search
Back to results

Phase IIb Study of Evobrutinib in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
M2591 25 mg QD
M2951 75 mg QD
M2951 50 mg BID
Placebo
Sponsored by
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, American College of Rheumatology, High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, Bruton's tyrosine kinase

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In Japan, if a participant is less than (<) 20 years, the written informed consent from the participant's parent or guardian will be required in addition to the participant's written consent.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of RA according to 2010 ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria of at least 6 months duration prior to Screening
  • Persistently active moderate to severe RA at both Screening and Randomization (if significant surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted for entry or enrollment purposes), as defined by: >= 6 swollen joints (of 66 assessed) and >= 6 tender joints (of 68 assessed).
  • An hsCRP >= 5.0 milligram/liter (mg/L) at Screening
  • Treatment for >= 16 weeks with 7.5 to 25 mg/week Methotrexate (MTX) at a stable dose and route of administration (oral or parenteral) for at least 8 weeks prior to dosing with the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) and maintained throughout the trial
  • For participants entering the trial on MTX doses < 15 mg/week (< 10 mg/week in Japan), there must be clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses of MTX were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines.
  • For MRI Sub-study participants, participants must have palpable synovitis of the wrist and/or >= 1 of metacarpophalangeal joints 1 to 5, defined as loss of bony contours with palpable joint effusion and/or swelling, in the MRI-designated hand (that is., the hand being used in MRI assessments).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ACR functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification of functional status or wheelchair/bedbound
  • Use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, or change in dose of corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to Screening or during Screening
  • Use of injectable corticosteroids (including intra-articular corticosteroids) or intra-articular hyaluronic acid within 4 weeks prior to Screening or during Screening
  • Initiation or change in dose for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (including low-dose aspirin and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors) within 2 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP
  • High potency opioid analgesics are prohibited within 2 weeks prior to Screening and during the trial; other analgesics are allowed (that is, acetaminophen, codeine, hydrocodone*, propoxyphene*, or tramadol), although not within 24 hours of study visits with clinical assessments (*not approved in Japan)
  • Current or prior treatment with any of the following:
  • Biologic Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (approved or investigational), including but not limited to:
  • Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or biosimilars of these agents (approved or investigational), or any investigational TNF antagonist
  • Interleukin-6 antagonists
  • Abatacept (CTLA4-Fc)
  • Anakinra* (IL-1 receptor antagonist) (*not approved in Japan)
  • B cell-depleting antibodies (example, rituximab, ocrelizumab*, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab*, ocaratuzumab*, veltuzumab*, or any biosimilars of these agents [approved or investigational]) (*not approved in Japan)
  • Anti-BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator) agents (example, belimumab, tabalumab*) (*not approved in Japan)
  • Dual BLyS/A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) neutralizing agents (that is, atacicept*, RCT-18*) (*not approved in Japan)
  • Targeted synthetic DMARDs, specifically:
  • Janus kinase inhibitors
  • Other Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors
  • Alkylating agents (example, chlorambucil*, cyclophosphamide) (*not approved in Japan).
  • The following restrictions on nonbiologic DMARD must be followed:
  • Auranofin (Ridaura), minocycline, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate (mycophenolate sodium not approved in Japan), tacrolimus, azathioprine: must have been discontinued for 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP
  • Leflunomide (Arava) must have been discontinued 12 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP if no elimination procedure is followed. Alternately, it should have been discontinued with the following elimination procedure at least 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP:
  • Cholestyramine at a dosage of 8 gram 3 times a day for at least 24 hours, or activated charcoal at a dosage of 50 gram 4 times a day for at least 24 hours.
  • Injectable Gold (aurothioglucose* or aurothiomalate): must have been discontinued for 8 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP (*not approved in Japan)
  • Anti-malarials (hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine*) will be allowed in this trial. Participants may be taking oral hydroxychloroquine (=< 400 mg/day) or chloroquine (=< 250 mg/day), doses must have been stable for at least 12 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP, and will need to be continued at that stable dose for the duration of the trial. If discontinued prior to this trial, they must have been discontinued for 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP (*not approved in Japan).
  • For MRI Substudy:
  • Inability to comply with MRI scanning, including contraindications to MRI such as known allergy to gadolinium contrast media, claustrophobia (if the site does not have ability to scan extremities only), presence of a pacemaker, cochlear implants, ferromagnetic devices or clips, intracranial vascular clips, insulin pumps, and nerve stimulators.
  • More than 25% of applicable joints of the target hand and wrist having had prior surgery or showing maximum Genant-modified Sharp erosion (3.0) or joint-space narrowing (4.0) scores, based on single posteroanterior radiographs of target hand and wrist read centrally.

Sites / Locations

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC
  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
  • Omega Research Consultants
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
  • McIlwain Medical Group, PA
  • Medication Management, LLC
  • Arthritis Clinic Of Central Texas
  • Hospital Italiano de La Plata
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas
  • Instituto Medico CER
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes
  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
  • Centro de Investigaciones Reumatológicas
  • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
  • APRILLUS
  • Expertia S.A- Mautalen Salud e Investigación
  • Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia
  • ILAIM-CEOM Inst. Latinoamericano de Inv. Medicas
  • Instituto Reumatológico Strusberg
  • Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER
  • MHAT "Hadzhi Dimitar", OOD
  • DCC "Alexandrovska", EOOD
  • UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD
  • Centro Medico Prosalud
  • Interin
  • BioMedica Research Group
  • Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos
  • Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia SAS
  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A.
  • Simedics Ips Sas
  • Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas SAS. CIREEM
  • Servimed S.A.S.
  • Clinica de Artritis Temprana S.A.
  • Revmatolog, s.r.o
  • ARTROSCAN s.r.o.
  • CCBR Ostrava s.r.o.
  • CLINTRIAL s.r.o.
  • Thomayerova nemocnice
  • MUDR. Zuzana URBANOVA Revmatologie
  • MUDR. Zuzana URBANOVA Revmatologie
  • MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o.
  • PV-MEDICAL s.r.o.
  • Centro Investigacion en Artritis y Osteoporosis S.C.
  • RM Pharma Specialists SA de CV
  • Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C.
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
  • Centro de Investigacion y Atencion Integral Durango CIAID
  • ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spółka Jawna
  • Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. Barbara Bazela
  • MCBK Iwona Czajkowska Anna Podrażka- Szczepaniak S.C.
  • Care Clinic
  • Silmedic sp. z o.o
  • GLOBE CLINICAL RESEARCH (Globe Badania Kliniczne Sp z o.o.)
  • Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Maciej Zymla
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.
  • Grazyna Pulka Specjalistyczny Osrodek "ALL-MED"
  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych S.C.
  • RCMed
  • Centrum Medyczne AMED
  • Medycyna Kliniczna
  • Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
  • Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
  • Reum-Medica S.C Eliza Roszkowska
  • Research Institute of Emergency Medical Care
  • Limited Liability Company "Centre of Medical Common Practice"
  • Ultramed
  • SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"
  • LLC Medical Sanitary Unit#157
  • NIH "Departmental Hospital on Station Smolensk of OJSC "Russian Railways"
  • SAIH of Yaroslavl region "Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N. V. Solovyev"
  • SBHI of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Hospital # 8"
  • Institute of Rheumatology_Site 1
  • Military Medical Academy
  • Clinical Center Bezanijska kosa
  • Institute of Treatment and Rehabilitation "Niska Banja"
  • General Hospital "Dr Laza K. Lazarevic" Sabac
  • Wits Clinical Research
  • Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd
  • Emmed Research
  • University of Pretoria Clinical Research Unit
  • Naidoo, A
  • Arthritis Clinical Research Trial Unit
  • Winelands Medical Research Centre
  • Regional CH Dep of Rheumatology SHEI Ivano-Frankivsk NMU
  • GI L.T.Malaya Therapy National Institute of the NAMS of Ukraine
  • Communal Institution of Healthcare Kharkiv City Clinical Hospital #8
  • Medical Center Medical Clinic Blagomed LLC
  • Med Center 'Ok!Clinic+' of International Institute of Clinical Trials LLC
  • Medical Center of Revmotsentr LLC
  • SI D.F.Chebotariov Institute of Gerontology of NAMSU
  • CH of State Border Service of Ukraine (Military Base 2522) Dept of Therapy, D.Halytskyi Lviv NMU
  • M.V. Sklifosovskyi Poltava RCH Dept of Rheumatology HSEIU UMSA
  • A.Novak Transcarpathian Regional Clinical Hospital
  • National Pirogov Memorial Medical University
  • CI City Hospital #1
  • CI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of ZRC
  • CI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of ZRC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

M2951 25 mg QD

M2951 75 mg QD

M2951 50 mg BID

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) Response Criteria (ACR20) Assessed Using High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
ACR20 response: a participant has at least 20% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants with ACR20 response using hsCRP = Number of participants with ACR20 response using hsCRP divided by total modified intent-to-treat (mITT) participants * 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS28 Less Than [<] 3.2) Based on 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.96. Scores ranged 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. Percentage of participants with low DAS28 < 3.2 based on DAS28- hsCRP at Week 12 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Remission Disease Activity Score (DAS28 Less Than [<] 2.6) Based on a 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.96. Scores ranged 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. A DAS28 score less than (<) 2.6 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with low DAS28 < 2.6 based on DAS28- hsCRP at Week 12 were reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50)
ACR50 response: a participant has at least 50% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 50% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response = Number of participants with ACR50 response divided by total mITT participants * 100.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70)
ACR70 response: a participant has at least 70% improvement ACR70 response in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response = Number of participants with ACR70 response divided by total mITT participants * 100.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inparticipant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 16 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported.
Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Change From Baseline in B Cell Count at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) Boolean at Week 12
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission was when a participant satisfied all of the following: tender joint count, swollen joint count (both based on a 28-joint assessment), C-reactive Protein (in milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]), and participant's global assessment (visual analog scale [VAS]: 0 centimeter (cm) [very well] to 10 cm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition) and all scores were less than or equal to (<=) 1. Percentage of participants with ACR-EULAR Boolean Remission were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Less Than or Equal to [=<] 2.8 at Week 12
CDAI: a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PhGA where, GH = general health component of the Disease Activity Score [DAS] (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where 0 (none) to 76 (extreme disease activity). CDAI score =< 2.8 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with CDAI score =< 2.8 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score Less Than or Equal to [=<] 3.3 at Week 12
SDAI was calculated based on following formula: SDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA + hsCRP where, GH = general health component of the Disease Activity Score [DAS] (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, where 0 (none) to 86 (extreme disease activity). SDAI score =< 3.3 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with SDAI score =< 3.3 at Week 12 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 12
EULAR Responder index based on 28 joint counts categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP >5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP <3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP <2.6. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index: good (absolute: <3.2 or >1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: >5.1 or <0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Responses were reported.
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Hybrid Scores Computed Using High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
The hybrid ACR combines the ACR 20/50/70 response with the mean percent change in all 7 ACR core components, thus providing a percent improvement from baseline on a continuous scale. For each participant, the mean percent improvement from baseline across the 7 ACR core set measures (tender joint count, swollen joint count, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], and C-reactive protein [CRP]) was calculated (a positive change indicated improvement, and the maximum worst change was limited to -100%) and the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response is determined. The hybrid ACR is determined from a reference table taking into account both ACR response and mean percent improvement in the core set measures. Scores can range from -100% (maximal worsening) to 100% (maximal improvement).
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on a 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
DAS28 was a composite score used for measuring disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. The calculation was based on the tender joint count (out of 28 joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 joints), hsCRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Total DAS28-hsCRP score ranged from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28-hsCRP < 3.2 implied low disease activity and >= 3.2 to <= 5.1 implied moderate disease activity, > 5.1 implied high disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(hsCRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014* Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity + 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 12
The CDAI was a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PhGA where, GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where 0 (none) to 76 (extreme disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Week 12
SDAI was numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA + hsCRP where, GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, where 0 (none) to 86 (extreme disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Sixty-eight joints were assessed and classified as tender/not tender and Sixty-six joints were classified as swollen/not swollen by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The participant's overall assessment of disease activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Changes From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 12
HAQ-DI score was an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assessed the degree of difficulty a person had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area were scored from 0, indicated no difficulty, to 3, indicated inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 mm horizontal VAS. Physician rated participant's arthritis disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (no arthritis) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis).
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
hsCRP was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of M2951 on the participant's rheumatoid arthritis.
Percent Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Sixty-eight joints were assessed and classified as tender/not tender and Sixty-six joints were classified as swollen/not swollen by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The participant's overall assessment of disease activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Percent Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 12
HAQ-DI score was an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assessed the degree of difficulty a person had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area were scored from 0, indicated no difficulty, to 3, indicated inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 mm horizontal VAS. Physician rated participant's arthritis disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (no arthritis) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis).
Percent Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
hsCRP was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of M2951 on the participant's rheumatoid arthritis.
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score According to the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS) at Week 12
A total of 8 joints in the hand and wrist were evaluated for RAMRIS synovitis. Individual joint scores were assessed on a scale of 0 (no synovitis) to 3 (67 to 100 percent volume enhancement). The final synovitis score was the sum of the individual joint scores. The total score from 8 joints ranges from 0 to 24, with 0 implying normal (no synovitis) and 24 implying 67 to 100 percent volume enhancement.
Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Edema (Osteitis) Score According to the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS) at Week 12
A total of 25 locations in the hand and wrist were evaluated for RAMRIS bone edema or osteitis. Individual location scores range from 0 (no edema) to 3 (67 to 100 percent involvement of original articular bone) based on the proportion of estimated originally non-eroded bone involved. The final bone edema or osteitis score is the sum of the individual location scores. The total score from the 25 locations ranges from 0 to 75, with 0 implying no bone edema or osteitis and 75 implying 67 to 100 percent involvement of original articular bone.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Using Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The HAQ-DI questionnaire assessed the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty [0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (worst disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score at Week 12
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning).
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

Full Information

First Posted
July 25, 2017
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Sponsor
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03233230
Brief Title
Phase IIb Study of Evobrutinib in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind Study in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Evobrutinib Compared With Placebo in Subjects With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 18, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 23, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 23, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, dose response, and safety of M52951 in participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), and to consider a dose to took forward into Phase III development.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, American College of Rheumatology, High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, Bruton's tyrosine kinase

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
390 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
M2951 25 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
M2951 75 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
M2951 50 mg BID
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
M2591 25 mg QD
Other Intervention Name(s)
Evobrutinib
Intervention Description
Participants received 25 milligrams (mg) of M2951 orally once daily (QD) for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
M2951 75 mg QD
Other Intervention Name(s)
Evobrutinib
Intervention Description
Participants received 75 mg of M2951 orally QD for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
M2951 50 mg BID
Other Intervention Name(s)
Evobrutinib
Intervention Description
Participants received 50 mg of M2951 orally twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants received placebo matched to M2951 orally for 12 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) Response Criteria (ACR20) Assessed Using High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
ACR20 response: a participant has at least 20% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants with ACR20 response using hsCRP = Number of participants with ACR20 response using hsCRP divided by total modified intent-to-treat (mITT) participants * 100.
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (DAS28 Less Than [<] 3.2) Based on 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.96. Scores ranged 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. Percentage of participants with low DAS28 < 3.2 based on DAS28- hsCRP at Week 12 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Remission Disease Activity Score (DAS28 Less Than [<] 2.6) Based on a 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.96. Scores ranged 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. A DAS28 score less than (<) 2.6 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with low DAS28 < 2.6 based on DAS28- hsCRP at Week 12 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50)
Description
ACR50 response: a participant has at least 50% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 50% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response = Number of participants with ACR50 response divided by total mITT participants * 100.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70)
Description
ACR70 response: a participant has at least 70% improvement ACR70 response in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response = Number of participants with ACR70 response divided by total mITT participants * 100.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Description
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inparticipant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 16 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.
Time Frame
up to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Description
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.
Time Frame
up to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Description
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Time Frame
up to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
Description
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.
Time Frame
up to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Description
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported.
Time Frame
up to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Description
Change in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in B Cell Count at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Description
Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) Boolean at Week 12
Description
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission was when a participant satisfied all of the following: tender joint count, swollen joint count (both based on a 28-joint assessment), C-reactive Protein (in milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]), and participant's global assessment (visual analog scale [VAS]: 0 centimeter (cm) [very well] to 10 cm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition) and all scores were less than or equal to (<=) 1. Percentage of participants with ACR-EULAR Boolean Remission were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Less Than or Equal to [=<] 2.8 at Week 12
Description
CDAI: a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PhGA where, GH = general health component of the Disease Activity Score [DAS] (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where 0 (none) to 76 (extreme disease activity). CDAI score =< 2.8 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with CDAI score =< 2.8 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score Less Than or Equal to [=<] 3.3 at Week 12
Description
SDAI was calculated based on following formula: SDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA + hsCRP where, GH = general health component of the Disease Activity Score [DAS] (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, where 0 (none) to 86 (extreme disease activity). SDAI score =< 3.3 indicated clinical remission. Percentage of participants with SDAI score =< 3.3 at Week 12 were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 12
Description
EULAR Responder index based on 28 joint counts categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP scores range from 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP >5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP <3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP <2.6. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index: good (absolute: <3.2 or >1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: >5.1 or <0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Responses were reported.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Hybrid Scores Computed Using High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Description
The hybrid ACR combines the ACR 20/50/70 response with the mean percent change in all 7 ACR core components, thus providing a percent improvement from baseline on a continuous scale. For each participant, the mean percent improvement from baseline across the 7 ACR core set measures (tender joint count, swollen joint count, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], and C-reactive protein [CRP]) was calculated (a positive change indicated improvement, and the maximum worst change was limited to -100%) and the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response is determined. The hybrid ACR is determined from a reference table taking into account both ACR response and mean percent improvement in the core set measures. Scores can range from -100% (maximal worsening) to 100% (maximal improvement).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on a 28 Joint Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
DAS28 was a composite score used for measuring disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. The calculation was based on the tender joint count (out of 28 joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 joints), hsCRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Total DAS28-hsCRP score ranged from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28-hsCRP < 3.2 implied low disease activity and >= 3.2 to <= 5.1 implied moderate disease activity, > 5.1 implied high disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(hsCRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014* Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity + 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 12
Description
The CDAI was a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PhGA where, GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where 0 (none) to 76 (extreme disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Week 12
Description
SDAI was numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA + hsCRP where, GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 = very well and 10 = very poor activity. The total SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, where 0 (none) to 86 (extreme disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Description
Sixty-eight joints were assessed and classified as tender/not tender and Sixty-six joints were classified as swollen/not swollen by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The participant's overall assessment of disease activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Changes From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 12
Description
HAQ-DI score was an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assessed the degree of difficulty a person had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area were scored from 0, indicated no difficulty, to 3, indicated inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 mm horizontal VAS. Physician rated participant's arthritis disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (no arthritis) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
hsCRP was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of M2951 on the participant's rheumatoid arthritis.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Description
Sixty-eight joints were assessed and classified as tender/not tender and Sixty-six joints were classified as swollen/not swollen by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The participant's overall assessment of disease activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 12
Description
HAQ-DI score was an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assessed the degree of difficulty a person had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area were scored from 0, indicated no difficulty, to 3, indicated inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12
Description
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 mm horizontal VAS. Physician rated participant's arthritis disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (no arthritis) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12
Description
hsCRP was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of M2951 on the participant's rheumatoid arthritis.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score According to the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS) at Week 12
Description
A total of 8 joints in the hand and wrist were evaluated for RAMRIS synovitis. Individual joint scores were assessed on a scale of 0 (no synovitis) to 3 (67 to 100 percent volume enhancement). The final synovitis score was the sum of the individual joint scores. The total score from 8 joints ranges from 0 to 24, with 0 implying normal (no synovitis) and 24 implying 67 to 100 percent volume enhancement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Edema (Osteitis) Score According to the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS) at Week 12
Description
A total of 25 locations in the hand and wrist were evaluated for RAMRIS bone edema or osteitis. Individual location scores range from 0 (no edema) to 3 (67 to 100 percent involvement of original articular bone) based on the proportion of estimated originally non-eroded bone involved. The final bone edema or osteitis score is the sum of the individual location scores. The total score from the 25 locations ranges from 0 to 75, with 0 implying no bone edema or osteitis and 75 implying 67 to 100 percent involvement of original articular bone.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Using Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Description
The HAQ-DI questionnaire assessed the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty [0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (worst disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score at Week 12
Description
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 12
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: In Japan, if a participant is less than (<) 20 years, the written informed consent from the participant's parent or guardian will be required in addition to the participant's written consent. Confirmed diagnosis of RA according to 2010 ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria of at least 6 months duration prior to Screening Persistently active moderate to severe RA at both Screening and Randomization (if significant surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted for entry or enrollment purposes), as defined by: >= 6 swollen joints (of 66 assessed) and >= 6 tender joints (of 68 assessed). An hsCRP >= 5.0 milligram/liter (mg/L) at Screening Treatment for >= 16 weeks with 7.5 to 25 mg/week Methotrexate (MTX) at a stable dose and route of administration (oral or parenteral) for at least 8 weeks prior to dosing with the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) and maintained throughout the trial For participants entering the trial on MTX doses < 15 mg/week (< 10 mg/week in Japan), there must be clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses of MTX were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines. For MRI Sub-study participants, participants must have palpable synovitis of the wrist and/or >= 1 of metacarpophalangeal joints 1 to 5, defined as loss of bony contours with palpable joint effusion and/or swelling, in the MRI-designated hand (that is., the hand being used in MRI assessments). Exclusion Criteria: ACR functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification of functional status or wheelchair/bedbound Use of oral corticosteroids greater than (>) 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, or change in dose of corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to Screening or during Screening Use of injectable corticosteroids (including intra-articular corticosteroids) or intra-articular hyaluronic acid within 4 weeks prior to Screening or during Screening Initiation or change in dose for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (including low-dose aspirin and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors) within 2 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP High potency opioid analgesics are prohibited within 2 weeks prior to Screening and during the trial; other analgesics are allowed (that is, acetaminophen, codeine, hydrocodone*, propoxyphene*, or tramadol), although not within 24 hours of study visits with clinical assessments (*not approved in Japan) Current or prior treatment with any of the following: Biologic Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (approved or investigational), including but not limited to: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or biosimilars of these agents (approved or investigational), or any investigational TNF antagonist Interleukin-6 antagonists Abatacept (CTLA4-Fc) Anakinra* (IL-1 receptor antagonist) (*not approved in Japan) B cell-depleting antibodies (example, rituximab, ocrelizumab*, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab*, ocaratuzumab*, veltuzumab*, or any biosimilars of these agents [approved or investigational]) (*not approved in Japan) Anti-BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator) agents (example, belimumab, tabalumab*) (*not approved in Japan) Dual BLyS/A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) neutralizing agents (that is, atacicept*, RCT-18*) (*not approved in Japan) Targeted synthetic DMARDs, specifically: Janus kinase inhibitors Other Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors Alkylating agents (example, chlorambucil*, cyclophosphamide) (*not approved in Japan). The following restrictions on nonbiologic DMARD must be followed: Auranofin (Ridaura), minocycline, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate (mycophenolate sodium not approved in Japan), tacrolimus, azathioprine: must have been discontinued for 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP Leflunomide (Arava) must have been discontinued 12 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP if no elimination procedure is followed. Alternately, it should have been discontinued with the following elimination procedure at least 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP: Cholestyramine at a dosage of 8 gram 3 times a day for at least 24 hours, or activated charcoal at a dosage of 50 gram 4 times a day for at least 24 hours. Injectable Gold (aurothioglucose* or aurothiomalate): must have been discontinued for 8 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP (*not approved in Japan) Anti-malarials (hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine*) will be allowed in this trial. Participants may be taking oral hydroxychloroquine (=< 400 mg/day) or chloroquine (=< 250 mg/day), doses must have been stable for at least 12 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP, and will need to be continued at that stable dose for the duration of the trial. If discontinued prior to this trial, they must have been discontinued for 4 weeks prior to dosing with the IMP (*not approved in Japan). For MRI Substudy: Inability to comply with MRI scanning, including contraindications to MRI such as known allergy to gadolinium contrast media, claustrophobia (if the site does not have ability to scan extremities only), presence of a pacemaker, cochlear implants, ferromagnetic devices or clips, intracranial vascular clips, insulin pumps, and nerve stimulators. More than 25% of applicable joints of the target hand and wrist having had prior surgery or showing maximum Genant-modified Sharp erosion (3.0) or joint-space narrowing (4.0) scores, based on single posteroanterior radiographs of target hand and wrist read centrally.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Responsible
Organizational Affiliation
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85037
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
City
San Leandro
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94578
Country
United States
Facility Name
Omega Research Consultants
City
DeBary
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
McIlwain Medical Group, PA
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medication Management, LLC
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis Clinic Of Central Texas
City
San Marcos
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78666
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hospital Italiano de La Plata
City
La Plata
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1900AXI
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas
City
Mar del Plata
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B7600FZ
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto Medico CER
City
Quilmes
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1878DVB
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas Quilmes
City
Quilmes
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1878GEG
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
City
Tucuman
State/Province
San Miguel De Tucuman
ZIP/Postal Code
T4000AXL
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Centro de Investigaciones Reumatológicas
City
San Miguel de Tucuman
State/Province
Tucuman
ZIP/Postal Code
T4000BRD
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1015ABO
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
APRILLUS
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1046AAQ
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Expertia S.A- Mautalen Salud e Investigación
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1128AAE
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M. Ramos Mejia
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1221ADC
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
ILAIM-CEOM Inst. Latinoamericano de Inv. Medicas
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
X5000BNB
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto Reumatológico Strusberg
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
X5000EDC
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
5400
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
MHAT "Hadzhi Dimitar", OOD
City
Sliven
ZIP/Postal Code
8800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
DCC "Alexandrovska", EOOD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1797
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Centro Medico Prosalud
City
Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7500000
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Interin
City
Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7500010
Country
Chile
Facility Name
BioMedica Research Group
City
Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7500710
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos
City
Santiago
ZIP/Postal Code
7501126
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia SAS
City
Barranquilla
ZIP/Postal Code
080001
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Riesgo de Fractura S.A.
City
Bogota
ZIP/Postal Code
110221
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Simedics Ips Sas
City
Bogotá
ZIP/Postal Code
111211
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas SAS. CIREEM
City
Bogotá
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Servimed S.A.S.
City
Bucaramanga
ZIP/Postal Code
680003
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Clinica de Artritis Temprana S.A.
City
Cali
ZIP/Postal Code
76001
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Revmatolog, s.r.o
City
Jihlava
ZIP/Postal Code
586 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
ARTROSCAN s.r.o.
City
Ostrava - Trebovice
ZIP/Postal Code
722 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR Ostrava s.r.o.
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
702 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CLINTRIAL s.r.o.
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Thomayerova nemocnice
City
Praha 4 - Krc
ZIP/Postal Code
140 59
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MUDR. Zuzana URBANOVA Revmatologie
City
Praha 4 Nusle
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MUDR. Zuzana URBANOVA Revmatologie
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o.
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
PV-MEDICAL s.r.o.
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Centro Investigacion en Artritis y Osteoporosis S.C.
City
Mexicali
State/Province
Baja California Norte
ZIP/Postal Code
21200
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
RM Pharma Specialists SA de CV
City
Mexico
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
03100
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Clinica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad S.C.
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44650
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion y Atencion Integral Durango CIAID
City
Durango
ZIP/Postal Code
34270
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spółka Jawna
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-879
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. Barbara Bazela
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MCBK Iwona Czajkowska Anna Podrażka- Szczepaniak S.C.
City
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
ZIP/Postal Code
05-825
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Care Clinic
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-060
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Silmedic sp. z o.o
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-282
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GLOBE CLINICAL RESEARCH (Globe Badania Kliniczne Sp z o.o.)
City
Klodzko
ZIP/Postal Code
57-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Maciej Zymla
City
Knurow
ZIP/Postal Code
44-190
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Grazyna Pulka Specjalistyczny Osrodek "ALL-MED"
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-024
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Badan Klinicznych S.C.
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-773
Country
Poland
Facility Name
RCMed
City
Sochaczew
ZIP/Postal Code
96-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne AMED
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
03-291
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Medycyna Kliniczna
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-660
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-118
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-141
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Reum-Medica S.C Eliza Roszkowska
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-244
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Institute of Emergency Medical Care
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
192242
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Limited Liability Company "Centre of Medical Common Practice"
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Ultramed
City
Omsk
ZIP/Postal Code
644024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
190068
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
LLC Medical Sanitary Unit#157
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
196066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
NIH "Departmental Hospital on Station Smolensk of OJSC "Russian Railways"
City
Smolensk
ZIP/Postal Code
214025
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SAIH of Yaroslavl region "Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N. V. Solovyev"
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SBHI of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Hospital # 8"
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Institute of Rheumatology_Site 1
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Military Medical Academy
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Clinical Center Bezanijska kosa
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11080
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Institute of Treatment and Rehabilitation "Niska Banja"
City
Niska Banja
ZIP/Postal Code
18205
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
General Hospital "Dr Laza K. Lazarevic" Sabac
City
Sabac
ZIP/Postal Code
15000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Wits Clinical Research
City
Johannesburg
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
2193
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd
City
Kempton Park
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1619
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Emmed Research
City
Pretoria
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
0002
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
University of Pretoria Clinical Research Unit
City
Pretoria
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
0002
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Naidoo, A
City
Durban
State/Province
KwaZulu-Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4319
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Arthritis Clinical Research Trial Unit
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western Cape
ZIP/Postal Code
7405
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Winelands Medical Research Centre
City
Stellenbosch
State/Province
Western Cape
ZIP/Postal Code
7600
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Regional CH Dep of Rheumatology SHEI Ivano-Frankivsk NMU
City
Ivano-Frankivsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76008
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GI L.T.Malaya Therapy National Institute of the NAMS of Ukraine
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61039
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Communal Institution of Healthcare Kharkiv City Clinical Hospital #8
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61176
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Medical Center Medical Clinic Blagomed LLC
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
01601
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Med Center 'Ok!Clinic+' of International Institute of Clinical Trials LLC
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
02091
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Medical Center of Revmotsentr LLC
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
04070
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
SI D.F.Chebotariov Institute of Gerontology of NAMSU
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
04114
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
CH of State Border Service of Ukraine (Military Base 2522) Dept of Therapy, D.Halytskyi Lviv NMU
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79049
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
M.V. Sklifosovskyi Poltava RCH Dept of Rheumatology HSEIU UMSA
City
Poltava
ZIP/Postal Code
36011
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
A.Novak Transcarpathian Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Uzhgorod
ZIP/Postal Code
88000
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
National Pirogov Memorial Medical University
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
CI City Hospital #1
City
Zaporizhzhia
ZIP/Postal Code
69104
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
CI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of ZRC
City
Zaporizhzhia
ZIP/Postal Code
69600
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
CI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of ZRC
City
Zaporizhzhya
ZIP/Postal Code
69600
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website https://www.emdgroup.com/en/research/our-approach-to-research-and-development/healthcare/clinical-trials/commitment-responsible-data-sharing.html
Links:
URL
https://clinicaltrials.emdgroup.com/en/trial-details/?id=MS200527-0060
Description
Trial Awareness and Transparency website
URL
https://medical.emdserono.com/en_US/home.html
Description
US Medical Information website, Medical Resources

Learn more about this trial

Phase IIb Study of Evobrutinib in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs