search
Back to results

Peri-operative Oral Pain Control Following Buccal Graft Urethroplasty (Buccal)

Primary Purpose

Urethral Stricture, Male

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard Buccal Harvest
Basic buccal procedure + Long acting local
Basic buccal procedure + Buccal block
Sponsored by
University of California, San Francisco
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urethral Stricture, Male focused on measuring buccal urethroplasty, urethral stricture, urethroplasty, buccal block, lidocaine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men, age 18 or older
  • Undergoing anterior urethroplasty with buccal grafting
  • Able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking chronic opiates for pain
  • Diagnosis of chronic pain
  • Prior buccal urethroplasty
  • Vulnerable population (e.g. prisoner)
  • Renal dysfunction or allergy preventing NSAID use
  • Liver dysfunction or allergy preventing Tylenol use
  • Medical allergy to local anesthetic
  • Medical allergy to Peridex/Magic Mouthwash
  • NYHA Class III/IV
  • Hematologic condition that excludes patient from surgery
  • Post-operative complication resulting in inpatient stay
  • Anesthetic complication
  • No buccal site surgical complication

Sites / Locations

  • University of California San FranciscoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1: Standard of care

Group 2: Standard of care + Long acting local

Group 3: Standard of care + Buccal block

Arm Description

Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site No further infiltration of local anesthetic in mouth

Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Up to a maximum of 10mL of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration in the buccal graft site

Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Up to a maximum of 10mL of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration as a buccal block

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change(s) in Post-operative pain
The Wong-Baker FACES pain scale is a validated scale where a score of 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Pain greater than or equal to 5 would result in significant limitations on daily life. Oral, incisional (surgical site), and overall pain will each be assigned a score of 0-10 at each time point (9 total scores).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change(s) in Post-operative Narcotic use
Patient measure of number of oxycodone tablets taken (0-5). Patient request for additional narcotic medicaiton (Yes/No) Patient measure of adherence to non-narcotic pain regiman (Yes/No)

Full Information

First Posted
March 15, 2022
Last Updated
May 1, 2023
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05300685
Brief Title
Peri-operative Oral Pain Control Following Buccal Graft Urethroplasty
Acronym
Buccal
Official Title
Peri-operative Oral Pain Control Following Buccal Graft Urethroplasty: Randomized Control Trial of Harvest Site Anesthetic
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 15, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients undergoing buccal urethroplasty will often have significant post-operative oral pain from the graft site. Various graft harvest techniques and methods for post-harvest hemostasis including graft site closure have been explored. Despite the frequency of this clinical scenario there is no established best practice for peri-operative pain management in this patient population. In addition to traditional post operative pain control, groups have sought various peri-operative anesthetic regimens to improve post operative pain. This has led recently to the description of various regional blocks including buccal and periorbital blocks for peri-operative local anesthetic. No study has looked at superiority of regional pain management in this patient population. This study will aim to assess three established anesthetic protocols for oral pain control in a blinded, randomized controlled trial. Hypothesis: Patients who have buccal block will have lower post op pain without any increase adverse oral outcomes.
Detailed Description
This is a blinded, randomized, controlled trial following patients undergoing buccal urethroplasty (see criteria). This study will aim to assess three established anesthetic protocols for oral pain control. Each study arm holds equal weight. Approximately 60 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive the following graft harvest techniques, which are all considered standard of care. Group 1: Current Buccal Harvest Infiltration of lidocaine 1% with 1:100,000 epinephrine (maximum 10cc) Graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Group 2: Basic buccal procedure + Long acting local Infiltration of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (maximum 10cc) Graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site 0.5% Marcaine (maximum 5cc) at case conclusion Group 3: Basic buccal procedure + Buccal block Infiltration of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine (maximum 10cc) Graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Buccal block with 0.5% Marcaine (maximum 5cc) at case conclusion

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urethral Stricture, Male
Keywords
buccal urethroplasty, urethral stricture, urethroplasty, buccal block, lidocaine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a blinded, randomized, controlled trial following patients undergoing buccal urethroplasty (see criteria). This study will aim to assess three established anesthetic protocols for oral pain control. Each study arm holds equal weight.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Approximately 60 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 3 different local anesthetic regimens following buccal graft harvest. The care provider administering will not be masked to the type of block, but they will be blinded to the post op outcomes.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1: Standard of care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site No further infiltration of local anesthetic in mouth
Arm Title
Group 2: Standard of care + Long acting local
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Up to a maximum of 10mL of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration in the buccal graft site
Arm Title
Group 3: Standard of care + Buccal block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Prior to graft harvest - infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine up to a maximum of 10 mL Routine, standard graft site hemostasis with monopolar cautery No suture closure of graft site Up to a maximum of 10mL of 0.5% bupivacaine infiltration as a buccal block
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard Buccal Harvest
Intervention Description
Our institutions current anesthetic regimen. Comparison group
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Basic buccal procedure + Long acting local
Intervention Description
Addition of long-acting local anesthetic to the wound bed following the oral graft harvest.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Basic buccal procedure + Buccal block
Intervention Description
Addition of long-acting local anesthetic as a buccal block after oral graft harvest
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change(s) in Post-operative pain
Description
The Wong-Baker FACES pain scale is a validated scale where a score of 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Pain greater than or equal to 5 would result in significant limitations on daily life. Oral, incisional (surgical site), and overall pain will each be assigned a score of 0-10 at each time point (9 total scores).
Time Frame
Postoperative Day 1, 5, 10
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change(s) in Post-operative Narcotic use
Description
Patient measure of number of oxycodone tablets taken (0-5). Patient request for additional narcotic medicaiton (Yes/No) Patient measure of adherence to non-narcotic pain regiman (Yes/No)
Time Frame
Postoperative Day 1, 5, 10
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Peri-operative Complications
Description
Clavien-Dingo is a validated tool to measure the severity of post-operative outcomes. Class I are mild and require no treatment. Class V is death.
Time Frame
Postoperative Day 0-30

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men, age 18 or older Undergoing anterior urethroplasty with buccal grafting Able to consent Exclusion Criteria: Taking chronic opiates for pain Diagnosis of chronic pain Prior buccal urethroplasty Vulnerable population (e.g. prisoner) Renal dysfunction or allergy preventing NSAID use Liver dysfunction or allergy preventing Tylenol use Medical allergy to local anesthetic Medical allergy to Peridex/Magic Mouthwash NYHA Class III/IV Hematologic condition that excludes patient from surgery Post-operative complication resulting in inpatient stay Anesthetic complication No buccal site surgical complication
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lindsay A Hampson, MD
Phone
415-353-2200
Email
lindsay.hampson@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rory Grant
Phone
(415) 353-7615
Email
rory.grant2@ucsf.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lindsay Hampson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lindsay A Hampson, MD
Phone
415-353-2200
Email
lindsay.hampson@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nathan M Shaw, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lindsay A Hampson, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin N Breyer, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31057252
Citation
Jonnavithula N, Bachu D, Sriramoju V, Devraj R, Gunta R, Pisapati MVLN. Effect of infraorbital nerve block on postoperative pain and 30-day morbidity at the donor site in buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan-Mar;35(1):114-118. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_211_17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22119261
Citation
Rourke K, McKinny S, St Martin B. Effect of wound closure on buccal mucosal graft harvest site morbidity: results of a randomized prospective trial. Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.073. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22889835
Citation
Lumen N, Oosterlinck W, Hoebeke P. Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa or penile skin grafts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2012;89(4):387-94. doi: 10.1159/000341138. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Peri-operative Oral Pain Control Following Buccal Graft Urethroplasty

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs