search
Back to results

Pilot TMS for Methamphetamine Use Disorder

Primary Purpose

Stimulant Dependence, Methamphetamine-dependence, Addiction, Drug

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sponsored by
Ryan M. Carnahan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stimulant Dependence focused on measuring methamphetamine, addiction treatment, transcranial magnetic stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with an active methamphetamine use disorder
  • Is engaged in psychosocial treatment or articulates a plan to engage in psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorder during the study period
  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • Able to consent for treatment and research participation
  • English-speaking
  • Receiving care from UIHC's Addiction Medicine service. This includes patients in the Crisis Stabilization Unit, seen by the inpatient consultation service, enrolling in partial hospitalization or intensive outpatient treatment, or seen in the outpatient Addiction Medicine clinics.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Patients that are excluded during TMS assessment including: patients with epilepsy or seizure disorder, patients with implanted ferromagnetic equipment in their face or skull near the stimulation target.
  • Current medical treatment with clozapine or stimulants.
  • Current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, that is deemed by research team psychiatrists not to have been drug-induced. Psychotic disorder not associated with drug use per the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychosis NOS, in remission, or drug-induced psychotic episodes are not exclusion criteria since these may be related to methamphetamine misuse.
  • Lacks the mental capacity to provide informed consent (i.e. not able to demonstrate understanding of the risks and benefits of participation)
  • Has a court appointed guardian.
  • Unstable medical illness.
  • Current diagnosis of neurological disorder or neurocognitive disorder.
  • Prior neurosurgical procedure.
  • History of seizure.
  • History of ECT treatment within the past three months.
  • History of any previous TMS treatment.
  • Known inability to complete the protocol, as assessed by asking them if they are able to make it to all visits for this study without assistance.

MRI Exclusion criteria:

  • Implanted device including pacemaker, coronary stent, defibrillator, or neurostimulation device that is not MRI-compatible
  • Metal in body including bullets, shrapnel, metal slivers
  • Claustrophobia
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Significant heart disease
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Kidney disease
  • Pregnant

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

DPFC first

MPFC first

Arm Description

Participants in this arm will undergo all study procedures including consent; pre-, during, and post-psychological assessments; pre- and post- MRI and fMRI; 16 treatments of dual target TMS over a 4-week period; and substance use-related assessments to include substance use, withdrawal symptoms, and cravings to use. This arm will receive the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation first.

Participants in this arm will undergo all study procedures including consent; pre-, during, and post-psychological assessments; pre- and post- MRI and fMRI; 16 treatments of dual target TMS over a 4-week period; and substance use-related assessments to include substance use, withdrawal symptoms, and cravings to use. This arm will receive the medial prefrontal cortex stimulation first.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Retention in the study
Time to study dropout (to assess feasibility and tolerability of the protocol)
Retention in psychosocial treatment
Time to discontinuation of psychosocial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior insula
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior insula measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Functional connectivity dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum
Functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Flanker Inhibitor Control and Attention Test, Age 12+
Summary score of accuracy and reaction time (0-10), higher indicates stronger inhibitory control and attention.
Kirby Delay Discounting Questionnaire, 27 item
Summary score of discounting rate. Scores range from 0.00016 to 0.5, with smaller values indicating a lack of discounting and preference for delayed rewards, and higher values indicating strong discounting and preference for immediate rewards. Higher scores are associated with addictive behaviors.
Number of days of stimulant use in the past week
Number of days (self-reported)
Urine drug screen positive for stimulant
Urine dipstick positive or not for stimulants (amphetamine, methamphetamine, cocaine)
Brief substance craving scale
Summary score of intensity, frequency and length of cravings in the last 24 hours
Brief Addiction Monitor Use Subscale
Use subscale. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating more use.
Brief Addiction Monitor Risk Factors Subscale
Risk factors subscale. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more risk.
Brief Addiction Monitor Protective Factors Subscale
Protective factors subscale. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more protection.
Brief Addiction Monitor Satisfaction with Progress Toward Achieving Recovery Goals
Item 17, satisfaction with progress toward achieving recovery goals. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating less satisfaction.
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form
Total score. Scores range from 16 to 80 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Scores generally reported as a percent of the maximum possible score, such that scores can be calculated with missing responses as long as less than one-third of responses are missing.
Patient Health Questionnaire--8 item scale
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety.
Assessment of Recovery Capital
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater recovery capital.
Positive and Negative Affect Scale Positive Affect Score
Positive affect score. Scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive affect. Higher positive affect is a better outcome.
Positive and Negative Affect Scale Negative Affect Score
Negative affect score. Scores range from 10 to 50 with lower scores indicating lower negative affect. Lower negative affect is a better outcome.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating better sleep quality.
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale--Short Form
Total score. Scores range from 18 to 90 with higher values indicating more difficulty with emotional regulation.
UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, 59-item revised version
Summary score. Scores range from 59 to 236 with higher scores indicating more impulsive behavior.

Full Information

First Posted
June 23, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2023
Sponsor
Ryan M. Carnahan
Collaborators
University of New Mexico, University of Utah
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04449055
Brief Title
Pilot TMS for Methamphetamine Use Disorder
Official Title
A Pilot Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Methamphetamine Use Disorders
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 6, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ryan M. Carnahan
Collaborators
University of New Mexico, University of Utah

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a pilot study to test the feasibility of a recruitment strategy and study protocol to examine the effects of a dual target transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in methamphetamine use disorder. The study will test intermittent theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with continuous TBS targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in people with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD) who are engaged in psychosocial treatment. Intermittent TBS targeting the DLPFC is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for major depressive disorder, and continuous TBS targeting the MPFC has been studied in cocaine use disorder. We will administer this dual target TBS daily for 2 weeks, followed by three times weekly for 2 weeks, and monitor depressive symptoms, anxiety, sleep, craving, quality of life, and methamphetamine use for three months. Changes in functional connectivity of brain circuits will be evaluated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after treatment. We expect to observe changes in connectivity between the DLPFC, MPFC, and other regions implicated in addiction and impulsivity. Furthermore, we will evaluate if baseline differences in functional connectivity can be used to predict response. Psychological tests focusing on state impulsivity and risk taking will be administered, and we expect to observe reductions in these characteristics after treatment. We will test this protocol in 20 patients recruited from clinical care settings at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of New Mexico Health System, and University of Utah Health to illustrate the feasibility of recruitment and completing the protocol, to support an external funding proposal.
Detailed Description
Overview: This is a single-arm clinical trial, with historical controls as a comparison group for select outcomes. Subjects with MAUD will receive 16 sessions of dual-target theta burst stimulation to the DLPFC and MPFC over 4 weeks. We will follow outcomes for 12 weeks. Outcomes include treatment retention, craving, self-reported MA or stimulant use, urine drug screen results, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, quality of life, response inhibition, and functional connectivity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure functional connectivity and a flanker task to measure response inhibition will be completed at baseline and four weeks. More detail is provided in the outcome measures section. Subjects will also complete the Big Five Inventory at baseline, a measure of personality characteristics, to explore how these relate to outcomes including retention in treatment and the study. MR Image Acquisition: MRI will be completed at baseline and after the last TMS session. The MRI sessions will be conducted using research dedicated MRI scanners at each site. Anatomical images will include volumetric T1 and T2 weighted images with a 1.0 mm isotropic spatial resolution. Resting state fMRI will be performed to collect 20 minutes worth of data. Statistical Analysis: Retention in the Study and Psychosocial Treatment: We will describe the proportion of subjects who complete the 4-week TMS treatment period and complete each subsequent monthly follow-up visit. We will use Kaplan-Meier curves to describe retention in the study and in psychosocial treatment. If non-retention is common enough, we will use Cox regression to explore baseline measures as predictors of retention. We anticipate that multivariate analysis will not be feasible with the sample size. Symptoms and Impulse Control Measures: Primary analyses for other measures will focus on changes over the 4-week TMS treatment period. Changes in symptoms evaluated weekly or biweekly (e.g. craving, depression, affect, anxiety, sleep) will be assessed using generalized linear mixed models with appropriate distributions. We anticipate a Poisson distribution for days of MA or other stimulant use and will use a binomial distribution with a logit link to evaluate changes in positive urine drug screens. Time will be the primary variable of interest to assess the slopes of change during treatment. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be used to evaluate changes in measures completed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. We will compare measures at baseline and 4 weeks to those at 8 weeks and 12 weeks similarly, but in separate analyses since decay in effects may occur after TMS ends. Functional Connectivity Analysis: fMRI functional connectivity analysis will be performed using a standard analysis pipeline. Functional images will undergo pre-processing including brain extraction, motion correction, spatial smoothing (6 mm FWHM), and temporal filtering (.008 Hz < f < 0.08 Hz). Following preprocessing, the fMRI signal will be corrected for potential sources of noise using image-based estimates and motion correction parameters. The resulting corrected time-series will be used for all functional connectivity analyses. Functional connectivity will be measured by extracting time-series data from the pre-processed imaging data for the regions of interest (ROIs). Multiple ROIs will be examined and will be defined as spheres (6mm radius) based on coordinate locations previously published by Yeo and colleagues. Specifically, we will focus on connectivity in the cingulo-opercular network involved in cognitive control and salience (DLPFC - anterior insula; DLPFC - anterior cingulate) and reward processing/motivation circuit (MPFC - ventral striatum). Analyses will be averaged across right and left hemispheres but we will also explore differences between right and left hemispheres. The time series from the ROIs will be cross-correlated with the time-series from the other ROIs to determine the strength of functional connectivity between regions. The resulting Pearson's r will be converted to Fisher's z scores to improve normality for the statistical analysis. We will treat each ROI pair connection (DLPFC - anterior insula, DLPFC - anterior cingulate, MPFC - ventral striatum) as a dependent variable. Primary analyses will use paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare connectivity at baseline vs. after TMS treatment. We will explore correlates of connectivity and changes using Pearson or Spearman correlations and linear regression or mixed models. Exploratory Analysis: Follow-up exploratory voxel-wise analyses will be conducted for functional connectivity, which will provide thousands of individual predictors. This will help confirm findings in large parcel ROI based analysis. We will use the same statistical models as used for the ROI based analysis described above but at the voxel level. Voxel-wise data creates a high-dimensional problem in which the number of predictors far exceeds the number of participants. Machine learning methods, such as random forest will be used to handle the high-dimensional sub-analyses. Random forest requires a minimum of data assumptions, automatically accounts for non-linear and interaction effects, and it has proven useful in identifying useful predictors in high-dimensional contexts. Comparison with Historical Controls: We will compare retention in psychosocial treatment programs and positive urine drug screens from chart review with a historical control group of patients with MA use disorder matched on age, sex, site, and psychosocial treatment modality. Treatment retention will be compared using a log-rank test. Positive urine drug screens in each week of follow-up will be compared using generalized estimating equation models with a logit link, clustered on subject, with participation in the TMS study as the variable of interest.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stimulant Dependence, Methamphetamine-dependence, Addiction, Drug
Keywords
methamphetamine, addiction treatment, transcranial magnetic stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized order of TMS site stimulated first
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
19 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
DPFC first
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will undergo all study procedures including consent; pre-, during, and post-psychological assessments; pre- and post- MRI and fMRI; 16 treatments of dual target TMS over a 4-week period; and substance use-related assessments to include substance use, withdrawal symptoms, and cravings to use. This arm will receive the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation first.
Arm Title
MPFC first
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will undergo all study procedures including consent; pre-, during, and post-psychological assessments; pre- and post- MRI and fMRI; 16 treatments of dual target TMS over a 4-week period; and substance use-related assessments to include substance use, withdrawal symptoms, and cravings to use. This arm will receive the medial prefrontal cortex stimulation first.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Theta burst stimulation
Intervention Description
Participants will undergo 16 treatments consisting of intermittent theta burst stimulation targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and continuous theta burst stimulation targeting the medial prefrontal cortex, over a 4-week period that coincides with psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorder.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Retention in the study
Description
Time to study dropout (to assess feasibility and tolerability of the protocol)
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 weeks (continuous)
Title
Retention in psychosocial treatment
Description
Time to discontinuation of psychosocial treatment
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 weeks (continuous--assessed weekly)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior insula
Description
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior insula measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Functional connectivity dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex
Description
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum
Description
Functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum measured with fMRI, as defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Flanker Inhibitor Control and Attention Test, Age 12+
Description
Summary score of accuracy and reaction time (0-10), higher indicates stronger inhibitory control and attention.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Kirby Delay Discounting Questionnaire, 27 item
Description
Summary score of discounting rate. Scores range from 0.00016 to 0.5, with smaller values indicating a lack of discounting and preference for delayed rewards, and higher values indicating strong discounting and preference for immediate rewards. Higher scores are associated with addictive behaviors.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Number of days of stimulant use in the past week
Description
Number of days (self-reported)
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Urine drug screen positive for stimulant
Description
Urine dipstick positive or not for stimulants (amphetamine, methamphetamine, cocaine)
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks
Title
Brief substance craving scale
Description
Summary score of intensity, frequency and length of cravings in the last 24 hours
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Brief Addiction Monitor Use Subscale
Description
Use subscale. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating more use.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Brief Addiction Monitor Risk Factors Subscale
Description
Risk factors subscale. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more risk.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Brief Addiction Monitor Protective Factors Subscale
Description
Protective factors subscale. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more protection.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Brief Addiction Monitor Satisfaction with Progress Toward Achieving Recovery Goals
Description
Item 17, satisfaction with progress toward achieving recovery goals. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating less satisfaction.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form
Description
Total score. Scores range from 16 to 80 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Scores generally reported as a percent of the maximum possible score, such that scores can be calculated with missing responses as long as less than one-third of responses are missing.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire--8 item scale
Description
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Description
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Assessment of Recovery Capital
Description
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater recovery capital.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Positive and Negative Affect Scale Positive Affect Score
Description
Positive affect score. Scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive affect. Higher positive affect is a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Positive and Negative Affect Scale Negative Affect Score
Description
Negative affect score. Scores range from 10 to 50 with lower scores indicating lower negative affect. Lower negative affect is a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Description
Total score. Scores range from 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating better sleep quality.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale--Short Form
Description
Total score. Scores range from 18 to 90 with higher values indicating more difficulty with emotional regulation.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, 59-item revised version
Description
Summary score. Scores range from 59 to 236 with higher scores indicating more impulsive behavior.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosed with an active methamphetamine use disorder Is engaged in psychosocial treatment or articulates a plan to engage in psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorder during the study period Age 18 to 60 years Able to consent for treatment and research participation English-speaking Receiving care from UIHC's Addiction Medicine service. This includes patients in the Crisis Stabilization Unit, seen by the inpatient consultation service, enrolling in partial hospitalization or intensive outpatient treatment, or seen in the outpatient Addiction Medicine clinics. Exclusion Criteria: Age less than 18 years Patients that are excluded during TMS assessment including: patients with epilepsy or seizure disorder, patients with implanted ferromagnetic equipment in their face or skull near the stimulation target. Current medical treatment with clozapine or stimulants. Current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, that is deemed by research team psychiatrists not to have been drug-induced. Psychotic disorder not associated with drug use per the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychosis NOS, in remission, or drug-induced psychotic episodes are not exclusion criteria since these may be related to methamphetamine misuse. Lacks the mental capacity to provide informed consent (i.e. not able to demonstrate understanding of the risks and benefits of participation) Has a court appointed guardian. Unstable medical illness. Current diagnosis of neurological disorder or neurocognitive disorder. Prior neurosurgical procedure. History of seizure. History of ECT treatment within the past three months. History of any previous TMS treatment. Known inability to complete the protocol, as assessed by asking them if they are able to make it to all visits for this study without assistance. MRI Exclusion criteria: Implanted device including pacemaker, coronary stent, defibrillator, or neurostimulation device that is not MRI-compatible Metal in body including bullets, shrapnel, metal slivers Claustrophobia Uncontrolled high blood pressure Atrial fibrillation Significant heart disease Hemodynamic instability Kidney disease Pregnant
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ryan Carnahan, PharmD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alison C Lynch, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25176528
Citation
Courtney KE, Ray LA. Methamphetamine: an update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 1;143:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31680830
Citation
Ma T, Sun Y, Ku Y. Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Stimulant Craving in Users of Cocaine, Amphetamine, or Methamphetamine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 18;13:1095. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01095. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31328353
Citation
Zhang JJQ, Fong KNK, Ouyang RG, Siu AMH, Kranz GS. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on craving and substance consumption in patients with substance dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2137-2149. doi: 10.1111/add.14753. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29189190
Citation
Makani R, Pradhan B, Shah U, Parikh T. Role of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Treatment of Addiction and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2017;10(1):31-43. doi: 10.2174/1874473710666171129225914.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30208372
Citation
Liang Y, Wang L, Yuan TF. Targeting Withdrawal Symptoms in Men Addicted to Methamphetamine With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1199-1201. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2383.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Pilot TMS for Methamphetamine Use Disorder

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs