare the rate of angiographic success among the study groups To compare the rate of procedural success among the study groups To compare the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the incidence of clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cost-effectiveness profile of the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 9-month in-stent late loss of paclitaxel-eluting stents to the in-stent late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents To compare the 9-month in-segment late loss among the study groups To compare the 9-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate among the study groups To compare the IVUS percent neointimal obstruction among the study groups Study Design: In the present RANDOMIZED study, the paclitaxel-eluting stent Infinnium® and the sirolimus-eluting stent Supralimus® will be compared to a metallic stent with the same structure (Milennium Matrix®) but without drug elution for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronaries. The study will be a multicenter clinical trial and will include patients for the treatment with one of the three study stents. In total, 275 patients will be enrolled, randomly allocated for the Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents in a 2:2:1 proportion. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months after the index procedure. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 9 months. A subgroup of 55 patients will be evaluated at 9 months with IVUS examination. Treatment: Patients will be treated, according to the randomization groups, with Infinnium®, Supralimus®, or Milennium Matrix® stents of 19 mm, 23 mm, or 29 mm and nominal diameters of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Restenosis
Keywords
Supralimus®,, Infinnium®,, Matrix®,, Restenosis, Percutaneous, Revascularization, Techniques, Metallic, Platform, Agents, Antiproliferative, Properties

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
280 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Milennium Matrix® (Control)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Milennium Matrix®
Intervention Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Infinnium®
Intervention Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stent
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Supralimus®
Intervention Description
Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stent
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
compare the in-stent late loss at 9M of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents.
Time Frame
9 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MACE at 1,9&12M, SAE & ST until 12M. Rate of angiographic & procedural success, TLR & TVR at 1&9M Instent LL between Supralimus®, Infinnium® & Matrix® Insegment binary restenosis at 9M IVUS% neointimal obstruction cost-effectiveness profile at 12M
Time Frame
1 Year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years; Symptomatic ischemic heart disease and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia; De novo coronary lesion (non-restenosis); Target lesion located in a native artery; Target lesion located in a vessel with diameter between 2.5-3.5 mm (visual analysis); Target lesion amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length; Target lesion with a diameter stenosis > 50% (visual analysis); Acceptable candidate for surgical revascularization; Signed informed consent term. Exclusion Criteria: GENERAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA Q-wave myocardial infarction < 48 hours before the index procedure Recent myocardial infarction, with or without Q waves, with cardiac markers levels still above the normal upper limits Left ventricle ejection fraction ≤30% Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl [>177 µmol/l]) Platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3 or > 700,000 cells/mm3 White cell count < 3.000 cells/mm3 Suspected or known liver disease (including subclinical hepatitis) Heart transplant recipient Know allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, paclitaxel, sirolimus, heparin, or stainless steel Life expectancy < 12 months Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the ideal participation in study Current inclusion in another study to investigate drug or other device, or planned inclusion in another study to investigate drug or other device during the follow-up. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) < 6 months in any segment of the target vessel Previous coronary angioplasty (with or without stent), at any time, in a coronary segment < 5 mm (proximal or distal) from the target lesion Coronary angioplasty (with or without stent) in any segment of the target vessel planned during the next 12 months following the index procedure. ANGIOGRAPHIC EXCLUSION CRITERIA Restenotic target lesion Need for treatment of more than one lesion in the target vessel; Diameter of the target vessel < 2.5 mm or > 3.5 mm (visual analysis) Long target lesion, not amenable to treatment with a single stent of up to 29 mm in length, according to the operator's discretion Significant (> 50%) unprotected left main lesion Angiographic thrombus Target lesion located in bypass graft Occluded target vessel (antegrade flow TIMI 0 or 1) Target lesion in ostial location; Target lesion in a bifurcation site with a side branch > 2.5 mm or that may require stent implantation; Calcified target lesion with anticipated unsuccessful balloon pre-dilatation; Severely tortuous target vessel.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Prof. Pedro A. Lemos, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto do Coração - InCor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio
City
Fortaleza
State/Province
Ceará
ZIP/Postal Code
60430-370
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital Meridional Intercath
City
Vitória
State/Province
Espirito Santo
ZIP/Postal Code
29156-580
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antonio de Moraes
City
Vitória -
State/Province
Espírito Santo
ZIP/Postal Code
29042-755
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital Biocor
City
Belo Horizonte
State/Province
Minas Gerais
ZIP/Postal Code
34000-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital Natal Center
City
Natal
State/Province
Rio Grande do Norte
ZIP/Postal Code
59054-630
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
Rio Grande do Sul
ZIP/Postal Code
90610-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Rede D'Or de Hospitais
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
20941-150
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital São Paulo - UNIFESP
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
04024-002
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital São Camilo
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05022-001
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Instituto do Coração - InCor
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-900
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital Santa Marcelina
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
08270-070
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20379631
Citation
Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT study. Rationale and design for the PAINT randomized trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Dec;93(6):547-53, 590-7. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001200006. English, Portuguese.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19670303
Citation
Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Martinez EE; PAINT trial investigators. Randomized evaluation of two drug-eluting stents with identical metallic platform and biodegradable polymer but different agents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared against bare stents: 1-year results of the PAINT trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):665-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22166.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22580255
Citation
Lemos PA, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE. Late clinical outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: 3-year follow-up of the PAINT randomised trial. EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):117-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25610805
Citation
Marchini JF, Gomes WF, Moulin B, Perin MA, Oliveira LA, Arruda JA, Lima VC, Lima AA, Caramori PR, Medeiros CR, Barbosa MR, Brito FS Jr, Ribeiro EE, Lemos PA. Very late outcomes of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: insights from the 5-year follow-up of the randomized PAINT trial. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):480-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.05.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs