Phase I/IIa Clinical Evaluation of AllerT vs Placebo in Subjects Allergic to Birch Pollen (AN003)
Primary Purpose
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergy
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
AllerT SC
AllerT ID
Placebo SC
Placebo ID
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Allergic Rhinitis focused on measuring Allergy, Birch Pollen, Immunotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Allergic rhinitis symptoms during the pollen season preceding the study, confirmed by SPT (prick tests) and/or a positive specific IgE CAP test for birch pollen (class I minimum)
- Positive SPT to Bet v 1 (prick tests), negative SPT to AllerT
Exclusion Criteria:
- received immunotherapy against any allergen within 3 years before the start of the study.
- symptomatic to perennial allergens or active seasonal allergy during the trial.
- non controlled asthma (peak flow lower than 30% of predicted value).
- history of any severe medical condition able to influence the course of the study
- Any confirmed or suspected immunodeficiency condition, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and asplenia.
- Subjects under immunosuppressive medication.
- Pregnant or lactating women or women willing or intending to become pregnant during the study.
- Any other significant finding which, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in this protocol or of dropping out of the study
Sites / Locations
- Lausanne University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
AllerT SC
Placebo SC
AllerT ID
Placebo ID
Arm Description
AllerT subcutaneous injections
placebo subcutaneous injections
AllerT intra-dermal injections
placebo intra-dermal injections
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of participants with adverse events
collection of local or systemic allergic reactions and any other adverse events through patient diaries and investigators' interviews during the 8-week treatment period and 4 week post-treatment follow-up (Day 84)
Secondary Outcome Measures
change from baseline in blood levels of specific IgG4 and IgE
blood samples were taken at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 of the treatment period, 4 weeks later and then in July 2010 and in July 2012
change from baseline in nasal provocation tests
nasal provocation tests with birch pollen extract are assessed before treatment and at visit on day 84 of the trial, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01728519
Brief Title
Phase I/IIa Clinical Evaluation of AllerT vs Placebo in Subjects Allergic to Birch Pollen
Acronym
AN003
Official Title
Phase I/IIa Study to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of AllerT, a Combination of Peptides Derived From Bet v 1, Administered Via the Subcutaneous or Intradermal Route to Volunteers Allergic to Birch Pollen
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Recruitment was stopped before start of the pollen season
Study Start Date
August 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Anergis
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Birch pollen allergic patients are currently treated by subcutaneous injections of pollen extracts either by standard allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) or ultra-rush immunotherapy. Such treatment is prone to side effects and has to be performed in a hospital environment due to the risk of potential anaphylactic reactions. The aim of this study is to test the new product AllerT expected to show widely reduced side effects. AllerT will be injected via two different routes, subcutaneous versus intradermal. The primary endpoint of the study is the local and systemic safety of repeated injections of the product. Since AllerT should provide patients with a pre-seasonal treatment to decrease seasonal allergic symptoms, we will also evaluate the potential efficacy of the approach using a nasal provocation test (NPT) with birch pollen
Detailed Description
In addition to the initial protocol, post hoc evaluations were conducted, after new ethics committee reviews, to assess quality of life during the birch pollen season following the trial (April 2009) and to obtain blood samples for evaluation of immunology markers IgG4 and IgE after the season 2010 (July 2010) and after the season 2012 (July 2012),
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergy
Keywords
Allergy, Birch Pollen, Immunotherapy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
29 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
AllerT SC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
AllerT subcutaneous injections
Arm Title
Placebo SC
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
placebo subcutaneous injections
Arm Title
AllerT ID
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
AllerT intra-dermal injections
Arm Title
Placebo ID
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
placebo intra-dermal injections
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
AllerT SC
Other Intervention Name(s)
AllerT subcutaneous injections
Intervention Description
AllerT subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56 - cumulative dose 440 microgram)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
AllerT ID
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aller T intra-dermal injections
Intervention Description
AllerT intra-dermal injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56 - cumulative dose 440 microgram)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo SC
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo subcutaneous injections
Intervention Description
Placebo subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo ID
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo intra-dermal
Intervention Description
Placebo intra-dermal injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with adverse events
Description
collection of local or systemic allergic reactions and any other adverse events through patient diaries and investigators' interviews during the 8-week treatment period and 4 week post-treatment follow-up (Day 84)
Time Frame
84 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
change from baseline in blood levels of specific IgG4 and IgE
Description
blood samples were taken at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 of the treatment period, 4 weeks later and then in July 2010 and in July 2012
Time Frame
after 7, 14, 21, 56 and 84 days and after 16 to 18 months and 40 to 42 months
Title
change from baseline in nasal provocation tests
Description
nasal provocation tests with birch pollen extract are assessed before treatment and at visit on day 84 of the trial, 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Time Frame
84 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Total score of the Mini-RQLQ Quality-of-life questionnaire
Description
weekly questionnaires are filled in by the subjects during April 2009 at the time of the birch pollen season in the trial center area
Time Frame
4 weeks during April 2009
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Allergic rhinitis symptoms during the pollen season preceding the study, confirmed by SPT (prick tests) and/or a positive specific IgE CAP test for birch pollen (class I minimum)
Positive SPT to Bet v 1 (prick tests), negative SPT to AllerT
Exclusion Criteria:
received immunotherapy against any allergen within 3 years before the start of the study.
symptomatic to perennial allergens or active seasonal allergy during the trial.
non controlled asthma (peak flow lower than 30% of predicted value).
history of any severe medical condition able to influence the course of the study
Any confirmed or suspected immunodeficiency condition, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and asplenia.
Subjects under immunosuppressive medication.
Pregnant or lactating women or women willing or intending to become pregnant during the study.
Any other significant finding which, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in this protocol or of dropping out of the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francois Spertini, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Lausanne Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Lausanne University Hospital
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1005
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Phase I/IIa Clinical Evaluation of AllerT vs Placebo in Subjects Allergic to Birch Pollen
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs