search
Back to results

Physical and Cognitive Function - Look AHEAD Ancillary Study

Primary Purpose

Diabetes, Weight Loss, Physical Function

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lifestyle intervention
Diabetes Support Education
Sponsored by
Wake Forest University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Diabetes

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 74 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The only inclusion criterion is that the participant is considered "active" at his/her Year 8 or Year 9 visit in the main study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The only exclusion criterion is the person is not willing to participate in this ancillary study.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • The University of Tennessee-Memphis

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Lifestyle intervention

Diabetes Support and Education (DSE)

Arm Description

Intensive Lifestyle Intervention that includes diet, physical activity, and behavior modification. The goal of the ILI intervention was for individuals to achieve and maintain a loss of at least 7% of initial body weight.

It offers an educational program to participants including developing support groups. Providing such benefits helps retain these participants in the trial.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was administered to assess lower extremity physical performance and consisted of standing balance tasks (side-by-side, semi- and full-tandem stands for 10 seconds each), time to complete 5 repeated chair stands, and a 6-m walk to assess usual gait speed. Each of the three performance measures was assigned a score ranging from 0 (inability to perform the task) to 4 (the highest level of performance) and summed to create an SPPB score ranging from 0 to 12 (best). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Gait Speed Over 400 m
A 400 m walk was administered to assess endurance. Participants were instructed to walk at their usual pace and time to complete the 400-m walk was recorded. The 400-m walk test was terminated if the participant reported chest pain, tightness or pressure, significant shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, feeling faint, lightheaded or dizzy, or other pain (e.g., leg pain).Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Grip Strength
Grip strength (kg) was measured twice in each hand using an isometric Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer (Jamar, Bolingbrook, IL). The maximum of the force from two trials for the stronger hand was used in the analyses. Participants with severe hand pain or recent surgery in both hands were excluded from testing. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Knee Extensor Strength
Maximum knee extensor strength (one repetition maximum (1RM)) was assessed on a Nautilus One™ Leg Extension machine. Participants with prior knee surgery on both knees where all or part of the joint was replaced were excluded from testing. The right leg was tested unless there was a contraindication (e.g., prior knee surgery). If participants experienced knee pain during the test and there were no contraindications to test the other leg, the other leg was tested; if participants experienced knee pain on the other leg, the test was terminated. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Trail Making Test (Part A & B)
Trail Making Tests A and B was used to assess attention and concentration (Part A) and executive function (Part B). Part A measures the time (in seconds) to draw lines to connect circled numbers in a numerical sequence and Part B measures the time (in seconds) to draw lines to connect circled numbers and letters in an alternating numeric and alphabetic sequence as rapidly as possible. The difference (in seconds; greater time indicates worse performance) in performance on Part B minus Part A was used in analysis to represent the contrast between performance on the simple (Part A) and alternating conditions (Part B). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was used to assess working memory. Participants were presented with a legend at the top of the page showing the boxes each with a number from 1 to 9 and below each numbered box is a unique symbol. As rapidly as possible, the participant fills in the randomly ordered boxes with numbers paired with blank boxes with the symbol that corresponds to the number in the legend. The score is the total number of correctly entered symbols completed in 90 seconds (range, 0-133; higher score indicates better performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) was used to assess verbal memory. The participant is read a list of 15 words five times. After each time the list is given, the participant is asked to immediately recall as many words as possible. Following the fifth recall, an interference list is presented, after which the participant is asked to spontaneously recall words from the original list. After a 10-minute interval has passed, the participant is asked again to recall as many words as possible from the original list. The number of words correctly recalled on the delayed recall were used in the analysis (range, 0-15; higher number correct indicates better performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Modified Stroop Color and Word Test
The Modified Stroop Color and Word Test was used to assess executive function. The test measures a participant's ability to view complex visual stimuli and to respond to one stimulus dimension while suppressing response to another competitive stimulation. The participant first reads aloud words denoting colors printed in black ink (Subtest 1), then names aloud the color of blocks printed in colored ink (Subtest 2), and finally names aloud the color ink in which the words are printed in which are incongruent to the word (Subtest 3). The amount of time to complete each subtest and the number of errors are recorded and interference calculated as time to complete Subtest 3 - Subtest 1 + errors (lower interference scores indicate better cognitive performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam (3MS)
The Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam (3MS) was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2011
Last Updated
August 9, 2018
Sponsor
Wake Forest University
Collaborators
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, University of Colorado, Denver, University of Tennessee, University of Pittsburgh, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01410097
Brief Title
Physical and Cognitive Function - Look AHEAD Ancillary Study
Official Title
Intentional Weight Reduction and Physical and Cognitive Function - A Look AHEAD Ancillary Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wake Forest University
Collaborators
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, University of Colorado, Denver, University of Tennessee, University of Pittsburgh, National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Obesity is associated with physical disability through both direct pathways (e.g., lower extremity pain, insufficient muscle strength) and indirect pathways (obesity-related comorbidities and inflammation). Furthermore, diabetes, a major obesity-related health condition, is associated with increased risk of disability and accelerated declines in physical and cognitive function. The investigators preliminary data suggest that intentional weight loss improves physical function, and there is strong circumstantial evidence that it would also benefit cognitive function. To evaluate the role of intentional weight loss on physical and cognitive function, the investigators propose an ancillary study to the on-going Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) trial. Look AHEAD is a multi-center, randomized clinical trial to examine the effects of a 4-year lifestyle intervention designed to achieve and maintain weight loss through decreased caloric intake and exercise in overweight or obese men and women aged 45-74 years with type 2 diabetes. The investigators propose to add validated and well-established measures of physical and cognitive performance to the year 8 follow-up visit - during the trial's weight maintenance phase - in ~1000 participants at 4 of the 16 Look AHEAD field sites (Colorado, Memphis, Pennington and Pittsburgh). The specific aims of this ancillary study are: 1) To determine the long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention designed to achieve and maintain weight loss on physical function; and 2) To determine the long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention designed to achieve and maintain weight loss on cognitive function. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that in the intervention group, larger initial weight loss, better weight loss maintenance, and higher physical activity will be associated with better physical and cognitive function. The investigators also hypothesize that in the control group weight loss will be associated with worse physical and cognitive function than in those who are weight stable or who have gained weight. The number of obese older adults is rising rapidly and there are few data to guide an evidence-based clinical response to their management. The results of this study will provide the first direct evidence of the role of long-term intentional weight loss on the maintenance of physical and cognitive function in older obese adults with diabetes. Since this study is being done as an ancillary study to an on-going trial it can be done in a timely and cost-efficient manner.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes, Weight Loss, Physical Function, Cognitive Function

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1089 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lifestyle intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intensive Lifestyle Intervention that includes diet, physical activity, and behavior modification. The goal of the ILI intervention was for individuals to achieve and maintain a loss of at least 7% of initial body weight.
Arm Title
Diabetes Support and Education (DSE)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
It offers an educational program to participants including developing support groups. Providing such benefits helps retain these participants in the trial.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Lifestyle intervention
Intervention Description
Intensive Lifestyle Intervention that includes diet, physical activity, and behavior modification. The goal of the ILI intervention was for individuals to achieve and maintain a loss of at least 7% of initial body weight.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Diabetes Support Education
Intervention Description
It offers an educational program to participants including developing support groups. Providing such benefits helps retain these participants in the trial.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score
Description
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was administered to assess lower extremity physical performance and consisted of standing balance tasks (side-by-side, semi- and full-tandem stands for 10 seconds each), time to complete 5 repeated chair stands, and a 6-m walk to assess usual gait speed. Each of the three performance measures was assigned a score ranging from 0 (inability to perform the task) to 4 (the highest level of performance) and summed to create an SPPB score ranging from 0 to 12 (best). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait Speed Over 400 m
Description
A 400 m walk was administered to assess endurance. Participants were instructed to walk at their usual pace and time to complete the 400-m walk was recorded. The 400-m walk test was terminated if the participant reported chest pain, tightness or pressure, significant shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, feeling faint, lightheaded or dizzy, or other pain (e.g., leg pain).Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Grip Strength
Description
Grip strength (kg) was measured twice in each hand using an isometric Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer (Jamar, Bolingbrook, IL). The maximum of the force from two trials for the stronger hand was used in the analyses. Participants with severe hand pain or recent surgery in both hands were excluded from testing. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Knee Extensor Strength
Description
Maximum knee extensor strength (one repetition maximum (1RM)) was assessed on a Nautilus One™ Leg Extension machine. Participants with prior knee surgery on both knees where all or part of the joint was replaced were excluded from testing. The right leg was tested unless there was a contraindication (e.g., prior knee surgery). If participants experienced knee pain during the test and there were no contraindications to test the other leg, the other leg was tested; if participants experienced knee pain on the other leg, the test was terminated. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Trail Making Test (Part A & B)
Description
Trail Making Tests A and B was used to assess attention and concentration (Part A) and executive function (Part B). Part A measures the time (in seconds) to draw lines to connect circled numbers in a numerical sequence and Part B measures the time (in seconds) to draw lines to connect circled numbers and letters in an alternating numeric and alphabetic sequence as rapidly as possible. The difference (in seconds; greater time indicates worse performance) in performance on Part B minus Part A was used in analysis to represent the contrast between performance on the simple (Part A) and alternating conditions (Part B). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Description
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was used to assess working memory. Participants were presented with a legend at the top of the page showing the boxes each with a number from 1 to 9 and below each numbered box is a unique symbol. As rapidly as possible, the participant fills in the randomly ordered boxes with numbers paired with blank boxes with the symbol that corresponds to the number in the legend. The score is the total number of correctly entered symbols completed in 90 seconds (range, 0-133; higher score indicates better performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Description
The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) was used to assess verbal memory. The participant is read a list of 15 words five times. After each time the list is given, the participant is asked to immediately recall as many words as possible. Following the fifth recall, an interference list is presented, after which the participant is asked to spontaneously recall words from the original list. After a 10-minute interval has passed, the participant is asked again to recall as many words as possible from the original list. The number of words correctly recalled on the delayed recall were used in the analysis (range, 0-15; higher number correct indicates better performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Modified Stroop Color and Word Test
Description
The Modified Stroop Color and Word Test was used to assess executive function. The test measures a participant's ability to view complex visual stimuli and to respond to one stimulus dimension while suppressing response to another competitive stimulation. The participant first reads aloud words denoting colors printed in black ink (Subtest 1), then names aloud the color of blocks printed in colored ink (Subtest 2), and finally names aloud the color ink in which the words are printed in which are incongruent to the word (Subtest 3). The amount of time to complete each subtest and the number of errors are recorded and interference calculated as time to complete Subtest 3 - Subtest 1 + errors (lower interference scores indicate better cognitive performance). Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study
Title
Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam (3MS)
Description
The Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam (3MS) was used to assess global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study.
Time Frame
Assessed 8 or 9 years post-randomization in Look AHEAD parent Study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
74 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The only inclusion criterion is that the participant is considered "active" at his/her Year 8 or Year 9 visit in the main study. Exclusion Criteria: The only exclusion criterion is the person is not willing to participate in this ancillary study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen B Kritchevsky, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70801
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15203
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Tennessee-Memphis
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38105
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35562076
Citation
Ip EH, Chen SH, Rejeski WJ, Bandeen-Roche K, Hayden KM, Hugenschmidt CE, Pierce J, Miller ME, Speiser JL, Kritchevsky SB, Houston DK, Newton RL, Rapp SR, Kitzman DW. Gradient and Acceleration of Decline in Physical and Cognitive Functions in Older Adults: A Disparity Analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Aug 12;77(8):1603-1611. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac109.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27676466
Citation
Beavers KM, Leng I, Rapp SR, Miller ME, Houston DK, Marsh AP, Hire DG, Baker LD, Bray GA, Blackburn GL, Hergenroeder AL, Jakicic JM, Johnson KC, Korytkowski MT, Dorsten BV, Kritchevsky SB; Action for Health in Diabetes Movement and Memory Ancillary Study Research Group. Effects of Longitudinal Glucose Exposure on Cognitive and Physical Function: Results from the Action for Health in Diabetes Movement and Memory Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jan;65(1):137-145. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14478. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Physical and Cognitive Function - Look AHEAD Ancillary Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs