Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses (COMET2)
Primary Purpose
Actinic Keratoses
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NDL-PDT
c-PDT
placebo c-PDT
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Actinic Keratoses focused on measuring actinic keratoses, photodynamic therapy, natural daylight
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of mild (Grade 1) and/or moderate (Grade 2) AKs on the face or the scalp on treated areas
- Subject with two symmetrical treated areas half scalps or two half faces excluding ears, chin, bridge of the nose, eyelids and lips inside the vermillion border): no more than a twofold difference in terms of total number of lesions between the two TAs
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe (Grade 3) AK on treated areas
- Subject with pigmented AK on the treated areas
- Immuno-compromised Subject for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons
- Subject with porphyria,
Sites / Locations
- Investigative site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigative site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigative site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
- Investigational site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
NDL-PDT/c-PDT
NDL-PDT/placebo c-PDT
Arm Description
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix-placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1
The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01821391
Brief Title
Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses
Acronym
COMET2
Official Title
Multi-centre, Randomized, Investigator-blind, Intra-individual Active and Vehicle-controlled Study, Comparing Metvix Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Metvix Conventional Photodynamic Therapy in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Galderma R&D
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study was to be conducted as a multi-centre, randomized, investigator-blinded, active and vehicle-controlled, intra-individual (split-face/scalp) non-inferiority (regarding efficacy) and superiority (regarding pain) study.
The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of NDL-PDT compared to c-PDT in terms of lesion complete response rate.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Actinic Keratoses
Keywords
actinic keratoses, photodynamic therapy, natural daylight
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
2 intra-individual groups:
Metvix NDL-PDT / Metvix c-PDT
Metvix NDL-PDT / Placebo c-PDT
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
131 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
NDL-PDT/c-PDT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
Arm Title
NDL-PDT/placebo c-PDT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy and Metvix-placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
NDL-PDT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Metvix NDL-PDT
Intervention Description
Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
c-PDT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Metvix c-PDT
Intervention Description
Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo c-PDT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Metvix placebo c-PDT
Intervention Description
Metvix placebo conventional photodynamic therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1
Description
The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical diagnosis of mild (Grade 1) and/or moderate (Grade 2) AKs on the face or the scalp on treated areas
Subject with two symmetrical treated areas half scalps or two half faces excluding ears, chin, bridge of the nose, eyelids and lips inside the vermillion border): no more than a twofold difference in terms of total number of lesions between the two TAs
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe (Grade 3) AK on treated areas
Subject with pigmented AK on the treated areas
Immuno-compromised Subject for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons
Subject with porphyria,
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicole Basset Seguin, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hopital Saint Louis France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bibiana Perez Garcia, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Ramón y Cajal Spain
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rianne Gerritsen, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Center The Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rolf-Markus Sziemies, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Klinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ingrid Synnerstad, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hudmottagningen Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Investigative site
City
Montpellier
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Nantes
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Nice
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigative site
City
Rennes
Country
France
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Aachen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Muenster
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Recklinghausen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Assen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Maastricht
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Huesca
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigative site
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Karlskoga
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Investigational site
City
Norrköping
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs