PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR 2)
Primary Purpose
Coronary Artery Disease, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Positron emission tomography: FDG viability imaging
PET imaging
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, positron emission tomography, viable myocardium, revascularization, cost effectiveness
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is > 18 years of age.
- Documented ejection fraction of <35% attributable to CAD.
- Documented CAD
- Any patient being considered for revascularization, transplant/heart failure work up or where, in the opinion of the attending physician or surgeon, viability imaging would be considered useful in ongoing clinical management decisions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other co-morbid conditions making survival unlikely
- < 6 weeks post myocardial infarction
- CAD unsuitable for revascularization
- emergency revascularization is required.
- severe valvular disease that requires surgery.
- Geographically inaccessible
- Lack of informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
PET guided Therapy
Standard care
Arm Description
Patients will be randomized to undergo positron emission tomography aspart of their clinical work up
Patients will be randomized to standard care will under go other types of imaging or work up for revascularization without PET imaging.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
time to occurence of the composite clinical endpoint of cardiac death,myocardial infarction, transplantation, or re-hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
occurrence of the composite endpoint; individual components of the composite endpoint; quality of life, costs, and cost-effectiveness of PET-guided therapy versus control.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00385242
First Posted
October 6, 2006
Last Updated
November 20, 2019
Sponsor
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00385242
Brief Title
PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR 2)
Official Title
PET and Recovery Following Revascularization: Outcome and Cost-effectiveness of FDG PET in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PARR 2)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2000 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Rationale: Patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and coronary disease have high morbidity and mortality. They may benefit from revascularization, but have significant peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) can detect viable myocardium that may recover from revascularization in such patients. It is unclear whether use of FDG PET in this population is improves outcome or is cost-effective.
Objectives: The principal aim is to determine whether FDG PET-guided therapy is effective versus standard care. Secondary objectives are to determine whether FDG PET-guided therapy improves LV function, quality of life and is good value for money versus standard care.
Detailed Description
Patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease have high morbidity and mortality but may benefit from revascularization. However, there is also significant peri-operative morbidity and mortality among these patients. This accounts for the variable approach to these patients in different cardiac centres. Clearly this patient group has the most to gain when coronary revascularization is beneficial, but also the most to lose when it is not helpful. There is a need for an approach that can better define patients with severe ventricular dysfunction due to ischemia, who will be more likely to benefit from revascularization. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been used to evaluate patients with ventricular dysfunction, to detect ischemic but viable myocardium more likely to recover from revascularization. Recently retrospective studies have shown that FDG PET can identify patients at high risk for cardiac events if they do not undergo revascularization. However, these studies did not evaluate whether FDG PET actually directed therapy decisions and because of their study design, could not determine whether FDG PET altered patient outcome. Our recent studies have shown that FDG PET can have important impact on therapy decisions and that patients with ischemic but viable myocardium are at increased risk. However it remains unclear whether an approach which utilizes FDG PET to define ischemic but viable myocardium can have a beneficial effect on patient outcome. It is also important to consider the potential clinical impact of FDG PET balanced against its limited availability. In addition, despite the cost of the technology, preliminary data from our group and others suggest a potential cost savings. Accordingly, a prospective randomized study is needed to evaluate whether FDG PET directed therapy has a beneficial effect on patient outcome and is cost-effective.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Keywords
coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, positron emission tomography, viable myocardium, revascularization, cost effectiveness
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
430 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PET guided Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will be randomized to undergo positron emission tomography aspart of their clinical work up
Arm Title
Standard care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will be randomized to standard care will under go other types of imaging or work up for revascularization without PET imaging.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Positron emission tomography: FDG viability imaging
Intervention Description
FDG PET viability imaging
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
PET imaging
Intervention Description
PET viability imaging
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
time to occurence of the composite clinical endpoint of cardiac death,myocardial infarction, transplantation, or re-hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
occurrence of the composite endpoint; individual components of the composite endpoint; quality of life, costs, and cost-effectiveness of PET-guided therapy versus control.
Time Frame
5 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient is > 18 years of age.
Documented ejection fraction of <35% attributable to CAD.
Documented CAD
Any patient being considered for revascularization, transplant/heart failure work up or where, in the opinion of the attending physician or surgeon, viability imaging would be considered useful in ongoing clinical management decisions.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other co-morbid conditions making survival unlikely
< 6 weeks post myocardial infarction
CAD unsuitable for revascularization
emergency revascularization is required.
severe valvular disease that requires surgery.
Geographically inaccessible
Lack of informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rob SB Beanlands, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y 4W7
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17996568
Citation
Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, Gulenchyn KY, Garrard L, deKemp R, Guo A, Ruddy TD, Benard F, Lamy A, Iwanochko RM; PARR-2 Investigators. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 13;50(20):2002-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19761983
Citation
D'Egidio G, Nichol G, Williams KA, Guo A, Garrard L, deKemp R, Ruddy TD, DaSilva J, Humen D, Gulenchyn KY, Freeman M, Racine N, Benard F, Hendry P, Beanlands RS; PARR-2 Investigators. Increasing benefit from revascularization is associated with increasing amounts of myocardial hibernation: a substudy of the PARR-2 trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(9):1060-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20237039
Citation
Abraham A, Nichol G, Williams KA, Guo A, deKemp RA, Garrard L, Davies RA, Duchesne L, Haddad H, Chow B, DaSilva J, Beanlands RS; PARR 2 Investigators. 18F-FDG PET imaging of myocardial viability in an experienced center with access to 18F-FDG and integration with clinical management teams: the Ottawa-FIVE substudy of the PARR 2 trial. J Nucl Med. 2010 Apr;51(4):567-74. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.065938. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22138342
Citation
Shukla T, Nichol G, Wells G, deKemp RA, Davies RA, Haddad H, Duchesne L, Freeman M, Gulenchyn K, Racine N, Humen D, Benard F, Ruddy TD, Chow BJ, DaSilva J, Garrard L, Guo A, Chen L, Beanlands RS. Does FDG PET-assisted management of patients with left ventricular dysfunction improve quality of life? A substudy of the PARR-2 trial. Can J Cardiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27609816
Citation
Mc Ardle B, Shukla T, Nichol G, deKemp RA, Bernick J, Guo A, Lim SP, Davies RA, Haddad H, Duchesne L, Hendry P, Masters R, Ross H, Freeman M, Gulenchyn K, Racine N, Humen D, Benard F, Ruddy TD, Chow BJ, Mielniczuk L, DaSilva JN, Garrard L, Wells GA, Beanlands RS; PARR-2 Investigators. Long-Term Follow-Up of Outcomes With F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Coronary Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;9(9):e004331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004331.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR 2)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs