search
Back to results

Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Prader-Willi Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Setmelanotide
Placebo
Sponsored by
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prader-Willi Syndrome focused on measuring Prader-Willi Syndrome, obesity, hyperphagia

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - 65 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female volunteers weighing at least 50 kg with BMI ≥27 kg/m²
  2. Age 16-65 years
  3. If a volunteer has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met:

    1. HbA1c <7.5% not being managed with insulin. Patients taking GLP-1 analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months.
    2. Fasting plasma glucose <140 mg/dL
    3. No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma
  4. Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable.

    1. Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 mm Hg
    2. Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg
    3. Pulse rate, 40-100 bpm
  5. Stable body weight at home for ~2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%).
  6. Blood pressure (≤150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol
  7. Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the patient who cannot consent for himself or herself.
  8. Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (CBC with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant.
  9. Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening FSH level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol.
  10. Males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to a double barrier method if they become sexually active during the study and for 90 days following the study. Male subjects must not donate sperm for 90 days following their participation in the study.
  11. Patients must be on a stable dose of any allowed chronic concomitant medications while participating in the study, as described in protocol. This is defined as no changes in medication for at least 60 days prior to Day 1 and no changes in dose for at least 30 days prior to Day 1; Note that stable concomitant usage (>3 months) of growth hormone, hormone replacement therapy, GLP-1 agents, statins, or other medications (excluding insulin, modafinil, anti-psychotics), and other medications commonly used in PWS patients are allowed (See Section 6.4.5 on Concomitant medications).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication.
  2. Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other DSM-III disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance.
  3. A PHQ-9 score of ≥15.
  4. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS.
  5. Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening.
  6. History of clinically significant bleeding disorders.
  7. Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or GI disease.
  8. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement).
  9. Cardiovascular disease event including history of CHF, coronary artery disease, MI, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome.
  10. Blood pressure >150/90 mmHG.
  11. Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, SGOT (AST), alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (> 1.5 x ULN for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis.
  12. History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, BUN, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockroft Gault equation (< 50 mL/min).
  13. History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma.
  14. Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at ~1% in PWS).
  15. Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist. Any concerning lesions identified during the screening period will be biopsied and results known to be benign prior to randomization. If the pre-treatment biopsy results are of concern, the patient will be excluded from the study.
  16. Significant history of abuse of drugs or solvents in the year before screening or a positive Drugs of Abuse (DOA) test at screening.
  17. History of alcohol abuse in the past year before screening or currently drinks in excess of 21 units per week (3 servings or units/day).
  18. Caffeine consumption exceeding 6 cups of caffeinated tea/coffee (or equivalent) per day.
  19. Volunteer is, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.
  20. Participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing.
  21. Positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C tests or tuberculosis.
  22. Serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug.
  23. Clinically significant blood loss or blood donation > 500 mL within 3 month.
  24. Inadequate venous access.
  25. History of low blood counts or recurring infections.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California Irvine
  • University of Florida
  • Kansas University Medical Center
  • Winthrop University Hospital
  • Vanderbilt University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Setmelanotide 0.5 mg

Setmelanotide 1.5 mg

Setmelanotide 2.5 mg

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants received setmelanotide 0.5 milligrams (mg) once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period) and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).

Participants received setmelanotide 1.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).

Participants received setmelanotide 2.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).

Participants received placebo matched to setmelanotide once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 1 to Day 14 (2-week, single-blind run-in period), Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Mean Body Weight - Period 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic drive score assesses the persistence in asking for food based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic drive range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic drive) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic drive). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic drive score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic behavior factor score assesses food seeking behaviors based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic behaviors range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic behavior) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic behavior). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic behaviors score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic severity factor score assesses the severity of hyperphagia based on 2 items. Both items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic severity range from a minimum score of 2 (no hyperphagic severity) to a maximum score of 10 (greater hyperphagic severity). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic severity score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Mean Setmelanotide Trough Concentrations
The average of setmelanotide trough concentrations values for both timepoints (5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70) is presented.
Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Time to the Maximum Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Area Under the Drug Concentration-Time Curve From Time-Zero to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC24h) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Volume of distribution calculated as Dose/The observed terminal rate constant*AUC24h.
Total Clearance (CL) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Clearance after extravascular administration; calculated as Dose/AUC24h.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 3
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Continuous Active and Continuous Placebo Treatments - Period 2 and 3
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using Dual x-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) - Period 2
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body fat were judged by investigator.
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 2
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body mass were judged by investigator.

Full Information

First Posted
November 25, 2014
Last Updated
July 6, 2023
Sponsor
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02311673
Brief Title
Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome
Official Title
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Effects of RM-493, a Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R) Agonist, in Obese Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) on Safety, Weight Reduction, and Food-Related Behaviors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 19, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 26, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 26, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a once daily subcutaneous injectable formulation of setmelanotide in obese participants with Prader-Willi syndrome on tolerability, weight loss, and hyperphagia-related behavior. The study drug (setmelanotide and placebo) was administered in a blinded fashion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prader-Willi Syndrome
Keywords
Prader-Willi Syndrome, obesity, hyperphagia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Setmelanotide 0.5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received setmelanotide 0.5 milligrams (mg) once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period) and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
Arm Title
Setmelanotide 1.5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received setmelanotide 1.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
Arm Title
Setmelanotide 2.5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received setmelanotide 2.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received placebo matched to setmelanotide once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 1 to Day 14 (2-week, single-blind run-in period), Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Setmelanotide
Other Intervention Name(s)
RM-493
Intervention Description
subcutaneous injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Time Frame
Days 15 to 41
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Time Frame
Days 42 to 55
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Resulted in death; Was life-threatening; Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Time Frame
Days 56 to 69
Title
Mean Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic drive score assesses the persistence in asking for food based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic drive range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic drive) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic drive). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic drive score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic behavior factor score assesses food seeking behaviors based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic behaviors range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic behavior) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic behavior). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic behaviors score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic severity factor score assesses the severity of hyperphagia based on 2 items. Both items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic severity range from a minimum score of 2 (no hyperphagic severity) to a maximum score of 10 (greater hyperphagic severity). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic severity score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4
Description
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Title
Mean Setmelanotide Trough Concentrations
Description
The average of setmelanotide trough concentrations values for both timepoints (5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70) is presented.
Time Frame
5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70
Title
Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Description
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Time Frame
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Title
Time to the Maximum Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Description
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Time Frame
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Title
Area Under the Drug Concentration-Time Curve From Time-Zero to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC24h) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Title
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Description
Volume of distribution calculated as Dose/The observed terminal rate constant*AUC24h.
Time Frame
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Title
Total Clearance (CL) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Description
Clearance after extravascular administration; calculated as Dose/AUC24h.
Time Frame
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Title
Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 3
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 4
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Continuous Active and Continuous Placebo Treatments - Period 2 and 3
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15), Day 42, Day 56
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using Dual x-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) - Period 2
Description
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Description
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body fat were judged by investigator.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 2
Description
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Description
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body mass were judged by investigator.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female participants weighing at least 50 kilograms (kg) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²) Age 16-65 years If a participant has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met: hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) < 7.5% not being managed with insulin. Participants taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months. Fasting plasma glucose < 140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable. Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 millimeter of mercury (mm Hg) Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg Pulse rate, 40-100 beats per minute (bpm) Stable body weight at home for approximately 2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%). Blood pressure (≤ 150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the participant who cannot consent for himself or herself. Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant. Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol. Males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to a double barrier method if they become sexually active during the study and for 90 days following the study. Male participants must not donate sperm for 90 days following their participation in the study. Participants must be on a stable dose of any allowed chronic concomitant medications while participating in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication. Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance. A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening. History of clinically significant bleeding disorders. Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or gastrointestinal disease. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement). Cardiovascular disease event including history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome. Blood pressure > 150/90 mm Hg. Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (> 1.5 x upper limit of normal for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis. History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (< 50 mL/min). History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma. Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at approximately 1% in PWS). Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist. Significant history of abuse of drugs or solvents in the year before screening or a positive Drugs of Abuse (DOA) test at screening. History of alcohol abuse in the past year before screening or currently drinks in excess of 21 units per week (3 servings or units/day). Caffeine consumption exceeding 6 cups of caffeinated tea/coffee (or equivalent) per day. Participant is, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study. Participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing. Positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C tests or tuberculosis. Serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug. Clinically significant blood loss or blood donation > 500 milliliters (mL) within 3 months. Inadequate venous access. History of low blood counts or recurring infections.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Meeker
Organizational Affiliation
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California Irvine
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92617
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kansas University Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Winthrop University Hospital
City
Mineola
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs